Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative essay on migration
Narrative essay on migration
Narrative essay on migration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Narrative essay on migration
The country of Greece has opened a state of the art museum to house the Parthenon Sculptures, just steps away from their original home on the Acropolis Hill. However, only half of these important sculptures, inscriptions and architectural columns have been placed within the museum. Due to a series of unfortunate events including an explosion in the 1600's, the sculpture and marble structures sat in disrepair for over 200 years. In 1816, an English gentleman named Lord Elgin purchased them from the ruling Ottoman Empire and brought them back to London where they have been on display in the British Museum. Although saving them from further harm and ruin in the 1800s and 1900's, Greece is now ready to take them back, embracing their all important ancient identity.
Antonis Samaras, the Greek Culture Minister, said this in 2009; “Everyone around the world who believes in the values and ideas that emerged on the slopes of the Acropolis(should)... join our quest to bring the missing Parthenon marbles home.” Speaking in English, he said their “abduction” and “enforced exile” was an injustice to the Greek people. Another Greek Culture Minister from 2002, Evangelos Venizelos emphasizes the sculptures and building as a whole: "The sculptures from the Parthenon are not a single item... ...but part of a single monument, the Parthenon. The Parthenon is a building. The marbles are part of this existing building. For me the bottom line is not a legal one or the problem of ownership of the marbles but the fact of the return, the fact of the restitution of the integrity, the unity of the monument.” (Godwin 2013).
Thanks to the efforts of the Greek people and their government, the New Acropolis Museum has become an ideal home, tailor made to ta...
... middle of paper ...
...rther were the Parthenon Marbles to be reunified with the museum. (Godwin 2013).
And lastly, one argument for keeping the marbles in London, the return of such cultural and historical artifacts to their country of origin would 'open the floodgates', The fear that museums across Europe and North America would be emptied as objects returned is unwarranted. Only collections that were acquired illegally, by force or victimization of these other cultures would be involved. There are agreed upon codes and rules such as the 1970 UNESCO Convention that governs and organizes these types of disputes. Thanks to organizations like UNESCO, the return of cultural objects to their countries of origin is slowly but surely taking place. The British have an obligation, not to Greece but to the cultural heritage of the whole world, to restore its symbol, the Parthenon.(Godwin 2013).
There is an ongoing debate on whether the Parthenon Marbles, now located in London, England, should be returned to their original homeland of Athens, Greece. The marbles were removed from the Parthenon by Lord Elgin from 1801-1812 and transported to England. They were sold to the British government in 1816 and put in the British Museum where they have been for the last 200 years. I believe that the marbles should now be returned to Greece, not only because of the method and circumstances surrounding their removal, but because they are original pieces of the oldest and most symbolic structure in Greek history that epitomizes the pinnacle of Ancient Classical Greece and the beginning of western democracy through artistic ingenuity.
"Should Britain Return the Elgin Marbles?" The Week UK. N.p., 14 Feb. 2009. Web. 13 Feb.
For years on end, countries have been fighting with big museums from other countries for ancient artifacts that belong to the original countries. The argument of whether or not the museums should be able to keep them still remains. It is the right of the country to have their own artifacts. It is imperative for countries to be able showcase their historical artifacts, therefor museums should return them to their rightful owners.
Besides being the Athenians greatest architectural achievement, the Parthenon serves a basic purpose. The Parthenon is a temple devoted to Athena, the Greek goddess of wisdom and guardian of the city- state of Athens that got its name from her. The temple marked the zenith of ancient Greek architecture (Glancey 26). The structure was built to protect and shelter the statue of Athena, which was sculpted by Phidias. The enormous statue of Athena consisted of gold and ivory and stood up to be approximately nine to eleven meters. Unfortunately, this statue of Athena was thought to be lost in the future and was later replaced. Upon construction of the Athenian pride and symbol, the Parthenon successfully stood for 2,500 years. Later, the Parthenon was converted into a church for Virgin Mary of Athens in the sixth century AD. The condition and position of the building seemed well until the fait of the Parthenon changed in the future when two major collisions occurred.
The debate over the Elgin marbles has been raging for centuries. When the ancient sculptures were stolen away from Greece’s Parthenon, Grecians were infuriated (Mortimer). Ancient stones are some of all that is left portraying the ancient Greeks’ religious figures. What gives nations the right to pillage each others’ archeological wonders?
Museums currently return artifacts to their rightful countries if they deem necessary. This decision is purely based on the judgment of museum officials. However, as stated in “Bring Them Home,” “museums acquire objects with full cooperation from the originating country” (Article 1.) Often times the transport of artifacts are done for legitimate reasons and are done legally. For example, if a country was once in an unstable state, they may have given an artifact to another country, in hopes of preserving it. This can be seen in article 1 when it talks about the removal of the Parthenon temple in Greece, in order to preserve it. In this case, the Greece was undergoing political issues that but the temple in danger.
Some believe that cultural artifacts should be returned to their origin and others believe that artifacts could help people learn about the world without traveling and could be safe from harmful thief's in museums. Even though people have different opinions on the topic of artifacts going to their original home, they should all know the other side of their believe. This is why I will give my opinion on cultural artifacts then I will give different counter arguments on my opinion.
However the concept of perspective should be taken in account when critically analysing Lord Elgin. Other artefacts were also supposedly plundered includes the bust of Nefertiti. Berlin still has claim over the invaluable relic due to an apparent agreement with the Egyptian government that allowed for the sculpture to be possessed by Germany. So the examination of bias is essential to convey meaning effectively. Furthermore for evidence to be accepted the shortcomings must be acknowledged. Elgin’s case is no different as his official record demonstrating he was given access to the Parthenon Marbles is problematic as the original document was lost and only the Italian translation exists. As the conversion from one language to another causes small discrepancies, so under close scrutiny, the document is not infallible. Nevertheless as it is a form of evidence, the inconsistencies will have to be recognised when used as a based for an
Keeping possession of something that belongs somewhere else is not reasonable. The passage “Returning antiquities to their country of origin” by Joyce Mortimer and “A case in antiques ‘finders keepers’” by John Tierney create controversy for either side of the argument. Antiques should be returned to their country of origin to be used as artifacts to tell stories of the history of those countries.
The Parthenon was a temple in Greece for celebrating all gods and religious cults. The Greeks built the temple to the goddess Athena, who was the goddess of war. This temple depicts a historic event as opposed to a mythological event and is the most recognized building of Ancient Greece. The historical atmosphere of the time greatly contributed to the temple's existence. The Parthenon frieze and the architectural structure combine to make a cohesive whole. The architectural style and the frieze pull everything together on the outside of the temple. It entices your eye to focus on the detailed sculptures at the top of the frieze.
Many of the artifacts that were either bought or donated to that country have likely been stolen from the country of origin. Because of these dubious acts of the stealing antique artifacts, there are now rules in place to help prevent it from happening, or at least to lessen the amount. These 'rules' include, "Today there are strict
The British Museum, founded in 1753, has a collection of over 8 million objects that span over two million years of human history. The British Museum pays special homage to the ancient Greeks, boasting a wide and varied assortment of historic art pieces for the public to enjoy -- including sculptures from the Parthenon.
This week, we studied the Parthenon in Athens, Greece and the Pantheon in Rome. In this essay, I will discuss the style and function of each of these buildings. I will consider whether or not each is a typical example of the architecture of their culture. Finally, I will compare and contrast the similarities and differences of these two cities as seen in the architecture of these buildings.
Monuments and statues tend to be large, grand, and in some cases, even imposing. Built with mediums of bronze, marble and granite, no expense is spared in their design to make them last as long as possible. Throughout history various people have been the subjects of these statues, ranging from Gods and Goddesses, to beloved gardeners. At the time of Greeks, they spent great time and expense carving statues of those that they deemed to be the most important, the Gods. In the Parthenon, for example, a statue of Athena was carved from ivory and gold, and stood a majestic 40ft tall, because what better way to honor their goddess, them by memorializing her image forever (the fact that the statue has been missing for a few hundred years is notwithstanding).
Some tales describe the sculptures as human beings who were mutilated and petrified by magicians; the spirit inside them (often referred to as an Arabian) is frequently heard to mourn for their condition (tale recorded by the traveller Hobhouse; cited in Gennadios 1930: 57-8, note 57). The Parthenon sculptures therefore had acquired another new meaning or rather a range of new meanings: for Western travellers and aristocracy they represented the magnificent artistic achievements of the foundational era of European culture. For most of the local population (with the exception of the 'enlightened' local intelligentsia with Western commercial links and European education), they represented supernatural forces that should be treated with fear and respect and not be