Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fast food companies and obesity
Fast food companies and obesity
Fast food companies and obesity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fast food companies and obesity
If you want to indulge yourself with chocolate today, would you still get it if the tax was higher? That is what the government is proposing to do: tax junk, fast, and fat foods because they may lead to obesity and other health issues. This type of tax is often referred to as a sin tax, which is "a sponsor tax that is added to products or services that are seen as vices such as, alcohol and gambling” (citation). One controversy to this issue is how does one determine what products are considered high in fat or sugar. Also, since healthy food is more costly, a sin tax on unhealthy foods is a difficult goal. To make this tax possible, the government would also have to decrease the price of healthy and fresh food such as fruits and vegetables. …show more content…
Some people abuse of the consumption of food when it should be consider a necessity. For example, when they are depressed, they find comfort in food, this results in obesity. Increasing the price of junk food might bring conscience to the consumer and can be persuaded to make healthier decisions. It is known that people with obesity are victims of discrimination. As a matter of fact, people with obesity are prone to develop cardiovascular problems, diabetes, and back problems. Under those circumstances, it is easier to do a change in habits rather than find a treatment for their condition. For this reason, increasing the price of fat, fast and sugary products is a positive change. In the long run, it will cost less to increase the price of the products rather than paying for treatments for health conditions when sometimes, health insurance do not cover in full for such …show more content…
The Governor of New York David Paterson suggested “an eighteen percent sales taxes on soft drinks and other non-diet sugary beverages to help raise four hundred million a year to plug a hole in the state budget.” The sales that sin tax collects can be used towards implementing better sources to help and to educate people with vices. Another way that an increase in taxes on junk food would be useful would be to fairly cover for medical services and health insurance. Reducing the price of health insurance would make it available to more people. Also, having an increase in the price of the products are not beneficial health could be a reduction to healthy products such as vegetables and fruits, that would help reinforce good eating
The article is intended for is one of non-academic audience based upon the language Bittman uses throughout, thus making it easy to understand by people not in the field of study. Bittman’s purpose of the article is to inform the audience about the cost of junk food in comparison to buying ingredients
In the argument “Bad Food? Tax It, and Subsidize Vegetables” by Mark Bittman, it talks about taxing unhealthy food and promoting vegetables. With the use of different strategies like emotions, credible research, solutions to problems, and much more he effectively assures that a diet change is what Americans need and will benefit from.
Drenkard, S. (2010). Overreaching on Obesity: Governments Consider New Taxes on Soda and Candy. Retrieved from http://heartland.org
Throughout the past years and more here recently obesity has become a fast growing problem in the United States and around the world. Since this has become such a problem certain authors are starting to take a stand in how they think the solution should be fixed. The solutions are discussed in the following articles: How Junk Food Can End Obesity by David H. Freedman and What You Eat Is Your Business by Radley Balko. Both articles have clear and distinct arguments, but the argument by Balko entices his readers and has a clear purpose and tone that allowed his article to be more effective.
...d,” (Bittman). Bittman uses these statistics to show how hyperprocessed foods and sugary beverages have impacts America. Since the percentage of obese individuals continuously rises, Bittman believes that the government should step in and protect the health of individuals by establishing a new tax on junk food. People sense the urgency within Bittman’s article, since he believes it is time for the government to step in. Throughout history people have always wanted to limit the control of the government and only sought their help in dire situations; therefore, if the government is becoming involved in the weight gain problem, it must be a big problem.
One out of every three Americans is obese and the majority of these obese people in the United States have eaten regularly at fast food restaurants. As the obesity rate increases, the number of fast food restaurants goes up as well. Although it is not certain, many believe that obesity in the United States is correlated to eating fast food. Since the United States has the highest obesity rate out of any country, it is important for Americans to monitor the fast food industry that may be causing obesity. With the pressure to get things done in a timely manner, fast food became a big necessity. However, when creating fast food restaurants, the industries were not thinking about the negative effects such as obesity. Other than obesity, other harmful effects exist as well. Fast food restaurants serve unhealthy products such as greasy foods and artificial meat that lead to dietary health issues in many adults and children. A recent study showed that “Young children who are fed processed, nutrient-poor foods are likely to become unhealthy teenagers, and eventually unhealthy adults. Now twenty-three percent of teens in the U.S. are pre-diabetic or diabetic, 22% have high or borderline high LDL cholesterol levels, and 14% have hypertension or prehypertension” (May, Kuklina, Yoon). The food that they provide is made to be eaten quickly, causing problems for the digestive system. Also, the health problems lead to the use for health insurance, which adds to the costs of Medicare. Health care costs will only worsen an already failing economy. Therefore, the government should regulate fast food restaurants in the United States in order to repair the deteriorating health and economy in America.
Governments would just be continuing to cause problems because another huge problem in America is there are already way too many people without jobs. When going to the store to get a soda, is there really much to think about when drinking sweetened goods has become a part of an everyday lifestyle. Why would someone suddenly put a tax on something which so many have loved and became addicted to. If there was a tax put on everything people have come to love there would be a huge tax for everything. Bittman does not think that putting a tax on sugar sweetened beverages would affect the jobs of people because he believes it would get made up by the selling of their other products. However it is important to realize that most places would not be passing this until 2018. Although, people really do need to realize what these sweetened products are doing and the reason why taxing for these goods is not looking so
Nevertheless, some people insist that fast foods, such as chips, hamburgers and fizzy drinks, that are so cheap and tasty, are not a consequence of the health problems. However, I strongly disagree that fast food has no bad impact on people’s health. I believe that fast food has a negative impact on society and, therefore, people must take care of themselves and lead a healthy lifestyle if they do not want to face serious problems with their
Everyday Americans die from the diseases they carry from obesity. Many Americans over eat because their social problems or because they are hereditary. Many plans have been discussed but finding the solution is the problem. Junk foods and unhealthy beverages have corrupted children’s minds all over the nation and putting a stop on it could lead to other benefits. Unhealthy foods and drinks should be taxed and healthy foods should be advertised more to help prevent American obesity.
In the past 60 to 70 years the fast food industry has been one of America’s bittersweet phenomenons. Its the foods that people undeniably crave served all in the matter of minutes at a beyond reasonable low cost, sounds almost too good to be true. With 60 million Americans served fast food everyday its safe to say its very enticing ( “Fast food statistics”, 2014). All the deliciousness aside, most rational individuals are aware of the underlying immoral results from frequent consumption of fast food. Giving way to the cliche, fitting perfect for fast food supporters, “Everything is good in moderation.” With all the recents cutbacks and reforms towards child obesity, currently one of the nations biggest epidemics, the thought of an increase of tax on fast foods has become a hot topic. With sugared soda beverages already banned from public schools and multiple programs implemented against our nations problems with child obesity, a tax on fast only seems like the next logical step towards resolving this issue. Opposers believe it will have minimal effect and its just another tax on the poor. With that said a substantial gain of tax revenue that the government would receive from this decision and reducing highly fattening food consumption amongst adolescence, there seems to be cognitive reason to enforce such a law.
In particular, this paper will look at “sin taxes” and their effects through the lens of behavioral economics. Sin taxes are a type of excise tax, which are levied on immoral or socially harmful substances such as alcohol, tobacco, gambling, and unhealthy drinks. While sin taxes have been a topic of hot debate in regards to finding ways to fund increasing health care costs, the concept of a sin tax is nothing new in the United States. However, its purpose has changed over time. Originally, sin taxes were predominantly “[…] enacted as wartime emergency measures, and were repealed when hostilities ended” (Williams & Christ 2009), whereas they are now used to curb proscribed habits. The first s...
A more simplistic definition to define sin taxes would be a tax on goods that are not needed for everyday survival or goods that are deemed immoral to society. Sin taxes also know as excise taxes date back to the Post Revolutionary Era. A sin tax is a form of tax used to “raise revenue for the government and…curtail behaviors that are unsavory” (Class notes). Sin taxes where mostly popular in the prohibition era the government not only used sin taxes to raise revenue but also a “noble experiment” for the government to take a national stand in order to curtail alcohol use (Class notes). In their quest to wage war on the budget the government has passed sin taxes on everyday goods such as “tobacco, alcohol, gasoline and candy”, this also including taxes on “pole and gambling” (Class notes). In this essay I will examine two different articles “Hate the Sin, Tax the Sinner” and “Paying with our Sins” on their view points on the use of sin taxes to raise revenue for the government.
Sin taxes are controversial in the U.S., but governments have always relied on tortuous taxes on goods as a source of income. “Sinful” goods such as cigarettes or alcohol traditionally have a punitive tax, while there is current interest in even penalizing the purchase of fatty foods or sugary drinks – a step too far. Sin taxes equate to excise taxes mainly designed to inhibit certain behaviors deemed harmful to society, and have functioned with varied importance throughout history. Taxes on items such as cigarettes and alcohol usually have bipartisan appeal, and are likely to benefit the fiscal, social and physical health of the U.S. Therefore, sin taxes are necessary in a state to both deter unacceptable behaviors and financially benefit from those who still partake in those unacceptable behaviors.
In America over 300,000 people are obese and that number continues to grow because the about of junk food that is being consumed. This cost the economy one hundred billion dollars. That more damage done than smoking or drinking. (Crowley, Michael 5) There are other health problems, such as heart diseases, chronic diseases, and type-two diabetes that occur because of junk food. Increasing the price of junk food, by adding tax, researchers hope that this will prod people to reject unhealthy foods. Taxes will also encourage a healthier lifestyle, even in low-income families (Franck, Caroline 2).
It became so clear that junk foods lead to a punch of catastrophic diseases like obesity, type two diabetes, vascular diseases and cardiac disorders. Those kinds of diseases cost more than $150 billion annually, just to diagnose, treat people who suffer from them. That disease is chronic and leads to many health-related issues, for example, obesity considers a risk factor for type two diabetes, and high blood pressure, joint disorders and many others (The Denver Post 2012). The key of preventing many chronic problems is nutrition. Low income plays an important role of limiting most people to buy and eat a healthy diet and in the other hand, it is easy for people budgets to purchase junk foods. So controlling the prices of healthy foods to be suitable for all people make good nutrition available for everyone. Adequate diets mean decreasing the epidemic of those serious diseases, and stopping the spread and break the bad sequences that may happen. Long-term exposure to junk foods that are full with chemicals like additives, preservatives have led to chronic illnesses difficult to treat. Also, the chemical added to junk foods are tasted unique and made millions of people becoming addicted to them and are available everywhere for example in restaurants, cafes, lunchrooms (The Denver Post