Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Implications of social class on education
Discussion of equality in education
Equality in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Implications of social class on education
THE EDUCATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES FROM 1800 TO 1870.
In the beginning of the 19th Century, England and Wales experienced a period of transition and change. Despite the events that occurred in the very beginning, the creation of the modern system of Education in England and Wales is remained to happen in the second half of the century.
Even though some people agreed for the creation of an educational system in the early part of the century, for a number of reasons, their proposals were not supported by the rest of the citizens or the government.
The main purpose of this essay is comment the period of change that the educational system in England and Wales went through from 1800 to 1870 and how children enjoyed education depending on their gender and social status.
The establishment of a system of Education in England and Wales appeared late due to the social, economic and religious situation in the century.
The main obstacles that interfered in the creation of a free educational system in England were:
The upper class had no interested in promoting the cultural development of the working classes and not even the working class had interest in the education of their children as the child labour was a common practice and working class families did not want to lose the money the were getting from their children and let them be educated. Child labour remained increasing after 1850.
There was also a religious conflict in which Anglicans, non conformists and those who saw no necessity of religion in Education were involved.
The government thought that voluntary schools were a success and there was no need of intervention in education. They left it to the private or voluntary sector and this did not help to the creation of...
... middle of paper ...
...e between the education provided to children coming from middle classes and poor children by looking at their daily routine.
Boys coming from private schools enjoyed more free time, better food in quantity and quality and the curriculum was very broad.
In the other hand, boys coming from public schools, did not enjoy the same privileges. They had less free time and the meals were considerably poor compared to the ones from the private schools.
Referring to gender inequalities, girls did not enjoy the same education as boys "The difficulties with which the girls ' schools had to contend were formidable. There were no accepted standards to which girls might work. The teachers were untrained and, even more frequently than in the case of men, many of them had drifted into the work with little enthusiasm because there was nothing else they could do." (Roach 1986:157)
Through the article, "How the School Shortchange Boys," by Gerry Garibaldi implies that the school setting has experienced a transformation towards feminization. In the past, the child faced numerous conditions that vindicated her trouble in a male dominated society. However, after the deceitful discharge processes, the woman was finally free and all institutions welcomed her input seeking to create a fair society. According to Garibaldi (2006), the modern school setting deprives the boy child freedom to interact and relate in a natural environment (Garibaldi 54). Girls are kind, complacent, understanding and conform to salient regulations without emphasis. With these elements, girls comply with school regulations delivering assignments on time. The boy child is inquisitive, rational and desires logical explanations explaining the reason behind every instruction. The modern school setting does shortchange boys as it creates an unequal platform where teachers favor girls and victimize boys because of their inherent traits.
Education in the colonial era was highly dependent on the financial prosperity of individual families. Most could not afford to send their children to school, however wealthier families could afford to send their daughters to primary school to learn basic skills including the alphabet, reading, writing, and womanly chores such as sewing and knitting. Boys had the opportunity to further their education past the basics; however, young girls often were not granted this privilege. Women possessing higher education were often considered unusual. This was detrimental to their likelihood of finding a suitable husband.
of their economic troubles. Inequality in schools starts with inequality in society. Someone who is
...management of their educational establishments. Although there are many debates still taking place today on how the education system needs improving or re-addressing, the fact remains that the education acts focused on in this essay, greatly impacted and improved the British education system in terms of the quality of education and equality for pupils.
Jackson, B and Marsden, D (1966) Education and the working classes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul plc.
In looking at how education within the primary sector is organised between Denmark and England, it is necessary to examine the brief historical and political influences in order to pay homage to the structure and processes of both primary schools in reference with these chosen countries. In Denmark, the outcome for the educational system evolves from their culture and values that accentuates an individualism approach, thus, creating a pol...
Women were not as privileged , during this time, as they are today. Women could not enter any career involving law or medicine. Women were also prohibited from joining , or enlisting, into the military. Despite the fact that the daughters of families were permitted to get an education, rich or poor, women could not be accepted into University. They were only granted permission to work as a domestic employee; such as a cook or maid. However, it was critical that upper class daughters get a basic education from school. Nevertheless, upper class daughters were , however, allowed to have a private tutor to keep as an educator.
The education system has been a controversial issue among educators. Requirements of school do not let student choose what they want to study for their future. It’s a big issue to force student study specific curriculums, which don’t help them improve, and what they like to create something. Educators choose a general system for education to all students which based on general knowledge. Intelligent or genius students have to be in that system of education, which doesn’t let them improve their creativity. Educators attempt to change that system to make it better, but their changing was not that great to be an example for the world. Also, did that change qualify education system to compete other systems or not? In some examples and reasons have been made me agree with some of points from Gatto’s and Edmunson’s and disagree them.
Class Size is another issue. In private schools there’s usually smaller classes, so students are getting more attention. This makes it better for the students because if they need help, then it’s easier to get help from the teachers and to be more focused because of less noise and easier for teachers to control their classrooms.
Nothing mattered back in Victorian Britain, except money and wealth. No one mattered unless you had money and if you didn’t bless your hard working soul, because if you didn’t have enough money to support yourself or family you were already dead. Unfortunately kids worked far faster than adults and most parents didn’t make the kind of money to send their children off to school so the rich factory owners seized the opportunity and tricked many children into working for free and they kept doing it. Education was difficult for most children to get because of the fact that most families could not afford it. During this time if you could afford to go to school they still had lots of rules and high standards, and if they were not followed then
The UK’s education system has seen many reforms aiming to improve opportunities for children. Education was once a supreme priviledge, of which only the rich members of society would receive the right to. A significant change in the form of The Forsters Education Act 1870 began to address this, with the introduction of free compulsory schooling. At present, in England and Wales, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) states that:
Before the 1840’s the education system was only available to wealthy people. Individuals such as Horace Mann from Massachusetts and Henry Barnard in Connecticut believed that schooling for everybody would help individuals become productive citizens in society. Through their efforts, free public education at the elementary level become assessable for all children in American by late 19th century. By 1918 all states passed laws that required children to attend elementary school. The Catholics were against this law, so they created their own private schools. In 1925 the Supreme Court passed a law that allowed children to attend private school rather than public school (Watson, 2008).
Separation in schooling first accord in 1852 when the first private school was established. In today’s school system attending a private school is statistically more beneficial than attending a public school. In some states, a private school can receive some state funding. However, for the sole purpose of this argument, I will refer to private schools as schools that get their funding from sources outside of the government and will determine public schools as schools that receive funding solely from the government. Private schools should be abolished because they do not allow equal opportunities for students and the education provided is not equal.
... Students who do well in a public school setting tend to feel better about themselves. They succeed because they want to, not because someone else forced them to. Whether someone prefers a public school or a private school, it all depends on the person.
I think private school are better and have more advantages than public school. There are upsides and downsides for both schools. Private schools have newer facilities and other materials. The benefits of private school for the students are that they have smaller class sizes and better teacher ratios from the students. Private have a high standards for discipline and respect to one another. Seventy two percent of parents agreed to send their kids to private school, because it has greatly improved students’performance and brighter experience and achievements in there harder lessons (Maga 2). Students will also have more individual attention. Students are motivated by the teachers to help in their studies. Parents would also have more opportunities to get involved with their kid’s education and that is very good thing. Private have flexible teaching methods for the students to do better. There are many advantages for the students (Elizabeth 1). Let’s talk about disadvantages. Their goal is to offer better education without making a profit (Amy Witherbee 2). Private school charge tuitions and that sound n...