Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the first amendment
Freedom of expression – A double-edged sword
Essays on the first amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When our country was founded in 1776, it was founded on the liberty of expressing and having your voice be heard which gave us the first amendment. Part of the first amendment is freedom of speech which lets many authors express themselves through words and informing readers about real world issues that nowadays people just ignore, and information that might be essential to someone on the days come forth .By challenging, banning or censoring a authors book you're basically restraining them from using their first amendment. When censoring a book it’s censoring a part of a book that either one or more have found offensive and with banning its the whole book. Banning or challenging a book is absurd , no one has the right to decide for everyone …show more content…
we're all humans who can make decisions for ourselves, we don't need anyone deciding what part of a book we can't read or in general the whole book.
Most book bannings happen in elementary's since a parent finds their child reading a book that they don't agree with and first challenge the book if successful the book is banned from the school's library which restricts other students from reading the book.Many authors have spoked up about the issue with banning, in the article Censorship Cannot Be Allowed in …show more content…
Americ. The author states their point in book banning by writing “But you do not have the right to decide "appropriateness" for everyone” ( “Censorship cannot be”), the author emphasizes that no one has the right to agree for everyone when it comes to books and if you dont like it just put it back down. When children pick up a book and take it home they might have just choosen it since the cover was pretty or they just didnt care and chose a random book , of course parents arent just gonna sit there and read the book from start to finish and tell them if they approve it , at most they might just skim through it. Parents arent always going to be breathing down their childrens neck meaning they wont know what theyre reading and if a child reads a excplicit book at a young age of course theyre gonna talk about it with other kids and no one want their child saying explicit things at a young age . A mother shared her opinion about book banning and she agreed that book banning isnt good but its also something important we need since there should be boundaries when it comes to literature “ And I'm one who dearly values common sense as well as decency and taste when it comes to drawing reasonable lines for our children's sake” (School Libraries Should ) , there should be a “line” that we need in literature yes the first admendment does protect our speech but that doesnt mean that we can just start writing explicit literature and believe that were not going to be harm , while it might not affect the life of the author it will to someone elses life.
A famous piece of literature “Faranheit 451” was banned in some parts of the U.S for bulgar language and the burning of the most well knows religious book : the bible . Even the author of the book , Ray Bradbury , spoke up about literature being either banned or challenged during national banned book week , in a article he said “You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them."”(Banned Books Week) , Bradbury doent say it directly
but
In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned. If the school district agrees with the parents, they will ban the book from the school curriculum and forbid teachers from teaching the book to students. Parents might think that the book goes against religious or moral...
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
By forbidding the reading of certain books, the first amendment rights of every American citizen are violated. The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution clearly states that all citizens have freedom of speech as well as freedom of press (Book Banning 1). By banning a book and making it so that no one can read it, the government is keeping the author from expressing their thoughts and opinions through press. The freedom of choice is also violated due to the inability of reading that particular book as an option. Not only the first amendment rights are violated, but also the academic freedom and diversity of thought guaranteed and protected by the constitution (Teachers 1). History will show that Americans do not take the violation of their rights lightly, and are more than likely to protest. Sometimes, in more extreme cases, they will rebel.
There is a difference between banned books and challenged books. According to the American Library Association (ALA), “A challenge is an attempt to remove or restrict materials, based upon the objections of a person or group (About banned, para. 2). A banned book is when a book or other reading material is removed from certain locations and not available. For example, one of the most challenged books in the 21st century is The Giver by Lois Lowry (100 Most). The novel, The Absolutely True Story of a Part-Time Indian by Sheman Alexie was banned in high school in Oregon because a parent complained that the book was offensive (Doyle, 3).
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
Books are banned for many reasons but more times than not it is because of the sensitive information found within the novel that agitates the reader. As long as people have been able to develop their own opinions, others have sought to prevent them from sharing. At some point in time, every idea has ultimately become objectionable to someone. The most frequently challenged and most visible targets of such objection are the very books found in classrooms and public libraries. These controversial novels teach lessons that sometimes can be very sensitive to some but there is much more to challenged books than a controversial topic. What lies within these pages is a wealth of knowledge, such as new perspectives for readers, twisting plots, and expressions that are found nowhere else. For example, To Kill A Mockingbird, contains references to rape, racial content, and profanity that have caused many to challenge the novel in the first place. The book was banned from countless
In conclusion, book banning is necessary because children may be taught bad habits, lose the magical innocence of childhood, and not be mature enough to decide what materials to read. The banning of books, while unfortunate, is needed to help keep children safe and
Censorship by definition is the suppression of speech or removal of communicative material which may be considered objectionable or repulsive. Censorship is nothing new and its effects are constantly felt throughout society. Many societies use censorship to protect the established moral and social order. Book censorship in western cultures can be traced to the earliest years of Christianity, when the church began to suppress opposing views as unorthodox. In ancient times, before the printing press and the mass production of literature, book burning was an effective form of censorship. This process guaranteed that no one would ever read them. Although book burning was very efficient it is now used as more of a gesture of protest to shock people rather than a real method of destroying a book. In modern times, censorship refers to the examination of media including books, periodicals, plays, motion pictures, television shows and radio programs for the purpose of altering or suppressing parts thought to be offensive. Today’s censorship occurs when certain people succeed in imposing their personal or moral values on others. Censorship deals mainly with the first amendment constitutional. “The law requires that if a book is to be removed, an inquiry must be made as to the motivation and intention of the party calling for its removal. If the party’s intention is to deny students access to ideas with which the party disagrees, it is a violation of the First Amendment” [First Amendment Center]. Though the First Amendment bars government authorities from prohibiting the free exercise, abridging the freedom of speech or practicing religious censorship in the United States, individuals have successfully pushed to remove books from public and ...
The censorship of books is a division of censorship that, apart from Internet censorship, receives the most publicity. Banning books is the most popular form of such censorship. Many banned books are literary classics, such as The Catcher in the Rye, by J.D. Salinger, which was listed as the number 6 most challenged or banned book in a list compiled by the American Civil Liberties Union in 1997.
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
...s restricting author’s freedom of expression. By practicing tolerance and self-censorship we can help lower the amount of censored books in the upcoming decade.
Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe. The Houston Chronicle, pp.C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database.
The process of banning books has been around for ages, but the real question is why does this exist? Books are banned because of many reasons, and the reasons are that they have inappropriate content which is the reason for books being banned on school grounds, or they give out a message that governments are trying to prevent from reaching the public. Since the year of 1982 more that 11,300 books have been challenged for banning for multiple and vast reasons at Mansfield Personality of Pennsylvania where Scott DiMarco works at.
Reading literature in schools is unavoidable, whether it be in kindergarten or twelfth grade. Most children will have a book they read in class or an assigned book they must do a report over. Parents may discover their child bringing a book home from a school library they dislike because of the content. When parents feel like a book is not suitable for a classroom or the library, they may challenge it. Challenging a book is an attempt to remove the materials based on objections to the material within.