Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical problems facing automotive industry
Ethical problems facing automotive industry
Ethical problems facing automotive industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical problems facing automotive industry
Background
In the late 1960’s, Ford Motor Company was being pressured by its stockholders and the American public to design and manufacture an inexpensive and efficient compact car to compete with other similar vehicles such as the Volkswagen Beetle and Chevrolet Vega. In response, Ford Motor Company began designing the Ford Pinto, a two-door subcompact car that would take only 25 months to engineer, as opposed to the industry average of 43. Furthermore, engineers discovered during the pre-production phase that “rear-end collisions would rupture the Pinto’s fuel system extremely easily ”, which would in turn exponentially increase the odds of the vehicle bursting into flames. As a result, Ford engineers developed two solutions that would entail a relatively small cost per vehicle; the first involved repositioning the fuel tank above the axel, placing it out of the way. The second involved reinforcing the current tank with a rubber bladder to prevent it from leaking fuel if punctured. In spite of this, Lee Acocca, the president of Ford at the time, and other senior executives within the firm decided based on a cost-analysis, that pushing forward with manufacturing and compensating burn victims would be a more economical decision. Although the decision was controversial, the Ford Pinto met the standards and laws set by government regulators within the industry. It was subsequently manufactured and distributed between 1972 and 1980 and since then “by conservative estimates, ha[s] caused 500 burn deaths to people who would not have been seriously injured if the car had not burst into flames .”
In February of 1978, Ford Motor Company was sued for $128 million, which amounted to more than three times the amount that had been previous...
... middle of paper ...
...hat most likely would have deterred many sales.
The unfortunate truth is that cases like the Ford Pinto have always taken place and will continue to occur in our capitalistic society. Although placing a value on an individual’s life and operating within the gray areas of the law is without a doubt unethical, it is considered by many corporate leaders as simply being good business. According to Hoffman, corporations often seek to meet the standards in place without exceeding them, in order to maximize their profit and increase their value . Although it is unfeasible to create a vehicle that will never result in the loss of a life, it is possible to make one that is safe by anyone’s standards.
Works Cited
Boatright, John R. Ethics and the Conduct of Business. New Jersey: Pearson, 2012. Print.
Hoffman, Michael W. The Ford Pinto. McGraw Hill Education, 1984. Print.
"Ford v. Wainwright." LII / Legal Information Institute. Legal Information Institute, n.d. Web. 19 Feb. 2014.
The Old Stagecoach by Eastman Johnson The work that I chose to talk about was “The Old Stagecoach by Eastman Johnson.” This work would be considered a painting. The images that are shown in the painting are of an old stagecoach as the name of the painting suggests. The stagecoach does not have any wheels and so it just sits on the ground.
The ‘Trolley Car Problem’ has sparked heated debates amongst numerous philosophical and jurisprudential minds for centuries. The ‘Trolley Car’ debate challenges one’s pre-conceived conceptions about morals, ethics and the intertwined relationship between law and morality. Many jurisprudential thinkers have thoroughly engaged with this debate and have consequentially put forward various ideologies in an attempt to answer the aforementioned problem. The purpose of this paper is to substantiate why the act of saving the young, innocent girl and resultantly killing the five prisoners is morally permissible. In justifying this choice, this paper will, first, broadly delve into the doctrine of utilitarianism, and more specifically focus on a branch
The majority of people, especially in America, cannot go about their daily lives without a car. Automobiles have instilled themselves in peoples’ lives and shown their usefulness since their debut in 1769. Since then, humans have redesigned and refined the automobile thousands of times, each time making the vehicle more efficient and economical than before. Now as the world approaches an ethical decision to dwarf all others, many people look toward automotives for yet another change. The emergence of the hypercar due to ecological turmoil exemplifies the change the world has demanded. Hypercars alter everything people know about automotives, modern ecology, and fuel efficiency. Not only do hypercars offer a solution to many ecological problems humans are faced with now, they also represent the only logical area for the automotive industry, and by some stretch American society, to expand.
During the 1960's the demand for sub-compact cars was rising on the market. Ford Motor Company, in competition with the foreign market, decided to introduce the Ford Pinto. The Ford Pinto was going to be the new wave for the Ford Company, but it was soon discovered that numerous problems existed. For example, the time that it took to manufacture an automobile was down from three and a half years to just over two years. Before production, however, the engineers at Ford discovered a major flaw in the cars design. In nearly all rear-end crash test collisions the Pinto's fuel system would rupture extremely easily (The Ford Pinto, n.d.). Other problems that were discovered compounded the problem that caused the fires. These included the gas tank being about six inches from the flimsy bumpers, the backend not containing rear sub frame members, and doors tending to jam shut in an accident. The fuel filler tube was prone to separate and create spillage (Alfred, n.d.).
The Ford Pinto case was very interesting to be able to tell if the case was morally wrong or not from a utilitarian perspective. In 1968, Ford decided to make a car that was cheap to make and economically friendly to the public. Ford was in competition with Germany and japan. The only problem with the car was that they put the gas tank in a dangerous location where if hit correctly, it would cause the car to combust. They failed the NHTSA crash test, which is 20 mph impact to the rear in 1970, but passed later buy adding a rubber bladder to the engine. This is where ford had to make a very tough decision, they had already sold plenty of cars without the installed bladder, so they could either recall the car to add the bladder
When we consider the case of the Ford Pinto, and its relative controversy, through the varied scope of ethical viewpoints, the results might surprise us. From a personal standpoint, as a consumer, the idea of selling a vehicle to the masses with such a potentially devastating flaw is completely unethical. When we consider the case from other directions and other ethical viewpoints, however, it makes it clear that often ethics are a matter of perspective and philosophy. It’s also clear that there are cases where more information will muddy the waters, rather than clear them.
It seemed then that Ford and Firestone failed to meet its ethical obligations. That is, they didn’t report safety related defect information to government agencies and they also concealed important information related to vehicle safety from the public. As a result, the consumers suffered the consequences of their unethical conduct. Many people died because of the defect in these tires. In fact, these accidents would have not occurred if both companies have solved the problem immediately.
Our week five case study, Mattel and Toy Safety, involves toy safety inspection and product recall concerns among outside contractors. In 2007, the infamous toy company, Mattel, recalled a very large number of toy products covered with lead-based paint that were manufactured in China. Mattel responded to the massive toy recall by increasing the testing of all products and reassuring its customers that they will take affirmative action to correct the recall issues as soon possible. In my opinion, I believe Mattel acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner regarding the safety of it toys because as soon as Mattel was aware of a European merchant finding lead paint on their toy products, Mattel conducted an immediate investigation.
Yet seeing that safety belt’s help save lives they are also the cause of death of many individuals that wear them as well(Smith,1973). It is known that helmets for motorcycle drivers is not a law any longer in some states, but the insurance for said driver who doesn’t feel the obligation to wear the helmet an increase of insurance fee. But those whom do wear a helmet get a fair fee on their insurance(Timmerman,2014). Everyone has a right to decide what is ethical for them as an individual, included in this should be the safety belt law. Ethical issue with laws carry the weight of the constitution on their shoulders. It is fair when the big picture can be seen as an afterthought that all the laws governed by the constitution an individual should have a right to
Since its creation, Toyota has the reputation of making reliable and beautiful cars. Despite that, Toyota acted unethically. The company disregarded the safety of its customers and employees by delaying the recall of some of its cars that it knew had some brakes and airbags issue. Toyota is a well know car brand. All over the world people drive Toyota’s cars with confidence. Unfortunately, this company dishonest behavior tends to show that the people at his base are immoral. All they seem to care about is profit. It does not matter the consequences even if it means the death of an individual.
Toyota issues in automotive industry resulted from a lack of moral and ethical obligations to loyal customers. In fact, people encounter ethics at one time or another. A business expectation is to act in manner upholding society values. According to authors Trevino and Nelson, (2004) states, “a set of moral principals or values, or the principals, norm, and standards of conduct governing a group or individual.” On the other hand, three ethical criteria determined in this discussion like obligation, moral ideas, and consequences which this article highlights an ethical dilemma with automobiles makers.
“The way to make automobiles, is to make one automobile just like another automobile [1].” With this statement, Henry Ford had invented the modern automobile. Many people may question this idea, as they know self propelled vehicles were in existence long before the days of Ford. In fact, these people would undoubtedly be correct; the idea of a self propelled vehicle and its actual realization had been present for at least one hundred years before Ford ever made one. However, by considering the definition of invention, the idea of the modern automobile and then briefly tracing the history of the self propelled vehicle, it will become increasingly clear how Henry Ford had invented this dominant form of land transportation.
In today’s fast paced business world many managers face tough decisions when walking the thin line between what’s legal and what’s socially unacceptable. It is becoming more and more important for organisations to consider many more factors, especially ethically, other than maximising profits in order to be more competitive or even survive in today’s business arena. The first part of this essay will discuss managerial ethics[1] and the relevant concepts and theories that affect ethical decision making, such as the Utilitarian, Individualism, Moral rights approach theories, the social responsibility of organisations to stakeholders and their responses to social demands, with specific reference to a case study presenting an ethical dilemma[2], where Mobil halts product sales to a garage, forcing the garage owner to stop selling solvents to young people. The second section of this essay will focus on advice that should be given to any manager in a similar position to the garage owner with relevance to the organisational strategic management, the corporate objective and the evaluation of corporate social performance by measuring economic, legal, ethical and discretionary responsibilities. It will address whom to think of as stakeholders and why the different aspect could cost more than a manager or an organisation could have imagined.
Wilson's encouragement to the readers of his article to imagine life as we currently know it without the automobile begins with Wilson outlining exactly why the personal automobile is destructible in so many ways. He points out that academic and social critics believe that cars "burn fuel inefficiently" (304) ejecting "large amounts of unpleasant gases into the air" (304); "vast quantiti...