Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sugar tax outline
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Taxing Sugar
Mark Bittman’s article, “Taxing Sugar to Fund a city,” emphasizes that on one hand, the taxation of sugar sweetened beverages would be a bonus. On the other hand it could continue to not be supported by the people and government. Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages is being considered in many different places throughout the world. The taxation was becoming a failure everywhere, until it worked for the first time in several cities. Cites such as Northern California, San Francisco, Albany and Richmond. These cities opened up their ideas to this new type of taxation, once those places became supportive many others begin to also be supportive of this new taxation. Philadelphia plans to use the taxes received for the needy, community schools, public parks, recreation centers and libraries. Some cities support using the money this way rather than using the tax for safe free drinking water like in Berkley and Mexico. Taxed products
…show more content…
Governments would just be continuing to cause problems because another huge problem in America is there are already way too many people without jobs. When going to the store to get a soda, is there really much to think about when drinking sweetened goods has become a part of an everyday lifestyle. Why would someone suddenly put a tax on something which so many have loved and became addicted to. If there was a tax put on everything people have come to love there would be a huge tax for everything. Bittman does not think that putting a tax on sugar sweetened beverages would affect the jobs of people because he believes it would get made up by the selling of their other products. However it is important to realize that most places would not be passing this until 2018. Although, people really do need to realize what these sweetened products are doing and the reason why taxing for these goods is not looking so
The article,“ Battle lines drawn over soda tax,” by Associated Press , the Press explains how there is an ongoing “national fight about taxing sugary drinks.” According to Associated Press, “ Health experts say the beverages contribute to health issues such as diabetes, obesity, and tooth decay.” This quote demonstrates that sugary drinks can lead to health issues. Since sugary drinks leads to health issues, people are considering soda tax. This is because thirteen percent of adult minorities are diagnosed with diseases such as diabetes.
Mayor Bloomberg’s plan is to decrease the amount of sugar intake that Americans digest. However, to do this successfully, he would need to include all sugary products that affect Americans, not just the most popular products, which happens to be soda. When you take away soda, people will start to replace the drink with something more available. The replacement drink could easily be something more caloric or sugary than the banned drink. Therefore, no change is made. Pure juices have the potential to be unhealthier than soda. These factors need to be considered when deciding what or what not to ban. It would be unfair to target soda and the companies that profit off of soda, without considering the other sugary products and their effect on the world. Some could argue that juice comes from fruit, while soda is artificial. Also, sugars in juice are more natural than the high fructose corn syrup. All the while, this is suppose to support the idea that juice is healthier than soda. However, according to the journal, Nutrition, fruit juice, on average, has a fructose concentration of about 45.5 grams per liter. 45.5 grams per liter is only a bit less than the average 50 grams per liter for
Drenkard, S. (2010). Overreaching on Obesity: Governments Consider New Taxes on Soda and Candy. Retrieved from http://heartland.org
From 1773 to 1775 the Americans felt the weight put to them by the supreme approaches. The mix of the brutal duties and the absence of an American voice in Parliament offered ascend to types of protection which drove thirteen settlements in North America to consolidated to break free from the English Domain, joining to wind up noticeably the Assembled Conditions of America. Before the finish of the Seven Years War there was nearly nothing, assuming any, motivation to trust that one day the American settlements would embrace an unrest with an end goal to make a free country state. As a piece of the realm the provinces were shielded from outside intrusion by the English military. Consequently, the pilgrims paid moderately few assessments and
Sugar growers continue to benefit from favorable economic conditions provided by the U.S. government. Yet empirical data reveal a decrease in the aggregate support for sugar legislation in recent years. In 1978, there were 9,187 full or part owners of sugar cane and sugar beet farms, compared to 7,799 farms in 1987. The level of sugar subsidy allocated to the farmers, however, has increased and even favored certain sugar growers disproportionately over others. Such empirical findings suggests that politics, as much as economics, affect the level of sugar subsidy. This paper examines why an increasingly smaller number of sugar farmers receive a steadily larger government subsidy.
But it’s doubtful that Americans will look favorably upon regulating their favorite vice. We’re a nation that’s sweet on sugar: the average U.S. adult downs 22 teaspoons of sugar a day, according to the American Heart Association, and surveys have found that teens swallow 34 teaspoons.” By consuming sugar consumers can experience what's known as a “sugar high” a sugar high can have the same effects drugs and alcohol cause. But since sugar is in our everyday lives it would be hard to regulate it. Research shows that the average adult consumes 22 teaspoons of sugar a day the average teen consumes 34 teaspoons of sugar. America is a country that loves sugar from soda to cereal everything has sugar. “Robert Lustig, an endocrinologist at the University of California, San Francisco, argued in the journal Nature that sugar is addictive and toxic—that it can poison the liver, cause metabolic syndrome (increasing the risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes), suppress the brain’s dopamine system, and cause us to crave more. Lustig concluded, controversially, that sugar should be regulated like a drug. Alcohol is regulated because of its ubiquity, toxicity, abuse, and negative impact on society, he wrote, and ‘sugar meets the same criteria.’” Robert Lustig wrote a journal saying that sugar is addictive and a toxin. It says that it poisons the liver and it suppresses the dopamine
While nobody denies we have a problem with taxation in this country for food, beverages, and everything that we buy in general, I believe that we should have a fat tax to detour people from buying soda and other fattening foods. We should also ban sodas and other fattening foods from vending machines in schools, and replace them with more healthy selections.
A soda tax aims to stop consumers from buying soda to help those who are obese. This will not be effective. Therefore, a soda tax will not be good public policy. A soda tax is a tax that will add an extra cent per ounce to a bottle or can of a sugary drink, including juice, tea, coffee, energy drinks, and soda.
I do not think the soda ban would have worked because all it was only restricting a very small portion of businesses that sell sodas. While sodas may be a large contributor to the US obesity epidemic there are many other sources of sugar-laden foods and drinks such as fast food meals, energy drinks, processed juices, and sports drinks.
Sugar is one of the most addictive things in the world. On average you should have consumed around about 35.4kg of sugar when I reality you have consumed 163.5kg. That is about 4.5 times the recommended 6 teaspoons per day. Personally, I believe that the sugar tax should not be introduced to Australia. Sugar taxing could be beneficial however there is more reason for why it’s not. Australia is already so addictive to sugar that 60% of Australian adults and 25% of Australian children are considered to be overweight or obese. I believe that adding a few more dollars on existing retail prices of sugary drinks is not the answer. The sugar tax is not fair to those who are of low income, the sales of soft drinks are quickly decreasing and deciding what drinks are taxed is too complicated, and soft drink consumption is already falling so what is the point
Probably some of the most pleasurable and enjoyable memories of a person has to do with sweets. When thinking back to birthdays, there is always the memory of the wonderful cake that mother beautifully made and decorated with frosting and glazes. A typical night out with dad can be transformed into a magical evening with a trip to the ice cream parlor. The end of a fantastic Thanksgiving dinner turns heavenly when a hot apple pie is brought to the table and topped with delicious, melting vanilla ice cream. A good wedding is never complete without the cutting of the splendid multi-level wedding cake, when the happy new couple gets to playfully shove and smear cake and white frosting into each other’s smiling faces. Everyone knows that as a child, the only good part about going to the dentist is getting the candy bar at the end of the visit. Why do some people get sick after eating too much suger? Some people do not even know that the abuse of sugar can lead to negative effects on your body. There is something strangely enjoyable and resplendent about the consumption of sugar. Why is it that sugar is so deliciously enjoyable and at the same time a food product that has many negative affects on people’s health?
Sugaring is a technique very similar to waxing with different benefits. Anyone who has waxed or considered waxing should take this option of hair depilation into consideration. It has been around for thousands of years, originated by the ancient Egyptians; its other term is hallawa, which is what sugaring is referred as in Egypt. Sugaring is similar in the sense of waxing because it is all natural, chemical free, and has about the same hair regrowth rate for hair. Sugaring would be best compared to hard wax because there is no use of strips in the process. It is slightly different in the sense that it can be made right at home for an affordable amount and there is no use of sticks. Wax also becomes a liquid when warmed for use, where as sugaring becomes a paste or gel that is room temperature and only clings to the hair and not the skin, like hard wax. There are kits available to purchase for sugaring, but the cheaper, less expensive route would be to make it yourself. All you need is 2 1/2 cups of granulated white sugar, 1/4 cup of lemon juice, and 1/4 cup of water. You will also need baby powder and a washcloth for the process, but that comes later. You will need a pot, a wooden spoon, and a glass jar if you are interested in storing the sugaring mixture for later. First you will combine the 2 1/2 cups of sugar, the 1/4 cup of water, and the 1/4 cup of lemon juice into a pot and cook on high heat until the mixture starts to boil; make sure to stir the mixture with a wooden spoon consistently. Once the mixture has reached a boil, stir until golden brown and then remove the pot from the heat until it cools down. Let the mixture sit and cool until it is cool enough to touch and then proceed to take the suga...
Manitoba, a place knew for adoring new and high taxes, refused to add junk food taxes because they knew that it was going to be a waste of time and there would not be any positive results (5). The many studies of junk food taxes have soon other countries that it is not going to work. People will find other alternative to get the sugary high they need. A study in a small city showed that soda intake decreased for a small amount of time and then it increased again, as well as the sales on beer increased (Luciani P.
Sugar, like many other tradeable goods, was circulated through a variety of regions for over a thousand years. As trade and transportation created opportunities for more interactions between locations, sugar was introduced to places that it had been previously unknown. In the sixteenth century, Europe, specifically England, took a large interest in sugar, first serving as a luxury for the elite class but eventually evolving into a good available to all social classes. The high demand for sugar led to the expansion of sugar production, an increase in African slavery, and implemented a significant system of trade.