Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gentrification in urban areas
Gentrification in urban areas
Gentrification in urban areas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
For centuries people have relied on public housing each year in Canada. Public housing is a known problem that does not get talked about often. Public housing is defined as a federal, provincial or local housing program that is provided for people with low incomes (XXX).
This paper will be predominantly focusing on public housing within Ontario. Not only will it look at the basics of Ontario but examine more directly on Regent Park within Toronto. It will discuss what public housing is and the explanation for why it exists, the government housing programs that are present with regards to public housing and the results of the government programs. The Purpose of this essay is to argue that the problem of public housing will never
…show more content…
fully be addressed because of fixed classes and income creates an area that is protected where money and capitalism will always be present. Explanation for Public Housing There are a number of households who are in core-need.
Core-need as stated by Banting (1990) as people who are living in an overcrowded environment, no running water, or no flush toilets is at 32% of the population in Ontario. Within the Toronto area there are a number of rent geared to income and co-op housing to help alleviate some of the stress of the cost of rent. Rent geared to income and co-op housing aims to make sure that only 30% of the renter’s income goes towards housing and utilities. Public housing allows the occupier to spend less on rent, in hopes of helping those under the poverty line create a balanced life through a less impoverished …show more content…
lifestyle. The need for public housing has been at a stable rate for the past few decades. There are more and more areas that are starting to appear because low income people tend to live around these neighbourhoods. When there are a lot of rent geared to income properties the rent with in the building may also be lower because people protest the cost of the others rent. A lot of the areas that were once for public housing have started to become more developed scaring the lower income people out of the area. A lot of public housing is built as high-rise apartment buildings and duplexes so they are able to fit as many people as they can into a small area. This shows that there are many people who need the housing provided by the government to help live a life where they are not struggling with more than 30% of their overall income. Even though they are In Canada it is important to follow the Universal Declaration of Human Rights it states in Article 25 that “everyone has the right to a standard living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care” (The United Nations, 1948). With this being a main part of the Human Rights code it helps to show that the government needs to be a part of providing adequate housing for the people in need. Every person that is living in Canada should have the option of proper living conditions. Public housing can help to provide a better life and to satisfy the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A Human Right is very important in public housing because it forces people to look at public housing in a not so negative light. Reason for Public Housing There are many reasons as to why public housing is an important aspect to Ontario. Public housing benefits a lot of people from different races, ethnicities and genders. People who are in need of the public housing usually have a low income and are unable to afford the majority of the necessities of life. The average income that someone who needs public housing ranges anywhere from xxx to xxx in a given year (). This shows that there are a lot of people who can only work minimum wage jobs to make their income yet need to have a place to live. Another reason there is a need for public housing is the number of homelessness that are present through out Toronto. A new initiative that has been started in Toronto is something called a housing first initiative where they try to provide housing for homeless people to try and get them off the street in hopes of being able to find a job easier. This is in hopes of being able to get a lot of people out of hostels and into their own homes so they can start to contribute to society. With being able to house the homeless it makes the neighbourhood look like a better place as well as being able to improve the overall health of the people around. Another group of people that are in need of public housing are immigrants that come to Toronto in hopes of finding a better life. Most immigrants live with other family members in crowded conditions meaning that they do not live in adequate living conditions. Immigrants who move to Canada do not always have jobs that they have come here for, they are trying to get a better life by moving to Canada. When immigrants move to Canada they usually are demoted from their jobs forcing them into a minimum wage job making it harder for them to make a good salary to provide properly for their family. Immigrants and refugees do not make the money that most other Canadians make, making it more difficult for them to find proper shelter. Public housing helps to set the immigrants up to have a better life by supporting them with somewhere to stay for a better price that is also adequate as well ass being able to integrate better in to society (Murdie et al. 2006). Government Housing Programs The government is a very important aspect in the public housing programs. Government is the one that has all the power with the money and control how often, where they open and to help with renovations. There are multiple government housing programs that are available through out Toronto. The government housing that is provided through out Toronto includes co-op housing, rent-geared to income, as well as the Toronto’s Affordable Housing Program. Government housing through Ontario different stages and acts to help the Canadian people to live better lives with better residency. The National Housing Act which “promoted the construction of new houses, the repair and modernization of existing houses and improvement of housing and living conditions ( ). This is when Ontario took over to manage its own public housing. A lot of the money funding from the federal government was no longer available and each province had to start developing their own public housing while the federal government still had to funding what was already provided. The Ontario Housing Corporation which was funded by rental income and provincial and federal subsidized. A great deal of money was invested into construction large apartment buildings and duplexes to help provide the public housing for the people in need within Toronto. Followed by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation who started non-profit and co-op housing promoted through the federal government which then municipal services took over the financial costs of the social housing. The way that government is involved has changed from previously to now. Government has become less involved over the years making it harder to become accessible. It also has made it more difficult for people to access public housing. When the government has the power to control public housing it becomes a very controversial topic. A lot of people in the community pay attention to the way the government runs public housing whether it during elections or continuous updates on the systems of public housing. Results of Government Housing Programs There were many positive results that came from the help of government housing programs within Toronto.
One major example of the help that was put into areas of Toronto is prominent is Regent Park, Toronto before gentrification. Regent Park showed that there are 65% apartments and houses that are market price but then there are 35% of the properties that are rent geared to income (Williams, 2009). Even though this was not a high percentage and was still beneficial to people who worked near the location of Regent Park in Toronto. Making it easier to access everyday necessities can make a lot of other expenses in life go down as well, when you do not have to worry about paying more than 30% of your income. Regent Park had a revitalization project to help turn this area from an area with high poverty rates to a nicer area by demolishing most of the public housing pushing the poorer people out of the area.
Even though there are positives to having public housing there are still some negatives that are present when looking at the way government is involved with housing programs. With having the federal government involved and giving up most of the responsibilities to provincial government it was a loss for the money that would be provided to fixing up and creating new public housing. Like in Regent Park a lot of the public housing that had been made by the federal government has been starting to be demolished to make areas that will bring in more economic
stimulus. A main negative aspect that goes a long with the way that government housing is run is the reputation that follows with it. There are a lot of low income people that live in the area mixed with people that also have to pay the regular rent of the area. With the development of the low-income housing comes population growth which can cause more harm to the area than good. With having a mix of people as well as the quick population growth within the community it changes the dynamics of the people which brings along a negative stereotype of crime and mischief within the community. With having so many people needing to live within public housing it becomes a lot harder to get a spot to get adequate housing. Once people do get a spot in public housing it is hard to get a new apartment if the family were to expand or getting a transfer with a job. Conclusion In conclusion, this paper has explored various aspects to public housing within Toronto. It went into detail about what public housing is and the reason people need it, and the way the government is involved. Additionally, this essay shows how their can be complications that do arise with public housing in different areas of Toronto such as Regent Park. Arguably there are many reasons that people do need public housing and how it affects the
According to statistics canada Toronto in 2001, around 70% of the buildings in the area are high rise rental apartments but during the industrial era (1940’s ) most were private homes. Immigrants from countries such as the Philippines , Vietnam , Tamil, Chinese , Tibetan , Caribbeans and Hungarian have occupied parkdale since the 1980’s to present leading to the construction of these apartments with high storeys as seen in the census done in 2001. With high number of immigrants in the area increasing,Parkdale area soon developed a bad reputation as a neighbourhood of poverty, crime , drugs and homelessness These reputations led to segregation of neighbourhoods where the rich separated themselves, this happened on the basis of both of income and ethnicity.These is currently mainly occupied by minorities.Looking at the statistics in 2001 the top ten ethnicity living in this area were all immigrants with 20% arriving in Canada between 1980-1991 and other 25% arriving by 1991-2000 according to Ontario immigration data. 51% of these immigrants were born outside canada. Since it cost more to live in nicer neighbourhoods most immigrants end up in areas like parkdale where rent is cheap and other
Chicago’s Cabrini-Green public housing project is notorious in the United States for being the most impoverished and crime-ridden public housing development ever established. Originally established as inexpensive housing in the 1940’s, it soon became a vast complex of unsightly concrete low and high-rise apartment structures. Originally touted as a giant step forward in the development of public housing, it quickly changed from a racially and economically diverse housing complex to a predominantly black, extremely poor ghetto. As it was left to rot, so to speak, Cabrini-Green harbored drug dealers, gangs and prostitution. It continued its downward spiral of despair until the mid 1990’s when the Federal Government assumed control the Chicago Housing Authority, the organization responsible for this abomination. Cabrini-Green has slowly been recovering from its dismal state of affairs recently, with developers building mixed-income and subsidized housing. The Chicago Housing Authority has also been demolishing the monolithic concrete high-rise slums, replacing them with public housing aimed at not repeating the mistakes of the past. Fortunately, a new era of public housing has dawned from the mistakes that were made, and the lessons that were learned from the things that went on for half a century in Cabrini-Green.
Many individuals would define leisure as time free from paid work, domestic responsibilities, and just about anything that one would not do as part of their daily routine. Time for leisure and time for work are both two separate spheres. The activities which people choose to do on their spare time benefit their own personal interests as well as their satisfactions. While some people may enjoy one activity, others pay not. Leisure is all about personal interests and what people constitute having a good time is all about. Some may say that the process of working class leisure can be seen to contribute their own subordination as well as the reproduction of capitalist class relations. Self-produced patterns of working class leisure can lead to resistance to such reproduction. This leads to social class relations and inequalities, and the fact that it they can never be completely reproduced in the leisure sphere. This film Home Feeling: Struggle for a Community, gives some examples of the role of leisure within a capitalist society dealing with issues such as class inequalities, and how they are different among various societies.
There are many examples of cities reforming itself over time, one significant example is Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. More than a hundred years after the discovery of gold that drew thousands of migrants to Vancouver, the city has changed a lot, and so does one of its oldest community: Downtown Eastside. Began as a small town for workers that migrants frequently, after these workers moved away with all the money they have made, Downtown Eastside faced many hardships and changes. As a city, Vancouver gave much support to improve the area’s living quality and economics, known as a process called gentrification. But is this process really benefiting everyone living in Downtown Eastside? The answer is no. Gentrification towards DTES(Downtown Eastside) did not benefit the all the inhabitants of the area. Reasons are the new rent price of the area is much higher than before the gentrification, new businesses are not community-minded, and the old culture and lifestyle of the DTES is getting erased by the new residents.
Furthermore, both articles “Gentrification: A Positive Good For Communities” and. “The Deeper Problems We Miss When We Attack ‘Gentrification’” exhibit their opinion on the positives of gentrification and the potential of “revitalization” in low-income urban communities. Badger argues that gentrification brings nothing more than further opportunities for urban communities while integrating citizens of different social classes. Furthermore, she continues to question if gentrification is in fact the monster that brings the prior expressions against gentrification where she says “If poor neighborhoods have historically suffered from dire disinvestment, how can the remedy to that evil — outside money finally flowing in — be the problem, too?”(Badger) Stating that the funds generated from sources external that are brought into these communities can’t be problematic.
The last big effect that comes from the urban housing reform is that it makes it difficult for people to get out of those areas. Living in urban projects is not a place where many people wish to be but they have no choice if they can’t afford to get out of the area. Some people re only able to afford living in those areas or cannot get a job that pays high enough to move to someplace else. This has created a vicious circle of the areas becoming more run down and more
Downs has sought to dispel myths surrounding housing policy. The first myth he debunks is the myth that all government-sponsored urban policies have failed. Downs believes that although they had resulted in greater hardships for poorer neighborhoods, the policies have given great benefits to a majority of urban American families. While he does not consider these policies to be a complete success, he refuses to call them failures due to the fact that they did indeed improve the standard of living for most of urban America. Downs also calls to our attention the effect of housing policies on the number of housing units. Starting in 1950, housing policies were aimed at ending the housing shortage until focus was shifted to low income households in the midst of the Vietnam War. To Downs, ending the shortage was important because it was affecting the American way of life. Couples were delaying marriage, extended families were living in one home, and overcrowded housing led to overcrowded local facilities, such as schools. Downs also argues that this overcrowding led to an inescapable cycle of “substandard”
Even with the daily struggle faced by youth in obtaining shelter and homelessness becoming a reality for a growing number of Canadians, Canada, with its high quality of life is one country that has always had a global long-standing reputation. This paper will be working towards giving the reader a better understanding with regards to homeless youth. It will be focusing on the reasons why they leave home, their lives on the street and steps they are trying to take to be able to leave the streets. An important finding from this research suggests, “the street youth population is diverse, complex, and heterogeneous”. According to Karabanow, made up of a number of subcultures including hardcore street-entrenched young people, squatters, group home kids, child welfare kids, soft-core twinkles, runaways, throwaways, refugees and immigrants is the generic term ‘street youth’.
According to Lee Tunstall, homelessness is a social problem that “has been growing since the 1970’s” (2009, para.1) and has caught the attention of both the Canadian government and the general public (Tunstall, 2009) . Predominantly, the homeless are individuals or families with no permanent residence who also lack the resources or abilities necessary to arrange for their own adequate housing and living (Stearman, 2010). This matter affects a diverse demographic of the Canadian public. In 2003, the Toronto report card on housing and homelessness reported that out of 32,000 people who used homeless shelters, 15% were families, 22% were youths between the ages of fifteen and twenty-four, 18% were single women and 48% were single men (2003).
“Homeless is more than being without a home. It is tied into education needs, food, security; health issues both mental and physical, employment issues, etc. Don’t forget the whole picture.” (“Boxed In” 2005 pg. 108)
If you do not already know what homelessness means, it is someone who is not able to live in a stable residence because of financial or psychological problems, so they are forced to live on the streets or put themselves on the streets, because they feel it would be a better fit. Homelessness in Canada is a very large and concerning issue because of the growing population.
Lance Freeman tackles the issue of gentrification from the perspectives of residents in the gentrified neighborhood. He criticizes the literature for overlooking the experiences of the victims of gentrification. The author argues that people’s conceptions on the issue are somewhat misinformed in that most people consider it as completely deplorable, whereas in reality, it benefits the community by promoting businesses, different types of stores, and cleaner streets. These benefits are even acknowledged by many residents in the gentrified neighborhood. However, the author admits that gentrification indeed does harm. Although gentrification does not equate to displacement per se, it serves to benefit primarily homeowners and harm the poor. Additionally,
... Picture a dreadful winter night, laying on the uncomfortable soil of the earth and nothing to protect you from the unpleasant weather but one jacket and maybe a tarp if you’re fortunate. Homeless deal with this problem in Canada more than you would know. Hardship in life and how Canada deals and finds solutions is the main aspect towards homeless. The country of Canada is trying to achieve on making a lower number of youth on the streets using multiple solutions. Such as shelter homes, charity and fund raisers. The use of shelter systems can cost up to $30,000 to $40,000 per year making it hard for this shelters to become more popular. The Canadian federal government helps fund the program they have towards homelessness called Supporting Community Partnerships Initiative and is trying to get a higher majority of people involved with helping homeless youth.
Compare and contrast the ways in which housing inequalities are discussed from the perspectives of social policy and criminology, and economics (TMA 02)
The government has the power to help reduce the risk of becoming homeless due to economic reasons. Nan Roman, president of the National Alliance to End Homelessness, points out that, in order to end homelessness, the government could make housing more affordable to lower income families “or figure out some way to supplement people 's income through vouchers or tax credits" (qtd. in Housing the Homeless). This would mean that even if a person, or an entire family, lost their main source of income, they would still have the me...