Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Protectionism vs free trade
Free trade and protectionism
Protectionism and free trade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Protectionism vs free trade
Research question: What is the impact of US's tariff on the steel industry in countries such as Japan, Russia, South Korea and Brazil?
Protectionism is the economic policy of promoting favoured domestic industry through the use of high tariffs or other regulations to discourage imports. A tariff is a tax placed upon imports (and/or export goods), sometimes called customs duty. A revenue tariff is set with the intent of raising money for the government. A protective tariff, usually applied to import goods, is intended to artificially inflate prices if imports and "protect" domestic industries from foreign competition. This latter is the method applied by the US, which is mentioned in the article.
Fig.1
As illustrated in Fig.1, the domestic price before trade is Po with quantity produced at Qdo. After trade, which leads to a shifting out of the supply curve, the price falls to the world level of Pa, where quantity consumed is Qa, of which only Qda is produced domestically. Domestic producer have lost production and their revenue has fallen to Pa*Qda. Therefore, some countries feel the need to protect their own industries or production lines from foreign competition by imposing tariff. When a tariff is imposed, supply curve is shifting in from Sd + f to Sd+f+t, leading to a drop in quantity consumed at Qb, which means domestic producers are increasing production to Qdb. Also, their total revenue will rise to Pb*Qdb. At that time, the government will receive the revenue from the difference of Qb and Qdb multiplied by price Pb-Pa. The consumption will decrease because there is less of the product and the product is set a higher price. Indeed, foreign exporters will receive Qb-Qdb times Pa. The tariff is more effective the more elastic the demand curve is.
In this case, the US's steel industry has to face with fierce competition with Japan, Russia, South Korea and Brazil, which leads to a loss of revenue for the US producers from Po*Qdo to Pa*Qda (Refer to Fig.2). For example, "Japan, the world's second-biggest steel producer after China, exported 2.2 million tones of steel to the United States in 2001." Therefore the US decided to impose "30% tariffs on a wide range of steel imports", blaming "cheap imports for 31 bankruptcies." As a result, supply shifts in from S Japan, Russia, South Korea, Brazil to S Japan+ Russia +South Korea +Brazil+ tariff, increasing US revenue from Pa*Qda to Pb*Qdb and decreasing the amount of imports dramatically from Ma to Mb.
·Tariffs doubly injured the majority of citizens, first by imposing heavy import taxes that were passed on to consumers and then by reducing the incentive for American manufacturers to produce goods at a lower cost than imports
Protectionism is the theory or practice of shielding a country's domestic industries from foreign competition by taxing imports. Between 2000 and 2008 the value of world trade in goods and services rose by 12% a year. However since the global recession in 2008 the value of world trade in goods and services has substantially decreased.
He then, states that the number of jobs lost barely even put a dent in the number of jobs produced by trade. Another important issue of the trade system is that the people who get rich from trade, keep getting richer while the poor stay poor. This is partially solved by protectionism (taxing imports), although it slows economic growth in the long run and protects some of the jobs that would be lost in the short run. To help understand the price of trade barriers, he explains this by stopping trade across the Mississippi River. This shows that the east side would then have to stop producing their goods and spend some of their time producing what the west side used to export. Although, there would be an increase in jobs, it would not be efficient because they are not using specialization to their full advantage. The author then moves on to the point that trade lowers the price of goods, due to it being cheaper to produce in other areas. He portrays this by showing why Nike can produce shoes in Vietnam instead of the United States. He further elaborates his point by proving that trade helps poor countries as
Increased inexpensive imports led to business failures, bank closures, and unemployment in cities. Britain ended The War of 1812 with America and trade increases. Britain’s industrial capacity exceeded Americas’.5 Britain then exported its surplus of manufactured goods to America. U.S. factories could not compete with Europe’s low labor costs and low price of goods. American imports rose from $12.9 million in 1814 to $151 million in 1816. Businesses were forced to close.
In a protectionist position, the government is aiming to ensure American businesses and at the same time decrease the amount of sales of foreign business. The fastest method for accomplishing this task is to increase tariffs, as in taxes on foreign goods coming into the country.... ... middle of paper ... ...
...lict. Neighboring countries will want to maximize their own revenues and in order to do so, they will set their own prices for goods and services.
In 1776, even as Adam Smith was championing the ideals of a free market economy, he recognized that the interests of national security far outweighed the principles of free trade. More then two centuries later, that sentiment proves to still be accurate and in use. Since the early 1900s, the United States has used this precept to defend its position on trade barriers to hostile nations, and through the majority of the century, that predominantly referred to the Soviet Union and its allies.
The United States has for over two centuries been involved in the growing world economy. While the U.S. post revolutionary war sought to protect itself from outside influences has since the great depression and world war two looked to break trade restrictions. The United States role in the global economy has grown throughout the 20th century and as a result of several historical events has adopted positions of both benefactor and dependent. The United States trade policy has over time shifted from isolationist protectionism to a commitment to establishing world-wide free trade. Free trade enterprise has developed and grown through organizations such as the WTO and NAFTA. The U.S. in order to obtain its free trade desires has implemented a number of policies that can be examined for both their benefits and flaws. Several trade policies exist as options to the United States, among these fair trade and free trade policies dominate the world economic market. In order to achieve economic growth the United States has a duty to maintain a global trade policy that benefits both domestic workers and industry. While free trade gives opportunities to large industries and wealthy corporate investors the American worker suffers job instability and lower wages. However fair trade policies that protect America’s workers do not help foster wide economic growth. The United States must then engage in economic trade policies that both protect the United States founding principles and secure for tomorrow greater economic stability.
Too many questions have been asked if dumping implies unfair trade practices. Recently, disputes over dumping make it difficult to decide whether or not we should allow this activity to enter our country. Many of us are equally familiar that more foreign imports mean more jobs are being destroyed in American industries. Because of this particular reason, WTO and GATT members have worked together to see if there is a relationship between dumping and unjust trades. In their study, some have discovered that dumping benefits the economy and helps increase competitions among various industries in the U.S. However, there were also some others who took the opposite side by arguing that dumping is an unreasonable practice of trade and may American economy in the future. If dumping really affects trade and costs jobs in the US, then what are the measures needed to prevent this practice and help maintain fair trade in the global economy.
A nation that possesses strong industry, a favorable trade balance, and a lack of dependency upon foreign states is optimum. This ideology is one that has been strongly advocated throughout America’s existence, by politicians from Alexander Hamilton to Pat Buchanan. When a nation faces a trade deficit, it means that competing states are producing more efficiently, and ultimately making profiting. Also, a deficit means that industry and jobs, which could exist domestically, are being “stolen” by foreign nations. According to mercantile policy, this is a zero-sum game; when a competitor is winning, we are losing. The United States faces this situation, having evolved from the world’s largest creditor nation during and following World War II to its current position as the world’s largest debtor. Because America imports much more than it exports, an additional 600 billion dollars is needed every year to balance the equation. This money is “borrowed” through the sale of government assets, sometimes to domestic investors, but increasingly to foreign ones. Many circumstances can be blamed for this situation: cheap foreign labor, foreign government subsidy, and closed foreign markets, among others. The question therefore arises: how to negate obstacle...
level. The sand is Both developed and developing countries benefit from tariff reduction. The consumer will have more choices with more products and a wider price range.... ... middle of paper ... ... Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/0109121e.pdf?expires=1394821453&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=148EDDDFD930AFCF166F34498B8601B6.
If all the tariffs on international trade in steel were removed, and subsidies to steel exporters around the world were banned, who would this benefit? Who would lose from such action?
One of the most cited arguments for intervention is that of protecting jobs and industries from unfair foreign competition (Hill). While industries like aerospace are protected given their importance for national security, job protection appears as a result of unions and industries putting political pressure given the threat of more efficient foreign firms (Hill). Many countries achieve this by increasing the tariffs on imports of foreign products. What really happens when a certain industry is ...
...y supply and this causes the collapse in the U.S. and elsewhere (Pinnell, Lecture notes, 3/23). Consequently, countries become very protectionist to protect firms at home and international trade collapses (Pinnell, Lecture notes, 3/23). Therefore, states must make decisions with reciprocity and consequences in mind (Pinnell, Lecture notes, 3/23).
Embracing the concept of free trade means that a government does not influence the trade by imposing sanctions but rather has a laissez-faire approach that allows the international market to decide which product has the comparative advantage. The global economy runs on this assumption but not all “play” by the same rules. The United States has limited sanctions imposed on free trade, allowing the free market to operate across the world. The United States’ approach to free trade is much like our approach to the US Olympic Team. Our athletes are unpaid volunteers that often fund their Olympic quest with sponsorships. As our metal count often shows, you do not always “win” ...