Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The great dictator speech analysis
Rhetorical analysis of the great dictator speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The great dictator speech analysis
In the famous final speech of Charlie Chaplin’s film The Great Dictator, released in 1940, it is clear that the speaker put forward an advocacy of democracy and against tyranny. Using Kenneth Burke’s pentad as a means of analyzing this speech allows for better understanding who he places blame on and what he advocates. Moreover, Kenneth Burke’s pentad also aids in understanding the relationships between the five components of the pentad, as well as which one becomes the determinant in every part of the speech, told from the twenty ratios made up with the five components. In this final paper, I would use the model of Burke’s dramatistic pentad to tentatively explore the rhetorical motivation behind Charlie Chaplin’s speech.
The film The Great Dictator tells a story of a Jewish barber, who joins the army during the First World War, and is sent to the hospital because of an injury. Adenoid Hynkel is the dictator of the country, and he has a cruel policy towards Jews. The barber is put into prison and later escapes wearing the army uniform. The soldiers mistake him for
…show more content…
Hynkel, to whom he is nearly identical in appearance, and ask him to make a victory speech. Conversely, the real Hynkel is mistaken for the barber and arrested. The barber makes a rousing speech, calling for humanity to break free from dictatorships. The splendid performance of Charlie Chaplin sticks in people’s minds, and the speech has become a classic. In order to know how Burke’s pentad could work in Chaplin’s speech, the theory of “dramatism” is the first important to be introduced. Dramatism, a philosophy of language, is adopted by Burke to probe how the language functions in the discourse and how language forms construct and imply the motives of human being (Burke). He develops a perspective for probing motivation that treats language and the primarily as the modes of action. That is to say, the center of dramatism is the terms of an agreement on human behavior, which form the terministic screen to specify the presentation of the reality by means of terms (Smith). Dramatism is the name he defines to his own system of analysis. Just once Shakespeare writes that the whole world is like a big stage and everyone is the actor or actress. Burke introduces concept “drama” in his new rhetoric aiming to construct a model to analyze human actions and compare the human relations to the drama’s mode (Burke). This mode is in accordance with his definition of man which is the symbol-using animal. Language plays an indispensable role in this kind of “animal” who show his daily performance in the scene of drama (Burke). The criticism that used for this investigation is the dramatist pentad proposed by Kenneth Burke. The pentadic criticism contributes to our understanding of what a rhetor’s real motives are and how this person uses rhetoric to shape worldviews that audience can accept (Foss 355). Published in Burke’s A Grammar of Motives in 1945, the pentad contains five elements: act, agent, agency, scene and purpose, which corresponds to the terms in journalistic writing when describing a story or event: who, what, why, when and where (Smith 325). According to Burke, the “who” is the agent who delivers a speech and explains idealist dreams and inspire audience; the “what” is the act in the pentad, meaning the actions that a speaker takes during a speech; the “why” is the purpose of a speech with various goals of taking certain actions; the “when” and “where” refer to the scene in the pentad, identifying the time and the location where a speech takes place. Additionally, the “agency” that is not on the list of the elements in journalist writing represents the “how”-how the act is accomplished in a speech. These five fundamental components are not individual units; instead, they are linked together as the mechanism for discovering a rhetor’s real intentions in a speech (Burke). “Scene,” refers to the specific time and place for the actual delivery of the speech, and also includes the audience and audience’s values that match or differ from the values that the speaker tries to convey (Burke). The scene in this film takes place during the Second World War and on the way of the Jewish barber escaping to Osterlich frontier from persecution. The audience in the film is the large crowd of soldiers and civilians who listen to his speech. From outside the film, the film was released and the speech was given in about 1940, during the outbreak of the Second World War. The film was shot in the United States, where it was still formally at peace with Nazi Germany at that time, but stood on the brink of entry into The Second World War. The audience are tens of thousands of movie watchers, including people from all over the world. “Agent,” refers to the group or individual who performs the act (Burke).
Considering this speech as a part of the film, the agent of the speech is the Jewish barber, who escapes to Osterlich frontier from persecution and is mistaken as Adenoid Hynke the great dictator. If the screenplay of the speech is regarded, however, the agent is Charles Chaplin, a famous actor and filmmaker, who also wrote, produced, scored, directed and starred in the film The Great Dictator.
“Act” is to deliver the address by the agent (Burke). In the film, the barber makes a rousing speech, calling for humanity to break free from dictatorships. And outside the film, reflecting on the tragic consequences of the First World War, Chaplin made an appeal for peace and against war. He also used this film to bring to light the Nazi Germany’s inhumanity and violence, as well as criticize and satirize Hitler’s brutality and
tyranny.
In the Summer of 1787, fifty-five delegates representing 12 out of the 13 states in Philadelphia to fix the Articles of Confederation. They met in philadelphia because the Articles of Confederation was too weak. Shay’s rebellion was the end of the Articles of Confederation bringing down the whole network calling for a change of government. They did this to prevent a tyrant or tyranny. A tyrant/tyranny is when someone or a group abuses their power. The Constitution guarded against tyranny through Federalism, Separation of powers, Checks and Balances, and The Great Compromise.
Even from a brief summary such as this, one can tell that Mel Brooks associates himself with comedical films that would categorize as satire and/or parody. Seeing that Brooks was born Jewish and that he has elements of “Hitlerism” in his works, you can begin to see the connection with what may...
Eight Men Speak by Oscar Ryan et al presents a variety of epic devices employed throughout its composition. We see “the essential truth in every word of these six acts”(Foreword 5) come to life in this thought provoking presentation of didactic literature. Through the use of Epic Drama we see the effects of our corrupt government as it is brought into perspective using the epic devices of using the audience as active participants, using narration rather than action , and political engagement. These epic devices play a key role in portraying the didactic message of the play. The play causes the reader not only to be a present member of the audience, but to have presence of mind as well; to not only hear what the characters are saying, but to take initiative if they wish to see change.
“A dramatistic explaination appears in terms that performers can comfortably employ in their efforts to stage events” (Pelias and Shaffer 62). This means that the process for understanding text in an aethestic manor needs to be simple and understandable to the performer so it can be clearly related to the audience. So, for the process to be effective it has to be true to reality, otherwise the message of the text will be lost. Pelias and Shaffer describe the questions in Burke’s Pentad as “fundamental of all human action” (62). The simplicity and familiarity of the concepts are comfortable for even the most inexperienced performer.
In précis, through comparing and contrasting the inclusion of certain themes and textual features, and their transformations, the main motifs behind these alterations are clearly established. These transformations are influenced by the author’s social and cultural context, as well as their present defined social order, which is extensively reflected in BBC’s adaptation of the Shakespearean play, “Much Ado about Nothing”.
Following the beginning of the Second World War, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union would start what would become two of the worst genocides in world history. These totalitarian governments would “welcome” people all across Europe into a new domain. A domain in which they would learn, in the utmost tragic manner, the astonishing capabilities that mankind possesses. Nazis and Soviets gradually acquired the ability to wipe millions of people from the face of the Earth. Throughout the war they would continue to kill millions of people, from both their home country and Europe. This was an effort to rid the Earth of people seen as unfit to live in their ideal society. These atrocities often went unacknowledged and forgotten by the rest of the world, leaving little hope for those who suffered. Yet optimism was not completely dead in the hearts of the few and the strong. Reading Man is Wolf to Man: Surviving the Gulag by Janusz Bardach and Survival in Auschwitz by Primo Levi help one capture this vivid sense of resistance toward the brutality of the German concentration and Soviet work camps. Both Bardach and Levi provide a commendable account of their long nightmarish experience including the impact it had on their lives and the lives of others. The willingness to survive was what drove these two men to achieve their goals and prevent their oppressors from achieving theirs. Even after surviving the camps, their mission continued on in hopes of spreading their story and preventing any future occurrence of such tragic events. “To have endurance to survive what left millions dead and millions more shattered in spirit is heroic enough. To gather the strength from that experience for a life devoted to caring for oth...
David Foster Wallace, author of the essay “Authority and American Usage*,” praises and advocates for “good” writers who have a strong rhetorical ability, which he defines as “the persuasive use of language to influence the thoughts and actions of an audience” (Wallace 628). To have a strong rhetorical ability, an author needs to be aware of whom their audience is, in order to present their information in a way that will be influential on their audience. Wallace recognizes that an author who applies a strong rhetorical ability will be able to connect with the audience so that they respond “not just to [their] utterance but also to [them]” (Wallace 641). An author needs to take into consideration not just content, syntax and grammatical structure (their “utterance”) but also how their character will be perceived by their audience. A positive tone will make the author seem more pleasant and relatable, whereas a negative tone connotes arrogance and pretentiousness. That is why it is crucial for an author to recognize that an audience will respond to “them” and not just their “utterance,” as an author’s appearance to their readers can also shape how impactful their writing is.
It is understandable to think that Rorschach is the most influential character in Watchmen, however it is clearly The Comedian due to his incredible influence of all the characters and the fact that his death sets the main plot in motion. Though his heroic code is not as strong and stable as Rorschach’s, The Comedian understands the world perfectly, but “he doesn’t care” (Moore, 4.19). Both of these characters saw the “true face” of this reality, one just fought against it while the other became a parody of it.
within it. " ' I agree with Ralph. We've got to have rules and obey
In analyzing McBride’s essay the rhetorical devices found to be used were logos and pathos. First, it will be sho...
In that light, it is interesting to analyse what it is that made these artistic words such a difference. A difference that persuaded people to change their behavior. Thankfully, human history has created a term to define these great speeches. It is called rhetoric. In this essay we will try to determine whether rhetoric is an art, or merely a
In the intense chaos following a major figure’s assassination, one man’s words have the power to rally huge portions of the population to his cause. As is the case in Julius Caesar, when Brutus and his conspirators murder the titular character midway through the play. After the assassination, the conspirators attempt to persuade the populace to give them power, but Mark Antony manages to usurp their authority in his funeral speech for Julius Caesar. He accomplishes this feat through the use of several key persuasive devices and techniques, those being specific evidence, props, and appeals to self-interest. Readers will come to appreciate the masterful oratory skills that Antony presents in his speech, and they will come to recognize similar
In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.
The flaws in civilization are indicated by the angle, lighting key and form in The Great Dictator. It is first shown when Hannah is shown from a low angle and in the shot, the word “Jew” is written on a window (Chaplin). This represents the degradation of the Jews. The door behind her mirrors the way Jewish people felt they could not escape their inferior treatment. The guards are shot from a low angle, given them the appearance of being powerful. The shift in lighting key once more directs us towards the sense that civilization is subservient to nature. In Tomania, the lighting is low and most shots of the Jews have stair railings, which resemble jail cells. The stair railings are meant to visualize how the Jewish people are stuck in a rigid
Turk, Ruth. A Lerner Biography Charlie Chaplin Genius of the Silent Screen. Minneapolis: Lerner Publication Comp., 2000.