Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Battle of Gallipoli failure essay
Conclusion of Gallipoli CAmpaign
Conclusion of Gallipoli CAmpaign
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Battle of Gallipoli failure essay
The Failures of Gallipoli The objectives of the campaign were to capture Gallipoli, and then invade Constantinople. This would knock Turkey out of the war and encourage Turkey’s neighbours to join on the allied side. Then they would invade Austria through the South and leave Germany isolated and unable to continue the war. The allies failed these objectives due to many reasons. The first reason for failure was due to lack of training and training in the wrong terrain. The allied and ANZAC troops were trained in the desert for a short period while Gallipoli was rocky with hills and trenches. They were not trained for landings on enemy beaches and therefore a lot of soldiers died. This shows the ill thought out plan, they should have trained the soldiers in similar terrain and also trained them for landings, which they didn’t. The equipment was also very bad. ANZAC troops would make homemade bombs and use them as grenades due to lack of equipment and ammo. The allied tactics were also very bad, they would always shell the trenches and then attack so there was no element of surprise. Also they used stupid tactics which were to send men over no mans land knowing that there was hardly a chance that they would make it and even if they did it would be maybe one or two men against 100. This is also a sign of the ill thought out plan and also lack of supplies. I think that if the plan was thought out better then there would have been more supplies because it would have been obvious to the commanders that the amount of supplies they had would run out because it would take longer then they thought. Also the communication was very b... ... middle of paper ... ...iated with other commanders and gotten more than 20,000 soldiers, which were not enough to take over Turkey. If the plan had been thought out better there would not have been soldiers dying needlessly, like the soldiers on the battleships hitting the mines, and therefore there would maybe not have been a lack of soldiers in Turkey. Also if there were better command, then there would have been better organisation. For example, if the commanders gave the soldiers better orders to follow then they might have been more successful. For example when the British troops dug in instead of over-running the Turks, which they could have done, the British troops did not know what exactly to do, and therefore they dug in. If the commanders gave orders not to dig in and keep going then they could have beaten the Turks in that battle.
The use of exaggeration and absurdity can be linked to the high saturated light on Turgidson as he is trying to be positive about Russia being bombed and how "only 20 million people will die." The effect of the exaggeration and the high saturated lighting of the general, significantly empathizes the absurdity and irony of the situation, as he is seen speaking in a humorous way even though it is highly important. A major plot in the storyline is that the Americans B-52's cannot be recalled after being given a Code red by General Jack D. Ripper. With the use of a low angle close up shot empathizing the power of General Jack D. Ripper , it demonstrates how nothing will stop him from achieving his own personal mission of bombing the Russians. During this important and serious scene, we then hear out of the blue a casual alcoholic beverage order made by Jack D. Ripper to Captain Mandrake to make the drink, this poses the question to the audience whether humanity is sane if during a chaotic and deconstruction of the world moment they are ordering an alcoholic beverage to be
...etheless, over a hundred men died per day due to lack of nourishment, healthcare, and even suicide by purposefully crossing the deadline causing the mortality rate to be twenty-nine percent (Davis 352; Savage 45; Turner 162).
The Gallipoli campaign was a military disaster but it is still one of the most important conflicts in which Australia was involved. On 25th April 1915 between 4:30 and 6:30 am the Gallipoli Peninsula was invaded by British, Australian and New Zealand forces. This was to start the long, hard weeks in which the troops were fighting for ground that the enemy controlled in Turkey. They were attempting to gain a supply route to Russia to aid them in repelling the German and Turkish soldiers from their country. I will be discussing the willingness of Australians to volunteer for the war effort and the love and respect they had for their Mother Country, England. I will also discuss how the young, naive soldiers arrived at war not knowing what warfare entailed. They were shocked by the conditions and casualties. I will also discuss the bravery that was shown by the ANZACS in the most dangerous conditions. I will conclude with my reasons of why the Gallipoli campaign holds such value and importance in Australian history and ideology.
In this essay I will explain the battle between Germany and Britain, discuss how important winning this battle was, what Britain had that the Germans did not have, and what could have happened if Britain would have lost. It is known cleverly as “the Battle of Britain”.
"The troops are not very well trained, they're frightened, and they're terrified. It seems as if the soldiers fire all over the streets at anyone who moves" (Everest 12).
The Battle of Normandy was a turning point in World War II. Canada, America, and Great Britain arrived at the beaches of Normandy and their main objective was to push the Nazi’s out of France. The Invasion at Normandy by the Allied Powers winning this battle lead to the liberation of France and Western Europe. Most importantly Hitler’s was being attacked from both the eastern and western front, and caused him to lose power. If the Allied Powers did not succeed in D-Day Hitler would’ve taken over all of Europe.In a document written by General Dwight Eisenhower he persuades the allied powers to invade Normandy. Dwight Eisenhower was born on October 14, 1890. Eisenhower became the 34th president of the United States. He served as the president from January 20, 1953 through January 20, 1961. Before his presidency Dwight participated in World War I and was moved up to captain. Dwight would then take part in World War II and work his way up to becoming a General.
of the affairs in the way that he did - for example Ireland - as some
Peter Weir’s 1981 film Gallipoli can in every sense of the phrase be called an ‘Australian classic’. The impact and effect this film has had upon the psyche and perspective of several generations of Australians has been significant. Whilst it can be argued that every Australian is aware of the ANZAC legend, and the events that occurred on the Turkish beaches in 1915, Weir’s film encapsulates and embodies a cultural myth which is now propagated as fact and embraced as part of the contemporary Australian identity. The film projects a sense of Australian nationalism that grew out of the 1970’s, and focuses on what it ‘means’ to be an Australian in a post-colonial country. In this way Gallipoli embodies a sense of ‘Australian-ness’ through the depiction of mateship and through the stark contrast of Australia to Britain. A sense of the mythic Australia is further projected through the cinematic portrayal of the outback, and the way in which Australia is presented in isolation from the rest of the world. These features combined create not only a sense of nationalism, but also a mythology stemming from the ANZAC legend as depicted within the film.
and most of all their hiding place so they wont find them . Also the woods
“I asked her to wear something revealing, so she showed up in a prophet's toga.”(CITE) Jarod Kintz’s words are an example of miscommunication, or failure to comprehend meaning. In this case, it is implied that one person misunderstood the message of another, but incomprehension also applies to problems other than falsely interpreted requests. Incomprehension can occur when people misinterpret another’s words or intentions, or when a person misreads situations or events. The outcome described in Kintz’s quote is unexpected and unintended, but there are instances of incomprehension that have consequences of greater severity. Perhaps a classic tragedy with a high body count falls under these parameters.
As the cold hand of death swept over the remnants of France, British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, orated on the imminent battle that would rage over his homeland and the foreboding struggle for survival that was now facing Britain:
...eping a death toll is a way that the people can spot signs of a victory that may be near. However, they have no control over the deaths. The fight is ultimately quixotic.
line of the poem “Or does it explode” is a warning that the population was so frustrated that there
but to use up valuable resource’s.What was so disturbing to them is that they were coming over
With the Great War beginning over a hundred years ago in 1914 there are no survivors left to reflect or corroborate any first hand accounts of the war that ushered in deadly new practices like trench and chemical warfare. Paul Fussels book The Great War and Modern Memory explores not only the firsthand accounts but also literature to the subject published during that time. There are no shortage of war memories detailed in Fussels book, and many of them look into experiences had by soldiers during the war that are unique only to them. In a book that sets out to chronicle the memory of all of World War I why are these specific memories included? Obviously they are curated by Mr. Fussel, whose primary intention seems to be to give a well rounded