Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dark knight film
The threat of modern terrorism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dark knight film
In a post-9/11 world, national surveillance and the subsequent Patriot Act became national issues in the United States. Is the government’s blatant and unconstitutional disregard for citizen’s privacy necessary for national security? This question dwelled in the consciousness of the post-9/11 American population. In The Dark Knight (2008), Christopher Nolan delves into this controversial subject and uses the heroic, yet morally ambiguous Batman and his cell phone sonar invention to depict the gray line that lingers in this highly contentious debate. During the scene where Batman introduces the new “spy technology” to Lucius Fox, Nolan uses stylistic elements such as lighting, cinematography, costuming, and acting in order to parallel the horror …show more content…
of the concerned citizen in response to the atrocious breach of privacy perpetuated by the United States government and paint Batman as a morally unscrupulous character. Before analyzing this specific scene and how it relates to current events, it is important to show the allegory between Batman and Bruce to the United States and the Joker to modern day terrorism that is strewn throughout the whole film. To begin, Bruce Wayne and Batman represent the two sides of America post 9/11. Bruce Wayne is the philanthropic, party boy consumed by the need to look powerful and suave monetarily. He is always hosting large parties and fundraisers for the rich and powerful and even has multiple women on his arms sometimes, This correlates to America’s outward presence to the world in today’s era. America today pampers the rich and powerful and carries an outward presence of power and influence wherever it goes in the world. In the film as well, Bruce also endorses Harvey Dent for District Attorney, who is the epitome of justice and the law, much like how the U.S. tries to endorse and spread political democracy and justice wherever it reaches out. Batman, on the other hand, resembles the opposite side of the same coin.
He lurks in the dark, utilizing borderline inappropriate methods to fight the same fight as Dent and Bruce. Even though he doesn’t kill, he does torture to get the information he needs. Even though Batman has the same goals as his alter ego, Wayne, and Dent, he actually ends up bringing more chaos than order. He created the Joker and Two Face even when he had the best of intentions because he fought in the shadows and had no concern for law and justice. This is incredibly analogous to the world we live in today due to years of intervention in the Middle East and what happened in the Bush presidency. America and Pakistan created the Taliban and propped them up as the resistance to Soviet control in Afghanistan to use them as a proxy for the overall conflict between America and the Soviet Union. This of course only backfired years later and resulted in one of the largest, most powerful terrorist organizations in recent history. Even today, after this movie was created, the U.S. is witnessing the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq with the emergence of ISIS. Throughout the years, America has tried to do what they thought as good, but has always ended up creating …show more content…
monsters. This parallel is bolstered by the various characteristics that the Joker and terrorist groups share. The Joker has no real name, no background, and no real motivation. He appeared out of nowhere and started terrorizing the people of Gotham. His motivations weren’t even about monetary gain or power. He just wants “to watch the world burn.” He views himself as the antithesis to Batman. This directly correlates to the modern face of terrorism. Groups like Al Qaeda and the Taliban have a very murky background where few people truly know their origin. They seemed to come out of nowhere under no real leadership and committed some of the worst acts of terrorism the world has seen in recent history. They have some real motivations for power, but for many, they just appear to want to watch the West burn. This allegory is crucial to understanding the ideological meaning within the short “Spy Technology” scene. It helps to understand that Nolan viewed the warrantless surveillance perpetrated by the United States government as evil, but necessary to defeat the terror. For example, the contrasting lighting in this scene helps to establish the binary opposition of dark versus light, and subsequently good versus evil. At the beginning of the scene, Batman starts out behind the screen with all the lights turned out behind him. In contrast, Lucius Fox starts out in front of the screen in a brightly lit area with all the lights turned on. In the grand scheme of works of art, darkness tends to represent evil whereas light tends to represent goodness and purity. When viewing this stylistic element in terms of the allegory previously set up in the movie and the cultural connotations of the binary opposition of Light versus Dark, it becomes clear that Nolan viewed the surveillance program negatively. The editing and camera positioning also goes to emphasize the divisive nature of the spy machine. Initially in the scene, the camera is positioned so that Batman is behind the wall of sonar screens and between the screen and Fox. The scene is also edited in a shot-reverse shot for the dialogue between Batman and Fox. These cinematography and editing choices help to highlight the separation between Batman and Fox. It also shows not just the degree of separation, but the fact that the separator is the sonar spying device. When pairing this with the aforementioned binary opposition of Light versus Dark and Evil versus Good, it becomes obvious that the spying machine is the focus of dissension about good and evil between Fox and Batman. Another example of a stylistic element that emphasizes the deeper connotations is the costuming of Batman compared to Fox.
In this scene, Batman is dressed up in a dark costume with a mask that only shows his eyes and mouth. Part of this costume is motivated for the plot, but within the context of this scene, it can represent much more. For example, throughout the entire Nolan trilogy, the mask goes to represent the character of Batman as a whole. It shows that Batman wants to hide his own identity. This could be motivated for many reasons. He could want to protect himself or the ones he loves, but within the context of this scene and allegory, he wears the mask to protect himself from criticism. He knows that his methods are barbaric, and if anyone found out that he was actually Bruce Wayne, people would begin to judge him even when he is not in
costume. The mask also lends itself to another interpretation to bolster the idea that Nolan disliked the spy program. The mask only allows for a stern expression with no emotions even while Batman is discussing the troubling idea of mass surveillance, and it goes to highlight the callousness by which the American government committed its actions. In a post 9/11 world, the government showed absolutely no regard for the American people’s right to privacy. They collected the phone and data records of millions of Americans with no warrant, necessary by the Constitution. They never apologized and even doubled down on their arguments. Even to this day, they are requesting more access to our private files. The last stylistic element that supplements the allegory and ideological meaning is the acting of Morgan Freeman and his portrayal of Fox’s grave concern for the seriousness of the situation. Everytime the camera cuts to Fox’s face, he is panning his head, scanning and taking in the shocking revelation. His eyebrows are scrunched and he is frowning in a disapproving fashion. This is all because Fox is astounded to learn that his technology, which was originally used on a small scale to catch one bad guy, has been exponentially expanded upon in a highly inappropriate manner. His face parallels the shock and horror of the American people with the revelation that American had taken its original concept of the Patriot Act and dramatically expanded its power. Even the original drafter of the Patriot Act, Jim Sensenbrenner, has come out in opposition to the NSA and the PRISM surveillance program because it has gone way beyond the original intent. All of these elements, when combined with the allegory, help bolster the idea that Nolan viewed the surveillance program as evil. The lighting establishes the good and evil dynamic between the differing opinions. The cinematography and editing emphasize the fact that the spy machine and U.S.’s surveillance program in general are the focus of the division. The costuming of Batman with his mask shows the apathetic nature of the U.S. government towards citizen’s privacy and it also serves as a corollary to the government’s desire to hide their true intentions and protect themselves from scrutiny. Finally, the subtle acting of Morgan Freeman is analogous to the reaction of the American people. With all these choices, it is clear that Nolan views America’s policies in a harsh light. The only issue becomes, though, that Nolan pairs this view with the heroic Batman who is the only one who can stop the terroristic Joker. In this scene, Fox also allows Batman to use this technology to stop the Joker, but then he is gone while the device remains. This shows that although Nolan disliked the surveillance program, he, like Fox, understands that it is likely necessary to stop modern terrorism, like how the sonar technology is necessary to stop the Joker.
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
The chapter, Church, has the troop hold up in a church for a few days. In the church, the monks take an immediately likely to the troop help with food and weapon cleaning. A few of the soldiers discuss what they wanted to do before the war. The troops learn more about each other and insight into what faith can be to them.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
I chose this word because the tone of the first chapter seems rather dark. We hear stories of the hopes with which the Puritans arrived in the new world; however, these hopes quickly turned dark because the Purtains found that the first buildings they needed to create were a prison, which alludes to the sins they committed; and a cemetery, which contradicts the new life they hoped to create for themselves.
As society continuously expands, building new structures, light pollution becomes increasingly problematic. Paul Bogard addresses this problem and argues against the increasing light pollution in his writing, “Let There Be Dark.” Through his use of the ethos and pathos, Bogard attempts to persuade his audience of the beauty of natural darkness.
The YouTube video “U.S. Armed Forces – We Must Fight – President Reagan” by Matthew Worth was made with the intention to motivate the viewers to support the U.S. Armed Forces. The purpose of this Rhetorical Analysis is to determine whether or not the video has been successful in doing just that, motivating and drawing support for the United States Armed Forces. The video was uploaded to YouTube on February 19, 2012 and has nearly 4 million views. Matthew uses the famous speech “A Time for Choosing” by the United States former President, Ronald Wilson Reagan, who has a reputation for his patriotism, to complement the video. This video has been effective in motivating the viewers because of its strong use of the rhetorical concepts logos, ethos, and pathos.
In the novel The Stranger by Albert Camus, the narrator’s monotonous tone makes the reader experience a lack of emotion and feeling. The novel starts off describing Mersault’s current job and how he must go on leave in order to attend his mother’s funeral. He and his mother have been disconnected for some time as they had come to a mutual agreement with her staying in an elderly home. Mersault, the main protagonist, did not have the money or time to tend to his mother. The elderly home was the best option for the both of them. When he returns home from the funeral, Mersault gets caught up in external affairs he should not be in. He ends up writing a break up letter to Raymond’s girlfriend, which drives the rest of the story. Raymond beats his
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
Today’s economy and the environment are hurting due to the lack of nurture we have been providing. Conventional farming rules the world of agriculture, but not without a fight from organic farming. Organic farming is seen as the way of farming that might potentially nurture our nature back to health along with the added benefit of improving our own health. With her piece “Organic farming healthier, more efficient than Status Quo,” published in the Kansas State Collegian on September 3, 2013, writer Anurag Muthyam brings forth the importance behind organic farming methods. Muthyam is a senior at Kansas State University working towards a degree in Management. This piece paints the picture of how organic farming methods
In a quote by John Mill, “Does fining a criminal show want of respect for property, or imprisoning him, for personal freedom? Just as unreasonable is it to think that to take the life of a man who has taken that of another is to show want of regard for human life. We show, on the contrary, most emphatically our regard for it, by the adoption of a rule that he who violates that right in another forfeits it for himself, and that while no other crime that he can commit deprives him of his right to live, this shall.” Everyone’s life is precious, but at what price? Is it okay to let a murderer to do as they please? Reader, please take a moment and reflect on this issue. The issue will always be a conflict of beliefs and moral standards. The topic
Jack Shakley’s “Indian Mascots- You’re Out” published on the op-ed page of the LA times, he impacted readers about the argument over professional and college sport teams whose mascots are using Native American names. Shakley is the former chair of the Los Angeles city/county Native American Commission. The author describes the history of using Indian mascots and how it hurt a group of people. He wants readers to know that it is necessary to remove Native American names and mascots from college and professional teams. Jack Shakley uses three strategies to present his argument to show his attitude to remove Indian mascots in teams.
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
As he thinks he is above the law but the truth is that the law needs him. In the heroes journey one must atone as it is part of the cycle. For batman his atonement is closely linked with his time in the pit. You could really only say that he atones in the last film for the actions across the trilogy. Batman atones for all his sins in the pit where after he rises above them, he leaves it all behind in the pit. In the pit he learns from the prison doctor and his friend about the power of fear and that is what the bat symbol was, it was just another symbol of fear. Or it’s a symbol of hope but it depends on what side you are on, if you are loyal to Banes cause then it is fear and Bane is your symbol of