Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychoanalytic theory in view of human nature
Psychoanalytic approach in counseling
Strengths of functionalism in sociology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychoanalytic theory in view of human nature
Social systems attempt to protect their survival through adaptation and self-preservation and are interrelated and interdependent; human systems and their environments are intricately connected to one another (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins, 2012). With this said, people and their environments are involved in a process of continual adaptation to one another and must be viewed holistically (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins, 2012). There are theories that adopt a systems perspective, however most focus primarily on the individual, interpersonal, some on society, and others on the earth ecological. Variation in their focus also leads to variation in their levels of application. Dynamic systems and the ecological approach are usually seen as having …show more content…
Germain (1973), states, “The ecological perspective has been proposed as an unifying paradigm that can apply to the numerous and diverse models of social work practice.” Ecosystems theory was an offshoot of functionalism, ecological theory, dynamic system theory, and many other psychological and developmental theories, it is also known as the ecological perspective and the life model (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins, 2012). Ecosystems theory focuses on the transactions between people and their environments. An important component of this theory is the ecological notion of interface, or common boundaries between systems (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins, 2012). Interface, “takes into account the fluidity in the arena of social functioning in which both the person and the environment are involved” (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins, 2012). “Goodness of fit” is a term that means, between people and their environments enable people and their environments to reciprocally adapt to one another (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins, 2012).when inputs or stimuli are insufficient, excessive, or missing altogether, an upset occurs in the adaptive balance which is conceptualized as stress; the usual fit between the person and environment has broken down (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins, 2012). Stress is a transactional concept rather than an individual or situational one. Stress is a psychosocial condition, generated by discrepancies between needs and capacities and environmental qualities (Canda, Chatterjee, and Robbins,
The person-in-environment approach views a client’s problems by how they react to the environmental contexts within their environment and how they occur. According to Gordon and Richmond, it has been stated that the person-in-environment approach is the “cornerstone” of social work practice. (as cited in Rogers, 2016, p.24). A clients’ systems are the interrelated aspects of a clients’ lives where all parts come together to function. Social workers utilize and focus on a clients’ systems when applying the person-in-environment. A clients’ system is anything that they interact with and hold roles in their lives. These systems can be on a micro level which is the individual and their biology, personality, and genetics. The individuals’ mezzo level would include their immediate environment, family, school, friends, or work. A macro level would include the larger social aspects of a clients’ life such as government policies, discrimination, oppression, or social class. Social workers incorporate these interactions and how they impact clients’ and their presenting problems. This theory and approach are beneficial as it allows a social worker to find out what resources are available to the client during their time with the worker (Rodgers,
When all of your systems, such as family, work, and school are working well together, then the individual systems are working together as one larger system. The theories under the Person-In-Environment lens are able to be applied to both individuals and environments (Rogers, A. 2013). There are five theories discussed under the person-in-environment lens.
...the social structures in a society, and the relationship it has with the functions of the society. In understanding the system theory, it is worth pointing out on important features defining the theory. According to Luhmann, functioning differentiation is the most complex form of differentiation. Thus, functioning differentiation refers to the working of differentiated elements in a social system. Functional differentiation asserts that in system theory, there is a dependence and interdependence of various elements of a society. Social systems refer to the structural elements that make up a society. In addition, subsystems are the individual societal structures and elements that make up a social system. According to the systems theory, sub systems are instrumental in initiating communication between elements of a social structure.
Still, this model presents a holistic, systems approach and identifies the interaction as well as influence of various dimensions of the biological, psychological, social, cultural and spiritual environment on the individual.
Theory has been defined as, “an organized set of assumptions, beliefs, or ideas about particular phenomena in the world (Teater, 2015).” Theory is used to understand and explain possible and perceived instances, behaviors and outcomes (Teater, 2015). Social workers use theory in order to understand, as well as, introduce interventions and solutions to their client’s individual situation. It is important for students entering into the social work profession to have a base knowledge of theories, with basic understanding of their similarities and differences to appropriately apply theory in practice. The theories which will be focused on in this paper include Systems Theory and Cognitive Behavioral Theory.
This paper delineates how analyzing the role of systems thinking in program planning, implementation, evaluation, and revision relates to: effective uses of information technology in public health practice, sources of inequality that produce health disparities across diverse populations, effective public health leadership, factors of population based health status and behavior, and public health action research. A brief description of systems theory will discuss relatively open and closed systems. How the focal system (area of focus) determines the task environment(s) and how the task environment illustrates the roles internal and external stakeholders. Similarly, an integration of systems will be infused into each section of the paper.
Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory “looks at children’s development within the context of the systems of relationships that form their environment.” (MORRISON, 2009) This theory describes multifaceted tiers within the environment, where each layer has a specific influence upon a child’s development.
Social ecological perspectives are often described as a web of relationships (k218, Learning guide 3, 3.1). They make us aware that each individual has many defining factors making up who they are. Social ecological perspectives have the child/young person at the centre and show how they are connected to the family, community and society as a whole. They demonstrate the layers that go into making the individual and show that everybody has a unique set of circumstances that affect the person they are, their achievements, social standing and even their health. Social ecological perspectives give us the opportunity to quantify these factors and offer a tool to collate the data, giving us the chance to see how factors such as employment, housing or demographic area can affect life chances in both the short and long term. Social economic perspectives tell us that to fully understand the individual we must also understand their environment and how they are connected to it. Rather than just looking at the child or young person on a standalone basis we must look at what factors affect their behaviour, where they are living, what the home or community environment is like and try to respond appropriately to this.
Systems approach is based on the fundamental principle that all aspects of a human problem should be treated together in a rational manner (Healy, 2005). I have divided this essay into relevant sections that cover an overview of systems ideas, general systems theory and ecological systems theory. This assignment will also include Germain and Gittermans life model, and it will be related back to the case study that has been provided. Limitations of systems theory will also be discussed.
A multisystematic approach is an “integration of knowledge” based on theories of biological, psychological and social perspectives of human development and the social environment. This approach involves four assumptions. The first is that there are three dimensions for assessing a human’s behavior (biological, psychological and social). The second assumption is that these dimensions make up a system of biopsychosocial functioning. The next thing is that these systems have an organized hierarchy from smallest to largest and the last thing is that each one of these systems is always interacting with the other systems. As social workers we can use these systems to help explain and evaluate
Systems theory arose from the fact that people always are in contact with others, nobody is an island. Systems theory as stated in Teater( pg 36) aims to see a person in his or her environment, conduct a holistic assessment of the individual, family, group or community, and explore all possible areas around the service user that may require or benefit from intervention. Systems theory emerged from the works of Urie Bronfenbrenner which looks at how system form part of all human development. It emerged in 1979 in the context of children,s development as being at the center of multilayered systems which interact with each other. However, it has evolved and is used in every aspect of social work focusing on the connections between, and the resources
social system that must be met for the system to survive and the corresponding structures that
In relation to Systems Theory it is important to have an understanding of the ecological perspective. As Robbins (2012) pointed out, the addition of the ecological perspective to Systems Theory allowed social workers to have increased awareness of the issue related to goodness of fit, socially, and physically, between people and their environments. The ecological perspective also allows systems theory to have a broader scope of application. According Karel Germain and Alex Gitterman (1995) in their work titled, The life model of social work practice, 3rd ed.
Because of this idea, as a future social worker, it provides an explanation of why clients act a certain way because of their environment. For instance, a mother could decide to be a sex worker because she needs to find a way to feed her children. However, social workers must then find her other resources, in order to “enhance human well-being and help meet the basic needs of all people” (NASW Code of Ethics). This idea of looking at a client’s environment is also mentioned in a scholarly British article, written by David Green and Fiona McDermott (2011) that state that "[p]erson-in-environment begins from a position that recognises the interdependence of phenomena in affecting, changing and sustaining human life. Such phenomena are conceptualised as if they occur and operate on different ‘levels’—micro, meso, macro—in attempts to categorise and account for the complexity within which social and human life exists and to which social and human life contributes" (p. 2416-2417). Both authors provide an explanation of how factors can play in clients’ lives and consequently effect everything
The capacity of human communities to form stable societies, to generate formal economies, and to plan for the future is underpinned by environmental stability, reliable supplies of natural materials, and the adequate functioning of the cleansing and recycling processes of nature. Thus all people and their societies are fundamentally dependent on ecosystem