Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Topic on animal rights
Topic on animal rights
An essay on Animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Topic on animal rights
Thesis Statement
Many people love dogs. They keep us company, help us with our careers and help the disabled with their daily. Although it is debatable of what kind of rights animals have. Ethics Experts have debated about animal rights for years. Some experts say that animals have limited moral rights while others say that they do not have any rights at all. I will argue ethically that dogs are not only moral patients, but breeding them as Purebreds for recreational use, like dog shows is always morally wrong.
Why Dogs are moral patients
When looking at animal rights there are two ways to look at it in an ethical view. Anthropocentrism a view where humans have rights and no other species do not and the other ethical views that state that
…show more content…
They have the right to life, due to that, they are valued by the majority of humans, but to environment and nature as well. Dogs are not capable of higher thinking. They do not have non-instinctual wants and desires, so they do not have the right to freedom of choice. They do though have the right not to be treated in a cruel way. Due to that Dogs, just like humans can feel pain and receive pleasure. It would be morally wrong to put them in situations where they suffer. In summary, Dogs have a right to life and the right not to be treated cruelly which would cause them …show more content…
From the evidence, it has been established that inbreeding a direct result of breeding purebreds. Causes inherited diseases which cause animals pain and early death. As well as some traits that are wanted by dog show judges and owners that cause animals pain and even the threat of death. Therefore, since we as humans are obligated morally to not create animals that will have short and painful lives. Due to that, it is the dogs right to live a long and happy life. It is morally impermissible to continue to breed purebred dogs that will have short painful life spans. Instead, we as a human species are morally obligated to create dogs that will have long happy lives. Therefore, not inbreeding animals for recreational
Animal rights can defined as the idea that some, or all non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that their most basic interests should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings. Animal rights can help protect the animals who experience research and testing that could be fatal towards them. The idea of animal rights protects too the use of dogs for fighting and baiting. Finally, animal rights affects the farms across america, limiting what animals can be slaughtered. The bottom line is, there is too much being done to these animals that most do not know about.
In the article Do Animals Have Rights? By Barton Hinkle he writes of a dog that was hit by a car and badly injured. The driver then proceed to cut off the dogs already injured leg and leave it out to die. Luckily the authorities were able to get to the dog in time. But this brings up the issue of what right do animals really have.The argument made against this is that rights belong to moral agents and animals lack that moral agency. This argument becomes complicated because there are animals, primates especially, that do have the ability to think. Society has a way of separating issues and problems into exceptions.
4. What is Animal Rights? Animal Rights is the thought of letting animals get the basic rights. They don’t want animals to be caused pain, or be exploited/killed by humans. It does not mean equality between humans and animals.
Imagine having to live in your own filth and waste. Now imagine living in your own plus many others as well. How about living in wire cages exposed to the elements like rain and heat from the sun. It certainly does not seem like a life anyone would want to live, but sadly, many dogs and puppies have no choice. These are just a few of the horrendous conditions that they experience when they are born or raised in puppy mills. Would you allow animal torture, because supporting and/or allowing puppy mills is basically the same thing.
In addition, dogs are kept in very crowded, unsanitary conditions. Dogs are kept in cages floored with wire, that can most likely injure their legs and paws. Sometimes, their cages are even stacked up in columns! Even though the idea of puppy mills may give a good source of income to the breeder of it, it hurts living animals, which is not okay. Also, cages can be kept in outside which can expose dogs to many types of health issues, like epilepsy, heart disease, and
The downfall of artificial selection is that it decreases variation in a species. Pure bred dogs are highly susceptible to many different disorders and diseases because of the lack of variation in their genotype. With these two processes, today we have friendly canine companions.
"The Case For Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan, promotes the equal treatment of humans and non-humans. I agree with Regan's view, as he suggests that humans and animals alike, share the experience of life, and thus share equal, inherent value.
They say that a dog is a man’s best fried, but they don’t tell you about the overall cost, responsibility, or convenience about adopting one. Dogs are supposed to bring so much joy to a household, but sometimes they can only fill a void for a short amount of time. When a dog owner buys a dog, do they actually research the things that they are about to get in to? When I bought my dog, Skye, I never really looked into is issues; I just looked at the benefits. I love Skye to death, and I guess I could say that she also loves me to death. Even though someone rescuing a dog may think they are doing something great; they are causing an issue on how they will forever live their life.
There are those who will still fight for animal rights, but one might wonder if this issue isn't just an excuse for some twisted person to do bodily harm to another. "Brian Cass...was left with a three-inch head wound after the attack" (Cass). Here is a quote from the PETA celebrity spokesman, Bill Maher "To those people who say; My father is alive because of animal experimentation,' I say 'Yeah, well good for you. This dog died so your father could live. "Sorry , but I am just not behind that kind of trade off." What kind of attitude is that? Perhaps the people who feel this way should have no more rights than an animal. That is cold, that a person could say that. Human life is the most valuable to God or he wouldn't have given us the means to protect and preserve our rights.
... concept. An animal cannot follow our rules of morality, “Perhaps most crucially, what other species can be held morally accontable” (Scully 44). As a race humans must be humane to those that cannot grasp the concept. Animals do not posess human rights but they posess the right to welfare and proper treatment by their handlers.
Animals deserve fair and ethical treatment, however not necessarily equally. Non-human animals and humans are not one in the same, there is no way we will ever be defined and put in the same category. Humans have reference levels, the ability to reason and think logically. We have evolved to the point where we can study, contain, and determine the outcome of basically any animal on Earth, now it’s up to us to ensure they are treated fairly.
The benefits of canine ownership are many and varied. Owning a dog can be beneficial to an individual’s health, emotional well-being and also provide social benefits and there are many articles, reports, and studies to support this, including scientific and medical research. Owning a dog can have many mental and physical health benefits. There has been quite a bit of research in recent years about the physical health benefits including the ability of dogs to detect certain types of illnesses using their sense of smell. Dogs have an acute sense of smell that is far better than that of humans.
Animal rights is the concept of giving non-human animals possessions over their own lives and granting equal consideration as those of humans. The topic of animal’s rights has been a discussion of debate for a long time. How many rights should an animal be able to have? Should it be equivalent to the rights of a human being? Many would argue that animals deserve to have rights because they have the ability to feel pain and suffering, while others may argue that animals do not deserve rights because they simply do not possess the same moral judgments as human beings.
Animals have their own rights as do to humans and we should respect that and give them the same respect we give each other. Animals deserve to be given those same basic rights as humans. All humans are considered equal and ethical principles and legal statutes should protect the rights of animals to live according to their own nature and remain free from exploitation. This paper is going to argue that animals deserve to have the same rights as humans and therefore, we don’t have the right to kill or harm them in any way. The premises are the following: animals are living things thus they are valuable sentient beings, animals have feeling just like humans, and animals feel pain therefore animal suffering is wrong. 2 sources I will be using for my research are “The Fight for Animal Rights” by Jamie Aronson, an article that presents an argument in favour of animal rights. It also discusses the counter argument – opponents of animal rights argue that animals have less value than humans, and as a result, are undeserving of rights. Also I will be using “Animal Liberation” by Peter Singer. This book shows many aspects; that all animals are equal is the first argument or why the ethical principle on which human equality rests requires us to extend equal consideration to animals too.
One of the greatest arguments against non human animals having rights is that they cannot speak for themselves, they cannot think and they are less human and so they can be created as such. There are flaws on this argument. Humans have an obligation to the society in a certain manor and this determines how they behave. From a young age, people are taught how to behave and act in a certain way and animal neglect and cruelty goes against the basic principles we are taught as children. Secondly, In addition, opponents argue that rights only belong to moral agents and that animals like moral urgency. This is absurd because some animals for example primates actually think very well and this should not be used against animals being given rights. Animals may not be having self awareness and are not able to communicate well but at least they inherently have rights just because they do exist as living things and they are able to feel pain and other emotions. Their ability to suffer and feel pain gives them a right not to be subj...