The Lecture On The Book 'Never Let Me Go'

733 Words2 Pages

The lecture about the book “Never Let Me Go”, was presented by five Speakers, who shared their thoughts about the book. As the first speaker begin, it reminded me of our little group meetings. It was only when the speaker got to the end, that I became more interested.
The sentence or quote that peaked my curiosity was the first quote that was taken out of the book. The speaker reads back

“I saw a new world coming rapidly. More scientific, efficient, yes. More cures for the old sicknesses. Very good. But a harsh, cruel world. And I saw a little girl, her eyes tightly closed, holding to her breast the old kind world, one that she knew in her heart could not remain, and she was holding it and pleading, never to let her go. That is what I saw, …show more content…

It was what defines human thought question of “what is humanity?”. If it the identification thought art that can show a soul or thought people ideas and influences. This also brings up the question of who has the power in the story. Even though some people ask why the clones could not walk away from their fate when they seemed to have more education than normal people and can leave on their own. Do the clone have their own power or is it the scientist who created them by possible manipulating the clone gene to constrain the emotion of …show more content…

Which I have seen to be more of a memo book from the perception of Kathy thoughts. Were the author seem to be unreliable on the truth background of the clone of where they come from, which I pose questions about. In over this entire book was not my favorite to read. The plot was fine, but I also expected some rebellious actions from Kathy and her two friends. But I do see that the characters were more flat faced emotions and accept their reality does remind me of our world. The presenters were also adept at telling us the book and why they chose the book in the first place. I enjoyed how there were some people who blankly told the truth that they did not like the book and explained why. At first I thought it would be a reader who liked the book, but having a conflicting side it better to draw up more ideas. This made me realized that you did not have to like the book to understand the value of expressing your our options to other

Show More
Related

  • The Character Study of Chlomo in Night by Elie Wiesel

    1322 Words  | 3 Pages

    "At the very end of the novel- what is represented as being important? Find two quotes to illustrate this".

    Read More

  • Ethan Frome: List of Quotes explained

    1263 Words  | 3 Pages

    This quote is also found on page 140, in chapter 9, still while Mrs. Hale is telling the narrator about the Fromes.

    Read More

  • Dehumanization in Never Let Me Go vs. Gattaca

    828 Words  | 2 Pages

    “I saw a new world coming rapidly. More scientific, efficient, yes. More cures for the old sicknesses. Very good. But a harsh, cruel, world. And I saw a little girl, her eyes tightly closed, holding to her breast the old kind world, one that she knew in her heart coul...

    Read More

  • Patterns of Images and Imagery in Macbeth

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is easier to grasp a meaning of this line further along in the book.

    Read More

  • Brief Story Outline Of The Help By Kathryn Stockett

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    Except for this I loved The Help Kathryn manages to merge fact and fiction perfectly, exploring different emotions ranging from sadness to happiness-at times all in the same paragraph.

    Read More

  • Why did R. L. Stevenson write Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde? Jekyll and Hyde

    825 Words  | 2 Pages

    a part in why the book as written. He uses lines such as “That is not

    Read More

  • The Catcher in the Rye: J.D. Salinger

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    it being for a few fleeting words. It may not be much, but in the final words of the book,

    Read More

  • Differences and Similarities Between Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro and The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood

    1820 Words  | 4 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to analyse and compare the narrative situations proposed by Franz Stanzel in the dystopian novels Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro and The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood. For this aim, I am going to focus on the aspects focalization (reflection), relationship reader-narrator, narrative distance, knowledge, and reliability and demonstrate that they affect the interpretation of the novel by readers in a significant way. In the end, I will draw conclusions on how these techniques serve to alienate the narratives from their science fiction setting to set even more disconcerting issues about human’s existence.

    Read More

  • The Use of Technology to Control Society in Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley

    1235 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Brave New World by Aldous Huxley : Barron's Notes." Brave New World by Aldous Huxley:

    Read More

  • Never Let Me Go

    1340 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the novel, Kathy is considered an unreliable narrator. Seymour Chatman’s concept of unreliable narrator states:

    Read More

  • Relationships in "The Girls in Their Summer Dresses"

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    “The story employs a dramatic point of view that emphasizes the fragility of human relationships. It shows understanding and agreemen...

    Read More

  • Never Let Me Go Sparknotes

    1126 Words  | 3 Pages

    I had originally planned to read a novel titled The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz, but I found myself struggling to become invested in the novel. Due to this I have decided to change my novel to Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Isiguro. This fictional novel is only 222 pages long, though I intend to watch the accompanying movie after completing it. With my understanding of the speed at which I read, I hope to complete this book within a day or two. I plan to write journal entries approximately every 40-50 pages, which should give me sufficient time to reflect on the events of this book. I was very drawn to this novel by the cover, as I felt that the author used some very compelling imagery, and I am excited to begin this read.

    Read More

  • Brave New World

    690 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine living in a society where there is no such thing as mothers or fathers, where you look exactly like the 500 people standing next to you, where casual sex and drug use is not only allowed, but is encouraged. Well, the society in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, is just that. While the prophecies from the Brave New World society are quite different from those of today, they can be argued as both right and wrong, but , and the technology to make them happen may be just around the corner.

    Read More

  • Film Review: Lincoln Six Echo And Jordan Two Delta

    2137 Words  | 5 Pages

    From the theories that have been considered I feel the Aristotle’s Virtue Theory is the best solution for this issue. Ethical egoism wouldn’t work in this situation because the clones prove that they have compassion for each another throughout the film, they are not selfish. Cultural Relativism would cause problems because its based on numerous society views and the culture would definitely have conflicting views of the clones. Aquinas Natural Law already doesn’t work because all the clones view Dr. Merrick as the father but in reality he really doesn’t care about their well-being. Aristotelian virtue ethics comes off as the best solution to this ethical dilemma because it shines a good light on the clones. Even though they aren’t technically human because they didn’t grow up and live regular lives, they have as much morality as any human being. Both Lincoln Six Echo and Jordan Two Delta embody many of the ethical virtues presented by Aristotle. Therefore, if they are capable of these virtues they have to be human on some level. Both are already physically human and throughout the film they demonstrate how they are mentally human as well. If they are physical beings that exhibit intellect, virtue and express human emotion how can view them as

    Read More

  • Never Let Me Go Comparative Essay

    972 Words  | 2 Pages

    Through the course of the novel, our protagonists struggle with what it means to an individual, and what it means to be human. Many people tie their identity back to their culture and family, and without that, it leaves background is their original. Kathy narrates, “Nevertheless, we all of us, to varying degrees, believed that when you saw the person you were copied from, you'd get some insight into who you were deep down”, showing the audience that even down to earth Kathy wants to know who her possible is, so she can find out who she is. Most of Kathy’s narration is not present in the film, so the audience cannot understand what it means to have found Ruth’s possible. In the book, Ruth continues to watch and follow her possible, while clinging on to the increasingly doubtful idea that she is her original, whereas in the film, Ruth’s possible turns around and gives her a look of disdain and disgust, proving that she couldn’t be modelled off her. In both forms, when Ruth realises that she couldn’t have been cloned from an office worker, she over-reacts, “We all know it. We’re modeled from trash.” Without knowing what they are, these clones are left with just who they want to be, however delusional it may be. Because of the novel’s narration, Kathy, Ruth and Tommy’s motives and emotions become clearer, making it a more

    Read More

More about The Lecture On The Book 'Never Let Me Go'

Open Document