Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Powerful effect of fake news
Impacts of using social media
Introduction advantages and disadvantages of using social media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Powerful effect of fake news
Some argue that fake news doesn’t matter, and that readers should simply not watch or read any news. Unfortunately, the public cannot just ignore something as prominent as the news, as they are the force protecting the people, or they should be. Many people do not even get fooled from watching news and instead form wrong conclusions from others telling it. Social media makes this practice more common than ever before, and without educating oneself first by watching different news sources, it is impossible to piece together who to trust for oneself. When the President tweets something like “The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!” (Account, Donald J. TrumpVerified) …show more content…
It is a scary tactic that has been used by dictators including Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler. Power to immediately disprove any comments against them, on top of the democratic power that that relies on people’s support, creates a very dangerous combination as the public ends up slowly believing anything a man in power says, whether it is true or not. What also ends up happening is people believe information about the country that are not even real pushing for a fix to problems that do not even exist, a large example what the second debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump where Trump has been quoting saying “...crime rates are now at an all-time high…” (Kurtzleben). This has been proven to be absolutely false with the truth being quite the opposite; crime at that time was the lowest it had been since the beginning of the 2000’s (“Statements We Say Are Pants on Fire!”). Of course after stating that, however, three right-leaning fake news sites cited that statistic as true including Inforwars.com, ChristianTimes, and the aforementioned Denver Guardian (“Don't Get Fooled by These Fake News
Through manipulation and lies, media manages to modify objective news into biased news in order to convince the public of what the media wants them to believe. The article, “How the Media Twist the News”, by Sheila Gribben Liaugminas discusses the major influence that news has on readers based on their choice of stories and words. “How the Media Twists the News” has borrowed from multiple other texts such as the books like Public Opinion and Liberty and News, news magazine writers such as Ruderman, and news networks like CBS through Bias, A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News and CNN to make her arguments valid and prove that the news is biased and that it does influence readers significantly because of it.
In his essay, “The Good, The Bad, and The Daily Show,” Jason Zinser explores the vices and virtues of so-called “fake” news programs. “Fake” news, as Zinser explains, are those programs that blend newsworthy events with comedy. By examining The Daily Show, Zinser reveals both positive and negative impacts that “fake” news could have on society. As a result, Zinser concludes that there are benefits as well as potential problems with “fake” news programs but insists that the true challenge is determining the net impact on society. The essay, which first appeared in The Daily Show and Philosophy: Moments of Zen and the Art of Fake News in 2007, challenges experts on both sides of the argument who either claim fake news is for entertainment only or that fake news is an acceptable source for information on current events. On one hand, Zinser uses expert testimonies to support his argument that the end result is a better informed public but on the other, he makes logical arguments enhanced by examples to illustrate the potential impacts “fake” news can have on its viewers and mainstream media.
As people look back at history they will see that little posts on Facebook and Twitter can be all lies. It’s not hard to make a post, all you have to do is create something that will draw people's attention. Even if you have to smudge the truth a little. When people find something on the internet they automatically think that it’s true, but in reality news stations sometimes have to “spice” up stories to make people watch their station. This is how the truth is sometimes expendable because the little change of words in a quote could change how people view the story. This is why people need to check who they are watching and shouldn’t take every word said is true unless heard by multiple reliable sources. As we as human beings move on, people need to remember that everything on the internet, new, and social media is true. If you want to know if the piece of information is true look it up, if it is there should be a couple reliable sources that have almost identical information. If you can’t find the same information then it is obviously fake. To help create a better democracy always remember to double check your sources and always check the world around you, because you never know what is true or
In doing this, the Political Party is in complete control over the citizens’ minds, blasting what they want each individual to think (Orwell, 6). They psychologically stimulate each individuals mind, limiting their ability to think and have a mind of their own. In a similar way, Stalin’s created “The Poster” and The Pravda (the Russian newspaper controlled by the government during Joseph Stalin’s regime) to twist and manipulate the minds of people into believing that what they were saying was absolutely right and true. Using this power, Stalin and his regime would get people to do anything for them. (Basgen, 2010).
(46) Not only does a limiting of words show society that by controlling methods of communication a government can easily manipulate the people but also how significant communication is to individuality itself. By eliminating words, the ability to completely express oneself in a unique way becomes impossible. Intimidation is a very effective tactic used by a predator to make himself seem more powerful than he truly is. The Party uses intimidation tactics, such as making an example out of Goldstein, in order to keep society in line. The government has a youth organization in which the children are brainwashed into loving their nation more than they love their parents....
...he people the truth at all. Democracies, however, use propaganda to persuade a person to one thing or another, and they always have to have a little bit of truth in the lies that they feed the people.
The nonstop supervision of the people abolishes instinct and promotes fear, which conditions the people. First, the Party takes away the natural impulse to think freely. To do so, the government set in place a group called the Thought Police. Their main role is to expose any thoughts that are disloyal to Big Brother, “It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place… the smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety… anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide.” (Orwell 1.5.145) The Thought Police creates a rising paranoia in the society so that citizens are willing to turn against each other in hopes of keeping on “good terms”
...society blurs the line between truth and lies and ultimately believes in the lies as if they were truths. This is assisted through consistent forgery of information. Since the next generation is also brainwashed by the government, one's sense of helplessness is amplified. Any clues of disobeying the selected laws of the country are seen by the children, and they would immediately and happily inform officials to condemn those people. Forgery was always done to shine the government in a higher light and make it impossible for society to know any truths. They could not question what they were taught or why, they just had to accept it. Through blind nationalism, false information, and influenced children, the government systems in both 1984 and China have controlled their respective populations through lies and fear, leaving society in a persistent state of helplessness.
Imagine living in a world where the public believed everything the government said, or a world where people did not question the authority. It would suck, right? Well believe it or not today’s society is faced with problems similar to those, and often people cannot see these problems while others do not realize that they are serious issues. Thankfully thanks to technology, we are able to bring awareness of these issues by placing emphasis on them.
Leaders are often feared when they abuse their leadership and status which causes their citizens to become silent. For example, in the novel 1984, by George Orwell, the author criticizes totalitarian governments through diction and repetition which conveys a harsh tone that demonstrates that totalitarian governments manipulate citizens by forcing false facts into their minds and conditioning them to always question their own thoughts which leads citizen to become blind to the truth. For example, “...twisting everything he said” (Orwell). The strong diction of “twisting” connotes a distorted shape and denotes pain and change of ideas which reveals that leaders sometimes destroy the distinction between memory and facts which eliminates the citizens ability to see the truth. When citizens are unsure of their own knowledge, they do not speak up against corrupt leaders. Leaders can change society by positively or negatively with their decisions and
From the beginning days of the printing press to the always evolving internet of present day, the media has greatly evolved and changed over the years. No one can possibly overstate the influential power of the new media of television on the rest of the industry. Television continues to influence the media, which recently an era of comedic television shows that specialize in providing “fake news” has captivated. The groundbreaking The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and its spin-off The Colbert Report have successfully attracted the youth demographic and have become the new era’s leading political news source. By parodying news companies and satirizing the government, “fake news” has affected the media, the government, and its audience in such a way that Bill Moyers has claimed “you simply can’t understand American politics in the new millennium without The Daily Show,” that started it all (PBS).
But how can we be sure that the news is not biased? Are we receiving information accurately, with details being simple to understand? After further research on media framing, I’ve come to realize that it is not rare to be someone who is skeptical of the news. In decades before now, media did a better job serving the public interests inside their news stories (Callaghan, 2001, p.186). But now, journalists may mix up facts intentionally and build a different story (Callaghan, 2001, p.184). How can one feel safe after knowing the media changes stories to keep us interested? Boring stories may not keep someone excited or fully interested, but at least people would not be misinformed and can, in a way, better prepare for what they will face outside their
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...
Fake News is constantly being written, permeating through television broadcasts, internet sites, and magazine articles. It seems that the amount of false news in the world is starting to overtake the amount of genuine information. This is indeed a problem, but not as much as people make it out to be. This is for a few reasons. Fake news is much like bacteria, there are both beneficial and harmful types of fake news. Beneficial fake news is usually
...stence depends upon continued success in furnishing readers and listeners with a wide range of facts,” said reporter Julian Adams. By the public depending on media for information, they are making the media money. Buying newspapers and magazines are compensating those companies. Listening to your local radio station and watching your local news channel is compensating those companies. “Staging (fabrication) or deliberate distortion of news is against public interest,” said writer William B. Ray. Society believes in media and the media believes in the society. So let the society know the real data and what’s important. Knowing what’s important captures the public’s interest rather than knowing what’s fake. Falsifying News is legal meaning the media is allowed to lie to the public. Everyone has their own views on this topic but either way lying to the society is wrong.