Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
To kill a mockingbird social inequality at the time of the novel
Essay on social inequality in to kill a mockingbird
To kill a mockingbird social inequality at the time of the novel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Within all humanity, contains a malevolent part in themselves that desires to corrupt the purity of the world for their own benefits. Humans do not have the slightest bit of concern for others, being blinded by their own selfish ambition. Personally, I have witnessed several inhumane acts in my lifetime. But, one of worst I have seen was when I followed my wealthy friend to buy a used bicycle. The original price was $100, however my wealthy friend bargained the price down to $70. The woman unwillingly accepted the price, almost as if she was forced to due to her desperate circumstances. Instead of giving her $70, my friend gave her two $20 bills and fled the scene immediately before she could notice. This experience made me feel sick to the …show more content…
Suppose a man has an extensive greed for money. He witnesses a blind woman asking for change with her $5 bill, but the blind woman was holding a $50 bill. The greedy man approaches the blind woman, takes her $50 bill and in return gives her a $1 bill. He used a woman’s disability to benefit himself, manipulating the situation to his own advantage. This is the true nature of mankind; evil, corrupt, and wicked. John Coffey knew very well about humanity’s vile ways, and he expresses that Wharton “killed them with they love … all over the worl’” (494). John Coffey reveals Wharton’s crime of killing “them”, referring to the Detterick twins whom the society assumed that John Coffey had raped and murdered. King could have simply stated that Wharton had murdered the Detterick twins, but he emphasized that Wharton exploits the pure and peaceful “love” of the twins to suit his own desire. “Love” is an intense feeling of deep affection. The twins had a deep “love” for each other that they did not want the other to die. Wharton, instead of embracing their love, only focused on pleasing his impish desire. Additionally, Coffey mentions that this happens “all over the worl’”. King adds that it is not just Wharton who is malicious, but actually it is comprised in human nature. King conveys the message of mankind’s wickedness, …show more content…
Envision a family who all have their own annoying habits. The wife is always annoyed by the husband who has the habit of leaving his socks on the floor. The husband has a flaw that the wife does not appreciate. Instead of correcting this imperfection, the husband decides to ignore it because of his arrogance. Doing so leads to an uncaring and turbulent setting, and the wife is constantly holding a grudge towards her husband’s habit. Everyone has their own foible which they must change to become more complete beings. When Paul and his team had just executed The Chief, Paul mentions that “[they] had once again succeeded in destroying what [they] could not create” (113-114). The word “destroy” is to put an end to the existence of something. When they executed The Chief, what they “destroyed”, and could not create, was peace and compassion. Paul knew that The Chief had committed a horrible crime, however Paul did not feel it was right to take his life. The execution was more like a vengeance to console the victim’s family, knowing that the criminal suffered for his actions. It was not compassionate to execute The Chief, because the audience holds a grudge against him. Therefore, Paul claims that peace was “destroyed” because they did not have any compassion for The Chief to forgive and forget his faults. Paul understood
The undeniable pursuit for power is Richard’s flaw as a Vice character. This aspect is demonstrated in Shakespeare’s play King Richard III through the actions Richard portrays in an attempt to take the throne, allowing the audience to perceive this as an abhorrent transgression against the divine order. The deformity of Richards arm and back also symbolically imply a sense of villainy through Shakespeare’s context. In one of Richard’s soliloquies, he states how ‘thus like the formal Vice Iniquity/ I moralize two meanings in one word’. Through the use of immoral jargons, Shakespeare emphasises Richard’s tenacity to attain a sense of power. However, Richard’s personal struggle with power causes him to become paranoid and demanding, as demonstrated through the use of modality ‘I wish’ in ‘I wish the bastards dead’. This act thus becomes heavily discordant to the accepted great chain of being and conveys Richard’s consumption by power.
Paul's experiences in combat shatter his former misconceptions of war; consequently, he gains the ability to reflect on events with his own accord. His naive ideas are severely challenged when he first witnesses the ugly truth of war. "The first bombardment showed us our mistake, and under it the world as they had taught it to us broke in pieces"(13). Paul's first engagement in combat reveals that everything he was taught as a young recruit are lies; consequently, he can now form his own conclusions. Through the ongoing course of the war, Paul comes to grips with the reality of the situation. "They are strong and our desire is strong-but they are unattainable, and we know it"(121). Paul realizes that the soldiers former lives are all but distant memories. His maturing personality gives him the insight to see past the facade of war and expose it for what it truly is.
One’s greed for power blinds their sense of pity for humanity which creates chaos in society because of their ignorance. In the text Danforth explains to Francis Nurse, “But you must understand sir, that a person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between” (Miller 94). In this quote Danforth explains to Nurse that a citizen of Salem cannot be against the court’s justice system: One must comply with its rules or else they will be counted as guilty. Danforth claims power over the people through the court and anyone who does not obey his demands will be persecuted which shows that this trial is for himself and not for the town. For the sake of his power, Danforth apprehends innocent individuals who are not compliant thus foreshadowing the misfortunes of uninvolved people who are suspects. Without knowing, Danforth intends to create a disorder in society because of his need for more control, which justifies his inexperience and his abuse of authority. Danforth also tells Nurse, “And do you know that near to four hundred are in the jails from marble head to Lynn, and upon my signature? […] And seventy-two condemned to hang by that signature?” (Miller 87). Here Danforth attempts to intimidate Nurse by bragging with h...
Another trait that is displayed by the Pardoner and a character in his tale is hypocrisy. Although the Pardoner is extremely greedy, he continues to try and teach that "Avarice is the root of all evil" (6). The characters in his tale display great hypocrisy as well. As the tale begins, the friends all act very trustworthy and faithful towards all of their friends. They nobly make a decision to risk their lives while trying to slay their friend's murderer. As they talk about their challenge, they pledge "to live and die each of them for the other, / As if he were his own blood brother" (241-242). At the end of the tale, the "brothers" begin to reveal their true nature. They all turn on each other in an attempt to steal the treasure for themselves.
War destroys Paul and his friends. Those who physically survive the bombing, the bullets and bayonets are annihilated by physical attacks on their sanity.
He realizes that he has to lose feeling to survive, “That I have looked far as the only possibility of existence after this annihilation of a human emotion” (194). Paul loses all feeling which may be one of the main factors keeping him alive in battle, so that he does not allow himself to process the violence and horror to which he is exposed. Even in the short time where he thinks about all that he has lost he is immediately overwhelmed with feelings and there is no time for this on the battlefront. Paul has no empathy to the enemy and kills without even thinking, “We have lost all feeling for one another. We can hardly control ourselves when our glance lights on the form at some other man” (117). The tragedies during combat desensitize the men of normal human emotions such as remorse, empathy, guilt, and fear; the un-naturalness of killing another human dulls all of these feelings. People were not made to destroy each other, and as a natural defense to this they shut down all of their feelings. Paul 's normal thought of insecurity are gone as he says, “Since then, we have learned better than to be shy about such trifling immodesties. In time things far worse than that come easy to us” (8). The emotions of the average young man are lost at war as their entire lives are put into perspective. Paul 's young adulthood is lost and he does not feel shame in frivolous things any longer. His emotions are not the only thing he loses as he also disconnects from his past, present and
Ask the average American what the problems facing his country are, and you will get a battery of standard responses. Some people will say health care, others violent crime, and still others will say drugs. There will probably be some who complain of high taxes or express a need for gun control. Certainly, there is evidence to support the fact that these are all issues of great importance. However, these are only superficial, and there is a deeper problem that will not have a simple legislative solution. Americans have forgotten how to think critically. Hannah Arendt places great importance on living a contemplative life, and it is for this reason that her book, The Human Condition, is a worthwhile text. In it, she offers many insights as to what could help to make the American society better, and it is for this reason that she cannot be brushed aside.
The beliefs of Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Galileo on the Bible are similar in some aspects, but mostly different from one another. Martin Luther and John Calvin are somewhat similar in their belief that faith alone is the key to salvation. Galileo, however was a scientist, and his views on the Bible differ from those of Calvin and Luther. Since Galileo was not a theologian, most of his writing is not about God and the Bible, but it is about science. Though their writings are very different, Calvin, Luther, and Galileo all speak about the subject of human individualism. Their views of human individualism differ from one another, and arise from different circumstances. Each of these three men’s writings contain their beliefs on human individualism and how it relates to the individual’s relationship with God.
Furthermore in both pieces main characters die; their deaths come about as a result, consequently because of their sinful nature and the pure greed of others around them. Human beings thrive on competition, subsequently such factors can change the way we think, the way we act as humans and how we treat others. In edition these authors use characters, particularly Jack and Macbeth, as examples of man’s self-corruption by letting our natural greedy self-centred self’s come through. Through their works it is shown, likewise their belief that if everybody revealed their true natures, the world would tear itself apart by the unconscious want for power that man will stop at nothing to get. Nevertheless in this game of survival, dishonorable tactics are used to climb the ladder swiftly with the deep craving of attaining the pinnacle of power.
Throughout history there have been a variety of theories on human nature proposed by intellectuals from different time periods. A general idea of human nature is defined as the characteristics, emotions and behavioral traits shared by all humans. During the different time periods of each philosopher, human nature varied due to its involvement in politics. Political theories and morals derive from historical imprints and observations. The precise ways to rule or govern a constitution have been questioned and emphasized through many philosophers and theorists. It is history that indicates what a long-term, obligating government may need to prosper. In order to understand a theory particular to a specific time, one must look at the author’s history and society. For example, Machiavelli, Aristotle and Frederick Douglass each come from different time periods where the structure of society differ. Societies reflect the morals and ideals that are correlated to its generation and highlight the structure and nature of the people. Thus, when looking closely at political theories, one must first observe the author’s society and history. A particular theory may influence many governments and political organizations, whether because of its validity or its rejection, both play a part in structuring a society. Human nature within each society also played a role the desire for justice. For example, during the era of the Jim Crow laws there was a clash between the beliefs of those who opposed discrimination and segregation and those who supported the laws in society. Overall, human nature plays a key role in political theories from a variety of time periods.
as a ‘law of nature’ and to fail to abide by it is to fly in the face
When psychologists speak about human-nature, it is as if we are no longer apart of human-nature. Human-nature appears to be discussed in the sense of dehumanized, sub-human, animals that are no longer part of nature at all. Is it truly possible that we are so far gone from what we were evolved to be that we no longer have a human-nature (Morton & Postmes, 2011; Fisher, 2012)? Current sociological writing generally avoids the term human-nature and gets by without it (Leahy, 2012). How do we answer this complex question when the two fields who study humans directly no longer use the term? “To all intent and purposes a newborn human baby is helpless. Not only is it physically dependent on older members of the species but is also lacks the behaviour patterns necessary for living in human society. It relies on certain biological drives, such as hunger and on the charity of its elders to satisfy those drives” (Horalambos & Holborn, 2008). This quote sums it up for both psychologists and sociologists, human-nature can only be found in a newborn infant who has not yet learned to be human. Perhaps that is just it, we can learn, human-nature is learning. Does this however answer anything? Can we go up against academic giants and simply tell them that human-nature is learning? Following will be a discussion on the bioethics conceptions of human-nature. This model both have advantages and disadvantages but for the author, come as close to possible to answering the ultimate question, what is human-nature?
The human psyche is an important part of every human. One of the most important subjects the human psyche impacts is survival. A main focus of the human psyche and survival is the way the human psyche plays an active role in humans needs to fend for itself and continue to survive. The human psyche is the totality of the human mind, conscious and unconscious. The three main categories of the human psyche are the id, ego and superego. Survival is the drive to stay alive or the fact of remaining alive, especially after facing life-threatening danger. On a controversial level, some humans look at survival in different ways. One example of survival would be a person who lives an average life in a suburban area. In order for them to survive, they would go to a store to buy their food and water. There is no severe life-threatening situation or any drastic behavior needed in order to “survive”. On the other hand, in a life-threatening situation where no civilization is anywhere to be found, a human must fight for their food and water by making rash and bold decisions. This severe situation can cause a dramatic change in the emotional and psychological aspects of a human. The age group that is being targeted in this topic is anybody who is a young adult. An adolescent age group is being targeted because young adults are very fragile and malleable. They are at a very important and pivotal moment in their lives where they are beginning to develop a sense of freedom and independence while still being sheltered and cared for by their guardians. The human psyche plays a role into human survival through the id’s instinctual aspect, the ego’s reality and the super ego’s conscience.
‘Human nature’ or ‘human behaviour’, as it is sometimes known, at the very fundamental level refers to the unique characteristics that humans possess. This would include the thinking, feeling and behaviours that humans have naturally. Human nature can also be understood as the foundation for human character, in which case we may have to consider temperament and disposition to be a part of the human nature. It is interesting to note that the basic human nature is not disposed to change. It does not change naturally nor can it forcibly be changed. This fact is proved by the study of history that show that people in the past were influenced by the same fundamental factors, responded similarly to stimuli were indulged in the same passions and had the
The Renaissance is the guidance of ideology for the Western European from the medieval society to the modern excessive cultural and ideological movements. Humanism is the core of thought. Humanism is a people-oriented rational thought, mainly concern about human and human nature. It includes human dignity, the value of the human being. The humanism was based on the ancient Greek and Roman literature study, advocate the basis of man’ dignity, think that a man can control his/her own destiny and confirm the value of human. As the rebirth of literature, scholars found out importance of thinking and the power of reason. Therefore, many significant literatures had written by scholars during the Renaissance. Pico della Mirandola and Niccolo Machiavelli were the two of the important humanists during the Renaissance. Pico della Mirandola wrote about the human dignity. His work “Oration On The Dignity Of Man” has brought a new view of belief and influenced the later scholars. Niccolo Machiavelli’s work “The Prince” pointed out the significant being as a king.