Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Structure/design of organizations
Reflection on organizational learning
How to improve organizational learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Structure/design of organizations
Peter Michael Senge was born in 1947, he is an American scientist. Senge received a B.S. in Aerospace engineering from Stanford University. While at Stanford, Senge also studied philosophy. He later earned an M.S. in social systems modeling from MIT in 1972. He also earned a Ph.D. from the MIT Sloan School of Management in 1978 (Wikipedia, 2011).
He was the Director of the Center for Organizational Learning at the MIT Sloan School of Management, and as of 2005 was on the faculty at MIT.
He is the founding chair of the Society for Organizational Learning (SoL). This organization helps with the communication of ideas between large corporations. It replaced the previous organization known as, The center for Organizational Learning at MIT.
He has had a regular meditation practice since 1996 and began meditating with a trip to Tassajara, a Zen Buddhist monastery, before attending Stanford. He recommends meditation or similar forms of contemplative practice (Wikipedia, 2011).
Aside from writing The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization (1990), Peter Senge has also co-authored a number of other books linked to the themes first developed in The Fifth Discipline. These include The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization (1994); The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations (1999) and his latest Schools That Learn in the year 2000 (Smith, 2001).
Critique:
The article begins with Senge stating that he believes that in today’s organizations there are five new component technologies that provide a different dimension that can build to learning organizations. As stated by author Michael Marquardt:
Four main forces h...
... middle of paper ...
... perceived limits. In learning organizations, everyone's opinions are valued and the amount that people can contribute is not always determined by position in the organization.
Works Cited
Kleiner, A. (1995). Why a learning organization. Retrieved March 5, 2011 from Web site
http://world.std.com/~lo/WhyLO.html
Marquardt, M. J. (2002). Building the Learning Organization (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA:
Consulting Psychologists Press.
Senge, P.M. (1990). The Learning Organization. Classics of Organizational Behavior, 468-472.
Reprinted from The Fifth Discipline.
Smith, M. K. (2001). Peter Senge and the learning organization, the encyclopedia of informal
education, Retrieved March 5, 2011 from Web site: www.infed.org/thinkers/senge.htm
Wikipedia (Jan., 2011). Peter M. Senge. Retrieved on March 5, 2011 from Web site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Senge
He has served as director in over 40 public companies and also serves as a
Aside from being CEO of Zappos.com, he is also the co-founder of Link Exchange and the general manager of Venture Frogs, LLC, which is an investment firm that invested in startups like Ask Jeeves, and of course, Zappos.com.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The leader's new work: Building learning organizations. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 7-22. doi: 812347
A company called Creative Learning Center, a fictitious company is selected for the purpose of this integrative learning project. Creative Learning Center is a child care services who also offer extended care that incorporates Christian-based curriculum for children from toddlers age to five years old. The mission of the Creative Learning Center is to provide first-rate child care services in a warm, safe and nurturing environment while reinforcing a child’s intellectual, mental and physical development. The Creative Learning Center takes a Christian-based team approach utilizing experienced and skilled staff whose profession is nurturing and educating the youth. The target market place for Creative Learning Center is the middle to upper class households with two incomes. This target group has two parents working and need day care and after school care services that can accommodate their schedule. This targeted group will have the income for child care services and is willing to spend more to get quality care and academic enrichment for their children. Since Creative Learning Center’s values is based on Christian beliefs, the company will also offer grant program for those home in the lower income bracket. Creative Learning Center believe that low-income children show have the same opportunity as the children from middle to upper class income households in developmental enrichment activities.
Hypothesis: “We hypothesize that the performance of individual members in such situations is likely to be highest when the members hold both individualist and collectivist orientations toward their work” (Hollenbeck, Humphrey, Meyer, Wagner, 2012, pg. 947).
The objective is to create a management education program designed to nurture the values of the human spirit. Trying to integrate this new approach Sheldrake and Hurley encountered many difficulties such as staffing, participants and the organizational
These disiplies are important in establishing a learning organization because in a growing environment, it is important to provide “creative thought process” feel. Concepts, ideas, and solutions should be discussed and available to everyone. Learning organizations set us free. Employees are allowed to express their ideas and challenges which contribute to a more efficient work environment. A learning work environment that incorporates these 5 disciplines can create the desired results where people and the organization will be equally
Smith, M. K. (2001, 2013). Chris Argyris: theories of action, double-loop learning and organizational learning. In The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved from [http://infed.org/mobi/chris-argyris-theories-of-action-double-loop-learning-and-organizational-learning/
According to Hatch and Cunliffe (2006), there are three major perspectives about the study of organization theory (OT): modern, symbolic interpretive, and postmodern. Each of these perspectives comes with its own assumptions and methodologies. Hatch and Cunliffe provided an introduction text about the concepts and characteristics of the three OT perspectives. Tsoukas and Knudsen also compiled a comprehensive handbook summarizing all facets of the meta-theoretical perspectives. In this post the writer will discuss the basic concepts of three perspectives, present Hatch and Cunliffe’s reasons why a multiple perspectives approach to organization theory is important, and compare Tsoukas and Knudsen’s introduction to the Hatch and Cunliffe introduction in their books.
Wirth, R. A. (2010). Why a Learning Organization? Retrieved from enTarga: Be the Change: http://www.entarga.com/km/whylrngorg.htm
Experiential learning theory, conversational learning, and seminar practices combine to shape an educational experience that is grounded in principles of appreciative inquiry.
Introduction: One definition of organizational learning is the thoughtful use of individual, group, and collaborative learning to reinvent new thinking and practices that continuously renew and transform the organization in ways that support shared goals, Collinson & Cook, (2007). Success for organizations demands nothing less than “the power to think, learn, and innovate”.
As the workers transition from focusing on their part of their job and begin to see how their part connects to the overall system, not only have the leaders taught the workers systems thinking, the leaders also have transformed their company into a learning organization (Chan, 2015; Lee & Green, 2015). This essay is to highlight how systems thinking, learning organization, and personal mastery function together within an organization. The first part of the paper provides an in-depth comparison of systems thinking and learning organization. The last part of the paper explores the importance of personal mastery to a team and an organization.
Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J. & Kleiner, A. (2012). Schools that Learn (pp. 32-69). Boston: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.