Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rent control pros
Rent control pros and cons essay
Rent control pros
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rent control pros
The argument above stated that the elimination of rent control is not a problem because the majority of renters didn't protest for the regulation. This argument relies on several unsupported assumptions and therefor fails to be persuasive. Firstly, the argument about the elimination of rent control regulation is rooted in the assumption that renters who did not protest is much larger and represent the opinion regarding the regulation. However, the author provides no evidence that can support this key assumption. Without specific statistics regarding the number of people who agree and disagree about such a regulation, we simply can not assume that one outweighs the other: all renters who did not protest because they agree the regulation, or
“How can a middle-class family afford a rent of $2,000 or even $2,800 when the family consists of four children and a single working parent. when food needs to be on the table every night and bills need to be paid. I find this ridiculous, no one ever wanted to live in Bushwick and now all of a sudden these people want to live here.” -
“gentrification as an ugly product of greed”. Yet these perspectives miss the point. Gentrification is a byproduct of mankind's continuing interest in advancing the notion that one group is more superior to another and worthy of capitalistic consumption with little regard to social consciousness. It is elitism with the utmost and exclusionary politics to the core. This has been a constant theme of mankind taking or depleting space for personal gain.
One of the most prominent concerns of Evicted is the issue of inescapable financial instability as it relates to eviction. In the very first few pages of the book, Desmond reveals that the majority of poor renting families in America spend over 50% of their income on housing, with an even more astonishing one in four spending over 70% of their income on it (4). When families are spending the majority of their already meager income on housing alone, it is no surprise that they have little money left for savings or self-betterment programs such as a college education. Compounded with this is the fact that some welfare systems are constructed in a way that discourages long-term financial responsibility. For example, Supplemental Security Income, a program that provides monthly stipends for low-income elderly or disabled individuals, is revoked if individuals have too much money in their bank account (217). For
... that mold him into what he is. When property owners over price a small "room" for these people, is it the poor man's fault? The law and community had turned away from the lower class and let things get out of hand. "In this matter of profit the law ought to have its strongest ally in the landlord himself, though the reverse is the case. (p. 211)" In the last paragraph of Riis's book, Riis states:
Downs has sought to dispel myths surrounding housing policy. The first myth he debunks is the myth that all government-sponsored urban policies have failed. Downs believes that although they had resulted in greater hardships for poorer neighborhoods, the policies have given great benefits to a majority of urban American families. While he does not consider these policies to be a complete success, he refuses to call them failures due to the fact that they did indeed improve the standard of living for most of urban America. Downs also calls to our attention the effect of housing policies on the number of housing units. Starting in 1950, housing policies were aimed at ending the housing shortage until focus was shifted to low income households in the midst of the Vietnam War. To Downs, ending the shortage was important because it was affecting the American way of life. Couples were delaying marriage, extended families were living in one home, and overcrowded housing led to overcrowded local facilities, such as schools. Downs also argues that this overcrowding led to an inescapable cycle of “substandard”
arguments, the points only pertain to a certain portion of the population. What about the
(2013): 14-15. Business Source Premier. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.Tucker, William. "How housing regulations cause homelessness." The Public Interest 102
New York City is not only a tourist attraction, but considered one of the most expensive cities in the world to fund because of its superb security, overall popularity, and partly its dependence on Wall Street to pay high income taxes to fund social programs, such as those who help homeless individuals and low-income residents. Ever since Bloomberg's re-election in 2005 he warned New Yorker's that because of a gaping budget deficit the city may have to raise property tax and state tax. The only people who struggle the most from increasing taxes are those who are barely able to pay rent and other expenses, such as utilities bills. One of the reasons why increasing taxes affect individuals is because as property taxes rise the property owner has to spend more, which means his/her profits may be affected, thus increasing the rent of tenants (the most current increase was 4% in one-year leases and 7.25% in two-year leases). In the other hand residents that currently live in homeless shelters have fewer chances of finding an affordable apartment even if he/she obtains a job (Most of the jobs homeless shelters refuges receive are low-paying jobs).
...problem is solved now, but in the long run landlords and the economy loses. Some of the negative effects caused by rent control are: it hurts the ones who are suppose to get help, gives landlords less incentive to maintain or to improve their rent controlled apartments, reduce investment on building and buying apartment in order to rent, discourage the construction of affordable houses to all in need, and increase the construction of luxury houses for those who can afford.
Beginning in the 1960s, middle and upper class populations began moving out of the suburbs and back into urban areas. At first, this revitalization of urban areas was 'treated as a 'back to the city' movement of suburbanites, but recent research has shown it to be a much more complicated phenomenon' (Schwirian 96). This phenomenon was coined 'gentrification' by researcher Ruth Glass in 1964 to describe the residential movement of middle-class people into low-income areas of London (Zukin 131). More specifically, gentrification is the renovation of previously poor urban dwellings, typically into condominiums, aimed at upper and middle class professionals. Since the 1960s, gentrification has appeared in large cities such as Washington D.C., San Francisco, and New York. This trend among typically young, white, upper-middle class working professionals back into the city has caused much controversy (Schwirian 96). The arguments for and against gentrification will be examined in this paper.
Compare and contrast the ways in which housing inequalities are discussed from the perspectives of social policy and criminology, and economics (TMA 02)
Sidney, Mara S. 2003. Unfair Housing: How National Policy Shapes Community Action. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.
Also, some people are paying more almost 50% of their allotted income on rent. The policy made more evictions than ever. This negatively will affect single mothers and low income families as the rent is too high and their income is too low. They will be forced to visit shelters and food banks as all their money would be going on rent. Someone who is on assistance can’t afford to pay that much on rent alone. This situation is stressful so we can imagine all the other factors that are involved for these people. This is also an issue for the working poor they are working to solely pay their rent and still sometimes it wouldn’t be sufficient. This also affects seniors as they are no longer working and will still need income. Furthermore, they are unable to obtain housing as they determine this based on your income. If you aren’t from a middle-class household your chances of even being able to obtain a place is slim, based on these
In President Reagan's own words, homelessness is one problem that we have had, even in the best of times (Reagan). However, economic experts are all in consensus that this is the worse era for the housing market. One...
City commissions and federal courts should lift the ban against homelessness and rather advocate for affordable housing. The federal government should set aside funds for housing and centralize the homeless. Subsequently, health service providers will be able to reach the homeless with much ease and follow up on medication adherence of the homeless individuals. HCH will also be able to manage health service use among the homeless and hence saving the cost incurred while offering health services to homeless individuals and families scattered in different public spaces. Additionally, the housing plan will ensure that the criminal justice system is not burdened with lawsuits against innocent homeless individuals. It will also ease overcrowding of jails. More importantly, the ban does not provide long-term solutions for homeless individuals and residents. Therefore, homeless people should not be banned from public places unless with provision of shelter. Providing settlement for the homeless will ensure that community health programs are implemented effectively, as well as sustainability of population