Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Jefferson vs Hamilton confrontations
Jefferson vs Hamilton confrontations
Jefferson vs Hamilton confrontations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Jefferson vs Hamilton confrontations
Presidency In exploring the basis on which the U.S President is considered to hold dominant authority in regard to foreign policy making, and whether the Congress ought to hold a significant role in the foreign decision making process, it is imperative to take into account the executive powers vested on the U.S presidency. This paper posits that the Presidency should be considered to be dominant, while at other times the Congress should be considered to be the dominant authority. In this perspective, it is essential that the Congress plays an important role in the foreign policy making process, since the most important feature of the U.S system is the division of powers. Discussion Welch, Gruhl, Rigdon and Thomas (2011) assert that, according to Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the executive power is granted solely to the President of the U.S. This clause of the constitution has continued to draw significant constitutional debate since the ratification of the Constitution. For example, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, in 1793 questioned whether the clause affords residual power to the President outside the enumerated powers stipulated in the Constitution. This debate is still significant in the contemporary times because it has a direct impact on the power of the President, and also, as an essential insinuation, it impacts on the freedoms and liberties of U.S. citizenry at home and in foreign countries. In this context, Pika and Maltese (2004) argue that, it is essential to mention a number of prominent Supreme Court cases that involve the outline of executive powers that have transpired, informed by in the perspective of foreign affairs, as well war. Therefore, it is not unforeseen that today, in the War on Terror, the... ... middle of paper ... ...alance of power between the President and the Congress has been shown to sway like a pendulum, conditional on key occurrences at the time, where as Justice Jackson argues at times the Presidency should be considered to be dominant, while at other times the Congress should be considered to be the dominant authority. In this perspective, it is essential that the Congress plays an important role in the foreign policy making process, since the most important feature of the U.S system is the division of powers. References Curtis, A. B., & Flaherty, M.S. (2004). Executive Power Essentialism and Foreign Affairs. Michigan Law Review, 102, 45-63. Pika, J.A., & Maltese, J. (2004). The Politics of the Presidency. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Welch, S., Gruhl, J., Rigdon, S., & Thomas, S. (2011). Understanding American Government. Stamford, Connecticut: Cengage Learning.
What were the major impacts on American foreign policy during the H.W. Bush & Clinton Administrations? How did Bush & Clinton define the post-Cold War world for the United States?
... This precedent allows future presidents to take actions strictly forbidden by the executive branch in times of national emergency without congressional approval. The most important expansion of the power of the presidency happened during the Jackson administration. When Jackson used the veto power of the president to influence legislation as a matter of policy and not constitutionality, he arguably altered the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches.
... in office and how the congress will act toward the President; whether he be a President that demands respect or one who forfeits it and whether the Congress gives in to the demands of the Executive or if the Congress comes down on t he Executive like a hammer on a nail. This can be accomplished by viewing the circumstances in which a President takes office, the manner in which he carries himself during his term, and the way in which the President leaves as Commander in Chief. Conclusion: The President has neither gained nor lost power. There exists the same balance between Executive and Congress as there was when Washington was sworn in as America's first President. The only difference between then and now, is the fact that today we must wade through the layers of insignificance and precedents that history has forged against us, the political thinker and historian.
As President of the United States, he who takes on one of many leadership decrees faces a possibility of issues during their term. Whether it’s problems that derive within the house, nation, or elsewhere. The way the president approaches the matter is the single most important task. In this analysis, I will begin by presenting the relationship between president and chief legislator. Next, the ideal role of the president and the challenges he must face as chief legislator. Then, point out the major bodies of conflict between congress and the president while the president is performing the role of chief legislator; along with the impact or influence it has over the branches. Closing out with the excessive use of executive order concerning the
War is a situation between two nations or regions where they both arrange in conflict. War is accompanied with warfare and casualties with both human lives and conducts financial crisis. Over the centuries, war has not changed in the slightest bit. Even the president, being the Commander in Chief, has complete control over the United States military. Debates rise to question that should the president have this power to command military personnel without the consent of United States Congress. Many consequences can emerge from these decisions from either within the nation or from other foreign lands. Congress should be able to
Presidential power has always been controversial. Congress and the Judiciary have clashed with both Bush and Clinton administrations over matters of executive privilege, impeachment, and the war on terror. Almost all modern presidents have moved to expand their power. So it is an even bet that given the foreign policy challenges of Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and North Korea—not to mention the disruptions to the domestic economy of the credit crisis—Barack Obama will soon be drawing on the well of executive power every bit as deeply as his predecessors have.
In this module we have study modifications to the way Congress and the President do business. The Constitution lists specific duties for Congress to attend to; it is a little vaguer when assigning duties to the President. It is up to both of these institutions to best determine how to accomplish these duties. The major theme of this module is change, the addition of offices under the President and the modifications to the power distribution within the Congress to help better and sometimes hinder these institutions in accomplishing their duties.
Harry Truman was once asked ‘who made US foreign policy’ he simply replied ‘I do’ . The United State president has always put the issue of foreign affairs to the fore front in order to retain the superpower America is. Although the President is viewed as the key decision maker in foreign policy the executive branch is not the only branch involved in determining the course of American foreign policy. The process of developing policies is of great importance to the branches involved because the United states government has the power to influence the lives of many people through the polices. While it’s believed that the president determines foreign policy, it has been said my many scholars who work in the field of constitutional law that Congress is giving a ‘Preeminent role in the formulation of foreign policy’ by the Constitution and the ‘Presidents role is in the execution of foreign policy’. While it has been established that there is a difference in the role of Congress and executive branch in regard to foreign policy, there has been a significant rise in the role of the State Department which is overseen by the some of the key personalities in the US Government such as the Secretary of state. This developed during the presidency of Benjamin Harrison. James G Blain, secretary of state, successfully put trade between the US and Latin to the limelight while also calling for a renegotiation of the Bulwer Treaty which would allow the US to construct the panama canal without the intervention of Britain, it is now seen that the secretary of state possess a bigger role in foreign policy than was thought. The way in which I would present a president’s influence in regards to foreign policy would be to analyse past event such as the Pa...
The people of the United States want to be safe, and it is the job of the elected president to make them feel safe. For example, in the article, President Bush didn’t think twice to take action on his own, when he decided to shut down all air travel in the U.S. for more than a week, without getting permission from the congress because that at time he was thinking about the safest of the citizen within the country. If he had to wait for Congress for their permission about the action he was about to take, maybe some people in Congress would not have agreed with him. Which could have cost more terror in the States. If Congress appoints a president, I believe he/she would be dependent on the Congress to make decisions or would make decisions that would support Congress. This would make Congress much more power than the other two branches in our judicial system. Hamilton in the article also described the difference between the U.S. President and the English ruler. Whereas, the English ruler isn’t charged with from criticism, responsibility and punishment, the U.S. President is held responsible for
Gans-Boriskin, R. And R. Tisinger. (2005). The Bushlet Administration: Terrorism and War on The West Wing. The Journal of American Culture, 28(1): 100 – 113
Several aspects of the executive branch give the presidency political power. The president’s biggest constitutional power is the power of the veto (Romance, July 27). This is a power over Congress, allowing the president to stop an act of Congress in its tracks. Two things limit the impact of this power, however. First, the veto is simply a big “NO” aimed at Congress, making it largely a negative power as opposed to a constructive power (July 27). This means that the presidential veto, while still quite potent even by its mere threat, is fundamentally a reactive force rather than an active force. Second, the presidential veto can be overturned by two-thirds of the House of Representatives and Senate (Landy and Milkis, 289). This means that the veto doesn’t even necessarily hav...
The United States was established as a democratic nation, in which it prides itself in a government by the people. One of the basic ideas is that the elected leaders serve the citizens by making decisions that would reflect the public preferences. However, many people believe that the public is not fit to make informed judgment about public policy, especially on foreign matters. Nevertheless, the public opinion continues to provide an essential guide for foreign policy makers. The reason for this is that American citizens are capable of guiding foreign policy, using their knowledge, coherent attitudes, as well as deeply held values and beliefs.
In the United States, the Constitution divides the powers of foreign policy between the President and the Congress so that they share equal power. Each branch plays its own important role, but even though the powers are separated the executive and legislative branches power’s can often overlap.(Costly) Both branches have equal opportunity to change or initiate foreign policy and they are meant to check and balance eachother out.
The President of The United States of America is often thought to be the most powerful person in the world, because America is arguably the most powerful country on earth. This is the typical assumption due to the sheer size of the United States military and the influential power that the United States carries globally in social and political affairs. Since the President is the leader of the most powerful country in the world, the popular misconception is that he is the most powerful man in America. However, the American political system is designed in such a way that no one individual is able to acquire a remarkable or potentially unhealthy amount of power. Based on his title alone, the President may have the most individual power, but one could argue that when it comes to law making and general control over the direction of the county, the Speaker of The House, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and even the Chairman of the Federal Reserve have more influential power than the President of the United States.
Although the separation of foreign policy powers between the Congress and President are outlined in the Constitution, it seems like the President is the one who holds the higher authority. While the power to declare war resides with the Congress, the underlying power the President has to send troops anywhere in the country without the approval of Congress has proven to be more overbearing than the powers that Congress have. Not to say that Congress is completely uninvolved in foreign policies, Congress plays its role when the President acts out and proposes something that would not sit well with the people or the other countries. This is attempted to be accomplished through the War Powers Act but eventually did not end up limiting the President but instead had him find loopholes so that he may still send troops without Congressional approval. In the end, the President still has the most authority since he is the one in control of the troops and can direct them as he pleases. This is why I believe the President holds more power in foreign policy when compared to the