Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of museum
Museums play a viable part in preserving a nation's past and spreading culture. Often times, a museum features artifacts from various regions of the world through which citizens of one country are able to experience a change in culture, whilst in the comfort of their own homes. This, however, leads to the issue of morality, in which the debate of whom the artifacts actually belong to and where they should go,in order to best preserve them for future generations arises. Museums currently return artifacts to their rightful countries if they deem necessary. This decision is purely based on the judgment of museum officials. However, as stated in “Bring Them Home,” “museums acquire objects with full cooperation from the originating country” (Article 1.) Often times the transport of artifacts are done for legitimate reasons and are done legally. For example, if a country was once in an unstable state, they may have given an artifact to another country, in hopes of preserving it. This can be seen in article 1 when it talks about the removal of the Parthenon temple in Greece, in order to preserve it. In this case, the Greece was undergoing political issues that but the temple in danger. …show more content…
According to the author of “Museum Preserve the Cultures of the World,” “ Museum professionals are experts, trained in the best ways to preserve and restore ancient art and other relics” (Article 2.) As a result of this, artifacts would be kept safe by trained professionals, and not be open to further damage by human and natural causes. In some instances, such as the one seen in article 2 with the nust of Queen Nefertiti, transporting ancient treasures would increase the chances of damage to artifacts, instead of the unified goal of protecting
Imagine that one piece of history that is taken from a town. This piece of history tells l people how this town was built and all the important people that were apart of the community. “Returning Antiquities to Their Countries of Origin” by Joyce Mortimer can many people about how objects are getting taken from Museums. They should be returned immediately. There are so many artifacts out there that could be so important to people, and if someone can just imagine what it would feel to have one of the most important object taken from a museum and to be never returned again. Many people enjoy seeing these objects so why are they being taken?
In Stephen Weil’s essay, he argues “the museum’s role has transformed from one of mastery to one of service” (Weil, 196). According to him, museums have changed their mission from one that cultures the public to one that serves
A memorable monument is a historical structure that represents a significant person or event. They are designed to show the importance of either the person or event. Monuments are intended to last forever so the subject will never be forgotten to society. The factors that should be considered when creating a memorable monument are that the subject must be powerful and meaningful to society and the design should resemble the significance of the subject. These factors help communicate the magnitude of the individual or group’s sacrifice, as well as honor moments of great achievement in history.
For years on end, countries have been fighting with big museums from other countries for ancient artifacts that belong to the original countries. The argument of whether or not the museums should be able to keep them still remains. It is the right of the country to have their own artifacts. It is imperative for countries to be able showcase their historical artifacts, therefor museums should return them to their rightful owners.
Duncan’s (1991) analysis of western museums is defined through the theme of “durable objects” as a criterion to judge the heritage of American and European art as a ritual of the modern state. In this manner western art museums are built like “temples” as a symbolic and figurative representation of greatness of western culture throughout the world: “[They] are more like the traditional ceremonial monuments that museum buildings often emulate—classical temples” (Duncan 90). This interpretation of American/European museums defines a dominant source of cultural heritage that ritualizes
In “Whose Culture Is It, Anyway? ”, Kwame Anthony Appiah begins by pointing out that some of the museums of the world, particularly in the West, have large collections of artefacts and objects which were robbed from developing and poor countries. He then raises a question: who owns these cultural patrimony and properties? Our first answer may be that since they make up the cultural heritage of a people, they belong to the people and culture from whom they were taken. Appiah has doubt about this and argues that if some cultural artefacts are potentially valuable to all human beings, they should belong to all of humanity. He thinks that when they make contribution to world culture, they should be protected by being made available to those who would benefit from experiencing them and put into trusteeship of humanity.
The past years have seen both an unusual increase in the number of museums throughout the world and an astonishing expansion and diversification in the services provided. This work focuses on museums as the intricate amalgam of historical structures and narratives and the way they have marketed their narratives and strategies of display to their audiences.
Television has affected every aspect of life in society, radically changing the way individuals live and interact with the world. However, change is not always for the better, especially the influence of television on political campaigns towards presidency. Since the 1960s, presidential elections in the United States were greatly impacted by television, yet the impact has not been positive. Television allowed the public to have more access to information and gained reassurance to which candidate they chose to vote for. However, the media failed to recognize the importance of elections. Candidates became image based rather than issue based using a “celebrity system” to concern the public with subjects regarding debates (Hart and Trice). Due to “hyperfamiliarity” television turned numerous people away from being interested in debates between candidates (Hart and Trice). Although television had the ability to reach a greater number of people than it did before the Nixon/Kennedy debate, it shortened the attention span of the public, which made the overall process of elections unfair, due to the emphasis on image rather than issue.
...troversy as all countries have lost, to a great or lesser extent, treasures of national renown and significance over time. Wars, theft, treasure seeking, changing boundaries and migration have all in some way contributed to this diaspora of art. There is clear evidence that the historic placing of objects in locations remote from their origin has on occasion afforded protection and preservation, The Elgin Marbles in The British Museum being a case in point. However, given the overarching principle of self determination it is difficult to argue that serendipitous historic placement is sufficient reason for items of true national heritage to be kept indefinitely. A world-wide system of touring exhibitions and cultural exchange, with context being provided by the originating society may provide the natural progression to the accessible widening of people’s experiences.
Of the many crimes that are present in this day and age, one that not only vandalizes the property, but as well as historical background is that of art theft. A crime that has taken away the sanctity of churches as well as many other religious and historical sites. Thefts have ranged from WWII (World War II) to the times of the Holocaust. Of the items that were taken from the churches, relics were items of great priority. These items not only had great value to the churches they were stolen from, but a great value to relic collectors. Most of the items taking during these times were either sold or placed in underground storage. Most of these items that were place in these secret places were never to be seen again. From the times of these so called “relic hunters” to now, art theft has become something that has taken some extreme changes. It has evolved from crime that started with minor relic thefts to something that has become a worldwide crime in need of better prevention.
On our trip to Washington D.C. in eighth grade, we were able to visit several of the Smithsonian museums where we saw artifacts from cultures all around the world. These artifacts, like many others, came with the controversial question, should artifacts be returned to their cultures of origin? Many people, such as myself, see the many issues with returning artifacts to their countries of origin. I believe that museums should not have to return artifacts to the original countries because the trades are legal, the artifacts are unprotected, and people are interested in learning about the artifacts and cultures.
The police and some other people that you have never met but look upset, come knocking at someone's museum door and say, “ Do you have these stolen artifacts?”, ; does one A.) give them back to their rightful owner, or B.) keep the artifacts for one’s self, but remember these artifacts are the people's most prised positions. There are stolen/ lost artifacts all around in the world in museums; the people who made them from their bare hands may want the artifacts back, also their families may want those antiquities as keepsakes because it is their family heritage. These artifacts should be returned to the people who made them or their families. As one can see, these antiquities mean something to the people that are related to it.
Yes cultural artifacts should be returned to their religion of origin. The artifacts should be returned to their religion of origin because that is where the artifact came from. So it is like we are stealing the artifacts from that religion. If we keep taking all the artifacts from a religion and putting them in a museum people could almost completely forget about that culture.
Many of the artifacts that were either bought or donated to that country have likely been stolen from the country of origin. Because of these dubious acts of the stealing antique artifacts, there are now rules in place to help prevent it from happening, or at least to lessen the amount. These 'rules' include, "Today there are strict
Many historical artifacts have been lost or destroyed over time. Archaeologists should relocate artifacts from their ruins to museums to help keep these pieces of history alive. Relocating the artifacts would ensure they are salvaged and preserved and help guarantee these artifacts would be protected from those who wish to damage or vandalize them. Relocating the relics to a museum would allow the public to value and view ancient pieces of theirs along with other culture’s history.