Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Henry VIII Contributions to the Reformation
Henry VIII Contributions to the Reformation
Changes to the Church of England during Henry VIII's reign
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Henry VIII Contributions to the Reformation
The Dissolution of the Monasteries
The dissolution of the monasteries during the reign of Henry VIII was
seen by many as a disaster for the people and only benefiting the king
and crown. However new research has contradicted this statement
suggesting that the dissolution affected less people, less
dramatically, it even goes as far as to suggest that the dissolution
was a brilliant opportunity for plenty of people across the country.
It is this change of opinion prompting people to question the facts
about the impact of the closers on the people that took place during
the fifteenth century.
The dissolution has many potential problems which have been disputed
between historians. Catholic writers believe that cultural and
religious vandalism took place pointlessly destroying medieval art and
architecture as well as entire libraries of knowledge because their
contents were ‘temporarily out of fashion’ thus, traditions and ides
dating back many centuries where eliminated. Although this is
accepted as fact to some extent modern historians now believe there is
a large amount of exaggeration involved with these cries.
The effects on the people were first seen to be huge in size
indicating that many people were displaced and forced to become
accustomed to a lower standard of living. Monks and nuns were often
the ones portrayed to be out starving on the streets, their ordered
way of life suddenly ended after being cast out into a turbulent and
fast changing world. In reality only 1500 out of 8000 monks could not
find alternative paid employment within the church with which to
supplement their pensions. It was the nuns that did ...
... middle of paper ...
...onarchy freer form violent revolution.
In conclusion I do not believe that the dissolution of the monasteries
was a disaster for that many people, undoubtedly it did put more
strain on the country economically, and it also slightly worsened the
problem of poverty leading future rulers to deal with the problem but
in the long run most people could find alternative employment and
finance a key statistic to prove this fact was only 1500 out of 8000
monks could not find employment elsewhere. I also don’t believe it
was a golden opportunity for many, when you consider England’s
population in 1540 and compare it to the number of people who were
transported to a higher social rank it is unrealistic to say that this
happened to a very large percent of people. I think that ‘many’ and
‘few’ are two extremes of the situation.
The Small Amount of Opposition to the Henrician Reformation The Henrician reformation brought many changes to the religious and secular ways of life in England. It stripped the nation of many of its traditional Catholic ways and forced new and unheard of customs into its religious life. The monasteries were dissolved deceitfully and effectively and a once cherished tradition was brought to an abrupt end. Henry agreed to have an English Bible in his churches, something that had previously been considered an act of heresy. Other Catholic traditions such as holy relics and the belief in purgatory were discouraged in the newly revised faith.
That is not to say there was no opposition to the reformation, for it was rife and potentially serious. The opposition came from both the upper and lower classes, from the monks and nuns and from foreign European powers. This opposition however, was cleverly minimised from the outset, Cromwell’s master plan ensured court opposition was minimal and new acts, oaths and decrees prevented groups and individuals from publicly voicing their dissatisfaction. Those who continued to counter such policies were ruthlessly and swiftly dealt with, often by execution, and used as examples to discourage others. Henry’s desire for a nation free of foreign religious intervention, total sovereign independence, a yearning of church wealth and the desire for a divorce sewed the seeds for reform.
In short, disestablishment is the most literal form of separation of Church and State; it prohibited the state from funding or establishing a religion. This was a continuation of the fight for the freedom on conscience. James Madison was very influential in this fight, “Religion was not invented by human policy” thus he argued that it should never be subjected to human policy (Maddison, 120). Maddison expresses that a person’s religion is to be determined by his own conviction and conscience, “and it is the right of every man to exercise it” (Maddison, 118). Freedom of religion, the first amendment, existed before disestablishment, but in it’s entirety was dependent on disestablishment. Establishment was achieved through imposing taxes on
From the Middle ages, the church faced many problems such as the Babylonian Captivity and the Great Schism that hurt the prestige of the church. Most of the clergy lived in great luxury while most people were poor and they set an immoral example. The clergy had low education and many of them didn’t attend their offices. Martin Luther had witnessed this himself, “In 1510 he visited Rome and was shocked to find corruption on high ecclesiastical places”
... in the church so much that they were willing to devote their whole lives to it. Whilst this period did see a rise in the influence of the church, this reflected a need for people to find some comfort against the hardships of disease, wars and the chaos from government collapsing.
The Church in the 1400’s was the center of everyone’s life and a peasant’s life was the hardest to live. The Church convinced everyone that if they broke the rules their soul would be damned. One of the rules was to devote time to the church where peasants would give hours of free labor in the churches’ fields instead of working on their own land to feed their family (“The Medieval Church”). The Church would gather tithes of food and money from every person and store them in a tithe barn where the food would rot or be poisoned by rats (“The Medieval Church”).
The Henrician Reformation The Henrician Reformation had much more political purpose than religious principles and to understand this much of the motives and changes of the reformation need to be considered. Reformation itself suggests that the events were all clearly linked together as a part of religious reform however, according to C. Davies "most of those involved in bringing about the reformation, included the King himself, had little understanding of the implications of what they were doing." Both Cromwell and Cramner also had a great influence on the changes within Englandbetween 1534 and 1546 and they themselves inclined the religious decisions which revolved around the Kings principles. Those principles were mostly political with power, money and an heir being best at the heart of Henry. One must remember the beginning of the reformation in England was King Henry VIII's desire to have a male heir.
The Church’ power was extremely great in the Middle Ages, as they had the most influence over the people, kings and knights. The Church had the ability to stop laws and change laws to their benefit and controlled the religious beliefs of the people. They had the power to sway the kings and send knights to war which sends the message that they were one of the most important institutions in all of Medieval Europe.
In closing, the decline of the monasteries and ultimately the “City of God” was due to the rise in the “City of the World.” The “City of the World” was the anti thesis of the “City of God.” They can be seen otherwise as church and state. When one was strong and powerful, the other could not be. The two could not exist in equilibrium. So therefore the stronger survived, and with the change of the times, this was the “City of the World.” The king, who at one time in history was strongly influenced by the church, took control of the Durham Priory, and all its worldly possessions.
Deep within the trees little hooded men walk along a path to meditate and pray dressed in brown robes tied with nautical rope. They dwell in silence and live a life of celibacy. This is what most of think of when we hear the word monk. Throughout the years, monks have always been people of intrigue. They live a different lifestyle than most. They live a life of seclusion far from the mores of modern society, which often makes people ponder who these people really are and why they choose to participate in such a foreign religious movement. This paper will attempt to unravel the mysteries of this peculiar movement of by researching it's origin, the true meaning of a silent lives, and how key leaders have helped to develop it one of the most popular movements in the history of Christianity. A movement called Monasticism.
The Reformation spurred a wave of political devolution throughout Europe in the early 1500s, the most obvious example being that of the Holy Roman Empire. Although the nobility of the Holy Roman Empire had managed to keep hold of its power throughout a time of political unification, the Reformati...
The Reformation was a decisive period in the history not only for the Catholic Church, but also for the entire world. The causes of this tumultuous point in history did not burst on the scene all at once, but slowly gained momentum like a boil that slowly festers through time before it finally bursts open. The Reformation of the Church was inevitable because of the abuses which the Church was suffering during this period. At the time of the Reformation, a segment of the Church had drifted away from its mission to bring Christ and salvation to the world. Throughout the Middle Ages, the Church had gradually become weaker because of abusive leadership, philosophical heresy, and a renewal of a form of the Pelagian heresy.
Many bishops and abbots (especially in countries where they were also territorial princes) bore themselves as secular rulers rather than as servants of the Church. Many members of cathedral chapters and other beneficed ecclesiastics were chiefly concerned with their income and how to increase it, especially by uniting several prebends (even episcopal sees) in the hands of one person, who thus enjoyed a larger income and greater power. Luxury prevailed widely among the higher clergy, while the lower clergy were often oppressed. The scientific and ascetic training of the clergy left much to be desired, the moral standard of many being very low, and the practice of celibacy not everywhere observed. Not less serious was the condition of many monasteries of men, and even of women (which were often homes for the unmarried daughte...
Though there was no driving force like Luther, Zwingli or Calvin during the English Reformation, it succeeded because certain people strived for political power and not exactly for religious freedom. People like Queen Elizabeth I and Henry VIII brought the Reformation in England much success, however their reasons were based on self-gain and desire for political power.
Finally, the friars were to wander around the neighbouring towns to preach and aid the needy.... ... middle of paper ... ... The Roman Catholic Church’s reputation for wealth and power furnished them with the ability to have a major impact over feudal society.