Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence europeans had on native indians
Why knowing other cultures are important
Importance of understanding culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influence europeans had on native indians
The Jesuit’s Take Over In 1632, there were French Catholic missionaries that were sent to New France to convert the First Nations into Catholics and to save them from being savages, and they would do this by forcing them to live their way, these people were called the Jesuits. They would also have to make them our allies. When the Jesuits got to New France and went on with their mission, they wrote journals and reports on their progress that would be sent back to their homeland, these documents are known as The Jesuit Relations. Their information might have been inflated due to the fact that their stories were being sold and it was probably written in a way that they would be able sell a lot of copies. The way these documents were written …show more content…
shows that they are in some sort of chronological order, first they would convert the First Nations into Catholics, then settle into New France by fishing and exporting fur, and the built a strong enough relationship that they would fight with them. The whole point of the Jesuit Relations was to promote a new style of life to get people to go to New France and expand their land, because back then it was thought that the more land someone had, the wealthier they are. Since New France was such a big piece of land full of resources that they thought no one collected yet, they needed people to defend their new found land from anyone who would want to take it from them. That is why the Jesuits went there, they observe the land and the First Nations and try to make the place seem better than it actually is, in hopes of getting as much people there as possible. Due to the fact New France was not a desirable place to live, not many people wanted to go on a boat for many hours to a place that had bizarre winters and blazing summers, so they thought that the First Nations would be able to fight with them, that is why they tried so hard to change them. The Jesuits think of themselves as superior to the First Nations, barely even thought of them as human beings. The Jesuit’s wanted to “make something out of our wandering Savages.” (Page 28) They would refer to them as, savages, barbarians, and at one point, human wolves. These terms are demeaning to the First Nations for the reason that it is as if they do not even view them as humans but animals. Considering their lack of what the Jesuits thinks is the only knowledge that matters, it automatically makes them smarter than the “savages,” they did not consider that there are different kinds of knowledge and different ways of beings smart. At one point they called the First Nations “our savages,” they think that they are entitled to the First Nations because they are not as intelligent as them. That is what makes the Jesuits rather arrogant. They wanted to change the First Nations into refined French Catholics. One of their ways to transform the “savages into angels” (page 16) was to baptise their children and basically get rid of their knowledge of their cultural background and replace it with French culture. The Jesuits thought that their way of living was the only way to live, and that they were far more superior to any other nation. The French wanted their people to “bear in mind that they are leaving France, a Country full of comfort and politeness, to come to a Country of rudeness and barbarism.” (Page 26-27) It is as if they do not believe that the First Nations could be anything more than savages. Imagine how surprised the Jesuits were when they found a young First Nations girl that “has nothing savage about her except her appearance and color; her sweetness, her docility, her modesty, her obedience, would cause her to pass for a young well-born French girl, fully susceptible of education.” (Page 27) If she were born French, she would have been perfect, it is implied that they are saying she is too good to be one of those “savages.” The Jesuits believe that “to be a Barbarian and a good Christian, to live as a Savage and as a child of God, are two very different things.” (Page 24) They claimed that they would “daily see men crying with hunger at our doors, whom we are constantly favoring and who have no other support than our Frenchmen,” (page 64) and they thought of this as their opportunity the get what they want from the First Nations. Although they would help those in need, they were very picky on who would they would be able to help. They “will not cherish them to the extent of taking the morsel from our own mouths to assist them in their needs; that we will observe very carefully those who perpetrate any public indecency, or who take part in these outrages and insane acts.” (Page 65) If the First Nations do something that they do not approve of then they will not be helped. It is almost as if they are trying to train them. It is heavily implied that the Jesuits wanted to strip the First Nations of their ethnic background. First, the Jesuits brainwashed the First Nations into thinking that if they baptised their sick children, then they will not die. One of the first kids that they baptised was really sick, he was on the verge of death. (Page 5) The father wanted to baptise their child, but the mother was against it, up until she finally gave in and baptised her son. Miraculously, he slowly started getting better. They were tricked and scared into thinking that their children will burn eternally in the flames of hell. To some extent they mocked the “mothers themselves [for] bringing their children to Baptism when they see them in danger of death; and some weep bitterly when they hear it said that their children are in the flames, for not having wished to believe, or that they are deprived of the pleasures of Heaven because they were not baptized.” (Page 25-26) In a few cases the children on the verge of dying actually got better after getting baptised and slowly the rest of the First Nations were baptising their children in hopes of them getting better and if not they would at least spend eternity in heaven according to the Christians. The Jesuits relied on the First Nation’s fear of hell to move on with their plan. After the baptisms, at a certain age the kids would get taken away and put into a residential school where they would learn more about the French people’s culture and religion. The Jesuits thought the First Nations “must almost […] forget their own language” (page 24) in order to fit in with them. Even though they were frightened into baptising their children and tricked into giving away their children, the documents claimed that the First Nations and the Jesuits loved each other. The observations of the Jesuits cannot be considered “factual information,” due to the fact that they are the ones writing history, they are making themselves sound like the “good guys.” Now, we simply cannot know if everything is completely true.
Back then the French did not know much about the First Nations, all they knew was what they observed. They sent the Jesuits to New France thinking that the First Nations needed their help, they thought that with their help the First Nation’s way of living could live up to their standards. The Jesuits believed that because they did not believe in their God, that is the reason things are happening the way they are now with many of their people dying, but little did they know that the Jesuits brought germs and viruses that, like the Jesuits, are foreign to the First Nations and they do not have the antibodies to protect themselves. Due to the Jesuits lack of knowledge about the First Nations, it seems as if their documents are considered factual. The documents the Jesuits wrote gives people now insight on why things are the way they are. Could have intentionally left the bad things out. The documents may be biased because these documents are being sent back to France to produce funds for their mission in New France. They were simply trying to get more money and people to New France and so they decided to inflate what they
wrote. These documents give us insight on what happened back then and gives us the perspective of the Jesuits, but it is rather bias in light of the fact that we do not know the First Nations side of this story. From reading the Jesuit Relations, as readers it is clear that they are not happy about having to change for the Jesuits, but what if there is more too it? No one can tell if the Jesuits were lying about what was going on in New France. It is hard to trust these documents and believe they are 100% true. They basically educated and trained the First Nations people into defending the French. Everything the Jesuits did was to make French more powerful and they were willing to bend the truth a little bit if they had too. The Jesuits claimed that their “neighboring Savages depend greatly upon” (page 65) them. They had a hard time with the Jesuits when they went to war because they did not understand what they were saying without a translator and so receiving orders what be rather difficult. The whole point to the Jesuits going to New France was to ally with the First Nations like “the fingers of the hand,” (page 70) and that everything they put them through was an act of friendship. These documents cannot be used as “factual information,” because they left out what they would do to those kids in the residential school and how the First Nations were really treated. There are so many gaps to what happened that no one could ever fill in.
How did imperialism manage to bring both disaster and success to Egypt? The morals of imperialism are mixed; it all depends on perspective. It brought along famines, heavy taxes, and many others to Egypt. On the other hand, it opened up trade routes from Britain to Asia and India, formed a steady supply of cotton for Britain, etc. (period6-5imperialism10.wikispaces.com, Egypt) In the beginning, Egypt actually tried to modernize itself, as an attempt to ward off European dominance (Modern World History, 354), but debts and other financial problems drove it into Britain’s arms. So how was Egypt affected by this? As a result of imperialism, Egypt received aid on some of the current problems, but were faced with many more new ones.
The similarity between the Spanish and the French was that they both had colonized for religious reasons. Both the Spanish and the French had used the excuse of needing to spread Catholicism within the Americas. The Spanish first used the excuse of “God, Glory, and Gold” to conquer the New World. Conquistadores like Hernán Cortés and Ponce de León had been a part of this motto and conquered for God, for the land and fame, and for all else the gold. Also when the Spanish had arrived in California, they had enslaved Native Americans to build missions. These missions would be used to place where the Native Americans would be enslaved and converted to Catholicism. In the missions, Native Americans would be again mistreated, abused, enslaved, and infected while they resided in the missions. As the French population was decreasing in Americas, the Ordonnance of 1627 was created for the Native Americans. The Ordonnance was that if an Native American decided to convert to Catholicism, he or she would be considered as a natural frenchman. This allowed religion to spread throughout and increase the French population in the
The Iroquois tribe was part of an alliance with five other tribes throughout New York that banded together against enemies, talked about land, and traded with each other. These peaceful people operated in a democracy, one of the first seen in the early world. Much is known about these tribes due to the missionaries which were sent out in the 1600’s. The Jesuits, an order of the Catholic Church devoted to teaching, spent the time to move out into the unknown world, live with these people, and teach them the ways of Catholicism. In doing this, they documented everything they saw and provided accurate accounts of the building of these structures.
Dutto, Rev. L. A. The Life of Bartolomé de Las Casas and the First Leaves of American Ecclesiastical History St. Louis, MO: B. Herder 1902
Egypt officially the Arab Republic associated with Egypt, is a transcontinental nation spanning the northeast portion of Africa and also southwest corner associated with Asia. It would be the world's only contiguous Eurafrasian nation. Most of Egypt's territory lies inside Nile Valley. Egypt is a Mediterranean country. Egypt has one of several longest histories associated with any modern area, arising in the particular tenth millennium BC as one of the world's first nation states. Ancient Egypt experienced lots of the earliest developments associated with writing, agriculture, urbanization, organized religion plus central government in history. Egypt is the predominantly Sunni Muslim area with Islam given that their states hope. The percentage
Egypt has one of the longest histories of any nation in the world. Written history of Egypt dates back to about 5,000 years, the commencement of civilization. While there is divergence in relation to Early Egyptian times, it is said that Egypt came to be around 3200 B.C., during the reign of a king by the name of Menes and unified the northern and southern cities of Egypt into one government. In 1675 B.C., Egypt was invaded by the Hyksos, people from the east, bringing along the very first of chariots and horses ever to come across Egyptian soil. Approximately 175 years later in 1500 B.C., the Egyptians had gotten rid of the Hyksos and driven them out. In 1375 B.C., Amenhotep IV had become the king of Egypt. During his reign he eliminated the worship of Egyptian gods and initiated the idea of only worshipping one god. But after his death, his ideas were retired and old ways were reestablished. Egyptian supremacy then started to decline around 1000 B.C. Between 1000 B.C. and 332 B.C., Egypt was ruled by many such as the Libyans, Assyrians, Ethiopians, and Persians. In 640, Muslims conquered Egypt and founded the city of Cairo in 969 and deemed it as the capital of Egypt. For many centuries Egypt was ruled by Muslim caliphs. A prominent ruler of this period was Saladin, who battled the Christian Crusaders at the conclusion of the twelfth century. In 1798 Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Egypt but was then forced to withdraw in 1801 Turkish and British armed forces. In 1805 Mohamed Ali began ruling Egypt till 1848 and great changed the country in terms of modernization and its military. During Mohamed’s conquest, he borrowed a lot of money from the French and British, which later resulted in Egypt’s coloniza...
The country I decided to research is Egypt. Egypt is located in northern Africa along the Mediterranean and Red Seas. The majority of the country however is located in northeastern Africa, but its Sinai Peninsula extends out into Southwest Asia, connecting the two continents. European nations wanted to colonize Egypt because it was considered to be a treasure, due to its fertile land and production of crops, such as: wheat, fruits, vegetables, corn, and cotton. Also because of its strategic location at the head of the Red Sea, that appeared valuable to countries such as Britain and France. Another reason was because they wanted to control Egypt in order to secure the main route to India, Malaya, Australia, New Zealand and to Hong Kong.This route was known as the Suez Canal. The Suez Canal was viewed as the “Lifeline of the Empire” because it allowed quicker access to its colonies in Asia and Africa. It also connected the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, built mainly with French money from private interest groups using Egyptian labor. Egypt was also targeted due to its weak economy and government, making it an easy target to imperialize. Egypt was colonized three times each by different civilizations. It was colonized by the Ottomans in 1517, by the French in 1799, and by the British in 1882. A key person involved in Egypts colonization was Muhammad Ali. After taking power in 1805, he strengthened the army and focused on cultivating the land. He also increased trade with Europe and sent officials to Britain to be educated.
Cardinal Altamirano, who represents the Pope is shown as a corrupted member of the Church when he rules in favor of the colonists. All Altamirano wanted was to protect the Church. He came to South American to take a decision which was already decided beforehand. The Jesuits are shown as a noble members who are helping the Guarani Indians by educating them, converting them to Christianity and by defending their community against the Portuguese and the Spanish. Finally and unfortunately, the Guarani Indians are shown as animals. They are kidnaped for slavery and are called devil worshippers.
to 2650 B.C., changed his name to the more commonly known Zoser. It was Zoser
This remarkable source document was reviewed in English through an internet based medieval source book. I selected this particular document because of our extensive study regarding the rise of Islam and, its movements throughout the Arab and Western worlds. The author of the original Coptic (hieroglyphic form of writing) piece entitled, The Accounts of The Arab Conquest of Egypt, 642, was a Bishop of al-Ashmunein in upper Egypt, between al-Minya and Assiut, around the tenth century” named, Sawirus ibn al-Muqaffa. Ibn al-Muqaffa has been noted as being “the earliest of the great Coptic writers in the Arabic language.”1(MacMillan)
The chapter I choose from the book The Rise and Fall of Ancient Egypt is chapter 1. The name of the chapter is In The Beginning. The first section is talking about the First King Of Egypt. It opens up talking about the Museum in Cairo which has one of the most important stones in Egypt 's history. It is called the Namar Palette and it marks the very begging of Ancient Egypt 's civilization. They struggled to get through tough layers of clay, but when they discovered the Palette they saw hieroglyphics that spelled out “Nar" “mer” which gives us proof the Narmer is no just an early king, but the first ruler to unit Egypt and he came to power around 2950 marking the first dynasty.
According to Stuart A. Kallen in 525 BC Egypt lost its independence and would not regain it for the next 2,500. Alexander the Great was the first to conquer Egypt, leading up to the colonization by the British Empire and many more. (Mentiply, 2009).
The Egyptian culture is vastly different from American culture. While there are similarities between business practices in both the United States and Egypt, understanding the key differences in how to conduct oneself when negotiating business can be the difference between closing a sale and leaving empty-handed. With this report, the sales and marketing teams of Chevrolet will better understand how to negotiate with Egyptian executives in order get more automobiles into Egyptian dealerships. The report focuses on: (a) how meetings are conducted in Egypt; (b) meeting times; (c) proper Egyptian greetings; (d) group behavior in a meeting; (e) common business hierarchy; (f) proper business attire; and (g) important business communication tips.
The Nile, is the longest river in the world, and is located in northeastern Africa. Its principal source is Lake Victoria, in east central Africa. The Nile flows north through Uganda, Sudan, and Egypt to the Mediterranean Sea, with a total distance of 5584 km. From its remotest headstream in Burundi, the river is 6671 km long. The river basin covers an area of more than 3,349,000 sq km. Not only is the Nile considered a wonder by Herodotus, but by people all over the world, due to its impotance to the growth of a civilization.The first great African civilization developed in the northern Nile Valley in about 5000 BC.
The late Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt in the Thirteenth Century BC was a demanding and strained time in Egypt and other Middle Eastern Countries. New and treacherous Pharaohs forge unrest in both foreign and domestic affairs by acting drastically and leaving their successors to resolve the complications left after their deaths. The novel, The Egyptian, by Mika Waltari, provides accurate information about Egypt during the time by portraying examples of historical leaders in Egypt, foreign relationships, and the Egyptian culture.