Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of Cultural Diversity in Organizations
Implications of performance management
Ideal performance management system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of Cultural Diversity in Organizations
One of the many ways to measure an organization's success in meeting or achieving its strategic objectives is to evaluate the performance of its employees. This evaluation, if it is to be effective or of substantial value to the organization, it needs to be systematic and purposeful. In order to explain the impact that a performance management system can have on other areas of human resource management, it is necessary to define the relationship between a performance management system and human resource management. First, a performance management system is one area of human resource management. It is now becoming a strategic issue for organizations, in their pursuit of addressing deficiencies in the performance of employees in a timely manner; channeling employees in the appropriate direction towards performance of specific objectives that are consistent with the work or overall strategies of the organization; and providing employees with appropriate and specific feedback to assist with their career development. Secondly, a performance management system needs to be well conceived so that there is full concurrence on the system and that it is not viewed as a subjective tool to highlight employee weaknesses. Human resource management involves "the development of a consistent, aligned collection of practices, programmes, and policies to facilitate the achievement of the organization's strategic objectives" (Mello 2002 p. 298). Given the fact that there is no single best way to manage people in any one organization, human resource management practices will invariably differ in organizations. The fundamental aspect of human resource management is the implementation of a successful people-management system that is supportive of the orga...
... middle of paper ...
...n cause change to the status quo where issues such as person-job-fit is a consideration or promotion based on merit as opposed to tenure or age. Changes in culture, therefore requires that employees traits and behaviour be carefully analyzed and focused on abilities of the employees. Effectiveness of cultural changes and the positive impact of performance measure systems should address issues that relate to employee loyalty, initiative and as a team player. It must be noted though, that although personality traits can influence decisions, say on person-organization-fit, it can also be subjective and such decisions may not be correct at all.
Bibliography:
1. Mello Jeffrey A. (2002) Strategic Human Resource Management. South Western Press, Canada. 2. William P. Anthony et al (1999) Human Resource Management: A Strategic Approach. Harcort, Inc., USA
Noe, Raymond A., et al. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010. Print.
Lengnick-Hall M.L.; Lengnick-Hall, C.A.; Andrade, L.S.; Drake, B. 2009. “Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field.” Human Resource Management Review, 19, pp. 64-85.
" This global London-based mining and mineral company was severely impacted by the global recession in 2008. Such an impact forced unprecedented workforce reductions worldwide and decentralized HR management had to be brought in under a single umbrella to ensure an orderly and efficient system that would support the organization’s future productivity."( Case Study OneRedesigning HR HRMG 5000 - Student Simple). Human resources have a strategic significance if managed efficiently and productively. The company revamped and managed its HR functions in a manner so as to achieve the strategic goals of the
Ramlall, S., Welch, T., Walter, J., & Tomlinson, D. (2009). Strategic HRM at the Mayo Clinic: A case study. Journal of Human Resources Education, 3(3), 13-35. Retrieved from http://business.troy.edu/jhre/Articles/PDF/3-3/31.pdf
In the 1980’s, the birth of a new concept called ‘Human Resource Management’ was born. This trend comes after an intense period of Taylorisation, Fordism and now, McDonaldisation. HRM came to counter balance these trends and to consider the concept of the Man as a Man and not as a machine. For the last several decades, the interests of companies in "strategic management" have increased in a noteworthy way. This interest in strategic management has resulted in various organizational functions becoming more concerned with their role in the strategic management process. The Human Resource Management (HRM) field has sought to become integrated into the strategic management process through the development of a new discipline referred to as Strategic Resource Management (SHRM). In current literature, the difference between SHRM and HRM is often unclear because of the interconnections linking SHRM to HRM. However, the concepts are slightly different. Thus, we can ask, what is strategic human resource management? What are the main theories and how do they work? What do they take into account and how are they integrated? What are the links between SHRM and organization strategy? In order to answer to these questions, we will precisely define strategic human resource management, followed by a look at the different approaches built by theorists, and finally, we will see the limits between the models and their applications depending on the company’s environment. Discussion Strategic Human Resource Management: definition Strategic human resource management involves the military word ‘strategy’ which is defined by Child in 1972 as "a set of fundamental or critical choices about the ends and means of a business". To be simpler, a strategy is "a statement of what the organization wants to become, where it wants to go and, broadly, how it means to get there." Strategy involves three major key factors: competitive advantages (Porter, 1985; Barney, 1991), distinctive capabilities (Kay, 1999) and the strategic fit (Hofer & Schendel 1986). Strategies must be developed with a relevant purpose to sustain the organizational goals and aims. SHRM is one of the components of the organizational strategies used to sustain the business long-term. SHRM defined as: “all those activities affecting the behaviour of individuals in their efforts to formulate and implement the strategic needs of the business. (Schuler, 1992)” or as “the pattern of planned human resource deployments and activities intended to enable the firm to achieve its goals.
Fisher, C., Schoefeldt, L., & Shaw, J. (1996). Human resource management. (3rd Edition). Princeton, NJ: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Introduction A comprehensive Human Resource Management Strategy plays a vital role in the achievement of an organisation’s overall strategic objectives and visibly illustrates that the human resources function fully understands and supports the direction in which the organisation is moving. A comprehensive HRM Strategy will also support other specific strategic objectives undertaken by the marketing, financial, operational and technology departments. In essence, an HRM strategy’s aim should be to capture the ‘people’ part of an organisation and its medium to long-term projection of what it wants to achieve, ensuring that. It employs the right people, those have the right mix of skills, employees show the correct behaviours and attitudes, and employees have the opportunity to be developed the right way.
Performance management aims to manage and improve individual performance with a vision to improving performance across the entire business. [Walter. M, 1995] defines performance management as the process of ‘Directing and supporting employees to work as effectively and efficiently as possible in line with the needs of the organisation’. It is very important to direct and support employees to work efficiently, and this can only be successful if a well-structured performance management system is put in place. But, nonetheless some organisations don’t get it
There is now a rising interest in organisational performance. This interest has being sustained by performance management as well as the successful management of the employees. The possible reasons for these increase in usage (Nankervis & Compton, 2006) was the need for companies to improve workforce output to meet market demands characterized with hyperactivities. The findings indicate that there is a high value placed on performance management systems. Dynamism of change and diversity, however, have mounted pressure on HR specialist and management team to refine, modify and or make more strategic method to performance management. This takes many forms e.g. Mbo, ‘hybrid’ systems, BSC, 360 degree and ranking & rating system. These forms are necessary in order to stay competitive and need effective management.
Performance Management is a critical component to organizational success. However, creating, developing, and maintaining a system that captures all the characteristics of an ideal performance management system should involve an ongoing collaboration between leadership and employees to achieve a successful outcome. After all, the performance and success of the organization is dependent upon the employees. Therefore, performance management should incorporate organizational goals, employee goals, and continuous feedback that reflect individual’s contribution (NorthCoast 99, 2012).
Understanding the strategic potential of HRM is a relatively recent phenomenon. Strategic HRM attempts to bring HRM to the boardroom. It requires personnel policies and practices to be integrated so that they make a coherent whole, and also that this whole is integrated with the business or organisational strategy.
Organisations worldwide are experiencing new challenges due to the increasing of globalization, business complexity and uncertainty in the economic climate. As the business environment becomes more knowledge based, we now see organisations in a different light. They are now knowledge driven institutes that focus on performance and continuous improvement, placing greater significance on human resources, their knowledge and capabilities. Singh (2013). Greater emphasis is now placed on performance management systems as it is seen an important and critical HR activity. However performance management is not a simple and uniform process it is a complex and lengthy process that requires total commitment from all levels of the organisation.
Performance management is used for the basis of promotion, reduction in force purposes (talent management), gives transparency of what an organization is looking for, merit increases, and lastly it provides protection against lawsuits for unlawful termination by keeping written documentation. Performance evaluations are advantageous to both the organization and the employee. A leading advantage of performance evaluations is it gives the employee an opportunity to create and achieve smart goals. Although performance evaluations primary function is to measure whether an employee is a good fit or a bad fit for the organization, its function is so much a broader. Performance management is tool purposely used to motivate employees to examine themselves and determine if they have selected the profession that is best for them; consequently the feedback an employee receives from their superior supports them with increase their knowledge and
Performance management is a continuous process that creates a working culture to encourage employees to improve their work performance and reach their full potential during their stay of employment. Performance Management also provides strategic direction, develop competency in employees and instill organization value. This paper will identify methods and affects that performance management plan has on the organization and their employees.
Noe, Raymond A., John R. Hollenbeck, Barry Gerhart, and Patrick M. Wright. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010. Print.