The Iowa model is the research translation model that was developed by Marita G. Titler, PhD, RN. The Iowa model depicts the importance of a holistic approach to the entire health care system spanning from the provider to the patient, and the supporting infrastructure; all of which utilize the latest research to guide and shape what is known as “best practice.” The Iowa model is designed in such a way that it aids the NP through engagement in problem identification and solution development as it relates to incorporating evidence findings into practice.
Identifying either a problem-focused trigger or a knowledge-focused trigger that will introduce the need for change is the first step in the Iowa Model of EBP (Moody and Moody, 2011). A problem-focused
Rouda, R. H., & Kusy, M. E., Jr. (1996, May 4). MANAGING CHANGE WITH LARGE-SCALE, REAL-TIME INTERVENTIONS. Tappi Journal. Retrieved from http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~rouda/T5_LSRTOD.html
The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model provides nurses with a system to formulate a practice question, appraise both research and non-research evidence, and to develop recommendations for practice (Dearholt & Dang, 2012). This model guides nurses through the evidence-based research process with ease and minimal difficulty using a problem solving approach.
The Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU) offers a “comprehensive, interdisciplinary framework of elements that affect the process of health-care knowledge transfer, and is derived from theories of change, from the literature, and from a process of reflection” (Graham & Logan, 2004, p. 93). It promotes research use, and could be used by policymakers and researchers (Logan & Graham, 1998). The OMRU is an example of a planned change theory, which helps “administrators control factors that will influence the likelihood of changes occurring at the organizational level and how these changes occur” (Graham & Logan, 2004, p. 2).
When performing evidence based practice research, the Iowa Model uses a team or individual approach to assist nurses in the journey to quality care. The Iowa Model begins by offering a process of selecting a proper clinical topic, which is often a recurring problematic issue (Polit & Beck, 2012). This topic is formulated as a question to improve a technique or procedure. Once the researcher determines that an ample amount of reported investigation exists on the desired question, information may be gathered and presented for approval (Polit & Beck, 2012). The research may lead to a gradual change in nursing practice.
Some critics have stated that there is not yet any quantifiable improvement in patient outcomes in comparison to the traditional model. Additionally some critics have voiced that some “practices may receive recognition without making fundamental change”.4 Another prominent flaw is the lack of funding to convert practices into PCMH. The cost to cut down patient flow, reconfiguring medical record systems, and get approval from insurers is more than many sites can handle financially. For the PCMH model to be accessible to some practices with the hopes of implementing such a program, capital funding would need to be made available from federal, state, and local entities. This limits many providers because many practices are not able to provide the necessary capital to start such a program. In addition to medical practices not having the necessary capital, providers must then work with a decreased patient load with the anticipation of possible reimbursement in the future.3 These points make it clear that the transition to a PCMH model would require hard work and commitment from the involved providers to make it
Goeschel (2011) described one collaborative cohort study that almost eliminated CLABSIs in over 100 ICUS across the United States, which implemented lessons from a Johns Hopkins collaborative project, called Matching Michigan. The results of this study were so astounding nursing leaders across the globe pushed to match their efforts, but found themselves at a cross-roads when implementing these changes. Some found it difficult to implement change policies due to technical and adaptive challenges. Goeschel stated nurse leaders needed to step forward, in all patient care settings, to bridge the gap between evidenced-based practice and current nursing care. She believed nurses should be at the forefront of change, pushing evidence-based practice standards forward to provide quality and safe patient care practices.
Evidence-based practice integrates best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for the delivery of optimal health care (qsen.org). Like most medical professions, nursing is a constantly changing field. With new studies being done and as we learn more about different diseases it is crucial for the nurse to continue to learn even after becoming an RN. Using evidence-based practice methods are a great way for nurses and other medical professionals learn new information and to stay up to date on new ways to practice that can be used to better assess
By 1990 this instruction had developed into the Advanced Training Program (ATP), which addresses quality change hypothesis, estimation and devices, medicinal services arrangement and frameworks and leadership (McLaughlin, Johnson and Sollecito, 2012). Since its origin the ATP has picked up acknowledgment from area pioneers, for example, Donald M. Berwick, president and CEO of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), who has said, "The ATP is the finest preparing program we know of for bringing forefront clinicians, medicinal services pioneers, and interior change specialists to a more profound comprehension of what it intends to make quality the center technique for an association" ("Home | About Us | Intermountain Healthcare", 2016).The ATP does not support one particular methodology or strategy for development (e.g., Plan-Do-Study-Act, Model for Improvement, Lean, Six Sigma); rather, it instructs a center arrangement of change standards and presents devices from an assortment of methodologies. A key principle of the ATP is that it is action-based and participants are required to apply their learning to an improvement project. Participants are paired with Institute staff members who provide mentorship and coaching support as they work on their projects between sessions. Participants in turn share their
The model chosen for this project is the Model for Evidence-Based Practice Change. The model consists of important guidelines tools in Evidence-based practice (EBP) that can reduce healthcare variation and improve patient outcomes (Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher‐Ford, L., Long, L. E., & Fineout‐Overholt, E., 2014). Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a problem-solving method to the delivery of health care as it combines the best evidence from well-design studies and evidence-based theories with expertise of the clinician and a patient’s preferences, values to make the best clinical decisions (Melnyk, B. M., et al. 2014). The model consists of seven steps of
Emory University Hospital is a teaching facility that embodies an “organizational culture that encourages critical thinking and acknowledges the inevitability of change” (Rubenfeld & Scheffer, 2015). By embracing a culture of change, Emory strives to fulfill its mission of “serving humanity by improving health.” This mission is being fostered, on my unit in particular, by the implementation of the evidence-based practice of an Accountable Care Unit (ACU). This transformational care model empowers nurses as leaders by giving them a voice and platform to advocate on their patient’s behalf. On my unit, these nurse leaders implement an ACU by offering and collecting information through their interaction with an interdisciplinary team, the patient,
In healthcare today, it has become more apparent that evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential to incorporate into every facility, but nurse leaders have noted difficulties during the implementation process. Therefore, Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt recommend that practice changes should be guided by conceptual models and frameworks (2015). In order to effectively integrate EBP into facilities, eight models were created. Within this discussion, the Evidence-Based Advancing Research and Clinic Practice through Close Collaboration (ARCC) Model will be investigated (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015).
Research in nursing is an important concept in which information is gained to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of nursing practice (Bjørk et al., 2013). One way in which research can be deciphered and utilized is through the application of research translation models. These models are frameworks for the development and application of evidence-based practice in various health-care settings (Polit & Beck, 2012). Numerous models are in existence and they all offer a variety of methods in which to translate topics of interest and issues into research-based evidence for the use in clinical practice (Polit & Beck, 2012). One such model is the Iowa model of evidence-based practice to promote quality
I work in a hospital system that has an extensive system in place to support research, implementation, and evaluation of best practices, thanks in part to Dr. Bernadette Melnyk, who is an expert in the field. Leaders hired Dr. Melnyk in 2011 to evaluate and improve an EBP system that was initiated in 2009. Evidence-base practice now ties together the College of Nursing Research, the Office of Research Practices, the Prior Health Sciences Library, the
In the actual world more than 85% of opioids are dispensed to patients with chronic pain, most of them fall asleep under the influence of those, and some of them do not wake up due to overdose. The opioid tolerant patients is increasing and along with this the dependence mechanism. Using the IOWA Model of EBP to address this problem will help us to identify a problem-focused trigger that will initiate the need for change. Once the problem is identified and priority determined, create a multidisciplinary team and look for the supportive literature will be the next step. If the evidence is sufficient to make change in practice, them implement a change in practice and monitor the outcomes. Finally the dissemination of results is the key in the
The Joint Commission identified care transitions as one of the most vulnerable areas in patients treatment, outcomes, and quality. Standardized care transition designs support communication, increases patient and healthcare provider’s level of accountability, facilitates health by decreasing