The Importance of Military Security to Our National Security

1293 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Impact of 9/11 attack

Military security has always been an integral part of national security. During the Cold War, the majority of threats that policymakers and analysts saw as risks to national security were military threats (Snow, 2014, p. 25). Nonmilitary elements were added to national security policy during this period, and today nonmilitary, semi military, and military elements all remain important. The September 11th attacks saw an increased focus on national security. Concerns of terrorism led to the Department of Defense working more closely with federal, state, and local agencies (Bowman, 2003). The military has always relied on civilian control, yet there are some characteristics that complicate the relationship between military and civilian society. In The Soldier and the State, Samuel P. Huntington argues that the nature of the military makes it incompatible with civilian society (Sarkesian, Williams, & Cimbala, 2013, p. 258). Three characteristics, expertise, responsibility, and corporateness, distinguish the military profession from civilian professions. Huntington believes that norms of military professionalism maintains that the military will always remain loyal to its civilian leaders, however, there can be tension in trying to meet the demands of the military while staying true to American liberalism. Morris Janowitz believes that since military society comes from civilian society, military society reflects the values of civilians (Sarkesian, Williams, & Cimbala, 2013, p. 259). It seems that there is a growing gap between the military and civilian society, and there are several reasons as to why this may be the case. Americans now have fewer familial connections to the military than ever before. A smaller number of Americans c... ... middle of paper ... ...itations that are placed upon the President may affect his ability to successfully implement U.S. foreign and national security policies. In the time spent seeking and waiting on Congress to authorize the use of force, a situation could have changed and worsened. President Obama meant well by wanting to consult with Congress, but in the future he should act on his own, as he did with Libya. As you can see, the War Powers Act was introduced with good intentions during a period when it was definitely needed. Thousands of American soldiers had died in both the Korean and Vietnam Wars, fighting in conflicts when war had not even been declared. Since then, presidents have obeyed the War Powers Resolution when they felt like it. President Obama meant well by going to Congress first, and his actions should lead to a serious look into whether the WPR is necessary.

Show More
Related

  • Supreme Command bny Elliot Cohen

    1859 Words  | 4 Pages

    Theory. The term ‘civil-military relations’ is often used to describe the relationship between civil society and its associated military force, moreover the fundamental basis upon which the civilian authority exercises control over its military organization. It is generally accepted that ‘civilian control of the military is preferable to military control of the state’ and although there are states that do not conform to this norm, they tend to be less developed countries that have succumb to military interven...

    Read More

  • The Subculture of the United States Army

    1137 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the Vietnam Conflict, many Americans held a poor view of the military and its political and military leadership. Protestors met returning soldiers at airports, train and bus stations, and in hometowns with open hostility. Following the conflict, and perhaps the maturing of the ‘60s generation, the view towards the military began to change somewhat. The hostility declined, but an appreciation for the military never really re-emerged during the ...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Power

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    Presidential power has become a hot topic in the media the in recent years. There has been extensive debate about what a president should be able to do, especially without the involvement of Congress and the American people. While this debate has become more publicized since the Bush administration, similar issues of presidential power date back to Truman and the Korean War. As with much of the structure of the U.S. government, the powers of the president are constantly evolving with the times and the executives.

    Read More

  • The War Powers Act of 1973

    1541 Words  | 4 Pages

    The War Powers Act of 1973. The War Powers Act limits the power of the President of the United States to wage war without the approval of the Congress. The War Powers Act is also known as the War Powers Resolution. The purpose of the War Powers Resolution is to ensure that Congress and the President share in making decisions that may get the United States involved in hostilities.

    Read More

  • The United States Army as a Profession of Arms

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States Army, in its current state, is a profession of arms. In order to be considered a profession, the organization must have an ethical code rooted in values, strong trust with its clients, and be comprised of experts within the trade. These experts are constantly developing the trade for the present and the future and hold the same shared view of their trade culture. The Army currently has an ethical code embodied in the Army Values, which provides guidance to the individual and the organization. These values are universal across the Army, regardless of an individual’s personal background or religious morals.

    Read More

  • The War Powers Act

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... terms of balanced separation of powers is met in the War Powers Resolution. The congressional power to declare war was meant as one of several checks on the President's authority over the use of American military forces. The War Powers Resolution helped to restore war power balance between the president and congress. Further, it is a practical restraint on the presidential use of armed forces and an appropriate mechanism for the president and the congress to share in decisions pertaining to involvement in war. The War Powers Resolution does not violate the constitution; rather if reflect the objective of sharing powers between legislative and the executive. It helps curb abuse of power performed by any of the branches. Thus, the War Powers Resolution is in compliance with the Constitutional roles of congress and the executive branches. (RushKoff, 1344-1346)

    Read More

  • Congress and The Presidency

    370 Words  | 1 Pages

    (Sell Lecture Notes, p.6) Congress shares responsibility with the president in declaring war, negotiating treaties with other countries and proving funds for soldiers and weapons. This is when conflicts come to head. The Vietnam War is a perfect example of this conflict, when the President waged war without a formal declaration of war from Congress. Because of this Congress then passed the War Powers Act in 1973. (Sell Lecture Notes, p.2) The Presidency has many responsibilities and powers.

    Read More

  • Lando Calrissian Case Study

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    The main legal question was if congress unconstitutionally delegated its legislative power to the president. The court in a 7-1 decision said that there was no constitutional violation. The court argued that there was a fundamental difference between domestic and foreign affairs, and that the federal government has the constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs as it wants to. The most important part of the case for my purposes is Justice Sutherland’s statement “In this vast external realm, with its important, complicated, delicate and manifold problems, the President alone has the power to speak or listen as a representative of the nation.” What this means is that the President has the sole power to be the representative of the nation in foreign relations. The president alone has the power to recognize, and negotiate with foreign powers. Even if we ignore the other cases, this one alone sets a legal precedent that should apply well to the case of Mr.Calrissian. Combined with the other cases, especially Zivotofsky the legal precedent is clear, and the court should rule that section 547d is

    Read More

  • Models Of Presidential Power

    2075 Words  | 5 Pages

    When the constitution of the United States was formed, the framers specifically designed the American Government structure to have checks and balances and democracy. To avoid autocracy the President was give power to preside over the executive branch of the government and as commander –in –chief, in which a clause was put into place to give the president the power to appeal any sudden attacks against America, without waiting for a vote from congress. While the president presides over the executive branch there has been ongoing debate over the role of the president in regards to foreign policy. Should foreign policy issues be an executive function by the president or should congress play a much greater role? With the sluggishness of our democracy, foreign policy issues most times need quicker response compared to how domestic policy is decided in the United States. Many believe to maintain openness and democracy both the president and congress need to agree on how the United States handles issue abroad. Although the president has been given much power, his or her power and decisions are sometimes limited based on decisions by congress and challenged and shaped by various bureaucracies throughout the government system. I shall discuss the Presidents role and the role of governmental bureaucracies (Department of Defense, Department of State and the National Security Council) that work together and sometimes not together to shape and implement American foreign Policy.

    Read More

  • Children's Development Of A Military Child

    1283 Words  | 3 Pages

    Andy grew up as a military child and he assures, “Being in a military family I can appreciate the veterans and their families more.” (Moore) Military children recognize the importance of sacrificial service that their parent committed. This ensures parents that raising a child in the military can help develop an appreciative, respectful, and prideful child by experiencing and interacting within the military lifestyle. The military provides a strong structure or values and traits that promote a healthy development of characteristics for

    Read More

  • Presidency and Foreign Policy Making

    1680 Words  | 4 Pages

    In exploring the basis on which the U.S President is considered to hold dominant authority in regard to foreign policy making, and whether the Congress ought to hold a significant role in the foreign decision making process, it is imperative to take into account the executive powers vested on the U.S presidency. This paper posits that the Presidency should be considered to be dominant, while at other times the Congress should be considered to be the dominant authority. In this perspective, it is essential that the Congress plays an important role in the foreign policy making process, since the most important feature of the U.S system is the division of powers.

    Read More

  • Presidential Scandals

    1538 Words  | 4 Pages

    The President of the United States is commonly referred to as the most powerful man in the world. The President is the head of the country which boasts the world’s largest economy, commander and chief of the most powerful military in the world, and has command authority over the largest active nuclear arsenal in the world. However, his power is not unlimited. Throughout the history of the United States, some presidents have attempted to go beyond the powers granted to them. Most of these attempts have ended in scandal. Regardless of whether these actions were for the good of the nation or for personal gain, laws must be obeyed. Otherwise the United States would become the same tyrannical government our forefathers fought to escape from.

    Read More

  • The Army Profession

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    In June 2013 Army Doctrine Reference Publication 1 (ADRP1) “The Army Profession” was released and the website http://cape.army.mil was created. In (ADRP1), it states there are five essential characteristics of the Army Profession, trust, military expertise, honorable service, Esprit de Corps, and stewardship (ADRP1, 2013). Those characteristics is what I think separates a Soldier from a civilian. No one should think that their job or occupation is harder or more important than someone else’s. It takes all kinds of professions to make this country work but the Army could not be as successful as it is today without our professionals teaching, coaching, mentoring and preserving these five characteristics.

    Read More

  • Interview with a Social Worker

    2018 Words  | 5 Pages

    Daley, J. G. (1999). Understanding the Military As an Ethnic Identity. In J. G. Daley, Social Work Practice in the Military (pp. 291-303). Binghamton: Haworth Press Inc.

    Read More

  • The Power Of The Executive Branch

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    The power of the Executive branch has expanded over time to become the most authoritative division of government. In contrast to the Constitution 's fundamental designer, James Madison, who predicted the Legislative branch would dominate due to it’s power in making laws and regulating taxes/spending, the executive powers have proven to be superior and ever broadening. From the birth of the Republic, the President has sought to protect his rights and seek beyond his restriction of power. Setting the precedent as early as 1795, George Washington refused to relay documents relating to the Jay Treaty to the House of Representatives and saw his actions as a justified act of “executive prerogative.” Moreover, weaving throughout the Nineteenth century, presidents such as Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln conceived and added functions, such as the extensive use of the veto and the president’s direct and active role as Commander in Chief to their executive tool-belt. The Constitution communicates very little details regarding the President’s use of the power of veto and the role as Commander in Chief, but it was these presidents which established the major authority of the executive branch in these areas.

    Read More

More about The Importance of Military Security to Our National Security

Open Document