Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gang violence in society
Gang Problems in America
Understanding gang violence and its effects on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gang violence in society
The Gangster Genre as a Creation of the Necessity to Promote Civic Responsibility and Social Contentment With Ones Society The Gangster genre is a creation of the 20th century as it originally took many of its plots and characters directly from the activities of those involved in the highly influential gang culture which developed in America during the 1920’s. As such, by the subject matter they cover, Gangster films are restricted to portraying the negative aspects of society, as shown by the culture of criminality they project and the lax morals of the film’s protagonists. Looking at the title question it becomes apparent that there are a few areas which must first be examined before a full and satisfactory examination of the overall question can be attempted. The factors which require this clarification are; what constitutes civic responsibility and social contentment? ; Why does this desire exist? ; How is this desire seen in other genres? Civic responsibility in this case could be seen as the politically preferable system of norms and codes of behaviour to which it is hoped the population of a country will ascribe themselves. This is the preferred situation for any governmental body as it means that the population of a country would be in consensus with the aims of the ruling body rather than opposing them. This opposition can take many different forms from criminal acts to full blown revolution. It may appear very obvious that it is in a governments best interests to promote this idea of Civic responsibility as it would help to decrease the number of social problems within a country such as crime, it also helps the members of ... ... middle of paper ... ...f, they felt that a strong gangster character would cause members of the populace to follow in their footsteps, so both in the James Cagney film and in the eyes of the censors the Gangster could not maintain their dignity for the good of society. It would appear however that this belief has been lost some what by today’s media savvy society and as such the Gangster can now stand proud, corrupt, but proud. Finally it is important to note that with the expanse in the range of mass media it is no longer necessary or viable to attempt to indoctrinate people through the use of movies alone, instead it is much easier to use movies to entertain the population and as such use these films as an escapist method of maintaining social contentment while other media out lets and institutions are used to promote civic responsibility.
The year of 1993 was characterized by gang life along the United States streets. Initially, the lifestyle defined by the gang life was part of the foundation of the book: Monster: The Autobiography of an L.A. Gang Member by Shakur Sanyika. Based on the arguments presented in the book, different analysts have presented their perception on the contribution of the book towards the criminal justice concerns. The acts of sensationalist and violence are clearly represented in the chapter. Besides, the book gives a preventative and pedagogic stance of the anti-gang.
Over the past 60 years there has been a recent phenomenon in the development and rise of gangs and gang violence. This is exceptionally apparent in South Central Los Angeles where the Bloods and the Crips have taken control of the social structure and created a new type of counter culture. Poverty in this area is an enormous problem caused by a shear lack of jobs; but just because there is a lack of jobs doesn’t mean that there will be a lack of bills to pay, so sometimes selling drugs in order to keep a roof over your head seems like the most logical option. Crime often times flourishes in these regions because the inconvenient truth is; crime pays. Senator Tom Hayden stated “It’s been defined as a crime problem and a gang problem but it’s really an issue of no work and dysfunctional schools.” this statement is in fact true, but with an exception it is a more broad issue than just involving school, and lack of jobs but goes beyond into social structure as a whole and more specifically the judicial system, this can all be supported by three sociologists Chambliss, Anderson, and Durkheim.
In the beginning, it seems unlikely that Gangs of New York will be an example of naturalism. Unlike To Build a Fire or Open Boat, the whole story of Gangs of New York happens in a civilized area, and nobody is in a case of danger because of the nature. Naturalism is implicit in this article. But being implicit does not mean it is ineffective. Instead, the idea of naturalism within this article is more confound than other two stories we studied before.
The Gangster Disciples is a violent gang which began in the Chicago, Illinois area. In the 1970's, the leaders of two different Chicago-based gangs, the Black Disciples and the Supreme Gangsters, aligned their respective groups andcreated the Gangster Disciples. Once united, the Gangster Disciples recruited heavily in Chicago, within Illinois jails and prisons, and throughout the United States. The Gangster Disciples are active in criminal activity in approximately 24 states. The Gangster Disciples employ a highly structured organization. Members are organized into geographic groups; each called a "count" or a “deck." Members in good standing are considered to be ”on-count" or ”plugged in." A meeting of a particular count may be referred to
Social and financial status have been the safety net or “go to” protection for African American people for many years back, leading one to assume education and an affluent life style could become a shield of protection over the black body. However, society has proven that your safety net ends where your skin begins. No matter how rich or established a person is, the fact will remain that they are black. Ta- Nehisi Coates describes his life growing up the ghettos of Baltimore. Throughout his book, Ta-Nehisi Coates repeatedly emphasizes that growing up his, “highest priority was the simple security of my body,” (p.130) Then he goes on to describe how his wife grew up in a more affluent and privileged lifestyle, a lifestyle that
Boyz N the Hood was a film created to convey an anti-gang message as well as to provide societal members an in-depth look at life in “the hood” so he or she can expand their culturally awareness of identifying societal issues (Stevenson, 1991). Upon the debut of “Boyz N the Hood” violence erupted at theaters across the nation, resulting in multiple shows pulling the film from scheduled showings to alleviate future violent behaviors (Stevenson, 1991). The film profoundly illustrates the realty of the events revealed within the storyline that frequently occur on a daily basis within every impoverish community; however, is overlooked by the individuals who are not directly involved and or affected (Leon-Guerrero, 2016) Children of lower socioeconomic status often are raised in ghetto neighborhoods where they often witness, crime, violence, gang activity, abuse, and drugs (Leon-Guerrero, 2016). Ghetto communities envelop tumultuous cycles of violence and substance abuse creating a pervasive occurrence within the residents of the community. This is prevalent in lower developed communities that unfortunately many children and the youth populace indirectly inherit and sadly conform to, as there are no other means to an end for them (Leon-Guerrero,
In what ways does Rich Cohen's Tough Jews add to our understanding of the development of organized crime? This book is regarding the obscure stories of Jewish gangsters, who in the '20s and '30s were in association with the Sicilians and in a lot of ways just as influential. But it's much more than merely a story of organized crime; the writer links the legends and thoughts of Jewish kids growing up amongst those gangsters to the value system of his father plus his friends, and how their attitude regarding "Tough Jews" gave them an option to the stereotypical roles permitted them by America at large. In its own strange, violent way it's a luminous, striking explanation of the eastern European Jewish immigrant experience in America. (Kaminsky, Stuart M. "The Individual Film: Little Caesar and the Gangster Film." American Film Genres. Pflaum Publishing, 1974: 13-32.) When organized crime reared its ugly head in the late 1920s in Brooklyn, at the base were men like Meyer Lansky and Ben Siegel, both Jews. Rich Cohen's romantic story of Jewish gangsters, Tough Jews, brings to life the ta...
There is a thin line that exists between the depiction of a villain and a gangster that Hollywood has mastered walking on. While villains and gangsters may do many of the same things in movies, like stealing and killing, they each do them for different reasons. Villains enjoy crime because that is what gets them off; some may feel they are doing society a favor, like Uncle Charlie in Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt, and others are more simply portrayed as naturally evil or mentally ill. But Gangsters are doing what they do for something American society can relate to—to make a living and, ultimately, get to the top.
Martin Scorsese’s Goodfellas and Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather both depict life in organized crime, but where Goodfellas addresses criminals with little “morals” and their everyday life, The Godfather centers on the opulence of the mob bosses and the preservation of their power while holding the value of family and loyalty above everything. Francis Ford Coppola uses Soviet-inspired montage in the beginning and end of The Godfather as a means of commentary to draw focus on the fine line the Corleone family straddles when justifying their mob activities by claiming it is moral by associating it with family and loyalty. The characters in Goodfellas justify their sprees of violence with the thought that being a gangster gives them license to do whatever it is they please.
This paper will cover issues that young minorities encounter in the movies; Crips and Bloods: Made in America (2008), Gran Torino (2008), A Better Life (2011). Movies will be summarize, and compare and contrast youths experienced. Criminological theories shall be utilized to further elaborate issues. Finally steps and theories will be utilized towards solving issues, also possible methods to correct the issues will be addressed in the end.
In “Gangsta, in French,” written in the New York Times in 2005, Brooks informs the facts on what American rap is doing to the younger generation which is damaging our youth in France. These young men are inspired by the violence and crimes that these men are portraying in their music. These young men who once were children were not informed on why these horrendous acts are wrong. These young adults need that guidance to understand. As Brooks stated, the difference between young men in America and young men in France is that most rappers go to college ...
Chapter 3 and chapter 16 “da joint and beyond” really caught my eye. Chapter 3 “gangsters-real and unreal” summarized the image of the “hood” and crime filled areas where people are regularly being robbed, shot, and killed. It also told how drugs came about and became a new indusry. It also became popular among musicians and soon became a way to employ young poor teens who lived in these “hoods”. As many ...
With Jefferies’ complex cool we can understand gangsta rappers as something more than nihilistic villains. It may not be the preferred way of representing the story of life in the ghetto but it does just that. Even with commercial Hip-Hop, real sentiment slip through the corporate cracks to reveal a gangsta masculinity that is emotionally responsive and cognizant.
5. Dimon, Laura. “Crip Walk: The Pop Culture Sensation That Came From Violent Gangsters.” Policy Mic. 3 Dec. 2013. Web. 20 May 2014.
In gangster movies, the tragic hero falls from his position because of a flaw in his character. This tragic flaw was called "hamartia" by Aristotle. In the movie Gangs of New York, Bill Cutting “The Butcher” have a lot of flaws on the surface, namely his poor temperament towards people around him, hubris, ego, jealousy and fault sense of