Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tragedy of the commons essay
Notes on tragedy of commons
Tragedy of the commons essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tragedy of the commons essay
The tragedy of the Commons is an issue where individuals exploit a shared resource to the point where there’s barely much of the resource left, and the resource becomes unavailable. This occurred several times throughout the history of mankind. This repetitive cycle happens for several reasons. The tragedy of the commons occurs due to self-interest, unawareness of the problem, and finite resources. These reasons for tragedy of the commons was in the 1972 cartoon “The Lorax” and a historical event on “Easter Island”.
Unawareness, or denial, of the issue, was among one of the reasons that the tragedy of commons can happen. In the Lorax: the Once-ler denies the fact that the environment was getting destroyed for his profit gain. “I chopped down
…show more content…
Usually, people believe that they’re not overusing a certain resource. And most resources are shared with other citizens of the public. This leads to overusing essential resources until there is barely enough to go around. Hardin addresses this issue as well in his writing. “But, in terms of the practical problems that we must face in the next few generations with the foreseeable technology, it is clear that we will greatly increase human misery if we do not, during the immediate future, assume that the world available to the terrestrial human population is finite. “Space” is no escape.”. (Hardin, Garrett). In “The Lorax” the Truffula trees were an example of a finite resource. Unfortunately, the Once-ler cut down too many trees for his short-term gain of profit. And once all of the trees were gone, he finally noticed that there was an issue, when it could have been realized before the whole forest was demolished. For Easter Island, the resources were the animals they hunted and the plant-life. When transporting the Moai they must clear the pathway of trees and logs for rolling them. So the Rapa Nui ended up cutting down many trees. And for other inventions and supplies needed to be built, they used wood. Eventually, the island became a treeless wasteland over
The Lorax has a very pessimistic view on how we humans are using the environment or our needs. Something he said was that cutting down the trees leaves nothing for the environment; meaning that trees are a big part of the environment and if we cut them down it’ll be very unhealthy. Another thing the Lorax had to say is about how unhealthy for the environment it is to cut down the trees for our benefit, and that we care
d. Both stories indicate that the ecological footprint of people is greater than the biological capacity for resource renewal. The Lorax shows that Once-ler only cared about his own benefits without thinking about the harm he gives to the resources that are not renewable. The Lorax presents that the society does not believe in sustainable practices and overconsumes the resources. To live sustainably, the society should rely on source of energy that can be replenished, use matter, control population growth and depend on local biodiversity. Like the Lorax, the Truax also does not indicate practicing sustainability. It presents the occurring deforestation and how people get maximum benefits from it. In comparison to Once-ler, Truax understands
In The Lorax, the trees produce a fabric that could be used on anything and everything. With all the resources of trees gone the species that once were dependent on it were forced to migrate elsewhere. Their population did not become extinct. Something that caught my eye about the people on Easter Island was that exploiting their resources was part of their culture. They used up their resources to build and they went overboard with it. At one point they could’ve realized that they had enough statues/monuments and left the land fallow to regain its nutrients. Unlike the Lorax, once the people of Easter Island ran out of its resources and were not able to hunt for food they resulted to cannibalism. This would later lead to human extinction on the
The Barbiloo bears had to leave their homes because the trees provided food for the bears. Also the birds were forced to leave after the air had become contaminated with awful gases that filled the air. The fish also played victim, the water had also been contaminated from all the toxins being thrown into the water. The Lorax and The Silent Spring tell close to the same story and have the same story. They look at what having factories, communities and, humans and what it can do in an environment without out our
of people sharing a resource tend to utilize it to satisfy their own needs, but
It is easy to deny the reality that the state of the environment plays a large role in the survival of society. People who argue to protect and preserve it are seen as “hippies” or “tree huggers” and discarded by society. On the other hand, those who support deforestation are seen as “killing us all.” This conflict that is often portrayed on modern media is actually one that span all the way back to the beginning of civilization. Jared Diamond, recipient of the Lewis Thomas Prize and physiology professor at UCLA School of Medicine, his essay “Why do Some Societies Make Disastrous Decisions” published by Edge on April 26, 2003, argues exactly how societies can doom themselves. Diamond creates his own roadmap as to how and why problems occur. He shows the various ways of how a problem may arise and be
Hardin states that throughout most of history there's been no need for concern about population control. Nature would come along with epidemic diseases and take care of the matter for us. Disease has been the primary population controller in the past. Because widespread disease and famine no longer exist, we have to find other means to stop population increases (Spencer 1992, pp.61-2).
The tragedy of the commons is a very unfortunate and very real thing. It occurs whenever everyone takes a little bit of a limited resource repeatedly. The result of this is that all the resources are gone. In The Lorax, the Once-ler cuts down all the truffula trees in the area to make thneeds (The Lorax). When all the trees are gone, the business shuts down and all the animals are forced to leave (The Lorax). The factories polluted the air and made the area unsafe to live in (The Lorax). This is a perfect example of a tragedy of the commons. A similar event happened in Easter Island. Tribes started inhabiting the area and began using the trees to build houses and eat food from them (Easter Island). Eventually all the trees are gone, and the society resorted to cannibalism and war because there was no food (Easter Island). Garrett Hardin states in his essay that maximimizing population does not maximize goods (Hardin). In this essay, both tragedies of the commons will be compared and will be examined to see how they could have been prevented.
It is pretty evident to the reader that he has a lot of passion with regards to protecting the environment, as evidenced by the tone in his voice. The Lorax begs the Once-ler to stop chopping down the Truffula Trees, but the Once-ler reassures him by saying “A Thneed’s a Fine-Something-That-All-People-Need” (Seuss). The Once-ler proceeds by inviting his entire family over for “a wonderful chance … to get mighty rich” (Seuss). They build a factory and continue to chop down trees, with no regard to how their actions take a toll on the environment. In today’s society, this resembles the typical big corporation taking over a rural land. Eventually, the Lorax is forced to send the animals away because the area is too polluted, and there is not enough food for survival. The main problem with today’s economy is that there are so few natural resources available, but the desire for these resources are unlimited. The Once-ler is seen as someone who wants to profit from the environment for his own personal gain. Unfortunately there are some people in the world today, who like the Once-ler, have little regard for the planet’s welfare. The more they profit from the environment, the more it will cost the world as a whole. Dr. Seuss is trying to inform his readers about the importance of protecting the environment, and how greediness can be quite
The Lorax is a tale that involves business ethics and environmental ethics. “Even in 1972, Dr. Seuss recognized that modern corporations don’t always have the environment at heart when they decide how to do business. The Lorax, provides a straightforward account of what can go wrong when companies fail to take environmental concerns into account (Arthur)”. Could the Once-ler have done things differently to keep the environment healthy? The film ultimately provokes the question, is there a way for businesses to exist that is not in conflict with the natural environments that they work
When we think about our accountability and our impact on the environment, a bold but underlying dichotomy of nature and nurture comes as a call into action and for the understanding towards the importance of ecological care, environmental literacy and education to shape future generations to make the best possible decisions for the restoration and conservation, and appreciation of our only home. In this essay I will analyze the rhetorical jeremiad and environmental melodramatic discourse in Dr. Seuss’s 1971 classic The Lorax. Its facilitation in understanding environmental issues and ecological complexities of caring for nature, natural resources is a framework for sustainability and an anti-profit perspective for the economy through mass industrialization
Although he had already destroyed the forest, the Lorax still made an impression on him. The Once-ler wouldn't have lived in isolation and regretted his mistakes if the Lorax hadn't have spoken up. Activity #1: Lets help the Earth, too! Purpose: Create a deeper understanding with the story by realizing why and how the Lorax had a deep connection with the Earth and protecting his community.
Hardin argues how the world only has so many resources and opportunities for agriculture to be expended. Therefore, with enough increase in population, these resources will become extinct. Thus, humans will run out of food and eventually starve to death. As Hardin declares, “a finite world can only support a finite population” (Hardin 98).
The Tragedy of the Commons “is a problem that occurs when individuals exploit a shared resource to the extent that demand overwhelms supply and the resource becomes unavailable to some or all” (Wigmore, 2013, August). He explains if by using an example of herdsman caring for their cattle in a common land owned by others. Everyone in the land have the same number of cattle they are allowed to have. If one herdsman was being self-centered things and had more cattle because he was thinking of his needs would then damage the community by “overloading it, erosion set in, weeds take over, and he loses the use of the pasture. He would just worry about his goals now and not the overall outcome which not only affected him, but the other herdsmen as well. (Hardin, 1974,
Common pool resources have long stood as the obstacle for human’s domain over the Earth. Humans have successfully conquered many frontiers, whether it has been the vast and almost endless open oceans or the dry and arid deserts across the world. With persistent exploration, discovery, and through new science advancements, humans have learned to not only become familiar with these new frontiers but have learned to exploit them. But when it came to utilizing these frontiers, common pool resources often created problems for anyone who sought to control it. “Common pool resources,” according to the encyclopedia, are resources made available to all for consumption and to which access can be limited only by high cost. Whether people realize the effects of this term or not, the availability and accesses to common pool resources has always afflicted with the relationship between