Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Important of staffing to an organization
Strengths and weaknesses of selection process
Important of staffing to an organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Important of staffing to an organization
One of the most important decisions that an organization can make is the hiring of prospective employees. It is illogical for an organization to employ an individual that cannot perform their assigned duty. Why would any organization spend large sum of money in training an individual that will not be beneficial to their organization. Therefore, it is reasonable for organizations to filter out the undesirable applicants. According to Dessler (2011) once an organization have a group of applicants, their next stage is to decide on the best person for the job. Normally this means reducing the applicant pool via screening methods such as tests, background checks, and interviews.
As stated by Dessler (2011) selection of the right employees is imperative for numerous reasons. These reasons can include the knowledge that organizations performance is contingent on its subordinate’s ability. Moreover, it should be common knowledge that employees with the reliable skills and characteristics will perform better for the company. On the other hand, employees who lack those skills or who are slacker will not perform efficiently, and the organization’s performance will suffer (Dessler, 2011).
Another reason selection is important because organizations want to avoid employees who are liability for them. According to Dessler (2011) there are estimates that reveal there are around 25% of employees with knowledge of coworkers who use illegal drug, and others report that 7% have been targets of coworkers’ physical threats (Dessler, 2011). Due to high rate of turnover in some organizations, companies are regularly examining methods to improve their human resource selection procedure. Several methods have been utilized for the selection of emp...
... middle of paper ...
...ical selection practices. Personnel Review, 30(5), 657-676. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214812080?accountid=32521
Caruth, D. L., & Caruth, G. D. (2009). The Re-emergence of Personality testing as an employee selection procedure. Super Vision, pp. 9-13.
Dessler, G. (2011). A framework for human resource management (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN: 9780132556378
Johnson, D.L., & Kleiner, B. H. (2000). A comparative view of employment testing. Management Research News, 23(7), 99-102. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/223538226?accountid=32521
Kantrowitz, T. M., Dawson, C. R., & Fetzer, M. S. (2011). Computer adaptive testing (CAT): A faster, smarter, and more secure approach to pre-employment testing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 227-232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9228-3
Human resource practitioners and I/ O psychologists have at their disposal a host of personnel assessment techniques. For example, traditional predictive measures used to screen job applicants have included the use of application blanks, job interviews and psychometric measures of personality and cognitive ability. For the most part, these instruments attempt to predict an applicant's potential for success by estimating her current level of functioning on some psychological construct that is believed to be related to job performance. Recently, however, personnel professionals have added a unique assessment technique to their arsenal.
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2015) report that the costs related to using personality tests are that the questions may not completely relate to the job. In addition, the questions may come off as very invasive to some test takers (Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2015). Furthermore, the costs of utilizing personality tests
In an attempt to hire the best possible candidate and to properly analyze current workers, many companies have used some form of personality testing to attempt to better know their employees. Personality testing has shown the employers are desperately trying to fit the perfect person into the perfect position. Some of the "master chefs" of the selection business are paying special attention to the new chemistry between personality tests, competency requirements, and behavioural interviewing. But is the process of personality testing truly accurate? This paper will go into detail about how personality testing came to pass and how it evolved into the present environment. Furthermore, it will elaborate two major arguments as to why personality testing is not an adequate method of the hiring process and, mainly, how these arguments are addressed and dealt with by the creators of the tests.
In conclusion, the ability to hire “fit” candidates is essential to effective leaders. Following these techniques will allow leaders to avoid costly hiring mistakes. Also, these techniques will develop successful teams and organizations. The article states, “We hear from line and HR executives in many companies that leaders should devote as much effort learning from failures in management selection as they spend, for example, on reviewing the reasons for losing customers and on failed bids for new projects.” This will hopefully help leaders to avoid losing customers and failed bids for new projects.
Employers have the right to know many things about their employees. Job skills and training can even be investigated by the employer. The employee is to perform services and these services must be done in a certain manner. Someone who is incoherent because of drug abuse cannot be a pilot, for example. This is why employers can test to see if characteristics or tendencies would affect performance.
Does personality testing define the final word on how we live our lives or interact in work environments, in academic settings, and within relationships? Recognized as a starting point, it confirms our strengths and weaknesses, assists in self-reflection, supports decision-making, enhances interaction with others, and designates where we reside along the personality spectrum. The following will explore my own personality preference, an explanation of my polar opposite persona, and the investigation into life situations and strategies.
Thompson, D.E., & Thompson, T.A. (1982). Court standards for job analysis in test validation. Personnel Psychology, 35, 865-874.
of decisions can and cannot be made on the basis of test data, and how should those decisions be made? What credentials, if any, are necessary to administer and interpret psychological tests? What rights do examinees undergoing psychological evaluation have? Public scrutiny of psychological testing reached its zenith in 1965 with a series of probing and unprecedented congressional hearings (see Amrine, 1965). Against a backdrop of mounting public concern about—as well as legal challenges to—psychological testing, many psychologists in the 1960s began to look anew at the testing enterprise. Beyond being a mere instrument of measurement, a psychological test was conceptualized by many as a tool of a highly trained examiner. The value of a particular
Psychometric tests are designed to measure the behaviour and capabilities of possible employees. (Johnstone, 1999). Employers use these tests to measure two categories of qualities – abilities and preferences (Mills et al., 2011). This provides an effective and efficient way to find the best person for the job as the tests give a true reflection of how an employee can accomplish assigned tasks which is completed online as part of the application process. Candidates are chosen for the next stage of the process through the comparison of test scores, resulting in grouping candidates into high and low percentile scoring categories. The higher scoring applicants are put through to the next stage of the process. This would normally be the interviewing stage. The lower scoring applicants would be declined. This is a form of filtering down the number of applicants, although the interviewing stage provides the means of selection, despite its subjectivity the tests provide a uniform set of standards to measure one candidate objectivity against another (Johnstone,1999). Psychometric
Hiring and keeping competent employees is critical to business success. However, you must develop a strategy to discover them. With the right employees you can accomplish many organizational goals. Fortunately, when a conflict arises in an organization, a good business team will know how to handle the situation. Whether a person is a manager, subordinate, or president, it is very important that you avoid a bad hire.
...s, many future problems can be reduced and hence help in improving the organization profits. Therefore, we can see that filtering the employees’ recruiting process is essential. Because good employees can bring up a good organization, at the same time good organization generate good profit and able to produce good GDP to our country as well and hence we can hedge against budget deficit that which will eventually lead to debt crisis.
Personality tests and skills assessments provide valuable information for certain well-defined positions, such as seller, buyer and worker in routine production. The interviews to study the person, carried out by experts are also useful when simpler methods do not clearly show certain characteristics such as emotional stability. Psychological tests on knowledge have limited success. The diversity of requirements for them, coupled with the complexity of motivations and behavior of individuals, make the structuring of proof extremely difficult. Psychological tests and interviews implemented for personality assessment act as a supplement to other administrative criteria. When it comes to executive positions, the main value of the evidence lies in corroboration or uncertainty about personal qualifications. The qualifications of persons based on experience are an important administrative requirement (Archer & Smith,
The importance of a sophisticated selection process may be described in terms of theoretical models such as the “Devanna model,” which emphasizes the interrelatedness of the principal human resource (HR) functions on each other [Bratton & Gold, 2012: 18]. The efforts put into the selection process, impact the performance of the worker, and subsequently the appraisal, rewards management and human resource development functions. In terms of performance, selecting applicants without the necessary qualifications and skills consequently leads to comparable lower productiveness. In terms of performance appraisal, selecting employees with incompatible organizational attitudes later requires a stronger supervision and a more frequent appraisal o...
Employers aim to use Personality Test as psychological screening tool in their person-job fit selection process, using the pass-fail approach to the tests results resulting in keeping candidates who pass the personality profile criteria.
Recruitment and selection is pivotal in this regard in certain important respects. At the most basic level our focus in this book is on people management within the employment relationship. Those charged with recruiting people to posts in work organizations take a crucial ‘gatekeeper’ role; only those people selected for employment can be led, managed and developed. So in the most fundamental sense the decision to employ (or not) underpins the whole area of managing people. Issues associated with exclusion from the workplace also highlight the need for professionalism, fairness and ethical behavior on the part of those engaged in this activity. Recruitment and selection also has an important role to play in ensuring worker performance and positive organizational outcomes. It is often claimed that selection of workers occurs not just to replace departing employees or add to a workforce but rather aims to put in place workers who can perform at a high level and demonstrate commitment (Ballantyne, 2009). We will elaborate on the sometimes complex linkages between recruitment and selection and performance later in this