Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial segregation in the justice system
Racial segregation in the justice system
Lynching in the new south
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial segregation in the justice system
Lynching is when a mob of people gather in one place to hang a person is a general idea. However, lynching is just an execution of an accused person by a mob (Lynching). A lynching could happen for many reasons including severe crimes like murder or theft, simple custom violations, or to make a simple example to strike fear into the “other” population. According to the article, “Lynching in America,” over 4,000 African Americans were lynched between 1877-1950. Though majority of the African Americans lynched were men, there were some women that were lynched, too. Lynching has become illegal within the United States today, but it was a difficult time coming to the end of “legal” lynching. This essay discusses how several factors led to the …show more content…
The number of lynching is truly uncertain at this day in age as researchers and historians try to piece together the documents of the past, but one thing that is true is that many African Americans lost their lives. However, the data most recently suggests that lynching of African Americans dates to the late 19th century, the Civil War was ending, and the African Americans were being freed from slavery by the Emancipation Proclamation. Location will be discussed in further detail later, but majority of the “lynchings began in the South,” where white people were trying to keep white supremacy a reality and ignore the newly enacted law (Lynch Law in America). The South did fight back against the law with the Plessy v. Ferguson case which ended up in Supreme Court in 1896 with a ruling that “public facilities for blacks and whites could be ‘separate but equal’” (A Brief History of Jim Crow). The South took that ruling and made it into the Jim …show more content…
For example, the lynching rampage of 1918 where numerous slaves were killed for the death of a white plantation owner who did not pay one of his slaves. Among the deceased was an eight-month pregnant Mary Turner. The reason the plantation owner did not pay his slave was because the slave did not work while he was sick; in addition, The Great Depression was slowly coming up and the plantation owner was trying to salvage whatever money he could to survive the next several years (Remembering Mary Turner). Besides the white supremacy goal in the South, African Americans were blamed for the financial hardships, The Great Depression, because “the United States had never been through such a terrible money issue like that before and the Southern people wanted someone to blame.” However, once the Depression ended, the Jim Crow laws slowly disappeared as the United States entered World War II (Gibson). That’s when fewer and fewer lynchings were needed because all men were needed to defeat a common enemy, Hitler, and restore the damage done (Gibson). African Americans lived a difficult life always being in fear and never knowing if they were going to be killed next; nevertheless, the lynching did decline as the United States entered war because they needed as many people as possible to
Interestingly, the book does not focus solely on the Georgia lynching, but delves into the actual study of the word lynching which was coined by legendary judge Charles B Lynch of Virginia to indicate extra-legal justice meted out to those in the frontier where the rule of law was largely absent. In fact, Wexler continues to analyse how the term lynching began to be used to describe mob violence in the 19th century, when the victim was deemed to have been guilty before being tried by due process in a court of law.
Wexler, Laura. 2003. Fire in a Canebrake: The Last Mass Lynching in America. Scribner; 2004. Print
Southern Horror s: Lynch Law in All Its Phases by Ida B. Wells took me on a journey through our nations violent past. This book voices how strong the practice of lynching is sewn into the fabric of America and expresses the elevated severity of this issue; she also includes pages of graphic stories detailing lynching in the South. Wells examined the many cases of lynching based on “rape of white women” and concluded that rape was just an excuse to shadow white’s real reasons for this type of execution. It was black’s economic progress that threatened white’s ideas about black inferiority. In the South Reconstruction laws often conflicted with real Southern racism. Before I give it to you straight, let me take you on a journey through Ida’s
In 1860-1960 there was lynching in the United States. When the confederates (south) lost the civil war the slaves got freedom and got rights of human beings. This was just to say because segregation wasn 't over in the South and didn 't go away for over 100 years. Any black person in the South accused but not convicted of any crime of looking at a white woman, whistling at a white woman, touching a white woman, talking back to a white person, refusing to step into the gutter when a white person passed on the sidewalk, or in some way upsetting the local people was liable to be dragged from their house or jail cell by lots of people crowds, mutilated in a terrible
Franklin Zimring (2003) examines the relationship between the history of lynching and current capital punishment in the United States argueing that the link between them is a vigilante tradition. He adequately shows an association between historical lynchings and modern executions, though this paper will show additional evidence that would help strengthen this argument, but other areas of Zimring’s argument are not as well supported. His attitudinal and behavioral measures of modern vigilantism are insufficient and could easily be interpreted as measuring other concepts. Also missing from Zimring’s analysis is an explanation for the transition of executions from representing government control in the past to executions as representing community control in the present. Finally, I argue that Zimring leaves out any meaningful discussion of the role of race in both past lynchings and modern executions. To support my argument, using recent research, I will show how race has played an important role in both past lynchings and modern executions and how the changing form of racial relations may explain the transition from lynchings to legal executions.
The population of African Americans from 1865 to 1900 had limited social freedom. Social limitations are limitations that relate “…to society and the way people interact with each other,” as defined by the lesson. One example of a social limitation African Americans experienced at the time is the white supremacy terrorist group, the Ku Klux Klan or the KKK. The KKK started as a social club formed by former confederate soldiers, which rapidly became a domestic terrorist organization. The KKK members were white supremacists who’s objective was to ward off African Americans from using their new political power. In an attempts to achieve their objective, Klansmen would burn African American schools, scare and threaten voters, destroy the homes of African Americans and also the homes of whites who supported African American rights. The greatest terror the KKK imposed was that of lynching. Lynching may be defined via the lesson as, “…public hanging for an alleged offense without benefit of trial.” As one can imagine these tactics struck fear into African Americans and the KKK was achiev...
Lynching began when Charles Lynch worked the practice of lynching (Rushdy 24). “It began quickly to spread throughout the rest of the Southern states” (Rushdy 24). Lynching came to bring capital charges against an individual. It was said that African Americas suffered more from the lynchings than white people did. “Although white c...
Racial unrest and violence was prevalent throughout the United States in the early 1900’s. It was hard to go any amount of time without hearing of the lynching of a black citizen, a violent mob against black people, or large riots of killing blacks. In Rosewood, Florida, an incident of high caliber and commotion occurred during these moments of extreme racial segregation. These Rosewood incidents became public knowledge as the entire population of blacks chose to move out of the small city. These black citizens were in fear for their lives as many racially heinous and violent crimes were occurring against the people of their same race. Lynching had become so common that many blacks moved in fear that if they did not, they would end up dead.
Lynching was supported by Federal Government through non-sanctions of lynch mobs. Such atrocities kept Black people in check for generations. These brutal acts of terrorism reaffirmed white authority, white identity, and solidified the white community.
During the era of Civil War and Reconstruction, lynching marked a pivotal time in the United States. It was prevalent in the Midwest and West and abundant in the South. Lynching occurred for numerous reasons with shameless public displays being advertised in newspapers, which drew large crowds of white families and exposed a key role by providing contentious moral support. Prior to the Civil War, lynching was carried out in order to impose vigilante on their way of life and their white women. The first practitioners of lynching engaged what they described as “frontier justice”, with the main rationale being that the local and federal governmental bodies were of little use out in ‘those parts’. Compared to later occurrenc...
In "Lynching in the South" is a letter written by Booker T. Washington,which he saw that many blacks people were getting killed and he wanting justice due to how the white folks would kill the african american without proving they were the caused.What Booker want to show thought the letter is that blacks were being blame for crime that they didn't commited and without trial they were send to death by being hung or lynch.The second thing Booker wanted to show was that how is began to effect him because the white folks would burn any african american they thought they had commited a crime and would be killed which effect him that justice had came for his race.The third argument Booker shows is that his race can't press to speak out against these
Lynching in the 19th century was an act of punishment caused by large groups, mobs, or vigilantes, in order to punish an alleged criminal, or to show authority over a certain minority group. Lynching was said to be first started in 1811, after William Lynch, who created “Lynch’s Law”. “This was an agreement with the Virginia General Assembly (Virginian state legislature) on September 22, 1782, which allowed Lynch to pursue and punish criminals in Pittsylvania County, without due process of law,” (New World Encyclopedia, Etymology, p.1)
Lynching was a widespread and profound phenomenon that obliterated the African American populace of the southern states throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Lynching was both physically cataclysmic, and psychologically calamitous. Lynching generated a level of fear and horror that surpassed that of all other forms of violence that the African American population had endured. Lynching was a gruesome spectacle that assumed tremendous symbolic power as a result of its physically and visually sensational and performative nature. Lynchings were often witness by thousands of white spectators, with tales of torture, hanging, mutilation and burning consequently reverberating swiftly around the region, further intensifying the fear associated
The story in this book talks about an overview of the lynching in America. The meaning of lynching comes from Lynch's Law originated during the American Revolution when Charles Lynch, a Virginia justice of the peace, ordered out unlawful punishment for Tory acts. Tory act was an act that reveals citizens who remained loyal to Great Britain during the year 1776. But for some reason we stuck on to this law but changed it up a bit.
The accusations of Black insurrection and riots were obviously fabricated to justify the mass killing of Black communities because no white people were ever harmed during the rioting while “[between] 1864-1872, hundreds of colored men and women were mercilessly murdered [for] being alleged participants in an insurrection or riot.” Despite the continued attacks on Black communities by white people, Black people did not enact violence in either riots or insurrections. Thus, the race riot excuse expired, but racism is transformative. Because lynching could no longer serve the alleged purpose of preventing race riots, white Southerners needed a new excuse to lynch Black folks. The second function lynching served was to prevent “Negro Domination” after Black men gained the right to vote. A number of Black men were successfully elected into public office in the years directly following the passage of the 15th amendment, which threatened the political dominance of white men. White Southerners used murder and intimidation to prevent Black men from voting and, thus, from further maintaining or gaining political power. Within several years, Black men were successfully disenfranchised again as they could not safely vote or run for office. A third iteration of lynching served the purpose of protecting the constructed sanctity of white womanhood. Accusing Black men of sexaully assaulting white women, provided a third excuse to lynch Black men. One of the most famous cases of lynching to prevent or avenge interracial sex is the murder of fourteen-year-old Emmett Till who was lynched for allegedly asking a white woman on a date. This excuse for lynching has particular gender implications because it illuminates the ways in which constructions of white womanhood are foundationally connected to the criminalization and