Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rent control essay
Pros of rent control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rent Control: Pros and Cons
Rent control is the government imposition of price ceilings on rent for
apartments in certain areas of a city. The goal is usually to protect the rights
of the poor. Thus, in a rent controlled or rent stabilized building, the amount
of rent will not increase as quickly as inflation. While the moral side of rent
control may have some appeal, in the long run the disadvantages far outweigh the
advantages.
Those who argue in favor of rent control say that it is the only way to protect
lower-income tenants from landlords who overprice, and from being forced to move
out of a neighborhood because they cannot afford the rent. Limiting the price
that a landlord can demand helps maintain a city's ethnic diversity and prevents
the creation of slums on the outskirts of the main city. Another thing that
proponents say is that by linking rent prices to apartment maintenance and
material improvements, rent control actually improves the state of housing.
Overall, they argue that the goals of rent control can be reached if they are
administered in a careful and just way.
The opponents, though, have both theoretical and practical experience on their
side. First, rent control creates a market that is unfair for everyone. Since
the rent is set at a lower than normal level, an unsatisfied demand is created.
This increase in demand leads to an increase in the cost of rents in the
uncontrolled sector. Thus, two types of rents are created: those that are
unfairly cheap, and those that are unfairly expensive.
Another problem that is created is that landlords who own rent controlled
apartments are often not able to earn enough money to adequately maintain
buildings. This leads to run-down, poor quality housing. In many cases,
landlords lose so much money that they are not able to even pay the debt on the
properties, and they abandon them. Both of these effects have been documented in
New York and elsewhere, and go against the goals of rent control.
Finally, rent control has the bad side effect of turning away new construction.
This is because even if rent controls don't include new constructions, owners
are afraid to build any new buildings if in a few years those too will be taken
over by rent control. Rent control thus leads to less construction and an even
greater unsatisfied demand. This, in turn, increases the rents of uncontrolled
apartments even more. New constructions are also avoided because banks and
insurance companies don't want to invest in areas where rent control is in
effect, because they know that it is likely that landlords will not be able to
“How can a middle-class family afford a rent of $2,000 or even $2,800 when the family consists of four children and a single working parent. when food needs to be on the table every night and bills need to be paid. I find this ridiculous, no one ever wanted to live in Bushwick and now all of a sudden these people want to live here.” -
One of the most prominent concerns of Evicted is the issue of inescapable financial instability as it relates to eviction. In the very first few pages of the book, Desmond reveals that the majority of poor renting families in America spend over 50% of their income on housing, with an even more astonishing one in four spending over 70% of their income on it (4). When families are spending the majority of their already meager income on housing alone, it is no surprise that they have little money left for savings or self-betterment programs such as a college education. Compounded with this is the fact that some welfare systems are constructed in a way that discourages long-term financial responsibility. For example, Supplemental Security Income, a program that provides monthly stipends for low-income elderly or disabled individuals, is revoked if individuals have too much money in their bank account (217). For
The root cause of homelessness is largely be explained by economics: people who become homeless have insufficient financial resources to obtain or maintain housing. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2010 American Community Survey (ACS) shows that 75% of households at or below the poverty line are severely housing cost burdened. Unexpected financial crises would jeopardize housing stability and lead to an increased risk of homelessness.
Rent control is a government-imposed law to set a maximum price as “price ceiling” on housing market to protect tenants from excessive rent increases. It also can slow booming economic by limit the abnormal inflation rate. To set a rent control, the maximum price has to be set of market to become effect. But if the price ceiling is lower the equilibrium level, it stimulates the quantity demand of housing, the demand will eventually exceed the supplies, and lead to a shortage of residence space. With rent control, it might not only cause shortage of house in a city, but also leads to deterioration due to loss of invest interesting to landlords.
Instead of focusing on the relationship between federal housing policy and segregation, as does Mohl, DiPasquale explores how rental housing and federal policies affect each other. In her article, “Rental Housing: Current Market Conditions and the Role of Federal Policy,” DiPasquale challenges the federal policies that were in place at the time she wrote her article. She brings to attention her belief that in the past, government policies have given much of their focus to homeowners and little to the renter. Through her research, DiPasquale had found that rental housing had become increasingly less affordable, especially to poorer tenants, who are spending a greater portion of their income on rent. This not only poses a problem to the renters, but also to the landlords, for if the renters cannot pay the rent, the landlords get a vacancy and no income from their property. She also asserts her belief that homeownership is not for everyone, and uses evidence from the recent housing crisis to support her claim. Her article calls for a revamping of current federal policies to level the playing field between home owning and renting. By doing so, households will have more choices available to them when it comes to choosing suitable housing for them
One reason why people become homeless could be due to the decline of housing units affordable to extremely low income households (National Resource Center on Homelessness and Mental Illness).
New York City is not only a tourist attraction, but considered one of the most expensive cities in the world to fund because of its superb security, overall popularity, and partly its dependence on Wall Street to pay high income taxes to fund social programs, such as those who help homeless individuals and low-income residents. Ever since Bloomberg's re-election in 2005 he warned New Yorker's that because of a gaping budget deficit the city may have to raise property tax and state tax. The only people who struggle the most from increasing taxes are those who are barely able to pay rent and other expenses, such as utilities bills. One of the reasons why increasing taxes affect individuals is because as property taxes rise the property owner has to spend more, which means his/her profits may be affected, thus increasing the rent of tenants (the most current increase was 4% in one-year leases and 7.25% in two-year leases). In the other hand residents that currently live in homeless shelters have fewer chances of finding an affordable apartment even if he/she obtains a job (Most of the jobs homeless shelters refuges receive are low-paying jobs).
The main problem rent control can create to landlords is the case of the tenant do not move out because of the good rental price. That causes the landlords to lose money by not being able to increase the rental price of their units. Besides, the price of maintenance continues to increase, causing landlords to not earn any profit with their ...
In my experience as a real estate sales representative, I have looked at many rental properties that are owned by people that are commonly known as slum lords. These units are in disrepair with leaks, mold, mildew, holes in walls, ceiling and poor floor coverings. Many people are afraid of pushing these issues to have repairs done as they might lose their shelter or their rent could be increased. There are people living in a rooms in a house, that are also at risk as they don’t realize they are not protected under the tenant act so the owners can remove them from their shelter without notice. I have also experienced people living in abandoned commercial buildings ...
the major factors that put homeless to the population is the combination of declining wages, reduced
The American dream was owning a house with a white picket fence. Now this dream is impossible. Individuals and families find it more difficult to find a decent home to rent in a suitable living area. According to Huffington Post, the hourly wage needed to afford a two bedroom apartment in California is at least $26 an hour. This is more than triple the minimum wage. Eviction, relocation, and inflation are the common keywords that associate with affordable housing. I 'm hoping to persuade you to support affordable housing for all. Today, I will be discussing, one, inflation of the housing market that needs to decrease, two, eviction from homes, three having to move to communities far from their work site.
Compare and contrast the ways in which housing inequalities are discussed from the perspectives of social policy and criminology, and economics (TMA 02)
Core-need as stated by Banting (1990) as people who are living in an overcrowded environment, no running water, or no flush toilets is at 32% of the population in Ontario. Within the Toronto area there are a number of rent geared to income and co-op housing to help alleviate some of the stress of the cost of rent. Rent geared to income and co-op housing aims to make sure that only 30% of the renter’s income goes towards housing and utilities. Public housing allows the occupier to spend less on rent, in hopes of helping those under the poverty line create a balanced life through a less impoverished
One should be using ⅓ of their income to pay for housing or rent to have money left over for other necessities. For most Oregonians, this is not the case. According to an article “Raise the Roof” forty percent of Oregon renters are paying more than ⅓ of their income (Strege-Flora). With such unaffordable housing, a rising of an “alarming number of evictions of low- and fixed-income… homelessness, and housing instability [has spread] throughout Oregon (Vilet). Sandy Burke is one of the many victims of this housing dilemma. She was a resident of The Lower Pines in Ashland, Oregon and was at the time “in immediate danger of losing [her] home,” (“Strege-Flora”) along with the rest of the residents in The Lower Pines. All residents were given a one-year eviction notice with no help to move or relocate. Luckily, Oregon Action stepped into the situation and fought before the city council for what is right and advocating the “general lack of affordable housing in Ashland” (“Strege-Flora”). If it weren’t for the Oregon Action, all of the residents would have been homeless. Oregon’s lack of affordable housing drives many into homelessness and “a recent study found that 9,000 homeless people sought shelter assistance every night… [and] Oregon shelters must turn away hundreds of people each night” (“Strege-Flora”). Homelessness is not scarce in Oregon and while many of
Arlene, while in poverty, was not originally “struggling,” Ariene had a steady income with two boys in school. One day one of her boys threw a snowball at a car which resulted in the driver kicking in their front door, From that moment forward Arlene began to struggle. With one eviction on her record Arlene struggled to be accepted by other property companies, and landlords. Not only did her eviction cause her issues being accepted but, having two little boys increased her struggle. For mothers in poverty who have kids, their chances of being accepted for housing decreases dramatically. But why? Because kids are high risk, kids break things, get in accidents, are loud, sometimes cry, the list goes on and on. Landlords, in turn, do not want kids in their units as there is a higher risk of damage and/or increased noise complaints from