Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments for animal rights
Advantages and disadvantages of natural and synthetic fibres
Arguments for animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments for animal rights
Animal rights are a fragile issue that goes back and forth between people often with so many different beliefs and ways of viewing things. A major question in animal rights is; are animals entitled to the possession of their own lives and their everyday basic needs? With opinions on this topic based on research and tests, opposers to animals having rights over their life are not taking into consideration that animals live just like us humans but we cannot physically communicate with them. It is unfair that because of lack of communication animals are killed all around the world for the use of their skin because of our selfish need to wear animal fur. When an animal is chosen to be skinned they are either killed by gassing, neck breaking …show more content…
What people don't realize is that even though fur and skins may be more sustainable than other textiles in the industry, during the process of tanning the leathers and dying of the fur before they are put on the market many lethal chemicals are used on the product.
Tom Ford, a huge designer in the fashion industry, actually stated that his reasoning for being pro fur in the industry is that it is an important luxury that lets people experience something that hasn't been harmful on the planet. Animals impact the environment and planet in a very huge way and by taking the focus on the physical animals and putting on a different issue Tom Ford is wrongly advertising the use of fur.
Before the discovery of new synthetic fiber fur was available and used for the purpose of surviving cold temperatures. Now with the technology we have to make durable clothes that hold the purpose of warmth just as much as fur, it is almost obvious that fur has turned into a symbol of high society. The consumer market should be more aware of the science behind their purchase. A higher social status should never be more important than the life of an innocent
Animal rights can defined as the idea that some, or all non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that their most basic interests should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings. Animal rights can help protect the animals who experience research and testing that could be fatal towards them. The idea of animal rights protects too the use of dogs for fighting and baiting. Finally, animal rights affects the farms across america, limiting what animals can be slaughtered. The bottom line is, there is too much being done to these animals that most do not know about.
PETA is arguably the largest animals’ rights organization in the world with more than 5 million members and supporters. They go further to say they are against the use of animals in food, clothing, research, and entertainment industries and claim to spread their message through public education, cruelty investigations, research, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns. This is all according to their website of course; however, a deeper look reveals another meaning filled with hypocrisy, deceit, terror, and greed.
Almost all humans want to have possession and control over their own life, they want the ability to live independently without being considered someone’s property. Many people argue that animals should live in the same way as humans because animals don’t have possession of their lives as they are considered the property of humans. An article that argues for animal rights is “The case against pets” (2016) by Francione and Charlton. Gary L Francione and Anna E Charlton are married and wrote a book together, “Animal Rights: The Abolitionist Approach (2015). Francione is a law professor at Rutgers University and an honorary professor at University of East Anglia. Charlton is also a law professor at Rutgers University and she is the co-founder of the Rutgers Animal Rights Law Clinic. In this article Francione and Charlton mainly focus on persuading people to believe in animal rights but only focus on one right, the right of animals not to be property. The article is written in a well-supported manner with a lot of details and examples backing it up, but a few counter-arguments can be made against some of their arguments.
The human-animal relationship is one that, in recent years, has come under heavy criticism. Organizations, such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), have been trying to raise awareness that this relationship may not be ethical. Changes have been made due to organizations like PETA and the HSUS (Humane Society of The United States). For example, Ringling Brothers Circus recently retired all of its elephants because people were boycotting the circus’s performances. Many people do not find anything about our relationship with animals unethical. The most common current uses for animals are agriculture, companionship, entertainment, and animal testing, each of which has its own controversial problems. A majority of
This theme song to a popular cartoon is a farce dealing with experiments carried out on animals. In the cartoon one mouse is made very smart and wants to take over the world while the other is clearly not as smart. While the cartoon makes jokes, the reality is that mice and other animals re being used for medical tests every day. For some people this testing brings up ethical questions. One of the biggest questions: is it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for "food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on" (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 1). Its stance is that any testing is painful, inhumane, and unnecessary when alternatives are available. The PETA website says that "animals, like humans, have interests that cannot be sacrificed or traded away simply because it might benefit others." (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 2-3). Essentially, PETA is of the opinion that animals and humans should have identical rights. In their press releases PETA puts out pictures of rabbits with open flesh wounds and dogs with rashes on their skins--all in an attempt to disgust people into sympathy for their cause. In actuality the number of lab animals used has been cut in half in the last 25 years (James-Enger 254). Of the animals used, 90 percent are rats and mice (James-Enger 1). Moreover, 11 million animals die each year in animal shelters (Americans for Medical Progress 2) and an astounding 95 percent ...
Most individuals have never seen a dog and questioned whether or not that dog would make a good fur coat. And yet, many countries around the world think so. Wearing fur is a growing epidemic, which is frequently looked over. Due to fashion and profit, animals are subjected to lives of pure torture and eventually death. Most of the fur contained in fur coats and accessories comes from fur farms, which make up nearly 85% of the fur used (Coster). The other 15% comes from the world fur trade. In order to meet escalating demand, today’s $15 billion industry now relies on the mass factory farming of wild and domestic animals to produce the majority of the world’s fur (Rogers).
"The Case For Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan, promotes the equal treatment of humans and non-humans. I agree with Regan's view, as he suggests that humans and animals alike, share the experience of life, and thus share equal, inherent value.
Animals will have rights when they have the means to enforce them. They don't have the ability to reason as humans do. The human race has such a vast understanding of the necessities for all of the different species of animals to exist. Humans are far superior to any other animal because they are so advanced in technology. One advantage of advanced technology is, humans can store information as reference material. With all of this reference material humans can look back at previous mistakes so they don't do the same thing again. With this knowledge, humans can see and predict outcomes before a choice is made. Humans have the knowledge to enforce their rights, something no other animal has.
“A 1998 investigation by The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) exposed the international fur industry’s ugly secret: the widespread slaughter of companion animals- domestic dogs an cats- for the manufacture of clothing, accessories, and trinkets.” (www.infurmation.com/)
Imagine being beaten to near death and being painfully skinned alive. This scenario seems as if it would only happen in a horror film, but in reality it occurs on a daily basis. Looking at a fur coat through a store window or in a glossy magazine one may not realize that animals were beaten, electrocuted, crammed in filthy wire cages, or even hanged just to produce a simple fur coat. Every year millions of animals are treated wrongly and even killed for the fur on their backs. Society may think twice about wearing the corpse of an animal when one knows what really happens in the name of fashion. An immeasurable amount of suffering went into every fur trimmed jacket, leather belt, or wool sweater hanging in ones closet. To eradicate the unnecessary suffering of animals for fashion, wearing fur must be made illegal.
After all, is there a woman in all this wretched world who doesn't?” (Cruella De Vil). Many people love wearing real fur so they can be fashionable and keep warm. Because of this, fur farms only breed animals for their fur and don’t use them to their fullest potential. People say, “People long ago wore fur, so why can’t we?”
... of the pain and suffering for fashion purposes. It is unethical to have an animal born into a world of fear; they deserve to live free as they are supposed to. Humanistic theory states that every person has good in them; supporting fur farms by wearing real animal fur helps go against this theory. However, if people would stop wearing fur, it would help animals from having an insensible death. “In 1987, 4.12 million minks were slaughtered on fur farms but, in 1999, about half the amount of minks were killed for their skins which is a tremendous change” (OCPA). As seen by these statistics, the fur industry is already beginning to decline in their usage of animal skin. This is a good way to go and people need to let the fur industry officially shut down for good. It will save millions of animals’ lives every year and will also help restore the goodness in humankind.
ABC. (2008). Fur industry thriving despite campaigns. ABC, 4 March. Viewed 16 August 2010. < http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/04/2179444.htm >
People for the ethical treatment of animals, also known as PETA is an animal rights organization. The main goal is to eliminate animal cruelty and they promote a vegan lifestyle. They believe that it is wrong for humans to use animals for entertainment, clothes, food, and testing because animals have rights as well. The organization has over 3 million supporters and members. PETA was founded in 1980 and was a way for people to not only help animals, but question, what they believe to be, the unethical use of them. PETA demonstrates their beliefs loudly and publicly so that more people can hear and understand why they want to stop the use of animals. PETA is a non-violent group and mainly uses undercover agents to film research facilities. They even helped influence a supreme court decision pertaining to the treatment of animals. The group influenced the Silver Spring monkeys case of 1981 which led to the first arrest and criminal conviction of animal experiment in
Fashion has become a big status in the world. It has the power to be prominent in society. There are also a lot of negative effects and issues in the fashion industry; such as gender equality, marketing, trend impacts on society, environmental degradation, wages, child labour and much more.11 Although clothing and garments may look harmless and risk free, it can be very deceiving. There is more to what we see behind it all. The one main issue I would like to deliberate is animal cruelty. Animal cruelty is a problem that is rapidly rising in today’s society globally.12