Dog Meat Is Unethical

720 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Yulin dog meat festival

Of course this idiot fails to mention that we are not hitting our turkeys in the head with a hammer, boiling them alive or peeling their skin off as they scream in agony.

It is estimated that 10,000 thousand dogs and cats are slaughtered and eaten at a 10 day long Yulin dog meat festival, and millions more are butchered each year throughout Southeast asia.

While a majority of the west finds the eating of Dogs and Cats morally reprehensible, those in the dog meat business defend their trade, arguing that it is no different than eating any other animal.

One Yulin meat market vendor shouted at animal rights protesters: “There are all sorts of cultural norms about what you can eat- you eat turkey, so why are you forcing us not to eat dog meat.”

This is a deflection argument put forth by the defenders of this barbaric practice. Most of China does not condone the dog eating ways of these Neanderthals but, they …show more content…

China has no law that is similar to the United States Humane Slaughter Act, or laws that protect animals from inhumane acts like when the Yulin butchers beat a dog to death with a stick, or throw the poor animal in a boiling pot of oil. In the United States they would be arrested, jailed and would never be able to set foot near a kitchen again.

What China lacks in protecting animals from evil they do have similar health code laws protecting their people from diseases such as rabies. If China did enforce their laws such as a 7 day quarantine period for any live stock that are to be used for consumption or their law that all "exit animals' must have proper paperwork showing where the animal originated

Show More
Related

  • Puppies Pigs And People Summary

    634 Words  | 2 Pages

    What we do to animals in factory farms is disastrous; we are torturing animals just for a quick meal. We subject animals to a life of misery just for one dinner. What Fred does to the puppies is morally wrong and no one can dispute this. People may argue that there is a moral difference between puppies and chickens, this I agree with. But, the moral difference between dogs and pigs are almost nonexistent. Both of these animals are very smart and are capable of making rational decisions. It does not make sense why some people will choose to eat a pig, but they can’t imagine eating a dog. Both species are complex. There is a moral problem in how we obtain our meat. We should try to strive in killing animals in as humane as a way as possible. I don’t think it is plausible to ask people to stop eating meat-I would not give up eating meat. But, I do agree with Norcross when he says that we need to stop factory farming. The ways animals are killed in these places in

    Read More

  • Animal, Vegetable, Miserable By Professer Gary Steiner

    827 Words  | 2 Pages

    The population of the earth is now 7 billion and rising. Demand for meat products is rising day by day and companies need to meet the consumer demand and to do so they forget morals about factory farming for animals. However some people over the world people are turning into vegetarians, some do it to improve their health and some do it for religion. After reading the article “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable” by Professer Gary Steiner, I came to agree with many of his well stated arguments against meat eating like: cruelty to animals, animals being given hormones and antibiotics or animals not living a good quality life. In his essay he constantly repeats about thanksgiving and the turkey which didn’t live its life to the fullest.

    Read More

  • Eating In The American Paradox, By Michael Pollan

    1236 Words  | 3 Pages

    We care so much about what the food is and how it is made that we overlook about where the food had come from. According to the reading selection, “Killing Them with Kindness?” by James McWilliams, an American history professor at Texas State University, states “animals raised in factory farms have qualities that make them worthy of our moral consideration…[and yet, we] continue to ignore the ethical considerations involved in eating meat” (311). This exhibits that when Americans are so engrossed in healthy eating, our morals about animal rights are neglected. Most of what we eat are animals, and animals like we do have emotions, interests, and possibly goals in life. We pay no heed of the animal’s interests and it should not be that way since our interests are no more important just because we are more superior, intelligent beings should not give us the right to perceive animals in such a manner. In addition to paying notice of the origin of where the animals come from, we need to be aware of what killing animals will do to the earth. In the TedTalk, “What’s Wrong with the Way We Eat,” Mark Bittman states “10 billion animals are killed each year for food and they represent 18% of the harmful greenhouse gasses” (Bittman). This reveals that our careless consumption would not only lead to the suffering of animal deaths but the suffering of our world and our imminent death. As we increase our progression with our unhealthy obsession over healthy eating, there will not be any positive effects for the body, the animals around us, or the world. If we were to be conscious about the source of our food and the consequence of eating then we will be able to eat healthily and

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Gary Steiner's 'Animal, Vegetable, Miserable'

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the last century the concern of animals being treated as just a product has become a growing argument. Some believe that animals are equal to the human and should be treated with the same respect. There are many though that laugh at that thought, and continue to put the perfectly roasted turkey on the table each year. Gary Steiner is the author of the article “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable”, that was published in the New York Times right before Thanksgiving in 2009. He believes the use of animals as a benefit to human beings is inhumane and murderous. Gary Steiner’s argument for these animal’s rights is very compelling and convincing to a great extent.

    Read More

  • Peta Is Unethical

    564 Words  | 2 Pages

    PETA is arguably the largest animals’ rights organization in the world with more than 5 million members and supporters. They go further to say they are against the use of animals in food, clothing, research, and entertainment industries and claim to spread their message through public education, cruelty investigations, research, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns. This is all according to their website of course; however, a deeper look reveals another meaning filled with hypocrisy, deceit, terror, and greed.

    Read More

  • Korean Dog Eating Tradition

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    The strongest argument against the dog meat industry centers on the treatment of the dogs that are often killed by ?beating, strangling, [and] boiling? instead of more humane methods such as electrocution. Unnecessary cruelty against animals is universally considered wrong, and is in many cases illegal, and that is what makes this argument effective. Saletan addresses this argument logically, with the simple fact that in the interest of humane treatment of dogs ?South Korean lawmakers are proposing to legalize, license, and regulate the industry.? This simple fact exposes a fundamental hypocrisy within the opposing viewpoint. Saletan argues that it is the same activists who base their arguments on ending cruelty against dogs who are trying to keep new, more humane methods from being adopted. The activists condemn and deplore cruel ...

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Animal Testing

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year approximately 100 million animals are killed as a part of scientific research in the United States alone. Animal testing is a highly controversial practice in the modern world. There are records of animals being used in biological and medicinal research as far back as 384 BCE with the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Many people believe animal testing is unethical as it is bringing harm to animals in order to benefit humans. Ever since the beginning of this practice, animal testing has been used for a variety of purposes, all of which are inhumane and unethical.

    Read More

  • Why Eating Meat is Morally Impermissible

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    Vegetarians are uncomfortable with how humans treat animals. Animals are cruelly butchered to meet the high demand and taste for meat in the market. Furthermore, meat-consumers argue that meat based foods are cheaper than plant based foods. According to Christians, man was given the power to dominate over all creatures in the world. Therefore, man has the right to use animals for food (Singer and Mason, 2007). However, it is unjustified for man to treat animals as he wishes because he has the power to rule over animals. This owes to the reality that it is unclear whether man has the right to slaughter animals (haphazardly), but it is clear that humans have a duty to take care of animals. In objection, killing animals is equal to killing fellow humans because both humans and animals have a right to life. Instead of brutally slaying animals, people should consume their products, which...

    Read More

  • Argument for Stopping Animal Abuse

    2126 Words  | 5 Pages

    Tom Regan, “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985), 21. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Services, Livestock Slaughter. 2005 Summary, March 2006: USDA, NASS, Poultry Slaughter: 2005

    Read More

  • Animal Ethics

    1818 Words  | 4 Pages

    I will first look at the views of Peter Singer, who is a utilitarian. A

    Read More

  • Is Eating Dog Inmoral or Not?

    558 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Jonathan Safran Foer’s “Let Them Eat Dog”, he discusses a controversial, yet debatable topic. The topic concerns the eating of dogs, and whether or not it is moral and right. This is an issue that has two sides to consider; it is either completely right or completely wrong, there is no in-between. The argument to eat dog is presented with the use of ethos, pathos, and logos. Foer has a number of important arguments why eating dogs is moral and unmoral, in the end he leaves it to the judgment of the reader as to which side they come down on.

    Read More

  • Meat Consumption: The Ethical Issue Of Eating Meat

    1149 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue of meat consumption has been a controversial topic on whether to allow the practice or discontinue it, non-meat eaters argue it’s unethical because it is abusive to animals. On the other hand, meat consumers argue that eating meat is ethical as long as meat eaters are conscious of how their meat is collected and the treatment of livestock is fair. The consumption of meat is an act that an individual decides whether to partake in or not. Therefore, the option of eating meat should not be completely taken away, but it should be limited. Eating meat ties in with vegetarian and vegan diets, in the sense that both have to follow guidelines to create an ethical approach to eating any grown foods. The consumption of food is ethical when

    Read More

  • Essay On Carnism

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    We neatly separate animals into relatively artificial categories – “pets”, “wild animals”, and “farm animals”. These categories affect how we treat those within the category. For instance, our treatment of farm animals would be illegal if applied towards pets. If a shed filled with cages was then crammed by dogs so tightly that limits them to stretch or move freely, one would face strong social and legal sanction, but would probably differ in the case for chickens. According to two recent studies by Kristof Dhont and Gordon Hodson, it was observed that conservatives consume more meat and exploit animals more because they dismiss the threat that vegetarianism and veganism supposedly pose to traditions and cultural practice, and they feel more entitled to consume animals given human “superiority”. Aside from that, the study also examined the possibility of both conservatives and socialists in simply preferring the taste of meat thus consuming them. It appeared that the conservatives are more likely to consume more meat for reasons related to ideology, even after statistically removing the influence of hedonistically liking the taste of meat from the

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of The Yulin Dog Meat Festival

    786 Words  | 2 Pages

    In fact, one local believed that it is crueler to eat beef as cows help to plough the fields while dogs merely play the role of pets. Another pointed out that cows are considered sacred in India but people still consume beef without much criticism. Hence he feels that dog-eating in Yulin is not big a deal at all especially when it is merely a local custom not practiced across China. However, local animal activists disagree. Many are dismayed by the fact that the festival is still ongoing despite the government claiming that it will be cancelled. This resulted in a local protest to occur at the city government which achieved nothing due to the lack of appearance of government officials. Others like Yang Xiaoyun, for example, travelled all the way from Tianjin in northern China and spent more than £45,000 rescue 100 dogs from the festival. From this, I believe that the Yulin Dog Meat festival fuel conflict and hence resulting in social unrest. In this case, dog

    Read More

  • Animal Abandonment Essay

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    The government laws on this unspeakable horrific act are MUCH too lenient. In fact, sometimes animal abuse is even ENCOURAGED!!!! There are many types of animal abuse, and most cases of these categories are not even against the LAW! One type of abominable torture is fur farming. Fur farming is practiced in China.

    Read More

More about Dog Meat Is Unethical

Open Document