Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The perils and pitfalls of leading change
The perils and pitfalls of leading change
How can the role of leadership be best understood in organization change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The perils and pitfalls of leading change
1. Why is diagnosis so vital in organizational change programs?
In order to implement a successful change program you must have reliable information outlining what you are attempting to fix. Failure to diagnose the problem can lead to even more problems. If you do not take the appropriate time to understand the problem you could be reacting and treating something that doesn’t need to be treated. For example, if you went to the doctor with a symptom and he doesn’t properly diagnose what has caused that symptom, the medicine he gives you for something that is not actually the problem, could create more complications.
Failure to accurately diagnose will create further poor decisions down the road. It is likely you will only be trying to fix some symptom of the actual problem so the problem will continue to persist until you get to the root cause. In order to identify the causes of the symptoms, performance measures are necessary. (Kaydos, W.1991) An example could be that you have a clogged sink. If you pour Drano down the sink pipes or try to plunge it out you will most likely be successful for a period of time. The clog will go away but then it can resurface. If the clog is actually due to tree roots growing through the plumbing, until you fix that, your sink will continue to periodically back up because you are only treating the symptom with your temporary solutions. In this scenario, even though the outcome has been identified, to clear the sink, the diagnosis was not accurate and the problem will persist.
Without proper diagnosis, you are not aware of what needs to change in order to resolve the problem. The diagnosis is at the beginning of a chain of events, if you fail to understand the root cause, your entire p...
... middle of paper ...
...llowed sufficient time to adjust to the idea of the new process, refreezing will be more successful. If management of resistance to change has been incorporated in the plan, with evaluation and feedback of the change, the new process will be congealed and the change plan effectiveness can be measured.
References
Amer, Dr. Naila H. Leadership Role in Management of Change. Retrieved from: www.kma.org.kw/Leadership.ppt
Brown, D.R. & Harvey, D. (2006). An experiential approach to Organizational development, (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, Konopaske. (2009). Organizations Behavior, Structure, Processes. (pg 458) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Kaydos, W. (1991). Measuring, Managing, and Maximizing Performance. (Pg. 38) Cambridge, MA. Productivity Press, Inc.
Davis, Kevin. "Management Skills - Introduction - Instructor's Statement to Participants." Fsu.edu. Florida State University, n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.
in place, lost the role of representing the best interests of the patient, clinical judgment inappropriate, error treatment, lack of intervention on the clinical evolution of the patient, lack of preventive care, mistake in the execution in the prescription and treatment errors
McShane, S.L., Olekalns, M. & Travaglione, A. 2013, Organizational Behavior: Emerging Knowledge, Global Insights 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, Sydney.
It is all about holding the organization accountable for the solution. Organizations need to do more than replace it or do it again. Malpractice suits are the reasons for those kind of solutions.
When an error occurs, the first step usually taken is to identify the individual that is responsible for the mistake. Frontline providers in health care, like nurses and doctors, are usually held accountable when a mistake occurs that affects patient safety and care. While this is the easiest step, it is not the most effective. "When human error is viewed as a cause rather than a consequence, it serves as a cloak for our ignorance. By serving as an end point rather than a starting point, it retards further understanding [1]." Factors outlined in Henriksen 's hierarchy, e.g. individual characteristics, the nature of the work, human-system interfaces, work environment, and management, need to be taken into account to identify the source of the
Robbins , Stephen P. and Judge, Timothy, A. Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice Hall. Pearson Custom Publishing. 2008 Print
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States of America: Pearson Prentise Hall.
Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behaviors, structure, processes (13th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Robbins, S., Decenzo, D., & Coulter, M. (2013). Fundamentals of management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, R. & Matteson, M. (2011). Organizational Behavior and Management. NewYork, NY: McGraw Hill.
Change usually comes with resistance in any workplace because change disrupts the employees’ sense of safety and control (Lewis, 2012). Kurt Lewin (1951) created a three step process for assisting employees with organizational Change (Lewis, 2012). The three stages are Unfreeze, Change and Refreeze. These are the steps to a smooth transition for change within organizations. Further, these steps are not possible without good communication from upper Management through line staff. Communication was consistently listed as an issue in surveys conducted by the department.
Ivancevich, John, Knopaske, Robert, Matteson, Michael, Organizational Behaviour and Management (10 edition (January 30, 2013). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009). Organization development & change (9th ed.). Australia: South-Western/Cengage Learning.
...ess of the organizations inclination to change; the staffs skills and competency; magnitude of revolution capability and decision-making strategy. This change must be pertinent to the organizations objectives and to its members; opportunities for the members of the organization to make informed and prudent choices for a prudent decision-making.
Brown, D. R. (2011). An experiential approach to organization development (8th ed.). New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.