Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Free trade advantages and disadvantages
An essay on fair trade
Free trade advantages and disadvantages
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Free trade advantages and disadvantages
Introduction
The idea of fair trade was founded in the 1950s, and it has become more prevalent in the 1980s. (Mohan, 2010) Fair trade is trade between developed and developing countries where suppliers in the developing countries are protected to ensure a fair trade. (Hayes and Moore, 2005) Suppliers usually benefit from guaranteed minimum price and the social premium. On the other hand, free trade does not have a fixed price, and it has low government intervention such as tariffs on imported goods. On free trade, the prices fluctuate depending on the demand and supply of the goods. Fair trade has its advantages, however there are drawbacks that must not be overlooked. Some critics argue that fair trade has little, if any, benefits to the producers, and it only affects a small number of suppliers. Fair trade only concentrates on a few individuals whereas free trade will have a positive impact in the whole economy. There are flaws in the fair trade system and unlike free trade, it does not encourage efficiency and competitiveness to sustain the suppliers. This essay aims to discuss the benefits and the flaws in the fair trade system and how free trade can be more beneficial to suppliers than fair trade.
Advantages of fair trade
Fair trade offers fixed price that can protect suppliers from fluctuations in prices. (Mohan, 2010) Most of the products traded under fair trade are agricultural. The prices of agricultural products are very volatile under the free market. This is because usually agricultural goods such as coffee and banana are necessities and their supplies are subject to random shocks such as natural disasters. Due to its volatile nature, any small changes in demand or supply will dramatically affect the price. For ex...
... middle of paper ...
...orks Cited
Booth, P. & Whetstone, L., 2007. Half a Cheer for Fair Trade [online]. London: Institute of Economic Affairs. Available at: [Accessed 11th December 2013].
Griffiths, P., 2010. Lack of rigour in defending Fairtrade: a reply to Alastair Smith. Economic Affairs , 45-49
Hayes, M. & Moore, G., 2005. The Economics of Fair Trade: a guide in plain English [online]. Newcastle Fairtrade Partnership. Available at: [Accessed 11th December 2013]
Mohan, S., 2010. Fair Trade Without the Froth: A Dispassionate Economic Analysis of ‘Fair Trade’ [online]. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Ronchi. L., 2002. The Impact of Fair Trade on Producers and Their Organisations: A Case Study with Coocafé in Costa Rica. University of Sussex.
Sidwell, M., 2008. Unfair Trade. London: Adam Smith Institute.
Wright, L. T., & Heaton, S. (2006). Fair Trade marketing: an exploration through qualitative research. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 411-426. doi:10.1080/09652540600948019
Roberts, Russell. (2006). The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Fair trade should give protection to governments from exploitation. For example, small farmers can be protected by giving government food sovereignty. An article from the Chicago Democratic Socialist Organization proposed, “The agreement must return to governments the ability to safeguard food sovereignty by protecting family and small-scale subsistence farmers” (Chicago Democratic Socialist). Rewriting the agreement can protect the small farms and retain jobs for farm workers. The article further addressed an issue discussed previously, “Large-scale importation of basic grains into Mexico is a major cause of the economic collapse of rural communities, which forces millions of undocumented migrants to seek work in the USA” (Chicago Democratic Socialist). Therefore, it would solve problems both in the US and Mexico. It will take efforts of the many to renegotiate NAFTA, and many other terms needs to be added. The general direction should focus on protecting the interest of the general public by restricting corporate powers. Fair trade will reduce the problems caused by
Many economic systems are revealed in A Respectable Trade: Slavery, Feudalism, Self-Employment, and Capitalism. England in 1788 was entering a period of economic transition. Viewing this finite period in A Respectable Trade allows us, as economists, to dissect the different market systems prevalent during that time.
...ystem primarily responsible for promoting global competition. Free trade also promotes shifts in production so as to fit the “comparative advantage” model. Though free trade is widely practiced concerns with how to regulate free trade, something supposedly unregulated, countries have to subject themselves to the controversial institutions of the IMF and WTO. Fair trade policies while potentially creating smaller markets support workers’ rights in both the U.S. and developing nations. Though the pros and cons of globalization continue to be debated the United States can no longer escape its role in the global economy nor can it impose policies that are detrimental to the United States founding ideals. However policies that play towards the advantages of both free and fair trade could stimulate a healthy domestic economy that is also competitive in the global market.
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
A country cannot produce all of the products to meet the needs of their people. Therefore, they seek trade with other countries to export their goods. Therefore, the Government of Canada signed a free trade agreement with South Korea. The aim of this agreement was to provide greater market access opportunities for Canadian companies doing business in Korea. As result of this agreement, thousands of new jobs will be created in many sectors.
With so much focus on the positive elements of free trade, the negative aspects of an open system are often overlooked. However, they do exist, and protectionism is needed. Consequently, safeguards are built into the system. States look out for their own good, whether that is through the use of escape clauses or the choice of the optimal forum for dispute settlement based on the precedent they do or do not want set. This paper argues that protectionism is valuable and inherent in the current system; however, not enough. Powerful states exploit weaker states, and “free trade” exacerbates the problem. I will first discuss why free trade does not work. Then, I will explain how the current system enables the inherent protectionist attitude of states. Finally, I will analyze the fairness of the system.
All nations can get the benefits of free trade by being specialized in producing goods they have a comparative advantage and then trade them with goods produced by other nations in the world. This is evidenced by comparative advantage theory. Trade depends on many factors, country's history, institution, size and. geographical position and many more. Also, the countries put trade barriers for the exchange of their goods and services with other nations in order to protect their own company from foreign competition, or to protect consumers from undesirable products, or sometimes it may be inadvertent.
It is evident in numerous countries where fair trade does not exist. Banana farming is not simple, the banana plant is in fact a very vulnerable and sensitive plant easily affected by “infection, poor drainage and wind damage.” Bananas are, of course, only able to grow in tropical countries that are exposed to high volumes of “pests, tropical storms and strong winds.” Fair trade has entered countries like Colombia offering a sustainable way of producing bananas, cutting costs of production, and helping farmers win the pricing wars in supermarkets. Farmers are often forced to lower the cost of their bananas so that they may enter the supermarkets, however, in forcing their prices to go down they are often making far less money than to cover the cost of production. By infringing on the prices and forcing farmers into a delicate position where they are hardly able to pay for their cost of production, either these farmers are forced into closing down their farms or cutting corners. Cutting corners involves, rather than round the clock backbreaking work going into protecting the banana plants, a high usage of pesticides starts being incorporated, rather than effectively protecting the environment getting rid of waste responsibly or finding a water source that will not negatively impact villagers of the town. Additionally, fair trade allows for these
In order for international trade to work well, governments must allow the world market to determine how goods are sold, manufactured and traded for all to economically prosper. While all nations may have the capability to produce any goods or services needed by their population, it is not possible for all nations to have a comparative advantage for producing a good due to natural resources of the country or other available resources needed to produce a good or service. The example of trading among states comprising the United States is an example of how free trade works best without the interve...
We begin our study of free trade by understanding the four principles of individual decision making.... ... middle of paper ... ... Edge, Ken, “Free trade and Protection: advantages and disadvantages of free trade” NSW HSC online http://www.hsc.csu.edu.au/economics/global_economy/tut7/Tutorial7.html#more Accessed November 29, 2011. Net Aparijita, Sinha, “What are the disadvantages of free trade?
Hayes, M. & Moore, G.,2005. The Economics of Fair Trade: a guide in plain English [online]. Newcastle Fairtrade Partnership. Available at: [Accessed 11th December 2013]
Free trade is a form of economic policy which allows countries to import and export goods among each other with no government interference. In recent years there has been a general consensus in economist’s stance on free trade. They view free trade as an asset. Free trade allows for an abundance of goods with increased varieties and increased availability. The products become cheaper for consumers and no one company monopolizes an industry. The system of free trade has been highly controversial. While free trade benefits consumers it has the potential to hurt manufacturers and businesses thus creating a debate between supporters of free trade and those with antagonistic positions.
Fair Trade is a simple idea that improves the living and working conditions of small farmers and workers. The Fair Trade movement promotes the standards for fair labor conditions, fair pricing, direct trade, environmentalism, social policy, and community development. Businesses wishing to adopt Fair Trade practices have to purchase certification licenses, which then leads to Fair Trade Labeling Organization (FLO) sending representatives to the farms from which the products are purchased and ensures that the farmers adhere to the procedures outlined in the Fair Trade standards. Products marked by the Fair Trade label contain 100% Fair Trade certified contents. Buying Fair Trade Certified products, consumers are helping the lives of famers out of poverty through investments in their farms/communities, protecting the environment, and developing the business skills for trading. The practice of Fair Trading a good way to not only help cause awareness but also improve the lives of the workers.