Animal Rights Act Of Hunting: Cruelty To Animals

Hunting could be perceived to others as cruelty to animals. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the act of hunting as an activity of killing wild animals or game for the use of food. Hunting, trapping, and the tracking of wild animals has been around since humans and animals coincided together. People may not be able to afford to buy meat from a store so hunting is an alternative to get meat for their families. Hunting in general has gotten a bad rap from animal rights activist because they think hunting wild game is inhumane. Hunting provides an alternative way for a person to provide food for his or her family. Animal rights activist may believe harvesting wild animals is morally incorrect, and that everyone should buy their meat from a store. Hunting gives wild game a better chance at getting away unlike the animals that go to a slaughter houses like cows, pigs, sheep, and other livestock. Livestock animals that go to a slaughter house have no fair chance of getting away from the killer, yet people think it’s more humane than hunting. People also see hunting as a way to help the environment, or help to bring back endangered animals. Cruelty to animals can raise eyebrows in many different ways, such as hunting, by wounding or having to shoot an animal multiple times. Hunters try their hardest to humanely harvest an animal, but not everyone

Hunting and trapping of wild animals has taken place since humans and animals walked the earth together (“Big Game Hunting”). The first humans learned that in oder to survive they need to eat and to eat they need food. Their food came from animals, they did not just go find a rotting dead animal in the middle of nowhere, they tracked their prey down and killed it. In many cultures people, view hunting as a noble right of passage. Nowadays, people view hunting not so much as a noble right of passage, but many people see hunting as a way to enjoy the