Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The great gatsby narrative essay
The great gatsby symbolism introduction
The great gatsby narrative essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The great gatsby narrative essay
The Great Gatsby H. L Mencken, in his review of The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, claims that the diction and syntax are impressive, deserving some credit. Mencken supports his claim by elaborating on the shallowness of Fitzgerald’s novel while acknowledging the careful, brilliant, and intelligent writing. The author’s purpose is to juxtapose Fitzgerald’s storyline with with his rhetorical genius, Mencken writes in a opinionated tone for the readers of the 1925 Baltimore newspaper, Evening Sun. Mencken building his creditability with specific detail from Fitzgerald’s work and employing a change of tone to reveal his opinions. In his article, Mencken fist sets the stage by exposing the crucial storyline of The Great
Gatsby. Mencken writes in lines 22 to 26, “The garage keeper’s wife, rushing out upon the roads to escape her husband’s third degree, is run down and killed by the wife of her lover. The garage keeper, mislead by the lover, kills the lover of the lover’s wife—the Great Gatsby himself. In two short sentences Mencken uncovers the storyline in order to support his opinion that The Great Gatsby is “no more than a glorified anecdote.” This outpouring of indignance is revealed in a judgmental tone, moving the audience to feel resentment towards the storyline as well. Toward the middle of his article, Mencken seems to shift from his judgmental tone to a more affectionate tone to explicate Fitzgerald’s use of adaptable syntax and diction. Mencken supports his statement in lines 51 to 53, “The sentences roll along smoothy, sparkling, variously. This is evidence in every line of hard and intelligent effort….” Mencken appends this in order to assist his stance of how “the charm and beauty of the writing” gives the story distinction. This flow of emotion from Mencken’s perspective conveys an admiring tone that reassures Fitzgerald’s careful placement of detail portrays penetrating second thoughts that allows easy reading. Critic H.L. Mencken, in his article The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, claims that Fitzgerald’s use of rhetorical strategies enables the audience to peruse the book smoothly despite the fact that the storyline is unimportant.
Trilling, Lionel. "F. Scott Fitzgerald." Critical Essays on Scott Fitzgerald's "Great Gatsby." Ed. Scott Donaldson. Boston: Hall, 1984. 13-20.
Like all writings of Fitzgerald, this novel represents the reality of the life through the author’s crystal-clear and romantic nature. Most of the reviewers were positive; for example, Edwin Clark wrote in the New York Times Book Review that The Great Gatsby was a “curious book, a mystical, glamorous story of today” (Pelzer 80). Fitzgerald’s friend, H.L. Mencken, wrote in the Baltimore Evening Sun:” I think it is incomparably the best piece of work you have done” (Bruccoli 158). Tom tries to show the Nick his mistress with the proud.
Fitzgerald, F. Scott, and Matthew J. Bruccoli. The Great Gatsby. New York, NY: Scribner,1996. Print.
Sutton, Brian. "Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby." Explicator 59.1 (Fall 2000): 37-39. Rpt. in Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Linda Pavlovski. Vol. 157. Detroit: Gale, 2005. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 15 Jan. 2014.
Fitzgerald, F. Scott, and Matthew J. Bruccoli. The Great Gatsby. New York, NY: Scribner, 1996. Print.
In The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Nick’s unreliability as a narrator is blatantly evident, as his view of Gatsby’s actions seems to arbitrarily shift between disapproval and approval. Nick is an unreliable and hypocritical narrator who disputes his own background information and subjectively depicts Gatsby as a benevolent and charismatic host while ignoring his flaws and immorality from illegal activities. He refuses to seriously contemplate Gatsby’s negative attributes because of their strong mutual friendship and he is blinded by an unrealized faith in Gatsby. Furthermore, his multitude of discrepancies damage his ethos appeal and contribute to his lack of dependability.
...ald." Critical Essays on Scott Fitzgerald's "Great Gatsby." Ed. Scott Donaldson. Boston: Hall, 1984. 13-20.
Sutton, Brian. "Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby." Explicator 59.1 (Fall 2000): 37-39. Rpt. in Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Linda Pavlovski. Vol. 157. Detroit: Gale, 2005. Literature Resource Center. Web. 24 Feb. 2011.
Fitzgerald, F. Scott, and Matthew J. Bruccoli. The Great Gatsby. New York, NY: Scribner, 1996. Print.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby is an absurd story, whether considered as romance, melodrama, or plain record of New York high life. The occasional insights into character stand out as very green oases on an arid desert of waste paper. Throughout the first half of the book the author shadows his leading character in mystery, but when in the latter part he unfolds his life story it is difficult to find the brains, the cleverness, and the glamour that one might expect of a main character.
Fitzgerald, F. Scott, and Matthew J. Bruccoli. The Great Gatsby. New York, NY: Scribner, 1996. Print
Trilling, Lionel. "F. Scott Fitzgerald." Critical Essays on Scott Fitzgerald's "Great Gatsby." Ed. Scott Donaldson. Boston: Hall, 1984. 13-20.
Works Cited Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. New York: Scribner, 2004. Print. The.
Trilling, Lionel. "F. Scott Fitzgerald." Critical Essays on Scott Fitzgerald's "Great Gatsby." Ed. Scott Donaldson. Boston: Hall, 1984. 13-20.
" Vol. I. Ed. Albert H. Smith, Ph.D. The Macmillan Company, London: 1985. Hooper, Osman C. "Fitzgerald's 'The Great Gatsby'," Critical Reputation of F. Scott Fitzgerald.