Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The evolution of management theory
The influence of the industrial revolution
Impact and consequences of the industrial revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The evolution of management theory
Management theories could be traced in 1800s during the industrial revolution and factory growth time (Bartol, Tein, Matthews, Ritson & Scott-Ladd 2006, p.16). The history of management viewpoint is partly involved in developing understanding about the norms of behaviour in the workplace. In fact, the Hawthorne studies did a lot of contributes to that. It also altered the focus of management study, in contrast with the classical management. This essay is trying to demonstrate that how the Hawthorne studies contribute to developing understanding about the norms of behaviour in the workplace and find out researchers’ experience of how group relationships have influenced work performance.
Between 1924 and 1933, a series of the Hawthorne studies was conducted by researchers, including Elton Mayo, of the Hawthorne Works which belonged to the Western Electric Company. Scientists attempted to determine the relation between work environment and productivity over the series of the Hawthorne studies. The first series of studies, called The Hawthorne Illumination Tests (HIT), was performed between 1924 and 1927. The purpose was just to find the optimal lighting for productivity (Sheldrake 1998, p.105). These experiments had two groups, control group (the group with lighting changed) and experimental group. Surprisingly, both of their performance enhanced at last, whether illumination declined or not. Due to Sheldrake’s viewpoint (1998, p.108), the results showed that there was no clear relationship between the intensity of lighting and the rate of output. Thus, researchers realised that there could be something else besides lighting to affect productivity. They doubt that the supervision of the researchers may have some effects on it. (, March 2006).
After the first experiment, researchers wanted to identify what other elements could influence productivity, so they began to perform the second set of studies (, March 2006). The second one was the most famous one, which was conducted between 1927 and 1933 by the Hawthorne Works. As Sheldrake (1998, p.108) has argued, six young women, aged from 15 to 28, were chosen to participate in the Relay Assembly Test Room (RATR) experiments. Researchers provided the six women different work conditions such as pay rules, workday length, rest periods, free lunches and then evaluated results they had got. Through the study, researchers found that six workers became a team and ‘productivity generally increased, no matter how elements changed’ (Bartol, Tein, Matthews, Ritson & Scott-Ladd 2006, p.24). Several years later after those experiments, Mayo (1945, cited in Pyöriä 2005) also wrote about that the experiment ‘was responsible for many important findings, but the most important finding of all was unquestionably in the general area of teamwork and cooperation’.
Most leaders believed that employees in their organization disliked work and would avoid it if they could. Daniel McGregor in his 1960 groundbreaking book The Human Side of Enterprise argued that “Those running companies were operating from a faulty assumption about human behavior” (Pink, 2009, p. 74). Managers believe employees must be coerced, controlled, directed, and threaten with punishment to acquire them to put forth an effort to achieve set objectives. McGregor’s X-Y theory suggest that there are two ways to manage people.
Fayol devised a ‘common sense’ view of the managerial responsibilities, within which he crafted arguably his most notable work, his five functions of management. These functions covered vital managerial tasks from planning and forecasting to coordination of operations, aspects of which can still be seen in modern day management widely (Fayol cited in King and Lawley, 2013). Fayol believed that people should be treated with respect and fairness by their superiors which would ultimately prevent a high turnover of employees; something he deemed to be inefficient. (Ref) Similarly to Fayol, Taylor was a pioneering theorist who contributed critically to the theories of managements witnessed in the rationalised workplace. Like Fayol, Taylor held a somewhat basic view of the behaviour of humans within the workplace and believed that organisations could be tightly managed through a set of clearly defined rules and regulations. In contrast to the more sensitised view that was held by Fayol, Taylor saw humans as animals who were driven by the capitalist view. In addition to the aforementioned difference between the two theorists, Taylor felt that people should be micromanaged as they respond better than when addressed as a group, generally treating everyone in a standardised form (Taylor, 2011). Arguably, the authour of this study notes that Taylor may have allowed his personal mistrust of
A group is defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives (Robbins & Judge, 2009). At some point in all of our careers, we will be tasked with working within a group setting. This discussion board will focus on conformity and deviant workplace behavior, and how each can negatively affect the outcome of working within a group setting.
It wasn't that long ago that employees were considered "just another input into the production of goods and services."(Linder 1998) Elton Mayo had a big impact on the view of employers at the time. Beginning in 1924 and continuing through 1932, Elton Mayo conducted the Hawthorne studies Linden, 1998) He concluded that employees were not solely motivated by money. Elton Mayo Previously believed that outside stimulus like lighting and physical surroundings affected productivity. Yet, no matter how they changed the stimulus during their experiment production increased. "It turned out that the stimulus that affected production most was being observed: being the focus of attention motivated people to hard work." (Cohen 1998, 93) His discovery was later refereed to as the Hawthorne Effect. His discovery changed the way managers looked at employees and they encouraged them.
Since the end of the 19th century, when factory manufacturing became widespread and the size of organisations increased, people have been looking for ways to motivate employees and improve productivity. A need for management ideas arise which lead to classical contributors such as Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol generating management theories such as Taylor’ Scientific Management and Fayol’s Administrative Management. In the late 1920’s and early 1930’s the Hawthorne studies were conducted where Elton Mayo was the predominate figure and contributed to the Behavioural viewpoint. This brought about a Human Relations Movement which included Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y approach. Similarities and differences can be found between the theories due to the relevant time period they were implemented, the motives or goal of the theory and how they view organisations. However the use of contingency theory can help negate the dissimilarities which occur as it allows the relevant elements from each theory to be applied to specific situations.
Toseland, Ronald W & Rivas, R. An Introduction To Group Work Practice, 5e. Retrieved on 16 Sept. 2011 from http://vig.pearsonptr.com:8081/samplechapter/0205376061.pdf
Kolb, D. A., Osland, J. S., Rubin, I. M., & Turner, M. E. (2007). The Organizational Behavior
Organisations study organisational behaviour within by; investigating individuals, social perception, attitudes and emotions. By doing so they are able to determine whether motivation is existent and if so, is it successful. How individuals work in groups and teams is important for unity within organisations therefore it is crucial to know how people communicate amongst their group/teams and how well is the outcome when they do. Employees can become stressed which would affect them a great deal because an employee stressed would not be able to work to his/her potential. However this would be the least of the organisations worry because stress affects an employee’s psychological well-being a great deal, this is dire for both the organisation and the individual. We know how these factors fit into the reason behind studying organisational behaviour however its relevance in today’s organisations is still a question, I’m going to discuss two of the factors in more detail and relate to whether they are relevant or not in today’s organisations.
Frederick Taylor thought that changes in the work process and/or rules would advance efficiency and productivity. He originated the scientific management approach in public administration. It was based on the idea that work processes should be observed via experiments which would greatly improve productivity. It would do so by doing away with the rule of thumb work methods and replacing them with the results of actual timed observations (14). The application of the scientific approach to management methods would lead to optimizing task time by simplifying the job. It would mean observing work processes to find the one best way to perform each job (15). Once the best way was discovered, all employees were to use it. The simplification of the job would improve task time. This method would lead to increased productivity, higher wag...
Hawthorne Studies have been subjected to many criticisms. Yet, the evolvement of many of the management theories today would not have come about without the experiments done by Elton Mayo. This essay will cover the various aspects of management that has been refined through the findings of the tests conducted and how improvements were made to aid in the development of organisational behaviour. It will also discuss the various studies and will show how these theories implement Hawthorne studies as the foundation and the basis of the human relations movement. It will also investigate the criticisms that arise within it.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology is a new idea, applied less than 100 years ago. In that time, many people within the field of had backgrounds in engineering, and some had background in history and law (Spector, 2008). The roots of industrial and...
After the end of the Industrial Revolution, large corporations were beginning to grow in size and power in order to satisfy what seemed the endless demands for new goods and services. As corporations and labor forces grew, there was a need to develop a more systematic study of organization and management, known as management theory, the significant being Frederick Taylor's Principles of Scientific Management which involved the development of training workers through special incentives and compensation (Boone p.33). In general, early management scientists tended to believe that there was a single way to organize companies and manage employees. By the beginning of the 20th century, there were initial attempts for launching a systematic and scientific study of management; by the 1950's, there were multiple books and articles focused on organization and management theory. Since then, a number of new paradigms, or models, concerning employee motivation and employee-employer relationships have aroused influencing the basic principles of modern management theory.
Huczynski, Andrzej. (2007). Organizational behaviour : an introductory text (6th ed.). Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Historically organisations strove to better productivity by bringing in technology and designing jobs in such a way that reduces the influence of personnel commitment on task outcomes (Harrison, 1987). Scientific management was prevalent in that employees were viewed as units of production or cost. Furthermore they made sure the little commitment needed from workers was achieved by way of multiple levels of employee supervision and stringent controls to minimise cost and maximise quality and output (Harrison, 1987). This is consistent with McGregor’s (1960) theory X, in that organisations considered workers to be lazy, dislike their work and in need of close supervision in order to be productive. Conversely the resultant boring and repetitive
Numerous studies have been carried out over the past decade in order to give an answer to the benefits of using competitive, individualistic, and cooperative strategies to promote productivity and achievement (see Johnson & Johnson 1989, 1999, 2005). Working in groups cooperatively to reach common goals has been demonstrated to produced better results on achievement and productivity rather than working individually or in a competitive way. Greater