Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The ethics of animal rights
Essays on eating meat
Animal rights vs human rights ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
PETA is arguably the largest animals’ rights organization in the world with more than 5 million members and supporters. They go further to say they are against the use of animals in food, clothing, research, and entertainment industries and claim to spread their message through public education, cruelty investigations, research, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns. This is all according to their website of course; however, a deeper look reveals another meaning filled with hypocrisy, deceit, terror, and greed. PETA portrays itself as the messiah of animals however, they share more of a resemblance with a villain right out of a horror movie. They lure animals in with promises they will not kill them in their sleep. You would think an organization that supports the ethical treatment of animals would keep them alive however, you would be very wrong because annually PETA euthanizes 90% of the animals they pick up. And these are not sick or non- rehabilitatable animals these are perfectly healthy kittens, puppies, bunnies and other cute animals who made their way to a PETA shelter hoping to find a new home only to be euthanized within 24 hours. This is mainly because PETA does not believe people should own pets and think humans have breed animals with selfish intentions, that this goes against the …show more content…
On paper this may sound good however humans are supposed to eat meat. We are carnivorous animals, are jaws even come with canine teeth. Human beings still exist because we eat meat. Our bodies became stronger, faster, and our brain grew and developed and were able to adapt, form communities, religion, and war. This would not be possible if humans did not eat meat. I recommend a balanced diet. However, a world without animal testing is one without vaccines, or medical treatment, or deodorant. Now ask yourself is that a world you are ready to live
One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test
I will admit that PETA has done some things that go along with their animal rights ways and have helped many animals in need. Some things they have done to help the animals would be, helping rescue animals who are in need, bringing the mistreatment of animals to the public’s attention, and relocating and finding homes for those animals who have been abused or neglected. This is People for the Ethical Treatment of Animal’s side, However there is always two sides to each story.
...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.
Animal testing is not going to stop because humans the results of it. What can be done to lessen the amount of animal testing done is to put more research into stem cells. With more breakthroughs in stem cell research, scientists can create useable organs to discover cures. Until these breakthroughs are accomplished, animal testing is the best choice the human race has to survive its own
In 2008, Prop 2 in California was supported by groups such as the HSUS and other groups. Prop 2 has enforced “… Packer/processors, grain producers, suppliers and those in the business of selling food, must recognize this, the organization focuses on different types of animals, such as: dolphins, whales, cats and dogs (Lovvorn & Perry, 2009).” Prop 2 was a law concerning animal holdings. It declared that animal holdings, such as cages, must be large enough for the animals to have room to extend their legs, move around, and not be cramped.. The Humane Society of United States and PETA supported the organizations to inform the people on the sidelines about the different tactics one could take to save the animals. The Humane Society of United States used the ability to spy as a tactic. Therefore the organization used a small pen sized video camera. In the The Barnyard Strategist, “The HSUS released the video in San Bernardino County, district attorney, the story made national headlines.” This can be related to the movie we watched in class “The Cove,” in which a group of men broke into a slaughterhouse of dolphins and whales to catch the ones who were slaughtering the animals. They did not know about the cameras. This helped provide footage to show how the animals were actually treated. The HSUS used merging different organizations such as the smaller animal welfare groups together, this was able to help the organization increase their money to help the company be able to inform others about animal abuse. Pacelle’s strategy consisted of creating a ballot measure that will allow those who are vegetarian and vegan to help reform the ballots. They use media to help get their point across by using a male who is vegetarian who strokes...
...hat animal testing is harsh and very cruel and sometimes wonder myself whether animal testing for medicine is even accurate or worth it in the end. If you think about it, what makes their lives any lesser than ours? Is it because we’re smarter? However, saying that would be like saying smarter people are superior to ones with smaller IQs. It is going to take a long time for people to start realizing what is truly going on in the world. It is hard to create a perfect and Utopian vision of what is humane and moral. I’m sure with the research people are doing now, they are coming up with new ways to tests different drugs and medications without the harm of animals, such as growing human skin tissue and cells from stem cells. Over time, new theories will emerge and new methods of medical tests will surface that will benefit humans and animals, and harm neither of them.
A large amount of information relating to animal rights disseminates from the many websites PETA is associated with. These websites are a key factor to attract supporters and publish information that will help advance its activism. These two PETA websites that were very useful for researching this paper are www.peta.org and www.furisdead.com. These websites ...
PETA deals with many animal rights issues, some including fair treatment to animals in movies and entertainment, such as Khartoum. PETA is a non-profit organization with a purpose of getting better treatment for animals. The organization has uncovered many illegal projects, which harm animals in doing so. In 1981, PETA uncovered the abuse of animals in laboratories and experiments, which launched the Silver Springs monkeys case. In this experiment, Dr. Edward Taub was cutting major nerves in the arms of monkeys, and teaching them how to use the paralyzed arm. While people argued that this experiment had no value to it, Taub did app...
I will first look at the views of Peter Singer, who is a utilitarian. A
Of course this idiot fails to mention that we are not hitting our turkeys in the head with a hammer, boiling them alive or peeling their skin off as they scream in agony. It is estimated that 10,000 thousand dogs and cats are slaughtered and eaten at a 10 day long Yulin dog meat festival, and millions more are butchered each year throughout Southeast asia. While a majority of the west finds the eating of Dogs and Cats morally reprehensible, those in the dog meat business defend their trade, arguing that it is no different than eating any other animal. One Yulin meat market vendor shouted at animal rights protesters: “There are all sorts of cultural norms about what you can eat- you eat turkey, so why are you forcing us not to eat dog meat.”
In PETA, one of the world’s foremost anti zoo advocates, goal is to establish and defend the rights of all animals. In the article, “Zoos and Other Captive-Animal
Adams). Derrida maintains “meat eating is not a simple, natural phenomenon, but is irreducibly linked in our culture to masculinity along multiple material, ideological, and symbolic lines” (quoted in Adams). Despite the absence of “real” meat, the patriarchal myth of masculinity remains on its website: “men are strong, men need to be strong”, thus men need vegan bacon. With this in mind, PETA’s use of sexually explicit and misogynistic ads makes sense. The group is attempting to reach male meat eaters (“Make your ‘stock’ rise”) and assume the familiar patriarchal subject cannot and should not change. The reiteration of such advertisements show that apparently you have to keep participating in the traditional construction of maleness
First of all, animal testing should be banned in order to protect the rights of animals. In other words, animals’ rights are infringed by experimenting on them. Animals and humans are similar in many ways. To begin with, they have similar levels of biological complexity. They both are aware that they exist and they both make conscious choices. Philosophy professor at North Carolina State University Tom Regan points out "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment." (F. B. Orlans) Experimentation on an animal ...
In conclusion, animal testing not only violates animals’ rights but also is not the best way to research. And the genes are different between animals and humans. Humans need to improve their ways to get the scientific experience and forbid animal testing in order to improve our lives and animals’ lives.
In conclusion, animal testing has been overused for too long. Nothing essential has been the outcome of it, and no scientific breakthrough has stopped anything from damaging us. The many, many animals are mistreated, many times killed. They need to begin to establish a more protective act, just like the AWA, however this time, it should strive to protect the majority of the animals used, so they can live safely. Finally, if we are able to find and develop successful alternatives to all animal testing, it might be gone forever. If all of these things can come together and make it happen, we may be able to see the day where all animals are treated ethically and with sheer, utter, respect.