Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rent control pros and cons economics
Rent control topics
Rent control pros and cons economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ethics, according to the Oxford dictionary is “a set of moral principles that govern a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity”. Ethics consists of doing what the law requires, following the standards of behavior our society accepts, and also has to do with what you believe is right or wrong. Rent control is not unethical, but is very controversial. If on one hand it is a good thing because it prevent landlord from being unethical charging the tenants unfair rent price, on the other hand it is unfair for the landlords to be imposed a rental price below market price which he/she is morally entitle to. Rent control can create several problems not only for the landlord but for the economy as well.
Rent control is a price ceiling imposed by the government. Which means is a law that places a maximum price a landlord can charge a tenant. This rent control affects the equilibrium of the market, making a change on supply and demand because if the price is set below the market price, the quantity demanded will exceed supply; as a result, people who want to rent will have to lean to units that are not rent controlled which will have a higher price. In a normal competitive market, when the quantity demanded exceeds supply, the price increases to eliminate the problem of shortage. In this case of rent control, the price of rent can only be increased each year by a fraction of the inflation rate.
The main problem rent control can create to landlords is the case of the tenant do not move out because of the good rental price. That causes the landlords to lose money by not being able to increase the rental price of their units. Besides, the price of maintenance continues to increase, causing landlords to not earn any profit with their ...
... middle of paper ...
...problem is solved now, but in the long run landlords and the economy loses. Some of the negative effects caused by rent control are: it hurts the ones who are suppose to get help, gives landlords less incentive to maintain or to improve their rent controlled apartments, reduce investment on building and buying apartment in order to rent, discourage the construction of affordable houses to all in need, and increase the construction of luxury houses for those who can afford.
Works Cited
Block, W. (n.d.). Rent Control: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved February 24, 2014, from Web site: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/RentControl.html
Smith, A. (n.d.). Rent Control is Bad for Affordability. (n.d.). Retrieved February 23 from Web site: http://seattletransitblog.com/2013/10/24/rent-control-is-bad-for-affordability/
“How can a middle-class family afford a rent of $2,000 or even $2,800 when the family consists of four children and a single working parent. when food needs to be on the table every night and bills need to be paid. I find this ridiculous, no one ever wanted to live in Bushwick and now all of a sudden these people want to live here.” -
The 1930’s were an interesting time for many African-Americans. Even though they had been freed from slavery decades ago, they still felt oppression. Langston Hughes does a fantastic job of describing this oppression in the poem “Ballad of the Landlord”. The author’s purpose for writing this poem is to show the problems that African-Americans dealt with in the 1930’s which is exemplified through the use of hyperbole, change of lines in stanzas, and repetition.
Those who argue in favor of rent control say that it is the only way to protect
If the government were able to lower rental costs, would it benefit those who cannot afford an increase in rent? This would be the immediate benefit. People would be able to better afford where they live. The issue is that the overall outcome is not considered. Rent control leads to unjust opportunities for those wanting to rent. The current residents would likely stay because of cheaper rent. It discourages landlords to repair or improved rental facilities since they no longer have a financial incentive. It also encourages the landlord to abandon current properties because of
Rent. To most people it is associated with an apartment, house, or another object. This word rarely conjures pleasant memories, but more often annoyance and stress. However, when someone mentions rent to me, my mind races to some of the most memorable experiences in my life.
Have you ever noticed that while you’re driving around Austin that the homeless have become a common casualty to exhibit. I know the first thing that comes to mind is, “How ridiculous, why don’t they just get a job!”It perfectly acceptable to wonder, whether your money would go towards feeding a starving stomach or a drug addiction, therefore your generosity would be put to better use through a charity foundation or simply by offering a meal. The reality is that the majority of people who are homeless are unable to work due to certain disabilities. In other words, the best response is compassion. There is only so far we can do as a community, the major change has to come from a superior source, which is why I propose that the City of Austin ought to step up and diminish this problem. The City of Austin should build more affordable housing and assistance programs because it will help reduce homelessness.
In my experience as a real estate sales representative, I have looked at many rental properties that are owned by people that are commonly known as slum lords. These units are in disrepair with leaks, mold, mildew, holes in walls, ceiling and poor floor coverings. Many people are afraid of pushing these issues to have repairs done as they might lose their shelter or their rent could be increased. There are people living in a rooms in a house, that are also at risk as they don’t realize they are not protected under the tenant act so the owners can remove them from their shelter without notice. I have also experienced people living in abandoned commercial buildings ...
The American dream was owning a house with a white picket fence. Now this dream is impossible. Individuals and families find it more difficult to find a decent home to rent in a suitable living area. According to Huffington Post, the hourly wage needed to afford a two bedroom apartment in California is at least $26 an hour. This is more than triple the minimum wage. Eviction, relocation, and inflation are the common keywords that associate with affordable housing. I 'm hoping to persuade you to support affordable housing for all. Today, I will be discussing, one, inflation of the housing market that needs to decrease, two, eviction from homes, three having to move to communities far from their work site.
Compare and contrast the ways in which housing inequalities are discussed from the perspectives of social policy and criminology, and economics (TMA 02)
Low income can lead to high levels of stress and pressure, which can lead to mental health issues such as anxiety and depression. Overcrowding can be negative for a person because it causes frustration and family breakups, and means that their personal space is invaded, and their right to privacy is ignored – this can lead to tension in the family, and issues such as domestic abuse. Inadequate housing can affect an individual’s health, as it can cause respiratory problems due to poor living conditions such as damp or mold. The lack of green spaces can mean that health and sociability are not encouraged, and mental and physical health
Nevertheless, the previous researches were either focused on the role of affordable housing associating with residential stability or educational improvement for children and employment outcomes for the adults (Manturuk, 2012). Others also emphasized that affordable housing could contribute to community-wide economic development, both for troubled and vibrant communities (Lubell et al., 2007). In addition, even the past researches started to examine the impact difference from various categories ownerships versus; however, the subcate...
The argument above stated that the elimination of rent control is not a problem because the majority of renters didn't protest for the regulation. This argument relies on several unsupported assumptions and therefor fails to be persuasive.
... The Corn Laws lead Malthus to come up with another one of his controversial theories, the Theory of Market Gluts. This theory stated that an excess of supply over demand was regarded as possible, which will eventually lead to unemployment, a glut, and the key force that can prevent such glut lay in the hands of the land owning class. Malthus argued, “There must therefore be a considerable class of persons who have both the will and power to consume more material wealth than they produce, or the mercantile classes could not continue profitability to produce so much more than they consume. In this class the landlords no doubt stand pre-eminent.” (Thomas Malthus, Principles of Political Economy, 2nd edition, 1836) meaning that landlords must spend freely in order for there to be enough demand because they have the money to do so and will lead to lower unemployment. By
It is a known fact that rent control creates a destructive shortage of apartments by setting the price below the market’s equilibrium price.
... and property values, making the market more affordable for many individuals. Many areas also have a ceiling of how much property values can increase within a given year. For example, if there is a spike in home prices, there is usually a cap that prevents taxable value from increasing by a certain percentage. The cap protects many taxpayers from unexpected price changes that might negatively impact their wallets.