The Importance Of Scientific Objectivity In Science By Dr. James Mickle

1104 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Enumerate the importance of research

In the natural sciences, writers conduct experiments, make and record observations, and report on their work in an effort to better understand the natural world. The natural sciences include a number of sub fields, including medicine, mathematics, physics and engineering, to name a few. Dr. James Mickle of North Carolina State University has been teaching in the sub field of biology since 1987. His research specializes in "whole-plant” taxonomy of fossil plants, conifer taxonomy and phylogeny, growth and development in fossil plant vegetative organs, and angiosperm fossil fruits taxonomy. Dr. Mickle stated that his research has been concentrated on fossil plants from eastern North America and southern Europe, and has been involved in extensive museum …show more content…

Science writing must show its readers that it’s offering an important contribution which could come off as argumentative piece. Uniting impartiality and argumentative writing can be puzzling. Scientific objectivity has two parts; your hypothesis must be testable and your results must be reproducible (Principles of Writing in the Science’s). It is still essential to make a solid case for the relevance and importance of your research. When Dr. Mickle was asked about the first major encounter he had with natural science writing his response was, “I published my undergraduate thesis. It was memorable in that it was reviewed by the committee with their comments, and then I sat down with the editor of the journal who was a very blunt person. It was humbling to say the least but it did result in my first publication”. Dr. Mickle explained that his major expectation for his students is that they will learn from their mistakes. The whole point of a learning environment is to learn, so he expects to see is improvement over

Show More
Related

  • They Say/I Say: The Data Suggest By Christopher Gillen

    428 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Christopher Gillen’s chapter “The Data Suggest” in “They Say/I Say: The moves that matter in Academic Writing”, Gillen (2010) addresses to the readers his rendition of the correct way to present scientific writing. He first explains that in order to convincingly portray the author’s point about the scientific issue that they either agree with, disagree with is to begin with the data. He states , “Data are the fundamental currency of scientific argument” (Gillen, 2010, pg. 204). Meaning, in order to appear knowledgeable and to open an argument at all, the data, including their numbers, methods and conclusion, from previously existing theories and from the author’s own experiment is crucial to present in the writing. Gillen claims that by

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Great Influenza By John M Barry

    596 Words  | 2 Pages

    Barry successfully conveys the many traits that scientists will endure in their work, and the qualities essential in order to be successful by using three effective rhetorical devices-- exemplification, powerful diction, and insightful figurative language. He uses his experience with the flu epidemic and rhetorical strategies to prove his claim that there is much more to science

    Read More

  • John M Barry Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    399 Words  | 1 Pages

    Overall, John M. Barry was able to define and characterize scientific research. Using rhetorical strategies such as, comparison, specific diction, and contrast Barry is able to show how scientific research is uncertainty

    Read More

  • Anita Leinweber Plagiarism Summary

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    What she considers effective writing are focused and concise papers. She reviews manuscripts and reads many where the author tries to include too much of their experiment. When doing research, many scientists do not just focus on one thing, but branch off. In their papers, it is better to focus on one small part of it so the readers do not get overwhelmed or confused. She says the same is true for the opposite. Trying to write five scientific papers about one interesting result is

    Read More

  • Argument Analysis: Coatesville By John Jay Chapman

    1988 Words  | 4 Pages

    My English 1310 course was taught by Professor Daniel Stuart. He taught us the concept of academic writing and why it is important. Academic writing is the process of down ideas, using a formal tone, deductive reasoning and third person. Writing done to carry out the requirements of a college or university on a research based level. It requires a starting point or introduction, followed by a thesis on the preferred topic, then comes proving and disproving of the evidence based arguments. Learning academic writing is important because it is a way to communicate our thoughts clearly and originality. It helps us think and see what evidence we can come up to contribute to that thinking. This course approached this idea of academic writing by

    Read More

  • Are Colleges Worth the Price of Admission?

    4200 Words  | 9 Pages

    ...Academic Writing. Ed. Gerald Graff. 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 179-189. Print.

    Read More

  • A Kind Word For Bullshit Analysis

    501 Words  | 2 Pages

    It would be foolish to claim that I have never overanalysed and disregarded conveying ideas and theories properly, in the interest of impressing my reader. Nevertheless, this aspiration indicates there is more to academic writing than simply passing information.

    Read More

  • Pamela Livingston Article on Preventing and Treating Obesity

    1264 Words  | 3 Pages

    Academic Writing. By Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2010. N. pag. Print

    Read More

  • Genre Analysis Of A Psychology Critique Paper

    874 Words  | 2 Pages

    For my psychology class, I am required to complete critique papers on reputable research studies. For one of these assignments, I was asked to analyze a research paper entitled “The Misperception of Sexual Interest” and to identify possible flaws in the study, as well as explain what the authors did well. While completing this assignment, I had to consider the ethos of the class and understand the kairos and network of interpretation in which I was writing. An understanding of these facets is essential for effective, well-structured writing that is focused and appropriate for a science course.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis On John Barry

    431 Words  | 1 Pages

    John Barry’s piece explores that science is more than the outcome of an experiment but rather the questions asked in the process. Through many different types of rhetorical strategies, he addresses the need to be uncertain to be a successful scientist.

    Read More

  • What I Learned in Writing 101

    954 Words  | 2 Pages

    Writing can be very frustrating; laying your ideas out on paper so that others can grasp the concept you are trying to convey is a very difficult task. In Writing 101 I have learned how to formulate good theses that are arguable and also how to validate articles that have to do with my topic. The most important element of a paper is the thesis statement. It captures the reader's attention and tells them what the essay is about. Having a well-structured thesis along with evidence to support that thesis are the main ingredients to a well-written essay. I have also learned how important it is to research an author’s background to ensure their credibility. This is a very important step in writing because today we can find information on a topic, however, it is not valid. By researching the author, we can see if he or she is an expert in the area and so this would make his or her information more credible. There is a ...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Levi's The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the mid-20th century, a central debate in the philosophy of science is the role of epistemic values when evaluating its bearing in scientific reasoning and method. In 1953, Richard Rudner published an influential article whose principal argument and title were “The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments” (Rudner 1-6). Rudner proposed that non-epistemic values are characteristically required when making inductive assertions on the rationalization of scientific hypotheses. This paper aims to explore Rudner’s arguments and Isaac Levi’s critique on his claims. Through objections to Levi’s dispute for value free ideal and highlighting the importance of non-epistemic values within the tenets and model development and in science and engineering,

    Read More

  • Science And Religion By John F. Haught

    894 Words  | 2 Pages

    Science and Religion dialogue has been a bitter-sweet topic for many people over the years. The controversy is not only common between one sole community, but affects a variety. The beliefs held about these topics has the potential to personally effect an individual, whether it be positively or negatively. In the United States, we draw only a fine line between religion and science, often failing to realize that the two benefit each other in copious ways but are not meant to interpreted in the same way. Due to this perspective, people seem to be influenced to pick one or the other, when in reality we should treat both science and religion with the same respect and recognize that they are completely separate from one another, along with having individual purposes. John F. Haught, a distinguished research professor at Georgetown University, published a book titled, “Science & Religion: From Conflict to Conversation”. In it he evaluates each side, persuading the reader that the truth is that both realms may benefit from each other despite the differences emphasized. John F. Haught introduces his audience with four approaches on Science and Religion. Haught’s third approach, contact, is of major significance to aid in the response of: “Does Science Rule out a Personal God?”

    Read More

  • Professor Daniel Stuart: Genre Analysis

    1756 Words  | 4 Pages

    My English 1310 course was taught by Professor Daniel Stuart. He taught us the concept of academic writing and why it is important. Academic writing is the process of breaking down ideas, using a formal tone, deductive reasoning and third person. Writing done to carry out the requirements of a college or university on a research based level. It requires a starting point or introduction, followed by a thesis on the preferred topic, then comes proving and disproving of the evidence based arguments. It is important because it is a way to communicate our thoughts clearly and originality. It helps us think and see what evidence we can come up to contribute to that thinking. This course approached this idea of academic writing by exploring further

    Read More

  • What Is The Importance Of Academic Writing

    1894 Words  | 4 Pages

    This is where the writer provides ideas and arguments with corresponding analysis, interpretation and evaluation. It also requires proficiency in grammar usage which means a writer should be mindful of the rules and conventions in writing to avoid erroneous sentence structure. Consistency is one of the skills needed in academic writing by making essays free from personal feelings and biases. A clear sense of argument is very important in academic writing because in writing the thoughts of writer would be vividly expressed. One has to give ideas and perception on a certain thing in the surroundings such as real object, picture, text, artifacts, phenomena and

    Read More

More about The Importance Of Scientific Objectivity In Science By Dr. James Mickle

Open Document