Compare And Contrast Jefferson And Hamilton

1578 Words4 Pages

The discourse of America, a nation built upon the foundations written by men, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton contributed a great ordeal of their lives into the creation of it. From similar childhoods to conflicting perceptions of government, Jefferson and Hamilton paved the way for the future of the nation. Through the comparison of Jefferson and Hamilton, by using factors of character, politics, and legacy, it is beyond question that Hamilton’s ambitious personality, politically involved nature, and estate truly resonates with history on a higher account compared to Jefferson. Born into the elite, Thomas Jefferson was raised in power and was familiar with wealth. From Jane Randolph, Jefferson’s mother, he was able to obtain a prominent …show more content…

Jefferson’s personality was the epitome of a typical white man of power. A man expected to become successful one day. Compared to Hamilton, Jefferson’s characteristics seem cliche. Everything Jefferson was, Hamilton was as well. They were both responsible, hard working, and educated men. As described by Jefferson’s granddaughter, Ellen Wayles Randolph, he was a simple man from the outside and within. He was not picky with his appearance as he dressed very simple and neat. While the trend at the time was to wear short waistcoats and pantaloons, he decided to stay true to his character and put staying in the trend as a priority. From another family member, Jefferson’s grandson, Thomas Jefferson Randolph, recounted him as being one to never abandon, “a plan, a principle, or a friend." This account from family members provides insight to the type of man Jefferson was. A family man that was highly respected by those who surrounded …show more content…

The federalist versus anti-federalist opposition to begin the political differences. Federalists were a group of people who pushed for a strong central government and weak state governments, while anti-federalists were a group of people who pushed for power in the states and not the central government. Hamilton, a Federalist, was a firm believer in the construction of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution. A broad interpretation of the Constitution meant more government control of the people. Hamilton believed that if a government were to operate efficiently, it would have to be conducted by the educated. Although at the time period, being educated was an expectation for only white men and a limitation for men of color and women. Through Hamilton’s position as being the Secretary of the Treasury, he was able to propose the idea of a national bank. His proposition of the bank was to serve as a way to help America back onto its feet after the Revolutionary War.The bank would regulate currency, help control the American currency, and prevent any singular group from having the most power. According to the Necessary and Proper Clause located in article 1, section 8, clause 18 of the United States Constitution, Hamilton believed the government had the implied powers to use it in order to help and protect the American people.Not only would the bank

Open Document