Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast analysis essay
Comparative analysis essay
Essay about comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast analysis essay
Written Response on Comparing How a Fictional and Nonfictional Narrative Portray the Same Subject In the poem “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus and the short story, “The Melting Pot” by Anna Quindlen, both are about immigration, and view them similar and different. “The New Colossus” and “The Melting Pot” both have similar opinions about immigration. Emma Lazarus’s poem and Anna Quindlen’s short story both share some similarities. In “The New Colossus,” Emma Lazarus writes the poem about the Statue of Liberty, welcoming immigrants from all over the world. As boats enter the borders of the United States, Lady Liberty opens her mouth and says, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, yearning to breathe free.” The Statue of Liberty wants all the immigrants who come from all over the world to breathe fresh and free air. Quindlen’s short story showed the reader about her diverse community. As Quindlen is giving you a tour on her neighborhood, she says, “We are friendly with the …show more content…
Ecuadorian family, with the Yugoslavs from across the street, and with the Italians next door.” The similarity between Lazarus and Quindlen is that both shows on how all the immigrants were greeted by the Statue of Liberty and grew up to have a diverse community.
In conclusion, Lazarus’s poem and Quindlen’s short story both shared their view on immigration. There are some differences between “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus and “The Melting Pot” by Anna Quindlen. For example, Lazarus’s poem is about the Statue of Liberty. Lazarus describes Lady Liberty as “a mighty woman with a torch, whose flame is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles.” Lazarus admires the Statue of Liberty, and she feels grateful for it. On the other hand, Quindlen’s short story is about her diverse community. Quindlen tells you about her neighborhood, and moves onto the marketplace. Her marketplace is also very diverse. On the fruit and vegetable stands there are “yellow peppers and fresh rosemary for the gourmands, plum tomatoes and broad-leaf parsley for the older Italians, and mangoes for the Indians. I stood and smiled as the seedy bar at the corner was transformed into a slick Mexican restaurant.” Quindlen has a community mixed with many races and cultures, and she loves her town. In conclusion, Lazarus’s poem talks about the Statue of Liberty and Quindlen’s short story talks about a diverse community. In conclusion, “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus and the short story, “The Melting Pot” by Anna Quindlen, both have different and similar views on immigration.
“America” by Claude McKay is a poem dealing with McKay’s thoughts as he processes through his inner turmoil as he faces the reality of being rejected from a country that he loves. As Claude unveils his feelings to the reader, a creative description of America is presented. The poem deals with love and loyalty and the vicious rejection when you aren’t accepted in a society’s culture. In the short poem “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus showcases and contrasts the ancient Greek statue Helios and the Statue of liberty. Lazarus lets the reader compare the ancient Colossus of Rhodes, representing traditional masculinity in contrast with the New Colossus a feminine symbol of unity and refuge for those in need. Both poems are social commentaries
The only thing the new immigrants had in common with each other was the dream of becoming rich and the poverty of their current state. Unfortunately, so many different people with so little in common often left tension between different groups on the edge of becoming violent outbreaks. The famous Tammany set the example early on of how to broaden it's ow...
The female, adolescent speaker helps the audience realize the prejudice that is present in a “melting-pot” neighborhood in Queens during the year 1983. With the setting placed in the middle of the Civil Rights Movement, the poem allows the audience to examine the experience of a young immigrant girl, and the inequality that is present during this time. Julia Alvarez in “Queens, 1963” employs poetic tools such as diction, figurative language, and irony to teach the reader that even though America is a place founded upon people who were strangers to the land, it is now home to immigrants to claim intolerance for other foreigners, despite the roots of America’s founding.
The narrator also discusses about a girl about the same age as her would have never been the “right kind of American.” Minorities such as the African Americans, Dominican Americans and any other ethnicity that came to America were looked right under the microscope. This perplexed me I do not understand why they are treated unfairly by the “True Americans.” There is no such thing as True Americans and that this poem definitely targeted it's audience through racial discrimination rather than cultural changes within a neighborhood in Queens, NY. Another Poet had a much refined and unique style of another part of New York City, he is one of my favorite poets Langston Hughes.
In this semester we read many essay but many of them had something in common. Every essay might have something like, yet there 's always something each essay make them so unique. In the 50 Essays: A Portable Anthology book has two essays that how felt a discriminated living in the United States for the color of their skin. Yet even though the two essay might seem alike, both essays go problems were treated different. In the essay "The Myth of a Latin Woman: I Just Met a Girl Named Maria" by Judith Ortiz Cofer she talks about how she felt being a Puerto Rican living in a country of judgment for being a Latina. In the second essay "How It Feels to Be Colored Me" by Zora Neale Hurston , she talks about how being a black female living in the
Often depicted as a melting pot, America is always being put on a pedestal by the rest of the world due to the large amounts of successful immigrants in the United States. Millions of people have packed their bags and moved to America in hopes of achieving their dreams. While some succeed, others fail and are let down by the dim reality that not everyone can achieve their goals. This essay will compare the poems, “Let America Be America Again” by Langston Hughes and “The New Colossus” by Emma Lazarus to exhibit my perspective on both works. Both poems portray people’s hopes that America will be great, however, due to the different eras and the authors’ backgrounds, the poems have different meanings. Lazarus’ poem was written in the early stages of America, as it describes her cheerful
Everyone had to prove they were independent, capable, and willing to integrate into the cultural melting pot with its own identity of hard work, grit, and determination which established and fostered success in American society. But, not everyone who chooses to take the adventure and risk associated with becoming American wishes to share in this identity. Many feel it necessary to shun the American identity and observe it with a level of disdain. Disregarding the reasons themselves or previous generations may have immigrated to America for. In the short story “Mericans”, Sandra Cisneros illustrates this concept through a character in the story. “The awful grandmother knits the names of the dead and the living into one long prayer fringed with the grandchildren born in that barbaric country with its barbaric ways. (Cisneros)”. In the story it is later identified the children in reference were indeed born in the United States. “Awful grandmother” has an incredibly low opinion of the society in which her grandchildren were born. Barbaric, let’s take a look at that word shall we—“without civilizing influences; uncivilized; primitive (barbaric)”. The detriment of that perception seems to be counterproductive to the melting pot concept of the United
In America, it is a common misconception that all foreigners are similar; it is believed that they all have similar dreams and each of them end up chasing after the same jobs. However, this is not the case. Not only do immigrants from different countries hold different dreams, but those with a shared background even have varying hopes and dreams for the future. This is evidenced in Bharati Mukherjee’s essay, “Two Ways to Belong in America.” She utilizes several rhetorical strategies in order to show that immigrants have the ability to be assimilated into the American culture, but that they should not be deported if they choose not to conform to said culture.
It is quite ironic that these "nativists" came to America for the same reasons as the immigrants who came in the time period of 1880-1925; however, they do not accept the immigrants who came in that period, just as they had once wanted to be accepted. Emma Lazarus’ "The New Colossus", which is on the Statue of Liberty, reads "Give me you tired, your poor, Your huddled mass yearning to breathe free," but in fact, many Americans, nativists, did not want these poor, huddled mass at all.
The Statue of Liberty described by Lazarus as the “Mother of Exiles,” was a symbol of an escape from persecution and poverty from the abandoned and orphaned. What most immigrants faced however, was a grim reality of racial and economic tensions in the slums of New York. After the close of the Civil War, many flocked to the industrial powerhouse cities in the North. In the 1880s, many of the 5.2 million immigrants settled in New York and fought for jobs and housing with 3rd and 4th generation immigrants, who were mainly Western European and Protestant, sparking enormous racial tensions particularly towards the Irish and Italians who were among the largest groups immigrating to the United States en-masse. These new immigrants lived in squalor with multiple families crammed into one unit. This issue was brought to light when Jacob Riis, an immigrant from Denmark and photojournalist, published How the Other Half Lives which showcased the dark, squalid living conditions of the lower class immigrants. It also included photographs of the sweatshops these immigrants toiled in to make only a few cents a day, oftentimes in hazardous work environments. His piece started a new movement of “muckracking” journalism that attacked established institutions and the upper class and ultimately inspired many reforms to both the living and working
Uyen Loewald’s poem deals with the issue of immigrants feeling less-than the majority and the image of the ‘model minority’; migrants who are obedient to the ideals and expectations of the dominant culture.
The main purpose of the two essays, Quindlen’s A Quilt of a Country and Kennedy’s The Immigrant Contribution is to inform the reader about how the immigrants offered many ideas and talents to the development of the United States. The two writers explained how the immigrants made different contributions to the development of the United States by using different types of diction and by appealing to your emotions or adding different kinds of fact and making to paper more informational. A Quilt of a Country appeals more to your emotion and how you feel about the immigrants, while The Immigrant Contribution adds more facts and gives you proof of how immigrants helped develop the country. There are two main differences in how the two authors explains their ideas whether it is emotional or informational.
Often America is referred to as “The large melting pot.” The idea that the United States is a land of opportunity, where anyone can come and blend into a new breed that is uniquely American. However, the cultural diversity in America is clearly evident, from physical characteristics to different religious beliefs and customs. As minorities immigrate to America and attempt to assimilate in society, they are forced to live a pluralistic lifestyle of blending with the current society, while struggling to maintain their heritage and identity “Minority individuals must learn to function in two environments: their own culture and that of the mainstream society” (de Anda, 1984: p101). There are some who successfully leave their
Even though both passages are very different, they both talk about how immigrants have changed America for the better. They talked about how people are all different and that it’s a good thing or America would be very different. They both also talk about how everyone is an immigrant or a descendant of an immigrant. Immigrants have brought many useful inventions
Most of the people who enjoy these benefits on the United States are its immigrants. America has always been known as a “melting pot” of different cultures, races, and languages; but today many Americans have decried th...