Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Greek and roman literatureee
Greek and roman literatureee
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Greek and roman literatureee
The Importance of the Invention of the Footnote
Introduction
The study of history has and will always be an everlasting continuum.
Throughout time, from Alexander the Great to Adolf Hitler, the study
of history and why we undertake it has changed. Be it through new
found articles, new technology, or new assumptions, the course of
history has and will continue to change. However is there something
that can add legitimacy to history? Something that can in a thousand
years convince our predecessors that what we have done today is
actually true. In short, no, as there will always be sceptics and
critics of old articles who point towards its spuriousness and
“realness”[1].
Leopold Van Ranke and Edward Gibbon will always be remembered as the
heroes of apparatus criticus, the men who founded the modern age of
historical writing. However through extensive research historians are
led back to less famous names in historiography, such as the Egyptian
priest Manetho and the Chaldean Berosus, cultural victims of Alexander
the Great. Their desire to prove the antiquity of their indigenous
traditions led them to scrabble among the stone documents of their
lands to produce extensively documented histories in the language of
their conqueror. Even before these paleosubalterns, Krateros and
Macedon visited Athenian archives and copied out inscriptions
recording the public decisions of the Athenian people.
But the real heroes of the footnote are the European humanists who
devised new standards of research and proof, men such as Jacques
Auguste de Thou, who wrote the history of Europe in his own day,
1544-1607. De Thou who enlisted a vast ec...
... middle of paper ...
...reader to understand. He describes he word as “simple
slang”
[2] - Extract from historical research website that gives explanations
on the major issues in history.
[3] - Adapted from History and Meaning course overview booklet.
Adapted from Lecture 5 reading by Jean Mabillon (1623-1707) On
Diplomats (1681).
[4] - Concluded after speaking to Rev. David Green of the St Stephens
Church, Balham, London. He is also a neighbour and a friend thus a
more accurate account of the New Testament is sure to be given. He is
also Catholic so no Protestant bias can be labelled against him.
[5] - The Historical Revolution – F. Smith Fussner; Routledge and
Kegan Paul
[6] - http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/jbalkin/articles/foot1.htm - article
by J Balkin explaining the problem with footnotes and their existence
in general
Writing history in the early Middle Ages "was not intended to be simply a matter of keeping a record for posterity." It was to help make the past more presentable and comprehensible to the present, "whether as support for contemporary political ideology or to explain God's purpose for humanity." Works that is widely read and follows these guidelines is writings Einhard and Notker did on Charlemagne. The writings of these two men can be looked at many different ways to decide how they wanted the history of Charlemagne to be perceived. "These histories can function both as a record of the past and as the exploitation of a different world in order to make particular political or polemical points."
Second, the historian must place himself within the existing historical debate on the topic at hand, and state (if not so formulaically as is presented here) what he intends to add to or correct about the existing discussion, how he intends to do that (through examining new sources, asking new questions, or shifting the emphasis of pre-existing explanations), and whether he’s going to leave out some parts of the story. This fulfills the qualities of good history by alerting readers to the author’s bias in comparison with the biases of other schools of scholarship on the topic, and shows that the author is confident enough in his arguments to hold them up to other interpreta...
Through examining these texts, it is evident that the advantages historians have when drawing on evidence such as this is that they can easily reveal certain social and cultural values of the society from which the authors came from, just as easily as it shows social and cultural values of the society of which it was written about. The limitations for historians when collecting written evidence is that some key features of the complex civilizations written about were often left out or could be easily misinterpreted or
History writing has evolved much over time with the contributions of many people. In the modern sense, it can be traced back to ancient Greece and China, where historians Herodotus and Sima Qian began keeping records of human existence. Although they were not literally the first people to write history, together they are named the first great historians of the Western world and the East because of their individual innovations and extensive work that has long affected history writing up until this day. There is much to debate when it comes to the greatness of these ancient historians, and although some believe they were both important and successful in what their works, The Histories and The Records of a Historian, accomplished, others believe the total opposite. Thomas R. Martin, the author of Herodotus and Sima Qian: The First Great Historians of Greece and China, argues that the two men were indeed vital to the progression of history writing over time. In my opinion, Herodotus and Sima Qian made huge advancements in history writing, and their titles as the first great historians of the Western world and the East are very fitting.
Technology is something that seems to be on everyone’s mind in today’s society. Does it really help? When it comes to medicine, there have been huge medical advances with help from technology, saving thousands of lives all over the world. Our society has been forever changed with the introduction of the smartphone; getting movies, music and news faster than ever before. But what about education? Does technology go too far and interfere with the learning process, and relationship between professor and student? Smartboards, laptops, tablets and smartphones are becoming more and more frequent in today’s classrooms. It helps teachers engage the students in their work, and it caters to different types of learning between students. However, our progress
It never fails to amaze me how someone can take a theory and expand on the idea so much that it takes twenty pages to defend his or her thesis.
It is important to keep in mind that the Hippocratic Corpus is not the text of a single author, but rather a compilation of writings by many authors with similar characteristics with Hippocrates of Cos. Possibly, many treaties were lost in the fire that destroyed the Great Library of Alexandria, but a librarian saved and compiled approximately 60 of the medical writings, publishing them as the Hippocratic Corpus. Identify which texts were actually written by Hippocrates is still an ongoing work for historians, but the influence of the physician of Cos is clearly observed in the text of the Corpus.
This investigation uses two sources frequently, the Encyclopædia Britannica and Alpha History. Both are accredited tools which concentrate on history of the world. These have provided much of the necessary information to complete this investigation.
History today recalls the Greek traditions starting from the second millennium B.C to date and not just during the Archaic and the Classical periods. The primary aim of history is to provide us with a broad comprehension of the principles that governed the Greek societies (Carey, 2017). Hegemony together with Greek historians provides a comprehensible examination of the fundamental cultural and political elements which pervades Xenophon, Thucydides, Ephorus, and Herodotus. Hegemony mainly explains the master plan.
This paper examines a National Geographic news article pertaining to the history of First Americans called, “On way to New World, First Americans Made a-10,000 Year Pit Stop”. The First Americans may have stayed on the Bering Land Bridge after separating from Siberia, which would explain a few things about the genetic variances between the two groups. Why do researches believe first Americans lived on the Bering Land Bridge? Are the reasons to believe in this justified? This paper attempts to answer such questions.
During this investigation I utilized various forms of primary and secondary sources, all with distinct opinions, allowing for me to arrive at an objective conclusion. As a historian, one must evaluate both sides of an argument before deriving a conclusion. I used primary sources such as cartoons created during the Gilded Age, capturing the spirit at the time. Similarly, I examined the actual federal act of the Sherman Antitrust Act to view congress ruling regarding monopolies. I also utilized secondary sources that were written decades afterwards, enabling for the authors to reflect back on the series of events that unfolded after the creation of the cartoons during the time of the Gilded Age.
*All primary documents from this text come with this preface in mind (especially that which I have bolded): In this volume, as in its predecessor, I have tried to keep both footnotes and editorial comment to a minimum, the only real problem occurring with documents written in the emerging literary English of the period. With most of these I have used modern versions, but one or two I have left in the original, to instance the spelling and form of the language. With these some notes have been necessary, but by and large they are intelligible with a little effort, and should be interesting to read. Such mistakes, as exist are of course, mine.
Rice, Eugene E. and Anthony Grafton. The Foundations of Early Modern Europe, 1460-1559. 2nd. ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1994.
When it comes to technologies that have greatly changed and impacted society what better time to look at than the 20th century. It was a time of great leaps and ingenuity. Some inventions of change that molded the technology of today is the personal computer, the automobile, radio waves, rocketry and the atomic bomb. While they may seem rudimentary by today 's standards, the helped to make advancements and life possible in the 20th century.
While is a common conception that pre-modern societies are primitive compared to their modern counterpart, this is not often the case, theses societies have complex systems within their society especially within their spirituality and religion. It is this complexity that has allowed aspects of pre-modern societies to evolve and adapt into modern societies. Myths, rituals and sorcery have been terms to describe the activities of pre-modern societies, but these activities have also been found to exist within modern society as well. This essay will further discuss the connections between pre-modern and modern societies that has allowed for myths, rituals and sorcery to exist in the modern societies.