Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morality and ethical decisions
Reflection paper on moral decisions
Morality and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The stories of Joyce Carol Oates "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been" and William W. Jacobs "The Monkey's Paw" have several different degrees of symbols and themes that warn the characters of emitted danger or bad outcomes in their stories that can be mirrored of each other. In, these stories the characters do not follow the warnings from these symbols and themes from the clues that are presented to them. From these terrible choices that are decided, they find themselves in situations that could have been avoided, but they did not proceed with. My analysis of these symbols and themes will demonstrate what they are and show the obvious of what to look for. So, let us begin on this analysis and see how the symbols and themes could have …show more content…
warned the characters of inadequate distinctive outcomes. The story by Oates "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been" is the first subject of this analysis. The character in the story is Connie she is a young and attractive girl who is trying to find herself in a sexual manner. The story tells about how Connie loved to brush her long blond hair. She has obsessed her hair and her beauty. The story states, ""Stop gawking at yourself. Who are you? You think you're so pretty?" she would (her mother). Connie would raise her eyebrows at these familiar old complaints and look right through her mother, into a shadowy vision of herself as she was right at the moment. She knew she was pretty."(Oates 1) By, having this kind of attitude she was too naive to realize by flaunting your looks someone might take notice that could be a possible threat to her existence. There is a part of the story where she would go to the shopping plaza with her friends not caring in the world of who is watching. There is a part where a boy in a gold painted jalopy with a flying saucer on the side of the car would try to get her to take a ride in it. She totally blew him off on this note "She drew her shoulders up and sucked in her breath with the pure pleasure of being alive, and just at that moment she happen to glance at a face just a few feet from hers. It was a boy with shaggy hair, in a convertible jalopy painted gold." "Connie slit her eyes and turned away, but she couldn't help glancing back and there he was still watching her."(Oates 1) This moment showed her wanting to seduce this boy with her hard to get moves while tempting him in a sexual way. This being another symbol with the gold car and the teasing a boy could show that if you cause the situation with a total stranger could cause a conclusion that would be bad for a young girl. The part of the story where her parents are going to church and a cookout was next sign of a situation that could have been avoided. She was more worried about washing her long beautiful hair and letting it dry while being alone is another bad example of poor choice making. Because she committed this act she put herself in harm's way. Since, the gold car pulled into her driveway of the boy she had teased. The car had two symbols on it that could perceive effects of something bad is going to happen. The flying saucer symbolized that she going on a trip and not coming back. The numbers secret code 33,19,17 could have some reference to Judges and Genesis in the Bible, but no real good reference were found. The gold jalopy defiantly was a sign of a time where Connie was going on a ride and not coming back. The last symbol was the phone that had the opportunity to call the police and save herself.
Connie went to pick the phone up "the telephone was clammy and very heavy and her fingers groped down to dial but were too weak to touch it. She began to scream into the phone, into the roaring."(Oates 8) Because did not make that call she had lost all hope. She gave up on herself and gave into Arnold Friend's demands. The phone was the last hope she had for the conclusion of the terrible warning to escape her possible death.
The other story "The Monkey's Paw" by William W. Jacobs also demonstrated symbols and themes that warnings bad outcomes are coming if not taken the signs. The symbols and themes that are going to be analytical are the chessboard game monkey paw, and the gentle men's warning to not use it.
The beginning of the story starts with the father and son playing chess. The father's rash determination to distract the son, so he could try and win is one example of poor choice
…show more content…
making. " 'Listen to the wind,' said Mr. White. He had made serious mistakes and wanted to distract his son's attention so that he wouldn't see it."(Jacobs 1) By trying to distract his son was a definite sign of dreadful decision making on his part. The monkey's pay was introduced next when the man came to visit his old friend. The man explained how the paw gave three wishes just like a genie would. He warned if not taken lightly consequences would happen. "The first man had his three wishes, yes. I don't know what the first two wishes but the third was for death."(Jacobs 2) By telling this story of how the man had made two wishes and then wish for his death was a really good sign not to take the paw at all. As human nature goes thought if something can get an advantage we will take the risk. The monkey paw is a good symbol of possible good luck and bad luck. In South America, many tribes used the paw of small monkeys for good luck rituals. Some used as offerings to their Gods and some were used to make Totems and Spiritual Potions. The case in this story thought is it can be good luck, but it takes away something else to balance out the universe. The monkey paw is one of those ominous signs that if you take the easy way out of your situation. The individual outcome could be worse than them starting out. The two stories mirror each other in the case of not monitory their situations they will have terrible after-effects.
Oates's Connie was a pretty, flirtatious, naive young girl who flaunted herself without any concern of what bad outcomes could happen. Oates had an idea of how to prepare young women from being aware of their situation, so they would not draw too much attention on themselves. In the case of Connie, she was not careful, and because of her unselfish awareness she was abducted and possibly taken to her death. Now with Jacobs characters in the "Monkey's Paw", they were desperate to gain an advantage in life by making 3 wishes. Jacobs was trying to convey that sometimes when something is too good to be true that it probably is not. Jacobs characters did not follow the wariness and in the process they lost their son. I feel that if you are not cautious and do not prepare or grab to surreality usually resorts into more harm than good. For those two situations, that was the outcome. One should be aware of what going on in life. If there are warnings of a series of events put in front of them take the threats as a clue and walk away or go where it is
safe.
In the short story, "The Monkey's Paw" by W.W. Jacobs, I came to the conclusion that Sergeant Major Morris was responsible for the sorrows that resulted from the monkey's paw. For instance, he was the one who owned the paw in the first place, allowed Mr. White to keep it, and even told them how to use it, stating on page 377, "Hold it up in your right hand and wish aloud."
In the story The Monkey's Paw the foreshadowing creates tension and suspense because during the story there was so many things going on and you didn't know what was going to happen next. I say this because in the Monkey's Paw the author writes He raised his hand. "I wish my son alive again." This quote explains foreshadowing by suspense because when he wishes for his son to be alive again it gives the audience suspense if he is going to actually be alive again or if it's not going to come true and they are going to be disappointed.
The Simpsons episode “The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror II” is about a magical monkey’s paw bought by the Simpsons, a modern day family that lives in a town called Springfield. The family uses the paw to grant themselves four wishes. The wishes, they soon find out, all include repercussions that harm the family in some way. The book “The Monkey’s Paw” is about a family that is given a monkey’s paw by a friend that says it can grant three wishes. The family’s home in this story is Laburnum Villa, sometime in the past. At first the family is skeptical of the friends claim that the paw is magic saying, “If the tale about the monkey’s paw is not more truthful than those he has been telling us, we shan't make much out of it.”(Page 4, W.W. Jacobs). They then proceed to use the paw and are surprised to find that what they wish for is in fact granted but comes with terrible consequences. While “The Monkey’s Paw” and “The Simpsons, Treehouse of Horror II” both share similar plots, the settings of the stories and the
Quite often in life we wish for things bigger than ourselves. Seeming to get wrapped up in our own minds we do not pay attention to reality. As reality comes full force we are not sure how to take it, so we let it take us. In the writing “Where are you going, where have you been?” we see Oates craft archetypes and allegories into the work through detail and word choice in order to help the reader understand the shocking outdistancing of day dreams and the overshadowing sockdolager called reality. These archetypes and allegories provide a way for the reader to join Connie in the story, but also to see the danger of what Connie doesn’t see.
Joyce Carol Oates intrigues readers in her fictional piece “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been” by examining the life of a fifteen year old girl. She is beautiful, and her name is Connie. Oates lets the reader know that “everything about her [Connie] had two sides to it, one for home, and one for anywhere but home (27). When Connie goes out, she acts and dresses more mature than she probably should. However, when she is at home, she spends the majority of her time absorbed with daydreams “about the boys she met”(28). This daydreaming behavior is observable to the reader throughout the story. From theories about dreams, theories about subconscious thought, and the clues that Oates provides, the reader is lead to believe that Connie’s experience with Arnold Friend is a nightmare used to awaken her to the consequences that her behavior could result in.
In the short story “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” by Joyce Carol Oates, many elements of fiction are used to convey subject of themes represented throughout the story, such as disguises. Throughout the story the use of characterization, detail, and allusions represents the presence evil in the modern world. Oates used these elements to capture evil that illustrates the theme that ‘Looks can be deceiving’.
Friend lies in Connie’s blindness; she misses what any reader could easily miss. Through Oates’
Joyce Carol Oates' short story "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?" written in the late sixties, reveals several explanations of its plot. The story revolves around a young girl being seduced, kidnapped, raped and then killed. The story is purposely vague and that may lead to different interpretations. Teenage sex is one way to look at it while drug use or the eerie thought that something supernatural may be happening may be another. The story combines elements of what everyone may have experienced as an adolescent mixed with the unexpected dangers of vanity, drugs, music and trust at an early age. Ultimately, it is up to the reader to choose what the real meaning of this story is. At one point or another one has encountered, either through personal experience or through observation, a teenager who believes that the world is plotting against them. The angst of older siblings, peer pressure set upon them by their friends, the need for individualism, and the false pretense that at fifteen years of age, they are grown are all factors which affect the main character in this story.
In Joyce Carol Oates’ short story, “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?,” Oates employs motifs, symbolism, and allegories to convey her holistic tone of disapproval towards the actions and outlook of the main character, Connie. Motifs are seen primarily in the references to music that channel Connie’s escape out of reality. Symbolism is also evident in the piece through the setting of Connie’s home which represents her only source of protection. The overall allegorical nature of the piece accentuates the ominous relationship between Connie and Arnold and foreshadows the ending. Through analyzing the active usage of motifs, symbolism, and allegory throughout the work, one can gain a clearer understanding of how these elements
In the short story “Where Are You Going? Where Have You Been?”, by Joyce Carol Oates, the use of the symbolism of Connie’s clothes, her fascination with her beauty, Arnold Friend’s car and Arnold Friend himself help to understand the story’s theme of evil and manipulation. The story, peppered with underlying tones of evil, finds Oates writing about 15-year-old Connie, the protagonist of the story, a pretty girl who is a little too into her own attractiveness, which eventually gets her into trouble with a man named Arnold Friend. The story is liberally doused with symbolism, from the way Connie dresses to the shoes on Arnold Friend’s feet. In “Where Are You Going? Where Have You Been?” the reader can pick up on some of the symbols very easily, while others need deeper thought. The subtle hints of symbolism throughout the story create a riveting tale that draws the reader in. Connie finally succumbs to Arnold Friend at the end of the story, it then becomes obvious that he represents the devil and the symbolism of her clothing and Arnold’s car all tie together to create a better understanding of the story.
...nie receives little attention at home and therefore craves attention from boys. Teenagers at Connie's age search for connections and companionship while evolving into young adults, discovering the powers of independence. Connie is searching for the good in Arnold as she is enjoying the attention he gives her. It is possible that in this state of wonder, Connie may not realize she is in danger until control over the situation is lost. Readers are left waiting for Connie to be rescued, fighting for her to be safe. One would like to think that she should have and could have gotten out of the situation had she not have been so naïve. However, the fear and anxiety Joyce Carol Oates portrays through Connie's character leaves Connie unable to protect herself from harm. Although this may seem unreasonable, could you be absolutely sure of what you would do in such a situation?
Joyce Carol Oates began her short story, “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?,” with a 15 year old girl named Connie whose mother that had always compared her to her sister June. This gave the reader a chance to establish a connection with Connie. Since almost every teenager has felt a comparison to another sibling at least once in their life, unless they were an only child, but then they were probably compared to family friend’s child. Her mother would say things like “Why don’t you keep your room clean like your sister?” or “How’ve you got your hair fixed – what the hell stinks? Hair spray? You don’t see your sister using that junk” (Oates, 1). Perhaps this is the reason that Connie has created a fantasy against the reality of the life she lives where “everything about her had two sides to it, one for home and one for anywhere that was not home” (Oates, 1). However, this is challenged when Connie meets the strange figure of Arnold Friend, who ultimately ends up changing Connie.
Joyce Carol Oates’s “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” tells the tale of a fifteen year old girl named Connie living in the early 1960’s who is stalked and ultimately abducted by a man who calls himself Arnold Friend. The short story is based on a true event, but has been analyzed by many literary scholars and allegedly possesses numerous underlying themes. Two of the most popular interpretations of the story are that the entire scenario is only dreamt by Connie (Rubin, 58) and that the abductor is really the devil in disguise (Easterly, 537). But the truth is that sometimes people really can just be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Connie, a victim of terrifying circumstance will be forever changed by her interactions with Friend.
put on it by an old fakir. The story continues and then Mr.White and the
How can the thrilling Monkey's Paw story be similar to the petrifying Hitchhiker story? how can they be different ? we can compare and contrast both stories according to various examination ,such as in the writers style in the plot and his/her use of words, techniques used to make suspense , the way they tell the story ,the type of narrator ,and the way they end .