The Four Political Parties Of Canada

4270 Words9 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Four political parties of canada

The Four Political Parties of Canada

In a country as vast and as culturally diverse as Canada, many different

political opinions can be found stretched across the country. From the affluent

neighbourhoods of West Vancouver to the small fishing towns located on the east

coast of Newfoundland, political opinions and affiliations range from the left

wing to the right wing. To represent these varying political views, Canada has

four official national political parties to choose from: the Liberals (who are

currently in power), the Progressive Conservatives, the New Democrats, and the

Reform Party. What is particularly interesting is that none of the latter three

parties compose Her Majesty's Official Opposition in the House of Commons. The

Bloc Quebecois, a Quebec separatist party who only ran candidates in the

province of Quebec in the last federal election in 1993, won 54 seats in that

province, and claimed the title of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition over the

Reform Party, who garnered only 52 seats. Because the Bloc ran candidates only

in Quebec, it would be difficult to think of them being a national political

party, even though they hold a significant number of seats in the national

legislature. This paper will examine the significant early history of Canada's

four main national political parties, and then will analyse their current state,

referring to recent major political victories/disasters, and the comparison of

major economic policy standpoints, which will ultimately lead to a prediction of

which party will win the next federal election in Canada.

Starting on the far left, there is the New Democratic Party of Canada.

Today's modern New Democratic Party was originally called the Co-operative

Commonwealth Federation (CCF), and was founded in 1932. Originally led by a man

by the name of James Shaver Woodsworth, the CCF was formed by several radical

farming groups who found out that they had more similarities with each other

than just their destitution. The 1920's had been a dark period for radicals and

unions within Canada; poverty and significantly lower wages for workers were

prevalent, and apathy regarding these issues was rampant. When the depression

wove its destructive web across Canada in the 1930s, proponents of capitalism

were staggered, but their left-wing opponents were too busy coming to the aid o...

... middle of paper ...

... into the 21st century, however, will be made in the soon-to-be-

called Canadian federal election. Democracy will speak out once again.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(1996) A Fresh Start for Canadians [Online]. Available:

http://www.reform.ca/FreshStart/summary.html [1997, Feb.25].

Guy, John J. People, Politics and Government. Scarborough: Prentice Hall, 1995.

Harrison, Trevor. Of Passionate Intensity. Toronto: University of Toronto

Press, 1995.

(1996) Liberal Party of Canada [Online]. Available:

http://www.liberal.ca/english2/policy/red_book/chapter1.html [1997, Feb.25].

Macquarrie, Heath. The Conservative Party. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart

Limited, 1965.

McMenemy, John, Winn, Conrad. Political Parties in Canada. Montreal: McGraw-

Hill Ryerson, 1976.

Morton, Desmond. The New Democrats, 1961-1986. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.,

1986.

(1996) New Democrats of Canada [Online]. Available:

http://www.fed.ndp.ca/fndp/fairtaxnow.html [1997, Feb.25].

Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. Designing a Blueprint for Canadians.

Ottawa, 1997.

(1996) Progressive Conservative Youth [Online]. Available:

http://www.openface.ca/PCU/library4.html [1997, Feb.25].

Show More
Related

  • Louis St. Laurent: A Politician in Canadian History

    1448 Words  | 3 Pages

    Canadian history consists of many memorable moments, including many great leaders that helped Canada become what it is today, like the well-known Louis St. Laurent. He was born on Feb. 1st, 1882 in Compton, Quebec, and died on July 25, 1973 in Quebec City (Coucil, 13). Louis St. Laurent was raised in a mixed family, with a French - speaking father, and English - speaking Irish mother, and was fluently bilingual. He studied many years in law, where he graduated from law school, at Laval University in 1914, and had been a successful corporation lawyer (“St-Stephen, St. Laurent”). Laurent entered politics a lot later in his years, as he became older; however he still managed to have a large impact on Canada, and achieved many accomplishments. Louis St. Laurent was an extremely important, and well-respected politician, because he helped resolve the conscription crisis from 1940-1944 (,Pickersgill,14), and prevented the government and cabinet from collapsing, which would have caused the society to fall apart at the time, he was involved in the establishment of the Canada Council, which introduced support for Canadian arts, to help Canada separate from the influence of American culture (Jocelyn), and lastly he welcomed Newfoundland into confederation in 1949 (“Newfoundland History”), which was a large accomplishment because of the failures Many other politicians experienced in trying to do so before.

    Read More

  • 1920s: The Roaring Twenties in Canada

    928 Words  | 2 Pages

    Canada experienced the revolution of changing politics and new ideologies, it was a necessary wave

    Read More

  • The Dangers Of Factionalism In Canada

    1298 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Founding Fathers and Canada’s Founders both faced many obstacles and concerns when working towards creating the best possible form of government for their respectable nations. The Federalist Papers seek to counter the Articles of Confederation whereas Canada’s Founding Debates is a discussion between supporters and opponents of Confederation. Between the Founding Fathers and Canada’s Founders in the Founding Papers chapter Federal Union, there are many common concerns about the future of the country. When there is a change in how a country is structured, it brings concern over group rights and interest being ignored for the common good, and it is very

    Read More

  • Canada´s New Democratic Party

    818 Words  | 2 Pages

    Did you know that the current leader of the New Democratic Party used to be a Liberal? Thomas Mulcair became the leader of the New Democratic Party after the death of Jack Layton. The New Democratic Party (NDP) is one of the major federal political parties in Canada. The NDP was formed in 1961 as the result of the merger of two different parties. There are numerous reasons why the people of Canada should vote for the NDP. Citizens of Canada should vote for the New Democratic Party because if elected, they promise to improve the environmental situation, provide better health care for Canadians, and improve the economy in Canada.

    Read More

  • Electoral Reform in Canada

    1874 Words  | 4 Pages

    The issue of electoral reform has become more important than ever in Canada in recent years as the general public has come to realize that our current first-past-the-post, winner-take-all system, formally known as single-member plurality (SMP) has produced majority governments of questionable legitimacy. Of the major democracies in the world, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom are the only countries that still have SMP systems in place. Interestingly enough, there has been enormous political tension and division in the last few years in these countries, culminating with the election results in Canada and the USA this year that polarized both countries. In the last year we have seen unprecedented progress towards electoral reform, with PEI establishing an electoral reform commissioner and New Brunswick appointing a nine-member Commission on Legislative Democracy in December 2003 to the groundbreaking decision by the British Columbia Citizen’s Assembly on October 24, 2004 that the province will have a referendum on May 17, 2005 to decide whether or not they will switch to a system of proportional representation. This kind of reform is only expected to continue, as Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty decided to take BC’s lead and form an independent Citizen’s Assembly with the power to determine whether or not Ontario will have a referendum regarding a change to a more proportional system. There is still much work to do however, and we will examine the inherent problems with Canada’s first-past-the-post system and why we should move into the 21st century and switch to a form of proportional representation.

    Read More

  • Canada's Electoral System

    994 Words  | 2 Pages

    It has become widely accepted that Canada uses a first past the post electoral system. However, this system may not be in the best interest of Canada any more. There are many reasons why Canada should change its electoral system to a mixed member proportional one, a variant of proportional representation. With a first past the post system, the elected officials will always be of the majority and this excludes minorities from fair representation. Adopting MMP can create stronger voter turnouts, more personal campaigning, better individual representation, and better party selection. John Hiemstra and Harold Janson, are both in favour of a MMP electoral system. They understand that with the switch, the citizens will get more representation in parliament, their preferred choice will have some say in the House of Commons, and finally someone can be held accountable which creates a closer knit between citizens and Members of Parliament. Nelson Wiseman argues against the MMP system because he feels that there is nothing to be fixed in Canada. If the current system has been working well thus far, there is no need to change it. MMP would allow smaller parties to have their voices heard. Unfortunately first past the post tends to have an over representation of regional parties; contrary to first past the post system, MMP lets Canadians have advocates and legislators who the majority of citizens agree with. Another advantage of MMP is the elimination of strategic voting. With MMP people can finally vote for who they want to rather than choose who the majority may prefer. A change in the electoral system of Canada will create a more fair and just Parliament governing the citizens.

    Read More

  • Canada's Electoral System

    1906 Words  | 4 Pages

    Democracy is defined as government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system (Democracy, n.d.). Canadians generally pride themselves in being able to call this democratic nation home, however is our electoral system reflective of this belief? Canada is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary democracy that has been adopted from the British system. Few amendments have been made since its creation, which has left our modern nation with an archaic system that fails to represent the opinions of citizens. Canada’s current “first-past-the-post” (FPTP) system continues to elect “false majorities” which are not representative of the actual percentage of votes cast. Upon closer examination of the current system, it appears that there are a number of discrepancies between our electoral system and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Other nations provide Canada with excellent examples of electoral systems that more accurately represent the opinions of voters, such as proportional representation. This is a system of voting that allocates seats to a political party based on the percentage of votes cast for that party nationwide. Canada’s current system of voting is undemocratic because it fails to accurately translate the percentage of votes cast to the number of seats won by each party, therefore we should adopt a mixed member proportional representation system to ensure our elections remain democratic.

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    552 Words  | 2 Pages

    The actions of the pigs express this theme by starting with good intentions, but slowly becoming more and more like what they were trying to avoid. In the beginning of the story Old Major gives a speech to the animals on the farm, and in this speech he mentions how cruel the humans are. During his speech Old Major uses Boxer the horse as an example when he says “You, Boxer, the very day that those great muscles of yours lose their power, Jones will sell you to the knacker, who will cut your throat and boil you down for the foxhounds.” (Orwell 11). He then proceeds to tell the animals that once they revolt the cruelty will end, and at first it does, but soon the pigs begin to act more like humans. The pi...

    Read More

  • The Collape of Animal Farm

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    In today’s world, people have always strived to create a utopian society. In the novel ANIMAL FARM written by George Orwell, the animals strive to create their own utopian society based on equality and prosperity. Animalism was created to, as like the Ten Commandments, Animalism’s Seven Commandments were rules for the animals to live by. However, similar to God’s rules, Animalism was a difficult concept for all the animals to follow and live by. Secondly, the collapse of Animal Farm was due to the animal’s own intelligence and their ability to fully understand how the farm was being run. Finally, the failure of Animal Farm was due to in large part by the pigs power over the other animals and the greed and desires that the pigs wanted to achieve. Therefore, the collapse of Animal Farm had to do with Animalism itself, the animals, and the corruption of the pigs.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Animal Farm By George Orwell

    1574 Words  | 4 Pages

    2. Provide a detailed plot summary: The story begins on a farm called The Manor. The farm is owned by a guy named Mr. Jones. He is a mean man who treats his animals cruelly, and uses them for profit. For example, he drowns old dogs when they are no longer of use and he slaughters anything thing that will make him money and buy him more whiskey. One night Old Major, a prize winning boar, who was respected by the other animals because he had lived so long called all the animals for a meeting in the barn. In this meeting, he shared

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    584 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a substantial amount of conflicts that occur in this satirical story. Often these conflicts are between the pigs and the rest of the animals. Only a minute portion of the animals didn’t really have some sort of conflict with Snowball, Napoleon, Squealer, or the rest of the dominating pigs. Overall, Snowball was a better leader than Napoleon, yet the animals reacted differently to Napoleon than to Snowball.

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the world today animals are treated poorly and are overworked under harsh conditions. In Animal Farm by George Orwell the idea of Animalism and lack of freedom is shown. Old Major gave an inspiring speech about how the animals live together without humans. After not being fed the animals attack Jones and end up taking over the farm. The animals survive on the farm, by making commandments, assigning jobs, and soon electing a leader. With Snowball and Napoleon guiding them they soon come across an amazing idea that could shorten the work week. After debating on the different viewpoints they both had on the windmill, Napoleon trains dogs to attack Snowball. With Napoleon now as the leader and Squealer as his spokesman they both run “Animal Farm”. With the victory at the Battle of Cowshed the animals start to have hope, after the windmill was knocked down by the humans everything falls apart. After years of mistreatment the animals decide to fight back. Unknowingly they place themselves under a manipulating leader. The animals soon believe that Napoleon is always right. In the end they lose their strongest most dedicated animal, Boxer. In order to secure a life of luxury for Napoleon and his fellow pigs, Napoleon (with Squealer as his spokesman) uses language that intimidates, language that distorts the truth, and language that appeals to the emotion of the others to manipulate the gullible animals of the farm.

    Read More

  • Federalism in Canada

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since federalism was introduced as an aspect of Canadian political identity, the country has undergone multiple changes as to how federalism works; in other words, over the decades the federal and provincial governments have not always acted in the same way as they do now. Canada, for example, once experienced quasi-federalism, where the provinces are made subordinate to Ottawa. Currently we are in an era of what has been coined “collaborative federalism”. Essentially, as the title would suggest, it implies that the federal and provincial levels of government work together more closely to enact and make policy changes. Unfortunately, this era of collaborative federalism may be ending sooner rather than later – in the past couple decades, the federal and provincial governments have been known to squabble over any and all policy changes in sectors such as health, the environment and fiscal issues. Generally, one would assume that in a regime employing collaborative federalism there would be a certain amount of collaboration. Lately, it seems as though the only time policy changes can take place the federal government is needed to work unilaterally. One area in which collaborative federalism has been nonexistent and unilateral federalism has prevailed and positively affected policy changes is in the Post-Secondary Education (PSE) sector.

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    546 Words  | 2 Pages

    In George Orwell's novel Animal Farm he writes a fairy tale with a meaning. In other words, it is about a bunch of animals living on a farm that decide to rebel against all humans starting with running their owner off by attack. This is compared to the Russian Revolution which is what I will be talking about in the paper. I will state which animal played which role and compare the animal to the person for whom they portray.

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    483 Words  | 1 Pages

    George Orwell's, Animal Farm, depicts how power can corrupt society. If one person receives too much power, one will most likely lead up to dictatorship. To exemplify this idea, Orwell uses a farm to represent a society and the animals inside to portray the people. Orwell's use of the pigs and animals are also an analogy that people sometimes act as 'mindless pigs';. Orwell makes the reader realize just how bad a society of dictatorship can really be.

    Read More

More about The Four Political Parties Of Canada

Open Document