Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection concerthing
Real life reflection
Reflection concerthing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection concerthing
Summary
In the beginning of the book we are introduced to Bashir Khairi and his cousins who travel to Al-Ramla, a city in central Israel. Bashir and his cousins have not been in Ramla since the The Arabians were ravaged and lived in poverty. Many of them lived as refugees or savages. Later, we meet Dalia Eshkenazi, a Jewish woman who escapes the horrors of the holocaust. Dalia’s family and Bashir’s families have been through much pain, and both characters understand being hated and loved by people. Eventually, Bashir travels to Dalia’s home , which was his former place. Dalia visits Bashir and I can see the bond these two people have even though they are coming from two different backgrounds.
Dalia who becomes inspired, she questions
…show more content…
Sandy wrote the novel in a way that the anyone who takes the time will enjoy the story. Even though the book does not solve a problem-which it wasn’t supposed to, this book is a novel that deserves it’s credit.
In the Lemon Tree, Tolan focused on Bashir and Dalia’s life, and a slight perspective on both sides of each story. The Lemon Tree was well written, but I believe that Tolan overlooked information about Israel and Palestine. Tolan overlooked that the Palestinians in
Israel never dealt with murder or genocide because of their race. Israel allowed Arabs that were outside of the border to be citizens of Israel.The leaders were just trying to make
Israel a Jewish nation, which is one of the most Jewish populated countries. Secondly, the
Arabs from Palestine started the war in 1948, but the Jews were targets because of their race. Furthermore, During the Arab massacres of the Jews, many of the Jews escaped- making the city become more Palestinian populated. Also, Sandy says that Al-Ramla was a
Muslim dominated town, but Ramla had Jews long before Ramla. Even more, Tolan doesn’t write about how Jews were in the middle east for thousands of years. Tolan rarely
…show more content…
The Jewish and Palestinians have a different knowledge and understanding of Israel because of religion, and how each parent raised them. Anyone can tell the differences and views of Bashir and Dalia. On page 160 of the Lemon Tree, Bashir responds to a question that Dalia asks for ‘Western occupying powers in Israel’, Bashir says ‘ First, to get rid of you in Europe. Second, to rule the East through this government and to keep down the whole Arab world. And then the leaders started remembering the Torah and started to talk about the land of the milk and the honey, and the Promised Land.’ Dalia recomments and says ‘ But there is good reasons for this. And the reason is to protect us from being persecuted in other countries.’ Both characters share their opposing views and we cannot fully understand them without living their lives and understanding the Middle East. We cannot understand the views and comments of both characters, until you view ancient history and information like the Bible. We all know the story about the Philistines
(Palestinian) and Israelites and the Bible is a historical reference that should be looked at when understanding the views of Palestinians and
As soon as Jewish immigration increased, so did the tension between the two groups because each felt like they deserved the Palestine land. Zionism began early in the history of Judiasm and it was the movement for the Jews to establish a home in Palestine, and return to their holy land. During the Holocaust, six million Jews were killed and the deep-seeded hatre against them increased
The last reason I sided with Israelis is the way they dealt with the many refugees. The Israelis took Jews from all over the world and invited them into Israel for a home.
story, the plot was good. The liked the purpose of the author and the way
“Many Jews were fleeing Europe from Hitler so that they can reclaim the land they believed was their Biblical birthright, (Document 4 Excepts from the Israeli Declaration of Independence). Leaders were petitioning Great Britain to allow Jewish people to begin migrating into Palestine, then in 194 8the formal state of Israel was formed. “The Balfour Declaration Britain promised a national home for the Jewish people as seen in” (document 2). However, people were already living there so the natives felt like they were getting there home taken away from
Most people think Israel always belonged to the Jews but it wasn’t always a safe, holy place where Jews could roam freely. Along with Palestine, it was actually forcefully taken from the Arabs who originated there. The main purpose of this novel is to inform an audience about the conflicts that Arabs and Jews faced. Tolan’s sources are mainly from interviews, documentations and observations. He uses all this information to get his point across, and all the quotes he uses is relevant to his points. The author uses both sides to create a non-biased look at the facts at hand. The novel starts in the year 1967 when Bashir Al-Khairi and his cousins venture to their childhood home in Ramallah. After being forced out of their homes by Jewish Zionists and sent to refuge for twenty years. Bashir arrives at his home to find a Jewish woman named Dalia Eshkenazi. She invites them into her home and later the...
This marked the beginning of the Palestine armed conflict, one of its kinds to be witnessed in centuries since the fall of the Ottoman Empire and World War 1. Characterized by a chronology of endless confrontations, this conflict has since affected not only the Middle East relations, but also the gl...
But, as Sandy Tolan 's book, The Lemon Tree, seeks to explain, through Dalia’s longing for zion and Bashir’s belief in the arab right of return, that the main catalyst of the Arab-Israeli conflict is
Israeli-Druze’s feel integrated into Israeli society, while simultaneously also feel alienated due to “lack of full equity, and linguistic-cultural differentiation” (Nisan). Regardless, the Maghar Druze community living in Israel identify as Israeli over Palestinian and even over an Arab nationality. The separation of identity from Arab to Israeli is due to long and violent religious conflicts between the Druze and Muslims in Palestine (Nisan). These hate crimes have created an obvious transition for Maghar Druze to align with Israel over neighboring Arab states. Most importantly the recruitment into Israeli military has provided the Maghar community the sense of protection against a common enemy which has strengthened the Druze – Israeli identity. Overall, the state of Israel has provided the Maghar Druze the sense of belonging through citizenship and military service; thus giving them the desire for a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to continue their integration into Israeli society.
The Israeli-Palestine conflict is an event that has been well documented throughout the course of Middle-Eastern history. The conflict dates back as far as the nineteenth century where Palestine and Zionist, will later be known as Israel, are two communities each with different ideologies had the same overwhelming desire to acquire land. However, what makes this clash what it is, is the fact that both of these up and coming communities are after the same piece of land. The lengths that both sides went to in order obtain they believed was theirs has shaped the current relationship between the two nations today.
It was not their intention to cause a refugee crisis. Most Arabs did not want to become citizens of Israel but for the Arabs who accepted, equal citizenship with fulfilled. Though not always successful the Israel 's government did what they could to give Palestinian Arabs better lives.
Israel began to have serious problems with the Arab enemies, and there were many losses.
The Arab-Israeli conflict is a struggle between the Jewish state of Israel and the Arabs of the Middle East concerning the area known as Palestine. The term Palestine has been associated variously and sometimes controversially with this small region. Both the geographic area designated by and the political status of the name have changed over the course of some three millennia. The region, or a part of it, is also known as the Holy Land and is held sacred among Jews, Christians, and Muslims. In the twentieth century it has been the object of conflicting claims of Jewish and Arab national movements, and the conflict has led to prolonged violence and in several instances open warfare opposing Israel's existence. These wars, which occurred during the years of nineteen forty-eight to nineteen forty-nine, nineteen fifty-six, nineteen sixty-seven, nineteen seventy-three to nineteen seventy-four, and nineteen eighty-two were complicated and heightened by the political, strategic, and economic interests in the area of the great powers. This fight is the continuation of an Arab-Jewish struggle that began in the early 1900's for control of Palestine. The historic and desirable region, which has varied greatly since ancient times, is situated on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean in southwestern Asia. The strategic importance of the area is immense. Through it pass the main roads from Egypt to Syria and from the Mediterranean to the hills beyond the Jordan River. Palestine is now largely divided between Israel and the Israeli-occupied territories, parts of which are self-administered by Palestinians. The ongoing feud is and was based around competing land claims and the two opposing viewpoints are that the Palestinians lived in the region long before Jews began moving there in large numbers in the late 1800's and that Jews believed they were justified by Zionism. “Chiefly, today’s Palestine question has to do with Jews and Arabs. Over the centuries, both groups have developed deep historical roots in a place both regard as a Holy Land. Both have strong emotional ties to it.” (Carrol, 3) This paper will discuss how discrimination against Arab-Palestinians is justified by Zionism and the results of these actions, the origins, purposes, and effects of the Arab “Intifada,” and what the future holds for the Arabs and Jews living in a race/religion biased land.
Salman Rushdie’s novel Midnight’s Children employs strategies which engage in an exploration of History, Nationalism and Hybridity. This essay will examine three passages from the novel which demonstrate these issues. Furthermore, it will explore why each passage is a good demonstration of these issues, how these issues apply to India in the novel, and how the novel critiques these concepts.
He avoids telling them for as long as he can, even if it keeps him from seeing Ruth “But such a trip would require telling his parents about Ruth, something he has no desire to do” (Lahiri 115). To him, his parents represent Bengali culture, something he is not sure he wants to be a part of. He tries to live entirely without their opinion, driving them out of his personal life almost entirely. Although he is trying to separate himself from Bengali culture, he still remains only a few hours away from home, still visits every other weekend. At the end of the day, Gogol is still connected to his home and culture in a way Ruth is not. Ruth seeks adventure in Europe choosing to study abroad in Oxford, London. “Instead of coming back from Oxford after those twelve weeks, she’d stayed on to do a summer course” (Lahiri 119). In fact Ruth wants to go back to England for graduate school, something Gogol has no real interest in doing. His connection, even if subconscious ends up being the driving force in Ruth and Gogol’s break up. He fails to learn from his mistakes with Ruth, however, and the next girl he dates is even more different than