The Infringement of Animal Rights

1155 Words3 Pages

Throughout history animal testing has had a very important role in finding new discoveries and helping save human lives. However, the companies providing these test tend to ignore the fact that animals are having to suffer unimaginable pain during these experiments. Some scientist believe that animals are non-human, so the pain they suffer does not matter (DeCoux, Elizabeth). Companies put animals through unnecessary torture for human benefit and selfish intentions. Animals have rights and humans are ignoring these rights as if they do not exist. Animal experimentation for human benefit is unethical and should be against the law. Innocent animals are dying, because humans are injecting them with diseases such as cancer. Most scientist would say that this is just a more accurate way to gain test results on how to cure more dangerous diseases. In reality, harming animals for insignificant reasons such as cosmetics and medical benefits, is not humane. Although some people might argue the difference between raising animals for research and raising animals for food. The difference is, raising animals for food is natural. Without food we cannot live. Plus animals raised on farms are not mistreated, they are feed, taken care of, and are in their natural habitat. Carol Sheridan, who was part of the intracardiac injection studies recorded some of the affects that these injections had on animals, she stated that “Animals injected with TMD-231, LMD-231, or MDA-MB-468 cells were killed when they developed one or more of the following signs: hind limb paralysis from suspected spine metastasis, excessive weight loss, visible tumors, or labored breathing from lung metastasis” (Sheridan, C.)”. It seems as if some scientist view an an... ... middle of paper ... ...esting." Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 200 (1992). DeCoux, Elizabeth. "In the Valley of the Dry Bones: Reuniting the Word'Standing'with its Meaning in Animal Cases." William & Mary Environmental & Policy Review 29 (2005): 681. Otto, Stephan K. "State Animal Protection Laws-The Next Generation." Animal L. 11 (2005): 131. Sheridan, Carol, et al. "CD44+/CD24-breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis." Breast Cancer Res 8.5 (2006): R59. Wisdom, Jennifer P., Goal Auzeen Saedi, and Carla A. Green. "Another breed of “service” animals: STARS study findings about pet ownership and recovery from serious mental illness." American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 79.3 (2009): 430-436.

Show More
Related

  • Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments, all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings. While animal testing has led to many life-saving cures, animal testing is cruel and inhumane because it involves inflicting pain and harm on the test subject to study its effects and remedies. Testing involves physically restraining, force-feeding, and depriving animals of food and water.

    Read More

  • Why Is Animal Testing An Issue?

    1135 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to an article by PETA, “experiments on animals are cruel, expensive and generally inapplicable to humans” (PETA 1). This shows how not only many laboratories and companies that use animals in their experiments are wasting money and time, but also wasting countless lives of animals. As a human, one does not have to suffer through unconsenting pain because no one would ever consent to be treated the way lab rats would be treated. A study done by the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that” medical treatments developed in animals rarely translated to humans” (Hackam, Redelmeier 1). This being said, it is not easy to comprehend why animal testing continues. However, as a community people think that “the benefits to humans does not justify the harm to animals” (Hajar 1). This goes to show how people who are pro-animal testing, marginalize the damage animal testing is doing to animals. While some may say that there needs to be alternative methods to animal testing, others may say that without animal testing it would be harder to test out new products for humans. Yet, with the information given by doctors Hackam and Redelmeier, it is clear to see that the use of animals is no longer

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: Unnecessary Pain for Dubious Gain

    1607 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animals and humans have different genes meaning that the products being used are going to have different effects on different species (Burrell). After a drug has been tested on a animal, the drug still has to go through a human trial. Which means that the drug they just spent all that time testing on the animal, still needs to be tested on a human to actually make it purchasable. Sadly, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work” (“11 Facts”). Meaning that most of the drugs used on animals, actually are not benefiting humans. A few of the drugs passed from animals, were detrimental to humans. For example, a arthritis drug tested on mice, seemed to protect their hearts, but when used on humans, it was the cause of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths (“12 Pros and Cons”). Even when some drugs are passed, they show some side effects that were not shown during the test trial. Animals have been used to help the “war on cancer”, but the tests haven’t transferred from humans to animals. The former head of the National Cancer Institute, Richard Klausner, has stated, “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in humans” (“Animal Testing”). Meaning that they have learned the ways of curing mice with

    Read More

  • animal rights

    1959 Words  | 4 Pages

    animals. If they keep the animals, then the animal will be treated as a pet or

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    Essentially we are torturing the animals for a negative outcome, both for the human and the animal. The Food and Drug Administration reports that “92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (“Top Five Reasons”). If the products and drugs that we are testing on the animals are not working then there is no use in harming a harmless animal. Some may disagree and say that animal testing has enabled us to develop many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals. But in reality, there are more cons than pros in animal testing.

    Read More

  • The Case for Animal Rights

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    "The Case For Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan, promotes the equal treatment of humans and non-humans. I agree with Regan's view, as he suggests that humans and animals alike, share the experience of life, and thus share equal, inherent value.

    Read More

  • Animal Bill Of Rights

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    I believe with the petition of the Animal Bill of Rights to an extent. I believe in equality and would like to have other people see the same way as I. For someone to just comprehend and see where I am coming from with all the animal rights and precautions. For someone to see the point of view of animals and how they can’t even speak for themselves without being labeled as rabid creatures. My perspective as a concerned citizen, I believe animals should have a Bill of Rights because research has proven the similarities between humans and animals, and because I believe in equality.

    Read More

  • Undergoing Argument For Animal Rights

    631 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animals rights have been an ongoing argument for many years and is still not resolved today. Animals, specifically rats, are still being used in research centers. Undergoing laws may have protection over lab rats in the future, but there are no guarantees. Research is a crucial tool in the development of today’s society; however, the use of animal experimentation and testing is not necessary due to the lack of ethical integrity.

    Read More

  • Debating Animal Rights: A Middle Ground Perspective

    624 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even if animals are like us, human rights for them sound a bit too unrealistic. I guess we should just let all animals roam free and make the whole universe go vegan (nothing against vegans though). In 3 articles, either written by Yong, Braithwaite, or Rifkin, there are solid topics that slowly reel their way into the ongoing and serious debate: Should animals have the same rights as humans? Where I stand is a difficult position. Animals should definitely have rights, but only to a certain extent. Animals feel pain, which is why they should not be abused. Animals are like humans, which is why they should be treated with respect. There is such a thing called “The Circle of Life,” which is why animals are where they stay.

    Read More

  • Ethical Arguement For Animal Rights

    1063 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thesis Statement Many people love dogs. They keep us company, help us with our careers and help the disabled with their daily. Although it is debatable of what kind of rights animals have. Ethics Experts have debated about animal rights for years. Some experts say that animals have limited moral rights while others say that they do not have any rights at all.

    Read More

  • Mistreatment Of Animal Rights

    302 Words  | 1 Pages

    Mahatma Gandhi, arguably one of the most influential activists, once said “the greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated (18).” And if this is true than we are in some trouble. As stated before the AWA was created in order to prevent horrific cases of mistreatments of animals, including animals in laboratories. A story posted to the Des Moines Register, part of the USA Today network, describes a fur farm in Des Moines, Iowa where officials found the farm to be forcing its animals to live in sweltering heat and maggot-infested filth. Officials also found decomposing animal carcasses in the same cages as the live animals. With all of this evidence animal rights activists are calling for the

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

    465 Words  | 1 Pages

    Every Year, 26 million animals are experimented on in the United States (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?” 1). These rodents, reptiles, birds, and primates are forced to endure terrible pain, hunger, suffering, and even death; yet, almost every medical breakthrough in the last century is thanks to the sacrifice of each of these creatures (“Forty Reasons Why We Need Animals in Research” 1). Although animal testing is a controversial subject that questions the morality of subjecting animals to painful experiments, it is a very necessary operation that takes place in today’s society, and is to thank for the countless human lives that have been spared.

    Read More

  • Animal Rights Act Of Hunting: Cruelty To Animals

    1687 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hunting could be perceived to others as cruelty to animals. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the act of hunting as an activity of killing wild animals or game for the use of food. Hunting, trapping, and the tracking of wild animals has been around since humans and animals coincided together. People may not be able to afford to buy meat from a store so hunting is an alternative to get meat for their families. Hunting in general has gotten a bad rap from animal rights activist because they think hunting wild game is inhumane. Hunting provides an alternative way for a person to provide food for his or her family. Animal rights activist may believe harvesting wild animals is morally incorrect, and that everyone should buy their meat from a store. Hunting gives wild game a better chance at getting away unlike the animals that go to a slaughter houses like cows, pigs, sheep, and other livestock. Livestock animals that go to a slaughter house have no fair chance of getting away from the killer, yet people think it’s more humane than hunting. People also see hunting as a way to help the environment, or help to bring back endangered animals. Cruelty to animals can raise eyebrows in many different ways, such as hunting, by wounding or having to shoot an animal multiple times. Hunters try their hardest to humanely harvest an animal, but not everyone

    Read More

  • The Animal Rights Movement

    1482 Words  | 3 Pages

    The animal rights movement has generated major controversy over the years and has proven to be an ongoing battle for animal activists. In a search for non-academic texts which address the issue of animal rights, I came across the news article If Animals Have Rights, Should Robots? and a blog post Tilikum has Died, But There’s Still Much We Can Do to Save Other Orcas. These two texts discuss the same topic, but are considered two completely different genres. Most people are aware of, and are able to distinguish the differences between a news article and a blog because these assigned genres are something everyone has come across at least once in their life.

    Read More

  • ANIMAL RIGHTS

    794 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animals have their own rights as do to humans and we should respect that and give them the same respect we give each other. Animals deserve to be given those same basic rights as humans. All humans are considered equal and ethical principles and legal statutes should protect the rights of animals to live according to their own nature and remain free from exploitation. This paper is going to argue that animals deserve to have the same rights as humans and therefore, we don’t have the right to kill or harm them in any way. The premises are the following: animals are living things thus they are valuable sentient beings, animals have feeling just like humans, and animals feel pain therefore animal suffering is wrong. 2 sources I will be using for my research are “The Fight for Animal Rights” by Jamie Aronson, an article that presents an argument in favour of animal rights. It also discusses the counter argument – opponents of animal rights argue that animals have less value than humans, and as a result, are undeserving of rights. Also I will be using “Animal Liberation” by Peter Singer. This book shows many aspects; that all animals are equal is the first argument or why the ethical principle on which human equality rests requires us to extend equal consideration to animals too.

    Read More

More about The Infringement of Animal Rights

Open Document