Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequentialist analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequentialist analysis
Why a Utopia is Impossible? Is a perfect society possible? What is a community without violence, love, color, or phones to use the internet? The purpose of this essay is to inform you about utopias and why a utopia is not possible. A utopia is an island or an area that has no problems with contended borders and is basically a perfect society. There are sometime many strict rules in a utopian community. Everyone in the community gets the same education, families are traditional, and towns are well-planned with no poverty. In most utopias, there is even no cell phones or technology to use because there is no Wi-Fi. Society is peaceful and harmonious with little …show more content…
In The Giver, it says, “Jonas and the The Giver had gone over it and over it, late into the night hours.”(pg.158) Jonas was planning his escape from the community and was trying to find Elsewhere. “The Giver” helps prove that a utopia is not possible because color, violence, love, and many other great things in life are taken away from the community. The community was not the same and ultimately failed without those great things that we have in life. Another example is in the article “4 Utopian Communities That Didn’t Pan Out.” On the second page of the article, in the Pullman’s Capitalist Utopia, it says, “The experiment lasted longer than many of the other settlements, but ultimately failed. Pullman began demanding more and more rent to offset company losses.” Pullman’s Capitalist Utopia has been one of the most successful communities, but ended due to a loss of money. The community lost six million dollars in just the first three years. This is also why a utopia is not possible due to the owner asking for more rent or for the members of the community to work more hours. Strict rules and money are more reasons why a utopia is not
it should be learnt that the search for „utopia‟ is a contemplative one, and can never be
how a utopia would not be good: The Receiver feels the pain of knowing there is more to life than life in the utopia, the community has no variety, and the Chief Elders take away all aspects of freedom humans have. For today’s society, living in a utopian society may not be far away. We today could undergo a terrible disaster and feel the need to live in a utopia. However to live in a utopia is to live like “ants,” and humans were not meant to be
“I knew that there had been times in the past-terrible times-when people had destroyed others in haste, in fear, and had brought about their own destruction” (48). In the old days, when people in Jonas’s community valued individual needs, there were lots of terrible happenings: violence; and then the society ended up with general welfare and safety. It is difficult for us to think of a world without color, freedom, music and love, but in The Giver, the society denounces these things in order to make room for peace and safety. In The Giver, by having a society based on general welfare they gave safety to their people. No violence, no criminal activities, nor homicides.
Imagine a place where everything is perfect. There is a place where there is no warfare, where all. All politics, laws, customs, and traditions are respected. A place where there is sameness among all the citizens and everyone is content and happy. This place would be considered a utopia.
There are many elements that are required to maintain a utopian society such as equal chores of an everyday household. There are responsibilities of every resident from cooking food to keeping the house clean. These chores have to be just otherwise the purpose of the utopian society is corrupted. All residents have the same right as any other member of the society yet there are some rules that are to be followed to help maintain the community. This is when a form of self-government comes into action.
“Critics and censors all agree that Jonas's situation in The Giver is horrifying. Through a series of shocking events, he discovers that...his people literally have limited vision and can not make decisions without the Giver's help” (Lord, Elyse). Being able to see different colors, Jonas thinks it would be nice if everyone could choose, which color shirt to wear in the morning. Jonas saw the importance of decision making when realizing it is essential to happiness. He notices, his people does not have the option of choice. They cannot see the red apple, the green grass, or the blue sky. There is only this sameness of black and white. Each year Jonas’s people follows the same concepts and routines, without any questions being asked. The option of choice was taken away from them hoping to build a utopian society. Jonas understands that having a choice helps to think for ourselves. Without it, in some ways life can be meaningless. In some ways the community as well as the chief elders, sees the Giver/receiver as a God. Reason being, the citizens, are only comfortable with things that are familiar to them. When not knowing how to deal with a situation, they come to the giver for advisement. He is familiar with all things known and unknown. Knowing this, they believe only he can truly give the right
Utopia is an imaginary state, which consists of people who believe they are more capable to live in a group than alone. In such a community, the welfare of the group is the primary interest comparing to the comfort of individuals. The purpose of this society is to allow people to live in equality and freedom. Their social and economical status would be the same. An example of such a society was established in 1848, by John Humphrey Noyes. It soon dissolved at 1880 because of the oppositions aroused among the people about the system of "complex marriage". This system is different from the one in The Giver, whereby all adults in the community were considered married to one another.
Utopia, by Sir Thomas More, introduces a seemingly perfect society in which everything, from the mindset of the citizens to the structure of the government, is ideal. Every Utopian citizen fits faultlessly into the community and no citizen is left without a job, a home, or resources. Furthermore, all Utopians live in peaceful harmony due to the fact that they are treated as equals and have complete trust in one another, a result of their lack of greed, which is something that Hythloday believes is natural in most humans. Hythloday, the only character from the text who has actually visited Utopia, hints that this lack of greed in Utopians is a result of there being no such thing as scarcity or private property there; everyone has access to the
The Utopia Reader defines the word utopia as “a nonexistent society described in detail and normally located in time and space.” (p.1) I would best define utopia as a fictional dream- paradise land where everything is peaceful, perfect and all runs smoothly. There is no crime disease, or pain. People are happy, kind and fair and have each other’s best
The short story Harrison Bergeron helps support the idea that all Utopias are going to fail. In Harrison Bergeron characters like him find flaws in their “perfect” community and do something about it. In the Giver, Jonas is the character that rebels against the community because he is able to see past the lies set up by the elders and see the bad parts of it. Another reason it failed was because of the pain from the handicaps. Jonas’s community doesn’t experience any pain,except for Jonas and the Giver, Jonas makes a stand by escaping and leaving the memories of pain for the rest of the community.
A utopia does not necessarily need to be absolutely perfect to be accepted by all the people. For example, in Brave New World, John says, “But I don’t want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want
Our fascination with utopias stems from our attraction to and pursuit of progress within our own society. We study utopias with the hope that our society will someday evolve into one. But what often goes unnoticed is that if our society improves enough to become utopian, it won't be able to improve any longer. Hence, it will be rigid and unchanging, the complete opposite of what it was as it evolved to its elevated state. This is an awful truth for us because we place value and virtue in the ideas of desire and progress. Our reason tells us: once in an ideal land, desire cannot simply cease to be, because desire is part of our human nature. And our reason is right. An ideal society should accentuate our human nature, not suppress it. As we desire a perfect society we know that a perfect could not exist without our desire. And as long as we desire, we hope for progress. The idea that an utopia wouldn't allow such progress to occur is enough to make us stop believing in utop...
The purpose of this book was to show us a possible version of a "Utopia".
The Utopians live a very simple lifestyle. They work, and in their spare time play games, read, and socialize. Other forms of entertainment, such as gambling and hunting are looked down upon. They only eat what is necessary, and their houses are built simply and furnished only with what is necessary. Thus, their consumption is very low. Utopians do not need material possessions for happiness. Happiness for them comes out of living an honest life and working hard to produce for themselves and for the entire nation.
One reason that a utopian society is not possible is because of human nature. A place where there's no problems or conflicts is impossible because humans can sometimes be ignorant to realize their own mistakes and learn from them. In the article “Why Utopias Fail” in paragraph 13 it states” while many people believe that utopias are doomed to failure because of human nature, it’s much more useful to approach utopia as the ultimate governance challenge. If men were angels, no government would be necessary. This is important to my claim because humans cannot be perfect angels because everyone makes mistakes and we can learn from them.