Henry VIII's Reformation

1018 Words3 Pages

Henry VIII's Reformation

In 1529 Henry VIII started to reform the Catholic Church in England,

however there are different opinions as to why he began these

controversial changes. The orthodox view concurs that there was a vast

anti-clerical feeling in 16th century England; the corrupt church was

unpopular with the masses. However the revisionist view claims that

the reformation was actually due to politics. Henry needed a male heir

and therefore needed a divorce. The needs and wants of the masses were

not taken into consideration. In this essay I am going to look at

England pre-reformation and reach my own opinion of whether or not

England was actually in need of a reformation in 1529.

There were lots of anti-catholic movements going on at the time such

as the Lutheran movement and also Lollardry. This suggests that people

were growing tired with the Catholic Church and therefore looking

towards other religions. The Lollards were an active group based in

England. Lollardy appealed to the lower and middle classes and its

idea's closely matched those of Luther. They denied the existence of

purgatory, rejected the pope and spoke out against war. It wished to

see a reduction in church wealth and the bible translated into

English. They encouraged new ideas and criticism of the church.

However it is difficult to interpret just how much Lollardry actually

influenced the reformation. It undoubtedly helped to weaken the church

and open peoples eyes to new ideas, yet it was also relatively small

scale and wouldn't have affected many people.

However there was generally an anti-clerical feeling amongst people.

The clergy of that time a...

... middle of paper ...

...ay or another, none of the were indicating that the church

needed to go through a full scale reformation but rather that the

church needed to reform itself, they were calling for a reformation

from within the church, they wanted the clergy to improve themselves.

The Catholic Church in England deniably did have some faults, but

generally people were content and satisfied with it. It wasn't the

institution in decline as it is often portrayed but actually just as

popular as it had always been. People were happy with what they knew

and therefore didn't like the idea of a new church and religion, which

is why there were protests after the reformation. Henry VIII and his

parliament undoubtedly exaggerated these faults in order to reform the

church for their own political needs, rather than the needs of the

ordinary people.

Open Document