Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does industrialization affect the environment
How does industrialization affect the environment
How does industrialization affect the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does industrialization affect the environment
The advent of industrialization and mankind's insatiable quest to devour nature has resulted in a potentially catastrophic chaos. Our race against time to sate the ever-increasing numbers of hungry stomachs has taken toll on the environment. Man has tried to strip every resource Earth has to offer and has ruthlessly tried to eliminate any obstruction he perceived. Nature is an independent entity which has sustained and maintained the balance existing within it. Traditionally, spring season hosts the complete magnificence of nature in full bloom. It is evident in the very first chapter when Rachel Carson talks about a hypothetical village which was the epitome of natural rural beauty and was a delightful scenery for the beholder. The village …show more content…
Rachel Carson was a zoologist, writer, and an ecologist. She recognized the issues which would prove to have deleterious long-term effects. On 27th September 1962, a book which changed the course of the 'environmental movement' was published. It was lauded by supporters who had witnessed the ill-effects of biocides and those who had amassed similar scientific proof. Both Rachel Carson and her publishers had expected a backlash of criticism which unsurprisingly came from chemical industries like Dupont and American Cyanamid. Soon after the book was published, a Dupont initiative 'Union Carbide' single handedly caused the biggest industrial chemical disaster in Bhopal. Major companies like Monsanto led colorful defaming campaigns against the author. The campaign seemed to backfire as the publicity led to increased book sales, and the public awareness rose proportionally. The overwhelming public response had forced the U.S Senate to pay heed to Rachel Carson's views. She presented the scientific data accumulated for the book to President John F. Kennedy and his sub-committee. Their agenda was to formulate policies to counteract the pollution caused by …show more content…
The author describes each chapter with a surreal narration. It begins with “A Fable for Tomorrow”, which starkly declares a bleak future of every U.S village if they erred to use pesticides. “The Obligation to Endure” describes the lack of public awareness and how it would become grievous. She justly reasons that if the public might suffer from long-term misfortunes due to insecticides usage, they have a right to know the facts. Felicitous “Elixirs of Death” describes the nature of insecticides in three apt words. Chemical structures of common biocides are explained in an uncomplicated fashion. A series of three successive chapters is dedicated to Earth and its components. These chapters include the closely inter-connected ecological cycles, existing in the water, mantle and soil horizons. Pesticide dispersal in soil followed by its access into the ground water table and the waterways is an inconceivable process. The book promulgates the escape of biocides from their place of application, and their integration into natural bodies. All her chapters thereafter revolve around the various short-term and long-term effects of biocides on the biosphere. Rachel Carson had stated countless dire cases wherein complete ecosystems faced annihilation. The influx of detrimental chemicals extended their reach over animals and plants, and were causing human mortalities as well. Humans are a part of
Saukko , Linnea.“How to Poison the Earth.”The Brief Bedford Reader. Bedford/St.Martin’s Boston: 9th edition ,2006.246-247.
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
There is this feeling we all experience when we step away from the chaos of rushing cars, infrastructure, and artificial lights, and we step into nature. Some describe it as bliss, comfort, excitement, pleasure or just pure happiness. This is the answer to the question Paul Bloom asks “Why should we care about nature?” in his article “Natural Happiness.” Paul goes through this process in which he uncovers the fact that “real natural habitats provide significant sources of pleasure for modern humans”, regardless of our need for food, clean water, and air. There are 3 main arguments that Paul makes in this article that I find particularly interesting, they include: “Our hunger for the natural is everywhere. In many regards our species has already kissed nature goodbye, and we are better off for it. There is a considerable mismatch between
Miss Carson first became aware of the effects of chemical pesticides on the natural environment while working for the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries. Of particular concern to her was the government’s use of chemical pesticides such as DDT. She was familiar with early studies of DDT and knew of its dangers and lasting effects on the environment. According to Miss Carson, "the more I learned about the use of pesticides, the more appalled I became. I realized that here was the material for a book. What I discovered was that everything which meant most to me as a naturalist was being threatened, and that nothing I could do would be more important." Thu...
When questioning the practice of eliminating burdening animals, Carson employs the metaphors, “chains of poisonings” and “wave of death.” These metaphors depict the eradications as shackling to the environment and bringing forth sweeping amounts of death. These negatively connoted comparisons evoke unpleasant feelings toward the extermination of invasive species. Further along in the passage, Figurative language is again utilized in the analogy, “Who has placed in one pan of the scales the leaves that might have been eaten by the beetles and in the other the pitiful heaps of many-hued feathers, the lifeless remains of the birds that fell before the unselective bludgeon of insecticidal poisons?” The analogy weighs the pros and cons of use of insecticides to show that it is heavily degenerative to the ecosystem. The reader then discovers that the figurative scale is heavily tipped towards the negative side of results. Metaphor and analogy used in the passage paint a vivid picture in the reader’s mind of the tragedy that occurs when animal populations are poisoned to avoid any possible undesirable dimension of their
Some of this legislation helped lead to rules and regulations against chemical companies and pollution. This is perhaps the biggest reason she was hated so much by chemical corporations. Her book not only hit them in the pocket book, but helped pass regulations against future use of chemicals cutting into chemical corps. Financial success in the future. They felt her book attacked them and they fought back. According to America’s Story, “President Kennedy understood the importance of Carson 's book. He asked his Science Advisory Committee to research Carson 's claims in Silent Spring. In 1963 the Committee released a report called "The Uses of Pesticides." It supported Silent Spring.” (America’s Story, n.d.). Carson’s book woke people up in America about the effects of chemicals and it caused them to write their congressmen, get involved in environmental organizations, and look into the facts for themselves. This is not a bad
In an effort to save the human race, humanity has almost been lost. Humans destroy nature in a futile attempt to conquer it, by doing so they begin to lose their own humanity and their natural connection to the environment. While some believe that attempts to control the environment, such as pesticides, affect only the desired nuisance, the truth of the matter is that they affect everyone. Barbra Kingsolver, author of “High Tide in Tucson,” Aldo Leopold of A Sand County Almanac, and Rachel Carson of Silent Spring agree that the way many humans treat nature is worsening and needs to be reexamined.
The environment deteriorating is a major consequence of society lacking care towards it. If the trend of not protecting the environment continues then its destruction is inevitable. Rachel Carson, well known environmentalist who has a passion towards environmental protection, addresses society about the dangerous spread of a poison, parathion, in her book Silent Spring. Ultimately, Carson disagrees with the spraying of parathion and encourages people to take a stand against its use when explaining the lethal hazards it possesses, criticizing the apathy of humans, and stressing the need for people to speak up.
Albert Schweitzer once stated, “Man can hardly even recognize the devils of his own creation” (Tbach) In the 1900’s, technology has discovered chemical substances that can easily terminate parasites and other disease transmitting insects. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, known as DDT, and other pesticides usage sored as corporate made huge profit out of them. What public did not acknowledge, however, was malignant effects caused by these chemically mortified substances. As DDT usage increased, insidious dangers destroyed both ecosystem and human health; with her book, Silent Spring, Rachel Carson drew attention to the hazards of pesticides, especially DDT, and triggered a movement that would eventually succeed in banning DDT.
“Silent Spring” is a documentary that highlights the background story of a popular environmental science book and how the author of the book, Rachel Carsen, came to write it and publish it. The documentary first started off discussing about Rachel Carsen’s childhood and how she overcame her obstacles to be a successful female biologist and later to be a famous writer. Later in the documentary, it was focused on the growing demand for pesticide use around the U.S., and how advertisements from large chemical companies are propagating the idea that the use of pesticides was safe for direct human contact and ingestion. Then it transitioned to Carsen’s conservation ideals and how she responded to a tragic incident that happened at her comrade’s
Pesticides cause an array of health scares, such as neurological diseases, cancers, and birth defects. Topsoil, air, sunrays, and water are perfect illustrations of the negative effects. Pesticides predictably mark numerous adjacent plants and animals, causing damage and demise. The spray’s fatal effects fluctuate from one organism to the next. For instance, because pesticides leak into water channels, heaps of fish perish annually.
Like it or not, people have a huge impact on the environment. A lot of the time, ‘the impact is detrimental to the environment. The detriment that people cause can affect the food we can't eat and the air we can't breath in it. I think the enrollment is bad because when people smoke the same goes into the air. And the wildfires the smoke goes into the air and it’s worse because it’s a lot of smoke.
“The more clearly we can focus our attention on the wonders and realities of the universe about us, the less taste we shall have for destruction.” This is a quote from Rachel Carson, an ordinary marine biologist who changed the world forever. She is most famous for writing Silent Spring, a book which almost single handedly stopped the use of toxic chemicals such as DDT from being used as pesticides, as well as indirectly leading to the creation of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
I observed that humans were only spectators in those lands. The nature existed independently, perfectly balanced and at peace within itself. I still remember the powerful sun rays in the high altitude illuminating every blade of grass, every mountain top, and every pure lake. However, what I don’t visualize now are the uncontrollable forest fires, toxic fumes released from volcanic activity, and ruthless predators that lurked in the foliage. Who would want to picture such destructive elements that soil the beauty we love? Despite their destructive nature, I realized that these natural occurrences are not undesirable. Rather they are necessary: they maintain balance to allow the nature we love to flourish. It takes a balanced view to appreciate what nature offers
The Chemical Revolution, the development of new pesticides and industrial chemicals was widely regarded as a positive step forward (ridding the world of POPs). At the time, they were seen as contributing positively to humans by combating pests and increasing crop-yields. (ridding the world of POPs) Today, these chemicals are known as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and they pose significant threats to human health, wildlife and the environment. (ridding the world of POPs). This revolution resulted in an endless stream of synthetic chemicals and insecticides, “every human being is now subjected to contact with dangerous chemicals from the moment of inception until death.” (Emily Carson) Among impacts on wildlife and the environment, there